Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As I said and you just proved - you must have been sleeping through the last 8 years. Go back to sleep, Rip-Van-Snowflake.I want to see the proof. Until then all you have is the same thing as the Birther conspiracy.
I didn't disagree with you. Trump said it. As CNN, The House Intel Committee Chairman, Comey, and the head of the NSA has now prove, Trump was right - Oama did do it / made it happen / facilitated it, to include the Felony acts of ESPIONAGE.[/QUOTE]I'm right. Drumpf said Obama did it. If you dont believe me go look at his tweet.Wrong.
As CNN reported, Obama illegally collected personal information of no Intel value, changed the law so he could distribute the information to the Intel agencies and so they could share amongst themselves, and then illegally distributed the PROTECTED personal information - that had 'no foreign Intel value' - to the Intel agencies. Those agencies then illegally committed the Felony acts of ESPIONAGE by illegally releasing the information they had illegally received from Obama (the 'accessory').
The DNC's fake news / fake crime has blown up in their faces. The House Intel Chairman made it clear - the 'incidental collection' of Team Trump data had no Intel value - as in nothing there - as in no crime committed - as in no collusion - as in NO CRIME - as in NO REASON to conduct 2 simultaneous FBA and NSA investigations (as there was no crime identified).
Trump's wire-tap claims began the digging into all of this and helped un-cover Obama's and his 'acolytes'' illegal actions / Felony Espionage.
Dont be one of Drumpfs useful idiots.As I said and you just proved - you must have been sleeping through the last 8 years. Go back to sleep, Rip-Van-Snowflake.I want to see the proof. Until then all you have is the same thing as the Birther conspiracy.
View attachment 118125
so hear say is what is being investigated and not actual tape? OMG dude, that's what you're going with? hahahahahahhaahaYou asked what else could have been listening. A human in the same room could have been listening and spying. Dont go into a rage because you were too stupid to realize there is more than one way to hear a conversation.WTF does that even mean? so you can't answer my post. so now you're 0 for one. put up or shut up.A human? Is it your claim that a human couldnt have listened to what was being said?dude what else is there that it could actually be if not listening to what they say? So tell me what else they could use to show collusion? wouldn't someone need to have been watched and listened to? I mean how else do you have a motive?Being under investigation doesnt mean you were wire tapped. Only an idiot would make that claim.sure they did. you weren't listening. comey stated that the trump campaign has been under investigation since july. D'OH!! are you deaf?
You dont need a wire tap to tape someone. You can have a recorder in your pocket. How ignorant of technology are you to believe otherwise?so hear say is what is being investigated and not actual tape? OMG dude, that's what you're going with? hahahahahahhaahaYou asked what else could have been listening. A human in the same room could have been listening and spying. Dont go into a rage because you were too stupid to realize there is more than one way to hear a conversation.WTF does that even mean? so you can't answer my post. so now you're 0 for one. put up or shut up.A human? Is it your claim that a human couldnt have listened to what was being said?dude what else is there that it could actually be if not listening to what they say? So tell me what else they could use to show collusion? wouldn't someone need to have been watched and listened to? I mean how else do you have a motive?Being under investigation doesnt mean you were wire tapped. Only an idiot would make that claim.
right, he violated the law.Good question... By the way of answering let me ask you a question. Is comey able to answer in the affirmative to that if his investigation is ongoing, not collated, not concluded?
so that's spying and surveillance. thanks for your time rookie.You dont need a wire tap to tape someone. You can have a recorder in your pocket. How ignorant of technology are you to believe otherwise?so hear say is what is being investigated and not actual tape? OMG dude, that's what you're going with? hahahahahahhaahaYou asked what else could have been listening. A human in the same room could have been listening and spying. Dont go into a rage because you were too stupid to realize there is more than one way to hear a conversation.WTF does that even mean? so you can't answer my post. so now you're 0 for one. put up or shut up.A human? Is it your claim that a human couldnt have listened to what was being said?dude what else is there that it could actually be if not listening to what they say? So tell me what else they could use to show collusion? wouldn't someone need to have been watched and listened to? I mean how else do you have a motive?
Was that directed at me? If so you would have to ask Comey.Good question... By the way of answering let me ask you a question. Is comey able to answer in the affirmative to that if his investigation is ongoing, not collated, not concluded?
Drumpf said wire tapping (which is very specific) not spying. Dont be a useful idiot moron.so that's spying and surveillance. thanks for your time rookie.You dont need a wire tap to tape someone. You can have a recorder in your pocket. How ignorant of technology are you to believe otherwise?so hear say is what is being investigated and not actual tape? OMG dude, that's what you're going with? hahahahahahhaahaYou asked what else could have been listening. A human in the same room could have been listening and spying. Dont go into a rage because you were too stupid to realize there is more than one way to hear a conversation.WTF does that even mean? so you can't answer my post. so now you're 0 for one. put up or shut up.A human? Is it your claim that a human couldnt have listened to what was being said?
Except we know now that 'electronic communications' were collected on trump and his team. Those communications proved to have 'No Intel value'; however Obama still illegally distributed the info to the Intel Communities AND he . his administration began 2 simultaneous investigations (FBI and NSA) on Trump and his team DESPITE Obama being told that communications collected showed NO VALUE - NO CRIME - NO COLLUSION - and thus NO CRIME TO INVESTIGATE...but he did anyway.FBI said nothing was found in regards to wire tapping. You sound gullible if you think the POTUS wire tapped Drumpf.
Electronic surveillance doenst mean he was wire tapped like Drumpf claimed. This is what happens when people are idiots like Drumpf. They say idiotic things then go back and try to spin it.Except we know now that 'electronic communications' were collected on trump and his team. Those communications proved to have 'No Intel value'; however Obama still illegally distributed the info to the Intel Communities AND he . his administration began 2 simultaneous investigations (FBI and NSA) on Trump and his team DESPITE Obama being told that communications collected showed NO VALUE - NO CRIME - NO COLLUSION - and thus NO CRIME TO INVESTIGATE...but he did anyway.FBI said nothing was found in regards to wire tapping. You sound gullible if you think the POTUS wire tapped Drumpf.
Absolutely ZERO evidence has been found against Trump, but snowflakes declare 'circumstantial evidence' has been found that warrants a continue fishing tri...er, investigation.
Well, the 'circumstantial evidence' against Obama is DAMNING. Already known to have illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, and Congress...already known to have illegally used the IRS to illegally target Americans, it has been shown that Obama's administration did listen in on Trump and his team, FOUND NOTHING, passed personally protected info illegally to Intel agencies, and that his people engaged in Felony Espionage by leaking that info...
... AND that Obama and his administration, based on ZERO evidence / ZERO crime proven - the communications 'incidental collected' of Trump, initiated 2 investigations of Trump and his team in the midst of an election.
That's a hell of a lot more than 'circumstantial evidence' 'warranting further investigation'!
Electronic surveillance was used - what is not known (and warrants further investigation) is if it was more than 'incidental collections'?Drumpf said wire tapping not spying. Dont be a useful idiot moron.
Electronic surveillance was used - what is not known (and warrants further investigation) is if it was more than 'incidental collections'?Drumpf said wire tapping not spying. Dont be a useful idiot moron.
The NSA records, as revealed, mentions a lot of 'electronic surveillance'.
We also know that both the FBI and the NSA conducted / are conducting their own investigations of Trump and his team, investigations far beyond that of 'incidental collections'. This investigation has been going on for 9 months, and if you seriously are trying to say during theses 9 months of investigations by the FBI and NSA not one bit of intentional electronic surveillance has been conducted than you are barking mad - it defies God-given common sense.
That thread is all they got.. Nunes just cut it and the whining hasn't stopped since.so hear say is what is being investigated and not actual tape? OMG dude, that's what you're going with? hahahahahahhaahaYou asked what else could have been listening. A human in the same room could have been listening and spying. Dont go into a rage because you were too stupid to realize there is more than one way to hear a conversation.WTF does that even mean? so you can't answer my post. so now you're 0 for one. put up or shut up.A human? Is it your claim that a human couldnt have listened to what was being said?dude what else is there that it could actually be if not listening to what they say? So tell me what else they could use to show collusion? wouldn't someone need to have been watched and listened to? I mean how else do you have a motive?Being under investigation doesnt mean you were wire tapped. Only an idiot would make that claim.
There was no wire tapping incident.As many as 12 Felonies were committed by Obama from this wire tapping incident alone.
Add in the history of scandal cover ups and perjury when investigating the scandals and this exceeds far and above and beyond any scandals and criminal activities committed by an administration in history.
Obama Admin Members who committed Perjury and were involved in Criminal Activities:
Rice
Holder
Clapper
Lerner
Lynch
Koskinen
Clinton
Comey
Not one person was even given so much as a slap on the hand.
Your chronic lying about Obama isn't going to get your Russian traitor off ya know.As many as 12 Felonies were committed by Obama from this wire tapping incident alone.
Add in the history of scandal cover ups and perjury when investigating the scandals and this exceeds far and above and beyond any scandals and criminal activities committed by an administration in history.
Obama Admin Members who committed Perjury and were involved in Criminal Activities:
Rice
Holder
Clapper
Lerner
Lynch
Koskinen
Clinton
Comey
Not one person was even given so much as a slap on the hand.
The part where you and drumpf claim the POTUS issued a FISA warrant. Can you clear that up for us all?Drumpf said Obama did it. Not his administration. Drumpf is a retard for making the claim and looks like a fool once again after the FBI proved him wrong. You fools are going to ride with him until he throws you under the bus like he did with his birther conspiracy.He's just here to muddy the waters and fuck up the thread. The truth is that Obama spied on the Trump campaign, then leaked the information to the press (albeit through surrogates). Sycophants will split hairs on the wording or definitions of words but the bottom line is that the Obama administration broke the law in their efforts to stop Trump and the entire Democratic Party is covering for him. Whether they'll pay a price for it next year or not remains to be seen.
"A president cant issue a FISA warrant"
"the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance"
Now if you need to split hairs to protect your Messiah I get it, but it makes you look stupid.
What part of AG did you misunderstand?
What part of "President" eludes you?
No, he didn't.You did because he agreed with me. You called him stupid for that.I didn't.You shouldnt call Doc1 stupid. I already did.You have a point. Anyone who would agree with you would have to be stupid.You cant be this stupid. You just agreed with what I said." Notwithstanding any other law, the President, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—
50 U.S. Code § 1802 - Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal;...of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of court
The ignorance of you people is astonishing.
