Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So much disinformation here...by the way, children are basically immune.
We have Trump on tape saying in FEBRUARY that he knew that to be false...
He told that lie to push kids back into school in order to bolsters the economy
He doesn't care how many get infected or die.
yesGreat. If your house is on fire do you stand in the middle of the conflagration and prey?those who leave everything in God's hands eventually see God's hands in everything
that's what Trump wants us to do, my friends
Great. If your house is on fire do you stand in the middle of the conflagration and prey?those who leave everything in God's hands eventually see God's hands in everything
that's what Trump wants us to do, my friends
Reread the OP. It's not about "tact" or rhetoric. It IS about policy...and Trump lied and failed...miserablyI don't disagree. I would like Trump to be more tactful at times, however, that should be secondary to actual results. If Trump spoke like Tony Robbins but did nothing or did things that harmed our country, I would not like him. Many Democrats would vote for him simply because he was a good speaker, policies be damned.
Fauci has stated that what Trump shared with the nation did not differ from what Fauci had advised him about the disease.
Now run along. Your argument is outdated.
The Woodward tapes show that Trump knew early on that children get infected easily as adults and that they can spread it.He meant they are rarely effected much by the virus. That is a true statement.
Reread the OP. It's not about "tact" or rhetoric. It IS about policy...and Trump lied and failed...miserablyI don't disagree. I would like Trump to be more tactful at times, however, that should be secondary to actual results. If Trump spoke like Tony Robbins but did nothing or did things that harmed our country, I would not like him. Many Democrats would vote for him simply because he was a good speaker, policies be damned.
Trying to understand his motivations for repeatedly lying to the American public about a deadly global pandemic that was bearing down on us, when you're trying to understand a person with the profound emotional and psychological issues this man has, is a jigsaw puzzle at best.We KNOW he knew that the nation was facing a cataclysm. It's on tape. We know he admitted to "downplaying" the virus that has killed TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND Americans
He knew that it was far more deadly than the flu. That is was extremely contagious. That it was as bad as the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918. And he knew that it most certainly infected children.
And he lied about all of that.
He claim he didn't want to panic the nation. Really?
Then why is he STILL lying about it? Still downplaying it?
Why did he not insist that we get functional tests QUICKLY? Why did he not invoke the DPA in FEBRUARY to get PPE and ventilators in place?
Why did he not shut down travel from Europe in FEBRUARY?
Why did he not quarantine or even TRACK returning travelers?
Why did he LIE about children being "basically immune" when he clearly knew differently?
He didn't care about "panic". He cared about trying to keep the economy going (and failing there because the virus simply will not allow that).
He lied about every aspect of this catastrophe and he's lying about why he lied
It may really be that he's being honest: Maybe, in his mind, he was protecting us somehow. It didn't occur to him that lowering our guard in that situation would certainly increase the velocity and severity of the virus's spread. That's just a function of an individual who lacks the intellectual elasticity required of a normal President.
There are two problems with that theory, though: First, on tape, he told Bob Woodward that the virus was, in his words, "the Plague". So clearly he held back critical information when he lied to the country. Second, if he were really trying to protect us, why did he constantly mock Americans who were just trying to protect the health of Americans and their loved ones via masks and social distancing?
There's just no way to know. We may never know.
Is it possible that our government would have downplayed it regardless of Donald Trump?
The campaign, more than anything else, is about the issues. The two parties are very different there.I don't know how to respond. I can't get you folks to understand that the way we communicate is every bit as important as what we say.Trying to understand his motivations for repeatedly lying to the American public about a deadly global pandemic that was bearing down on us, when you're trying to understand a person with the profound emotional and psychological issues this man has, is a jigsaw puzzle at best.We KNOW he knew that the nation was facing a cataclysm. It's on tape. We know he admitted to "downplaying" the virus that has killed TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND Americans
He knew that it was far more deadly than the flu. That is was extremely contagious. That it was as bad as the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918. And he knew that it most certainly infected children.
And he lied about all of that.
He claim he didn't want to panic the nation. Really?
Then why is he STILL lying about it? Still downplaying it?
Why did he not insist that we get functional tests QUICKLY? Why did he not invoke the DPA in FEBRUARY to get PPE and ventilators in place?
Why did he not shut down travel from Europe in FEBRUARY?
Why did he not quarantine or even TRACK returning travelers?
Why did he LIE about children being "basically immune" when he clearly knew differently?
He didn't care about "panic". He cared about trying to keep the economy going (and failing there because the virus simply will not allow that).
He lied about every aspect of this catastrophe and he's lying about why he lied
It may really be that he's being honest: Maybe, in his mind, he was protecting us somehow. It didn't occur to him that lowering our guard in that situation would certainly increase the velocity and severity of the virus's spread. That's just a function of an individual who lacks the intellectual elasticity required of a normal President.
There are two problems with that theory, though: First, on tape, he told Bob Woodward that the virus was, in his words, "the Plague". So clearly he held back critical information when he lied to the country. Second, if he were really trying to protect us, why did he constantly mock Americans who were just trying to protect the health of Americans and their loved ones via masks and social distancing?
There's just no way to know. We may never know.
I guess you didn't notice the Democrat's reactions during this crisis. What on God's green earth would make you think that Obama or Biden would have done anything differently other than perhaps keeping the country unnessarily shut down for a longer period to create more long term government dependency, which is always good for Democrats.
You can look it up (at least, if you had the intellectual curiosity to do so): Many studies have clearly proven that the way a message is delivered is absolutely critical to its efficacy.
I know you're not going to criticize Trump. I know you're fine with the way he mocked Americans who were trying to protect themselves and their loved ones.
I also know I just wasted some bandwidth.
I don't disagree. I would like Trump to be more tactful at times, however, that should be secondary to actual results. If Trump spoke like Tony Robbins but did nothing or did things that harmed our country, I would not like him. Many Democrats would vote for him simply because he was a good speaker, policies be damned. That is why I keep stressing the point that pragmatism matters most. All this feel good fluffy nonsense about how Trump said this that or another should not be the predominate issue in the campaign. I know several "jerks" who are in high positions because they get the job done. That is how it works in the real, adult world.
Well if you think he failed then you must also think Pelousy failed.
That's what Governments do. Downplay shit so as not to start a panic.
What Fauci did or didn't say is not the issue.The Woodward tapes show that Trump knew early on that children get infected easily as adults and that they can spread it.He meant they are rarely effected much by the virus. That is a true statement.
You don't listen much, do you.
#3.
Well if you think he failed then you must also think Pelousy failed.
Pelosi is not President. She DID however push through the initial relief package that provided loans and extra unemployment dollars to keep the country going
That's what Governments do. Downplay shit so as not to start a panic.
That is a FAILING of government. Trump FAILED us.
And Trump didn't give a shit about panic. He cared about trying to prop up the market
We KNOW he knew that the nation was facing a cataclysm. It's on tape. We know he admitted to "downplaying" the virus that has killed TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND Americans
We KNOW he knew that the nation was facing a cataclysm. It's on tape. We know he admitted to "downplaying" the virus that has killed TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND Americans
He knew that it was far more deadly than the flu. That is was extremely contagious. That it was as bad as the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918. And he knew that it most certainly infected children.
And he lied about all of that.
He claim he didn't want to panic the nation. Really?
Then why is he STILL lying about it? Still downplaying it?
Why did he not insist that we get functional tests QUICKLY? Why did he not invoke the DPA in FEBRUARY to get PPE and ventilators in place?
Why did he not shut down travel from Europe in FEBRUARY?
Why did he not quarantine or even TRACK returning travelers?
Why did he LIE about children being "basically immune" when he clearly knew differently?
He didn't care about "panic". He cared about trying to keep the economy going (and failing there because the virus simply will not allow that).
He lied about every aspect of this catastrophe and he's lying about why he lied