To all Gun Grabbers

[Uncensored2008]

You just ruined herewegoagains imaginary gun defense story. Sorry Here, not a defense cause you let them run away in your imagination.

Whatever makes ya feel better pole smoker.

Hey, talk to soup. He says your imaginary story isn't a defense.

Again....How so?

You can't follow very well huh? He said by definition it isn't a defense if you let the criminal run away. Sorry.

If the criminal is running away I can still shoot him to protect my property.

Depends on the state.

California is a "victims rights state," which means you have the right to be a victim, and NO OTHER RIGHTS.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Someone quite stupid marked my post regarding the judge in the case speaking of the importance of a large mag.

Hey, thugs tend to be stupid.

{
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — High-capacity gun magazines will remain legal in California under a ruling Friday by a federal judge who cited home invasions where a woman used the extra bullets in her weapon to kill an attacker while in two other cases women without additional ammunition ran out of bullets.

"Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts," San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez wrote as he declared unconstitutional the law that would have banned possessing any magazines holding more than 10 bullets.}

Judge blocks California's ban on high-capacity magazines over 2nd Amendment concerns

Stalinists sure are dumb motherfuckers.....

And future mass killers cheered...

So you're a Round up salesman?

 

[Brain357]

You can adequately defend yourself without high capacity magazines and I don't care if you ask me a page full of questions. I was kinda guessing on the number of bullets in an average mag. So I just googled it and the "average" is 8 or 9!!!! If you can't hit your target by then, you need to hit the range.

DO you feel this way about the police as well?

Mark

Police are apprehending criminals. Quite a bit different than defense obviously.

How so?

Police actually go to the crime. And when there they have to apprehend the criminals. Defenders don't look for crime and they let the criminal run away. Funny you can't see the difference.

And when they go to the crime there is usually a victim who needed the same sort of defense that the police need .

Your attempted comparisons are sensationally stupid failures.

Incidentally by definition defending does not mean letting someone run away

Here you go soup:
"Incidentally by definition defending does not mean letting someone run away"

 

[Brain357]

You can't follow very well huh? He said by definition it isn't a defense if you let the criminal run away. Sorry.

If the criminal is running away I can still shoot him to protect my property.

Tell it to soup. Your imaginary defense is gone according to him. You let the criminal get away, sorry.

Only because I'm a responsible gun owner.
Had they shown so much as a knife I'd have had a crime scene in my front yard.

Well again, talk to soup. He says it's not a defense so stop claiming it.

Not only are you proven wrong you are also a proven liars I said no such thing.

I dare you to post a quote where I said that you dishonest little coward

Dishonest and stupid. Quite the combo you have there.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Gun grabbers never stop.

Do you really think I want to take your guns?

Yes.

You want the peasants disarmed so that your filthy party cannot be resisted,

Quite the imagination you have....

We've seen you operate dozens of times. Never again.

And when have you used your gun to resist? You understand we have elections for that right cowboy?

You really are dumb as a pile of bricks.

I live in California, elections mean nothing. The results are decided long before any ballots are cast.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Whatever makes ya feel better pole smoker.

Hey, talk to soup. He says your imaginary story isn't a defense.

Again....How so?

You can't follow very well huh? He said by definition it isn't a defense if you let the criminal run away. Sorry.

If the criminal is running away I can still shoot him to protect my property.

Depends on the state.

California is a "victims rights state," which means you have the right to be a victim, and NO OTHER RIGHTS.

Yeah I mentioned that earlier.
Texas aint a victims rights state thank God!!
Go Joe Horn!!!!

 

[Soupnazi630]

DO you feel this way about the police as well?

Mark

Police are apprehending criminals. Quite a bit different than defense obviously.

How so?

Police actually go to the crime. And when there they have to apprehend the criminals. Defenders don't look for crime and they let the criminal run away. Funny you can't see the difference.

And when they go to the crime there is usually a victim who needed the same sort of defense that the police need .

Your attempted comparisons are sensationally stupid failures.

Incidentally by definition defending does not mean letting someone run away

Here you go soup:
"Incidentally by definition defending does not mean letting someone run away"

Which is still true and still makes you a liar

 

[Brain357]

It won't matter.
Supreme Court Justices allow ban on high-capacity guns - National Constitution Center

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It won't matter.
Supreme Court Justices allow ban on high-capacity guns - National Constitution Center

2017?

 

[Soupnazi630]

If the criminal is running away I can still shoot him to protect my property.

Tell it to soup. Your imaginary defense is gone according to him. You let the criminal get away, sorry.

Only because I'm a responsible gun owner.
Had they shown so much as a knife I'd have had a crime scene in my front yard.

Well again, talk to soup. He says it's not a defense so stop claiming it.

Not only are you proven wrong you are also a proven liars I said no such thing.

I dare you to post a quote where I said that you dishonest little coward

Dishonest and stupid. Quite the combo you have there.

Really?

When will you post a quote where I said what you claimed i did

You tried but failed and are lying and misquoting me all over the place

This is after I made you look like a bigger fool than usual and you lost the argument

Clearly it is you who is dishonest and stupid

 

[Brain357]

It won't matter.
Supreme Court Justices allow ban on high-capacity guns - National Constitution Center

2017?

Yes and it's just as constitutionally legal now obviously.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It won't matter.
Supreme Court Justices allow ban on high-capacity guns - National Constitution Center

2017?

Yes and it's just as constitutionally legal now obviously.

Sorry but your bullshit is being struck down in calipornia at the moment.

 

[Brain357]

It won't matter.
Supreme Court Justices allow ban on high-capacity guns - National Constitution Center

2017?

Yes and it's just as constitutionally legal now obviously.

Sorry but your bullshit is being struck down in calipornia at the moment.

And the Supreme court says its constitutional.

The court knows the 2nd is limited.
Bump stocks: Supreme Court denies request to halt ban - CNNPolitics

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It won't matter.
Supreme Court Justices allow ban on high-capacity guns - National Constitution Center

2017?

Yes and it's just as constitutionally legal now obviously.

Sorry but your bullshit is being struck down in calipornia at the moment.

And the Supreme court says its constitutional.

The court knows the 2nd is limited.
Bump stocks: Supreme Court denies request to halt ban - CNNPolitics

Who the fuck needs a bump stock?
I can use my belt loop or a rubber band.

 

[Brain357]

It won't matter.
Supreme Court Justices allow ban on high-capacity guns - National Constitution Center

2017?

Yes and it's just as constitutionally legal now obviously.

Sorry but your bullshit is being struck down in calipornia at the moment.

And the Supreme court says its constitutional.

The court knows the 2nd is limited.
Bump stocks: Supreme Court denies request to halt ban - CNNPolitics

Who the fuck needs a bump stock?
I can use my belt loop or a rubber band.

You seem to have missed the point. The Supreme Court knows the 2nd is limited.

 

[McRocket]

Of course they can, and they have to pursue the criminal. Completely different than civilian defense.

If you're in my yard after dark after attempting to break into my home you're a dead man.
See Joe Horn. And that was in daylight.

LOL...you talk like 12 year old who has had too much Red Bull.

And your reading comprehension is right up there with the spider monkey.

LOL...nope. Your sentence was so simplistic said 12 year old could read and understand it.

And it still makes you sound like a pre-teen after too much 'energy drink'.

Hate ta break it to ya but I'm a 53 year old man.
Who by the way retired at 46. Try and take away my hard earned wealth and see what happens.

LOL...man, I did not say you are a 12 year old. I said you are talking like a 12 year old (after too much Monster drink). And you still are.

'you're a dead man' AND 'see what happens'.

Jeez...


Anyway, have a nice day.

 

[McRocket]

You are obviously wrong. You just keep embarrassing yourself....

I have proven you wrong and you know it

It is you being used to wipe the floor

You"re the one embarrassed slick we all know I have easily defeated you

Sorry kid, you lose.

Wrong little one

I proved your a smaller and less educated person.

You are wrong and that is fact

Only to people who can't see the difference between a defender letting the criminal run away and police actually having to apprehend the criminal. One would have to be real stupid not to understand the difference....

Wrong.

The facts I pointed out still stand unchallenged

Criminals almost never try to attack cops the victims need the same defense as a cop the cop just needs it later if the criminal resists apprehension

The need is the same regardless.

Most intelligent people know this and know you are wrong and truly a fool

Soooo...most intelligent people in America not only (somehow) know Brain357? But also (according to you) 'know' his level of foolishness.

I am curious, just how exactly do ALL these millions of intelligent people know this about Brain357 - considering probably 99.9% of them are not even on this forum?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Someone quite stupid marked my post regarding the judge in the case speaking of the importance of a large mag.

Hey, thugs tend to be stupid.

{
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — High-capacity gun magazines will remain legal in California under a ruling Friday by a federal judge who cited home invasions where a woman used the extra bullets in her weapon to kill an attacker while in two other cases women without additional ammunition ran out of bullets.

"Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts," San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez wrote as he declared unconstitutional the law that would have banned possessing any magazines holding more than 10 bullets.}

Judge blocks California's ban on high-capacity magazines over 2nd Amendment concerns

Stalinists sure are dumb motherfuckers.....

And future mass killers cheered...

You have a sadz because the victim didn't die.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Judge blocks California's ban on high-capacity magazines over 2nd Amendment concerns

The 9th circuit will overturn; hopefully the USSC takes it up.
Meanwhile, if Californians are smart, they will buy as many as they can -- and assemble 11+ round 5.56 and 7.62 belts.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Sorry kid, you lose.

Wrong little one

I proved your a smaller and less educated person.

You are wrong and that is fact

Only to people who can't see the difference between a defender letting the criminal run away and police actually having to apprehend the criminal. One would have to be real stupid not to understand the difference....

Wrong.

The facts I pointed out still stand unchallenged

Criminals almost never try to attack cops the victims need the same defense as a cop the cop just needs it later if the criminal resists apprehension

The need is the same regardless.

Most intelligent people know this and know you are wrong and truly a fool

You are legally crazy eh?

What form of retardation do you suffer from?

It's called "Stalinism."

It afflicts all democrats.