- Sep 16, 2012
- 59,496
- 53,292
- 3,605
There is a video of the lecture, about the book, in post #1,080. You were the one the asked if it is "credible or reasonable," without knowing the details, and then? Without really knowing a thing about it, decided in your own mind, to characterize the argument as, "conspiracy theory," because you are joyful about the politicization and weaponization of the justice system.Lecture? By whom? I've never been easily susceptible to conspiracy theories. This reminds me of the stuff surrounding 9/11
meh.
Whatever. You don't even know what you are talking about, and now you are throwing out fallacious arguments, making ad hom fallacies, straw man fallacies, and fallacies of false equivalence arguments. Anything at all, to ease your cognitive dissonance. Right on!
![113 :113: :113:](/styles/smilies/new/113.gif)
![iu](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.pinimg.com%2F736x%2F57%2F22%2Fa5%2F5722a5a336927d501a89bc48f1c3e261--argumentation-persuasive-writing.jpg&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=dbe40faa264a5253ffe31e70c55b368c34cb0d1164695e72920dc359913f58ff&ipo=images)