Time to Investigate Obama

when asked the direct question "does the FBI have evidence to Trump's claims of tapping"

- Comey, if he does have evidence, but the evidence is still being investigated, should respond directly to the question definitively saying ---- No the FBI does not have evidence supporting Trump's claim

He is not there to feed Congress a bunch of premature, investigatory, piecemeal evidence.
Thats not what he did or said about Drumpfs involvement with the Russians. He said he was investigating it.
 
If they had evidence then Comey wouldnt have said they have none.
Yes he would, he's a liar.
So you think the guy that did his best to sink the Dems is now protecting a Dem by lying?
He didn't try to sink the Dems.
How quickly you seem to forget.

James Comey, FBI director, reopens Clinton email investigation

"The FBI has renewed its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s secret emails, Director James Comey told Congressin a new letter Friday, heightening the stakes for the Democratic presidential nominee with less than two weeks before Election Day."
 
As many as 12 Felonies were committed by Obama from this wire tapping incident alone.
Add in the history of scandal cover ups and perjury when investigating the scandals and this exceeds far and above and beyond any scandals and criminal activities committed by an administration in history.

Obama Admin Members who committed Perjury and were involved in Criminal Activities:

Rice
Holder
Clapper
Lerner
Lynch
Koskinen
Clinton
Comey


Not one person was even given so much as a slap on the hand.
Your chronic lying about Obama isn't going to get your Russian traitor off ya know.
We have Transcripts and leaks.
What do you have?

Oh, FAKE NEWS and someone's opinion,
 
The fact of the matter is that the FBI esp. Comey in front of a house investigatory committee could have evidence of Trump's claims and sit on it because it is part of an ongoing investigation.

Appropriately it has been pointed out that this is in disparity to Comey commenting on the existence of a 'similarly ongoing' investigation of Trump and the Russians in which he said there was NO evidence.

How do we have this contradiction in FBI policy regarding commenting on ongoing investigations? good question.... But we do.
 
If they had evidence then Comey wouldnt have said they have none.
Yes he would, he's a liar.
So you think the guy that did his best to sink the Dems is now protecting a Dem by lying?
He didn't try to sink the Dems.
How quickly you seem to forget.

James Comey, FBI director, reopens Clinton email investigation

"The FBI has renewed its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s secret emails, Director James Comey told Congressin a new letter Friday, heightening the stakes for the Democratic presidential nominee with less than two weeks before Election Day."

Let's assume That Comey is not ideologically driven and he is acting on the evidence... and see how the discussion pans out...
 
Thats not what he did or said about Drumpfs involvement with the Russians. He said he was investigating it.

INVESTIGATING WHAT? BASED ON WHAT?

The FBI, the NSA, and the House Intel Committee Chairman made it clear that the 'incidental communication collections' of Trump and his team constituted/ showed NOTHING ILLEGAL AND HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE whatsoever.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF CRIMES THUS NO REASON TO ILLEGALLY DISTRIBUTE THEIR PERSONAL INFO 'INCIDENTALLY COLLECTED' TO 16 INTEL AGENCIES AND NO REASON TO LAUNCH 2 INVESTIGATIONS! Obama / They did anyway...

The Director of the FBI made it CLEAR the other day before Congress that the ONLY EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY to date is the FELONY ACTS of ESPIONAGE perpetrated by Democrats - OBAMA HOLD-OVERS....yet Comey added that he would NOT at that moment reassure the American people that he will investigate those crimes and bring those traitors to justice...but the fishing expedition that started against Trump 9 months ago based on NO CRIME TO INVESTIGATE and that has revealed not 1 shred of evidence against Trump and/or his team will continue.

:wtf:
 
The fact of the matter is that the FBI esp. Comey in front of a house investigatory committee could have evidence of Trump's claims and sit on it because it is part of an ongoing investigation.

Appropriately it has been pointed out that this is in disparity to Comey commenting on the existence of a 'similarly ongoing' investigation of Trump and the Russians in which he said there was NO evidence.

How do we have this contradiction in FBI policy regarding commenting on ongoing investigations? good question.... But we do.
A cow could be a bull if it had testicles too. In light of his comment there is not much to go on.
 
Thats not what he did or said about Drumpfs involvement with the Russians. He said he was investigating it.

INVESTIGATING WHAT? BASED ON WHAT?

The FBI, the NSA, and the House Intel Committee Chairman made it clear that the 'incidental communication collections' of Trump and his team constituted/ showed NOTHING ILLEGAL AND HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE whatsoever.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF CRIMES THUS NO REASON TO ILLEGALLY DISTRIBUTE THEIR PERSONAL INFO 'INCIDENTALLY COLLECTED' TO 16 INTEL AGENCIES AND NO REASON TO LAUNCH 2 INVESTIGATIONS! Obama / They did anyway...

The Director of the FBI made it CLEAR the other day before Congress that the ONLY EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY to date is the FELONY ACTS of ESPIONAGE perpetrated by Democrats - OBAMA HOLD-OVERS....yet Comey added that he would NOT at that moment reassure the American people that he will investigate those crimes and bring those traitors to justice...but the fishing expedition that started against Trump 9 months ago based on NO CRIME TO INVESTIGATE and that has revealed not 1 shred of evidence against Trump and/or his team will continue.

:wtf:
Easyt could you elaborate on how Comey might come to say what he did about Trump's claims while having uncollated evidence that does support Trump. I'v tried to get my point across on this buy you seem to be better a better communicator than I.
 


You just hit on the ONLY point the Democrats have to stand on!

Trump and his team did not collude with the Russians - the FBI and the NSA have already declared that to be the case by declaring their 'incidental communications' picked up / showed NO evidence of crime and NO information of Intel Value.

Comey, however, F*ed Hillary!

Incompetent and unable to control his own agency, the FBI let it leak that Hillary was under investigation - MULTIPLE investigations. At the same time he did not mention the fact that both the FBI and NSA were investigating Trump. (Probably because they didn't want anyone to know they were investigating Trump and his team because, as already proven, there was never a crime or reason for an investigation.)

Hillary Clinton SHOULD HAVE BEEN FORCED FROM THE CAMPAIGN / ELECTION for being under multiple criminal investigations so close to the election. (Snowflakes know that had the shoe been on the other foot - Hillary not known to be under investigation but known Trump was - they would have gone for his juglar' and forced him out.)

THAT BEING SAID, the American people at that point deserved to know / should have been told Trump was also under multiple investigations. And at that point the American people should have gotten so fed up as to say. 'F* 'em both, we deserve better', and forced BOTH of them out of the race!

Comey did not do that, and Hillary legitimately got f*ed....

Stick with THAT argument...it's your best one.
 
Last edited:
The fact of the matter is that the FBI esp. Comey in front of a house investigatory committee could have evidence of Trump's claims and sit on it because it is part of an ongoing investigation.

Appropriately it has been pointed out that this is in disparity to Comey commenting on the existence of a 'similarly ongoing' investigation of Trump and the Russians in which he said there was NO evidence.

How do we have this contradiction in FBI policy regarding commenting on ongoing investigations? good question.... But we do.
A cow could be a bull if it had testicles too. In light of his comment there is not much to go on.

That's kind of my point... FBI has a contradictory history, or more aptly, an evolving policy on what it will comment on.
 
Thats not what he did or said about Drumpfs involvement with the Russians. He said he was investigating it.

INVESTIGATING WHAT? BASED ON WHAT?

The FBI, the NSA, and the House Intel Committee Chairman made it clear that the 'incidental communication collections' of Trump and his team constituted/ showed NOTHING ILLEGAL AND HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE whatsoever.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF CRIMES THUS NO REASON TO ILLEGALLY DISTRIBUTE THEIR PERSONAL INFO 'INCIDENTALLY COLLECTED' TO 16 INTEL AGENCIES AND NO REASON TO LAUNCH 2 INVESTIGATIONS! Obama / They did anyway...

The Director of the FBI made it CLEAR the other day before Congress that the ONLY EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY to date is the FELONY ACTS of ESPIONAGE perpetrated by Democrats - OBAMA HOLD-OVERS....yet Comey added that he would NOT at that moment reassure the American people that he will investigate those crimes and bring those traitors to justice...but the fishing expedition that started against Trump 9 months ago based on NO CRIME TO INVESTIGATE and that has revealed not 1 shred of evidence against Trump and/or his team will continue.

:wtf:
Comey has zero integrity. I have a problem with how he has acted and divulged.
 
Thats not what he did or said about Drumpfs involvement with the Russians. He said he was investigating it.

INVESTIGATING WHAT? BASED ON WHAT?

The FBI, the NSA, and the House Intel Committee Chairman made it clear that the 'incidental communication collections' of Trump and his team constituted/ showed NOTHING ILLEGAL AND HAD NO FOREIGN INTEL VALUE whatsoever.

THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF CRIMES THUS NO REASON TO ILLEGALLY DISTRIBUTE THEIR PERSONAL INFO 'INCIDENTALLY COLLECTED' TO 16 INTEL AGENCIES AND NO REASON TO LAUNCH 2 INVESTIGATIONS! Obama / They did anyway...

The Director of the FBI made it CLEAR the other day before Congress that the ONLY EVIDENCE OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY to date is the FELONY ACTS of ESPIONAGE perpetrated by Democrats - OBAMA HOLD-OVERS....yet Comey added that he would NOT at that moment reassure the American people that he will investigate those crimes and bring those traitors to justice...but the fishing expedition that started against Trump 9 months ago based on NO CRIME TO INVESTIGATE and that has revealed not 1 shred of evidence against Trump and/or his team will continue.

:wtf:
This is the textbook example of a political witch hunt while ignoring the crimes they themselves commit.
 
Obama illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, and Congress. Obama illegally used the IRS to target Americans. Ex-CIA Chief James Clapper testified under oath that Americans were not being illegally spied on...before it was revealed that they were, and Clapper was given the opportunity to 'amend' his testimony rather than be sent to jail for Perjury, which is what should have happened. (Clapper is now saying Trump was not spied on / wire-tapped by Obama.)

The CIA's 'spy secrets', the untold ways the CIA illegally spies on anyone / everyone was hacked and released...

And in today's news:

WikiLeaks Vault 7 Leak Claims CIA Bugs ‘Factory Fresh’ iPhones

Yeah, if you think there is no way Obama could have / didn't illegally spy on Trump you're a 'NAIVE RUBE', and I have a bridge to sell you...

upload_2017-3-23_14-44-58.jpeg

1-800-386-2277 (1-800-DUMBASS) :p
 
WTF does that even mean? so you can't answer my post. so now you're 0 for one. put up or shut up.
You asked what else could have been listening. A human in the same room could have been listening and spying. Dont go into a rage because you were too stupid to realize there is more than one way to hear a conversation.
so hear say is what is being investigated and not actual tape? OMG dude, that's what you're going with? hahahahahahhaaha
You dont need a wire tap to tape someone. You can have a recorder in your pocket. How ignorant of technology are you to believe otherwise?
so that's spying and surveillance. thanks for your time rookie.
Drumpf said wire tapping (which is very specific) not spying. Dont be a useful idiot moron.
what's the difference other than semantics?
 
Obama illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, and Congress. Obama illegally used the IRS to target Americans. Ex-CIA Chief James Clapper testified under oath that Americans were not being illegally spied on...before it was revealed that they were, and Clapper was given the opportunity to 'amend' his testimony rather than be sent to jail for Perjury, which is what should have happened. (Clapper is now saying Trump was not spied on / wire-tapped by Obama.)

The CIA's 'spy secrets', the untold ways the CIA illegally spies on anyone / everyone was hacked and released...

And in today's news:

WikiLeaks Vault 7 Leak Claims CIA Bugs ‘Factory Fresh’ iPhones

Yeah, if you think there is no way Obama could have / didn't illegally spy on Trump you're a 'NAIVE RUBE', and I have a bridge to sell you...

View attachment 118149

1-800-386-2277 (1-800-DUMBASS) :p
but Putin hacked the DNC. These fkoffs are too funny.
 
The fact of the matter is that the FBI esp. Comey in front of a house investigatory committee could have evidence of Trump's claims and sit on it because it is part of an ongoing investigation.

Appropriately it has been pointed out that this is in disparity to Comey commenting on the existence of a 'similarly ongoing' investigation of Trump and the Russians in which he said there was NO evidence.

How do we have this contradiction in FBI policy regarding commenting on ongoing investigations? good question.... But we do.
A cow could be a bull if it had testicles too. In light of his comment there is not much to go on.

That's kind of my point... FBI has a contradictory history, or more aptly, an evolving policy on what it will comment on.
We can only go with the facts. Todays facts specify he is still investigating Drumpf and there is no information that proves Drumpf was wiretapped at all let alone by Obama. Until that is proven untrue then the OP has proven to be a useful idiot.
 
You asked what else could have been listening. A human in the same room could have been listening and spying. Dont go into a rage because you were too stupid to realize there is more than one way to hear a conversation.
so hear say is what is being investigated and not actual tape? OMG dude, that's what you're going with? hahahahahahhaaha
You dont need a wire tap to tape someone. You can have a recorder in your pocket. How ignorant of technology are you to believe otherwise?
so that's spying and surveillance. thanks for your time rookie.
Drumpf said wire tapping (which is very specific) not spying. Dont be a useful idiot moron.
what's the difference other than semantics?
Dont have the time to get technical with you. Go google it.
 
Obama illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, and Congress. Obama illegally used the IRS to target Americans. Ex-CIA Chief James Clapper testified under oath that Americans were not being illegally spied on...before it was revealed that they were, and Clapper was given the opportunity to 'amend' his testimony rather than be sent to jail for Perjury, which is what should have happened. (Clapper is now saying Trump was not spied on / wire-tapped by Obama.)

The CIA's 'spy secrets', the untold ways the CIA illegally spies on anyone / everyone was hacked and released...

And in today's news:

WikiLeaks Vault 7 Leak Claims CIA Bugs ‘Factory Fresh’ iPhones

Yeah, if you think there is no way Obama could have / didn't illegally spy on Trump you're a 'NAIVE RUBE', and I have a bridge to sell you...

View attachment 118149

1-800-386-2277 (1-800-DUMBASS) :p
but Putin hacked the DNC. These fkoffs are too funny.

Obviously he did something.

US Officials: Info suggests Trump associates may have coordinated with Russians - CNNPolitics.com
 

Forum List

Back
Top