To all you calling BS on the Trump indictment…

[Slade3200]

Does Bleach-Bit Hammer-Time ring a bell in your coherence of recent political history?
Asking for the record.
Thanks.

No

 

[Slade3200]

Yeah, that's what a prog douchebag would say.

Trump is a target because he tells thr truth about progs, and they hate him as a result. Why do you bother posting this shit? No one is fooled.

I was thinking the same thing about you. Trump telling the truth just makes me laugh

 

[Slade3200]

No. Arrest Biden now. Hold him to account.

Prosecute if there’s evidence of a crime. I’m all for it

 

[Slade3200]

View attachment 773892

Fun pictures

 

[SeaMajor7]

No

Selective memory/outrage/hypocrisy.
Thanks for your honesty, as PATHETIC as it is.

 

[schmidlap]

No. Arrest Biden now. Hold him to account.

Assuming that the hyper-partisan smear campaign targeting the President and his family is based upon any shreds of credible evidence, why does the fatwa never go beyond media entertainers, and Jim Jordan et al contrive any actual charges?

 

[bripat9643]

Prosecute if there’s evidence of a crime. I’m all for it

Sure you are. You that only because you know it's never going to happen with Biden running the DOJ.

 

[bripat9643]

Assuming that the hyper-partisan smear campaign targeting the President and his family is based upon any shreds of credible evidence, why does the fatwa never go beyond media entertainers, and Jim Jordan et al contrive any actual charges?

He's the target of a smear caMpaign? Ohhhh, the poooooor baby! How is the evidence not credible? Are you saing those photos of Huter smoking crack are faked?

Jim Jordan is not the DA, moron.

 

[schmidlap]

He's the target of a smear caMpaign? Ohhhh, the poooooor baby! How is the evidence not credible? Are you saing those photos of Huter smoking crack are faked?

Jim Jordan is not the DA, moron.

Hunter Biden has not been elected to any office, and he is not charged with any crimes, Sunshine.

Whether he ever will be is of no concern to me.

Where are the lurid exposés promised by Jordan and his mouthy mob?

House GOP’s Biden investigations sputter out of the gate

 

[Slade3200]

Selective memory/outrage/hypocrisy.
Thanks for your honesty, as PATHETIC as it is.

Is that was I said? Are you being honest?

 

[emilynghiem]

How do you know it’s bs?!

The case requires taking biased sides where there are conflicts in the law and interpretations.

1. First, the conflict between state jursidiction and federal.
The argument relies on taking federal laws regarding election campaign financing and reporting
then applying that back to state jurisdiction.

The misdemeanor of misreporting Cohen's transaction under state law occurred in the past.

The accusation of wrongdoing is based on reimbursing Cohen later,
citing federal laws and trying to tie that back to the previous breach under state laws.

2. Another key point is the issue of "statute of limitations"
and trying to extend this by citing a condition of "Trump being out of the state"
which is supposed to mean he was not available.

(But these charges were not even pursued until later, and earlier during the time
he was "out of state" his whereabouts were known publicly, so he could have been served.
Thus, this is also debatable whether the exception to the statute of limitations applies to this case.)

3. Most critical is the issue of how to interpret Trump's payment to his lawyer.

The settlement/NDA that Cohen paid for was transacted in the past where the statute of limitations has run.
Trump was already making partial payments over time, as many people pay their lawyers or other business contractors.
The amount that Trump paid back Cohen wasn't just "legal expenses" as incorrectly reported, but was for the amount of the settlement.

The issue is whether Trump paying back Cohen WHILE TRUMP WAS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT,
counts as a "campaign expense/contribution" or not. Trump paid Cohen as part of their attorney-client relationship.

If Cohen had paid a "campaign expense" then he should have reported it as a donation.
If Trump was paying for a "campaign expense" then he should have reported it.

However, Trump considered it a legal settlement and legal cost between him and his attorney.
(Trump argues that Cohen's testimony against him is compromised by political pressure to use him against Trump,
because of the plea bargain that Cohen was cornered into requiring him to make statements the prosecution wants him to say.)

For the prosecution's arguments to work, all THREE debated conflicts would have to be decided
in favor of prosecution and against the defense.

For Trump's defense to win, only ONE of these three conflicts needs to be decided in favor of rejection.

Even if the prosecution manages to get all THREE conditions decided in their favor,
this will clearly be so politically skewed and stretched, that anyone pursuing this will lose any remaining credibility.

It will more likely end in failure to convict, so the left can keep playing the victim card
arguing that Trump is buying his way out as the bad guy above the law who should have been punished.

 

[Westender]

Ok thank you, an honest response. You don’t know it’s BS you’re just assuming it is… Kudos for admitting that

So this time its for real right?

 

[Slade3200]

So this time its for real right?

What’s for real?

 

[scruffy]

No

You just lost all credibility.

Not that you ever had any.

 

[BackAgain]

Prosecute if there’s evidence of a crime. I’m all for it

That’s stupid. He can’t be arrested while he holds office. But he will be out of office soon enough.

 

[Slade3200]

You just lost all credibility.

Not that you ever had any.

Ha ha, oh no, that really hurts. Why did I just lose all credibility?

 

[Slade3200]

That’s stupid. He can’t be arrested while he holds office. But he will be out of office soon enough.

Yeah, that’s pretty much exactly what’s happening to Trump, right?

 

[BackAgain]

Yeah, that’s pretty much exactly what’s happening to Trump, right?

No. Trump, as all honest folks plainly see, is getting railroaded.

 

[scruffy]

Ha ha, oh no, that really hurts. Why did I just lose all credibility?

Rocket scientists. ^^^

 

[Slade3200]

No. Trump, as all honest folks plainly see, is getting railroaded.

Oh, well that’s exactly what the Dems would say if any Republican prosecutor went after Biden after office. And you’d defend it the same way the Dems are defending the prosecution of Trump. Right? Don’t you see these are just Pardison games? Or if Trump committed crimes and there’s evidence of those crimes you will get busted. That’s a good thing. If Biden committed crimes and there’s evidence of crimes, he should get busted. Drain the swamp, right?