🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Trump calls for violence against protesters

So Hillary was polite and offered to answer the protesters questions or comments, but the protester kept interrupting her. Without a request from Clinton, the protester was guided away. In the other video, law enforcement removed a heckler, again, with no nasty comments from Clinton. So, how does that compare in any way to Trump's irresponsible calls for violent reactions from his supporters?
It says that Hillary can be shut down anytime. They even took Bernie's mic away. A real difference.
 
Way back in November, after a protester was assaulted by members of his audience, Trump said,Maybe he should have been roughed up, because it was absolutely disgusting what he was doing.”

 
It’s not hard to make the connection between Trump’s rhetoric and 78-year-old John McGraw, the supporter who blindsided a young African-American protester, Rakeem Jones, with a right hook on Wednesday night.

“Yes, he deserved it,” McGraw said in an interview with Inside Edition afterward. “The next time we see him we might have to kill him.”
 
I's been fomenting this violence from the onset. He's taken his plays from the George Wallace playbook. Attack the protesters, attack the media.
The protesters are an organized attempt to shut him up. You forgot that part. What's with you stupid libs anyway? You can only see what you want. The right doesn't organize and go to Bernie or Hillary rallies to shut them up.

LOL, what a bunch of fruitcakes!
 
It’s not hard to make the connection between Trump’s rhetoric and 78-year-old John McGraw, the supporter who blindsided a young African-American protester, Rakeem Jones, with a right hook on Wednesday night.
I love that video and how libturds continuously point out his race as if that's all they can see.

If the asshole spent the rest of his life drooling in a cup it would be tough shit. You stir up shit, expect to get some on you. Most of us learn that by the time we are five.
 
Liberals here are proving that they are fascists, that they are willing to excuse Brownshirt mob actions to suppress their opponents, on the flimsy excuse that Trump made a few improper comments about handling protesters, even though he clearly repudiated those comments and spoke against violence before last night.
 
It’s not hard to make the connection between Trump’s rhetoric and 78-year-old John McGraw, the supporter who blindsided a young African-American protester, Rakeem Jones, with a right hook on Wednesday night.
I love that video and how libturds continuously point out his race as if that's all they can see.

If the asshole spent the rest of his life drooling in a cup it would be tough shit. You stir up shit, expect to get some on you. Most of us learn that by the time we are five.
Of course you do.
 
Liberals here are proving that they are fascists, that they are willing to excuse Brownshirt mob actions to suppress their opponents, on the flimsy excuse that Trump made a few improper comments about handling protesters, even though he clearly repudiated those comments and spoke against violence before last night.
That's some juicy Irony right there.
 
What the heck is wrong with you people?

It's undeniable that trump has called for violence. It's undeniable that leftist protesters are violent too.

Stop blaming other for what you are supporting. If you don't want violence than don't get violent. If you support violence don't whine about it when it happens.

Until you stop blaming others for what you are guilty of it will never stop
 
Watch As Hillary Clinton’s Security Ejects A ‪’Black Lives Matter’‬ Protester – Video



Man Holding Protest Sign Removed From Clinton Event In Dallas

Hillary's Hypocrisy: Silent Protester Assaulted and Ejected from Speech

Notice that no one punched him on his way out.

There is no hypocrisy...no one is saying that protesters should not be escorted out. We are saying that the attendees shouldn't be violent enough to put their hands on them. Surely you are smart and adult enough to see the difference.
 
"Earlier this week, our 2016 campaign season's sui generis "dog bites man" story hit the headlines again, after Rakeem Jones -- attending a Donald Trump rally in North Carolina as a dissenter -- was sucker punched by 78-year-old John McGraw. Here is the incident, captured in GIF form:

Asked to comment on the incident at the most recent debate, Trump did what he has always done -- tepidly sidestepped the issue before offering an endorsement of this sort of violence. His supporters, he said, "have anger that's unbelievable," and it's "a beautiful thing in many respects."
Will Donald Trump Actually Pay His Violent Supporters' Legal Fees?

His supporters, he said, "have anger that's unbelievable," and it's "a beautiful thing in many respects."


I don't agree with Trump's position and statement. Objectively, I also don't agree with Pelosi, Reid, Clinton, and Obama and the same Trump-like position they took with Occupy, Ferguson, and Baltimore.
 
Trump's handful of clearly joking comments about handling protesters roughly are no justification for the disgraceful and shocking mob action that shut down Trump's rally in Chicago last night.

The last several times Trump has been asked his comments on handling protesters, including just two days ago during the last GOP debate, he has said that of course he does not really want any protesters harmed and that he urges his supporters not to engage in violence.

What happened in Chicago last night should trouble every person who believes in free speech and law and order, whether you're a Democrat, Republican, or Independent. This is scary stuff.

Just imagine what the Left would be saying if a mob of conservative protesters shut down a Bernie Sanders or Hillary Clinton rally with such tactics. They would scream "fascism," "Nazi tactics," "brownshirts," etc., and they would have a point. Such conduct is exactly what the Nazis did to their opponents before they came to power.
His dense followers aren't getting the joke.
 
Yo moron, it was the leftist brown shirts who shut it down. Go back to bed, fool
Anger is anger, a mob is a mob. That's why Inciting a Riot is not protected speech.

then the violent anti-Trump protesters who are really instigating this violence should be arrested and put in jail. You do know it is a right, free assembly.
The protestors were assembling at a public forum. The stadium was advertised as being open to anyone who showed up. If Trump didn't want protesters showing up he could have and should have restricted participants to only those who support him. There is a multitude of legal and standard ways he could have done that. He and his supporters are escaping responsibilities, or at least trying to.
The city streets are a public forum? LOL, you got whacked on the head, didn't you?

There's a bit of a difference between someone not letting some assholes disrupt your speech and the assholes that are disrupting your speech. If you can't figure that out, go back to watching cartoons or something.
What does the crowd outside in the street have to do with the events inside the stadium? Sounds like the usual right wing distorting of reality and fact.
 
12803119_467507953445209_3422117171751257756_n.jpg
 
Yo moron, it was the leftist brown shirts who shut it down. Go back to bed, fool
Anger is anger, a mob is a mob. That's why Inciting a Riot is not protected speech.

then the violent anti-Trump protesters who are really instigating this violence should be arrested and put in jail. You do know it is a right, free assembly.
The protestors were assembling at a public forum. The stadium was advertised as being open to anyone who showed up. If Trump didn't want protesters showing up he could have and should have restricted participants to only those who support him. There is a multitude of legal and standard ways he could have done that. He and his supporters are escaping responsibilities, or at least trying to.
The city streets are a public forum? LOL, you got whacked on the head, didn't you?

There's a bit of a difference between someone not letting some assholes disrupt your speech and the assholes that are disrupting your speech. If you can't figure that out, go back to watching cartoons or something.
What does the crowd outside in the street have to do with the events inside the stadium? Sounds like the usual right wing distorting of reality and fact.
I think the cops knew more about the situation than someone on a internet forum. They knew what would happen. But you avoided my point, for obvious reasons. It isn't the same. AND there is no right to occupy city streets. So no, you couldn't figure it out.
 
What the heck is wrong with you people?

It's undeniable that trump has called for violence. It's undeniable that leftist protesters are violent too.

Stop blaming other for what you are supporting. If you don't want violence than don't get violent. If you support violence don't whine about it when it happens.

Until you stop blaming others for what you are guilty of it will never stop
There's a big difference there though. Why down play it? If someone shut me down I'd want to kick his ass. But I won't go and try to shut someone else down because I don't like them. That's not how a democracy works. See the difference?
 
I've cleaned up the thread. I don't want to see any more posts about other members. Stick to the topic. Thanks
 
Anger is anger, a mob is a mob. That's why Inciting a Riot is not protected speech.

then the violent anti-Trump protesters who are really instigating this violence should be arrested and put in jail. You do know it is a right, free assembly.
The protestors were assembling at a public forum. The stadium was advertised as being open to anyone who showed up. If Trump didn't want protesters showing up he could have and should have restricted participants to only those who support him. There is a multitude of legal and standard ways he could have done that. He and his supporters are escaping responsibilities, or at least trying to.
The city streets are a public forum? LOL, you got whacked on the head, didn't you?

There's a bit of a difference between someone not letting some assholes disrupt your speech and the assholes that are disrupting your speech. If you can't figure that out, go back to watching cartoons or something.
What does the crowd outside in the street have to do with the events inside the stadium? Sounds like the usual right wing distorting of reality and fact.
I think the cops knew more about the situation than someone on a internet forum. They knew what would happen. But you avoided my point, for obvious reasons. It isn't the same. AND there is no right to occupy city streets. So no, you couldn't figure it out.
I can figure out that you are distorting my comment and the discussion in general. Of course, Trump and his supporters are not responsible for what goes on or went on in the street outside of the venue. What is being discussed is the way the disruptive crowd inside the venue was dealt with and what caused the protesters to be disruptive.
 

Forum List

Back
Top