Trump Caravan, Police, Sued in Texas





I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,
Could you find on from a real media source? Those are all from RWNJ conspiracy theory sites.
there is video on tweeter in the link...tweeter! so it must be true
Tweeter isn't real news.
dont tell synthaholic that,, she lives on twitter news,,
 
This one will probably make it to Court. The Trump Train were explicit in their intention. To prevent the political rally and stop the bus from arriving.
There's no evidence of that and they cannot generally blame that on a political candidate who was not there, absent some concrete evidence Trump ordered them to "prevent" the bus from arriving.

They are suing the people in the Trump train. They can prove that easily. The idiots filmed themselves doing it snd posted it on their own accounts.
They are suing Trump. What does any of that prove regarding Trump himself?

Scooter. You have the news confused. Let’s go slowly so even you can understand. Several people in Congress are suing Trump and Giuliani for the 1/6 “protest” under the same law.

The people named in the Trump Train Lawsuit do not. Let me repeat. Do not. Let me bold this. Do not include Trump

Trump is not being sued. The Trump Fanboys are. The minions if you prefer.

From the news story.

The complaint alleges that the defendants -- named as Eliazar Cisneros, Hannah Ceh, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros, Dolores Park, and a Jane and John Doe -- conspired beforehand to surround and block the bus in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act, passed by Congress in 1871 to prohibit the obstruction of free and fair elections via the coordinated intimidation of voters. As a result of their actions, they claim, the campaign was forced to cancel its stops in San Marcos and Austin out of fear for their safety.

Not Trump. Not Trump. The patriotic good Americans who violated the law. They are being sued.

Ok. Got it now? Biden campaign workers and ex-state lawmaker sue 'Trump Train' members involved in dangerous Texas highway incident
They are suing joe blow for "blocking" a campaign bus???

:laughing0301: :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:

That is even MORE stupid than I thought.

How pathetic. It will go NOWHERE!!!

A couple things. I doubt your abilities to think are significant. Second. It will drive the Trump Supporters first to a lawyer. And then to a different lawyer. The second one will be a Bankruptcy Attorney. Unless they decide to heed the advice of Abraham Lincoln and represent themselves.
So, you admit that the aim of this litigation is solely to harass and run up costs?

If you had the ability to think clearly, you would know what a stupid a move this is.
 
This one will probably make it to Court. The Trump Train were explicit in their intention. To prevent the political rally and stop the bus from arriving.
There's no evidence of that and they cannot generally blame that on a political candidate who was not there, absent some concrete evidence Trump ordered them to "prevent" the bus from arriving.

They are suing the people in the Trump train. They can prove that easily. The idiots filmed themselves doing it snd posted it on their own accounts.
They are suing Trump. What does any of that prove regarding Trump himself?

Scooter. You have the news confused. Let’s go slowly so even you can understand. Several people in Congress are suing Trump and Giuliani for the 1/6 “protest” under the same law.

The people named in the Trump Train Lawsuit do not. Let me repeat. Do not. Let me bold this. Do not include Trump

Trump is not being sued. The Trump Fanboys are. The minions if you prefer.

From the news story.

The complaint alleges that the defendants -- named as Eliazar Cisneros, Hannah Ceh, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros, Dolores Park, and a Jane and John Doe -- conspired beforehand to surround and block the bus in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act, passed by Congress in 1871 to prohibit the obstruction of free and fair elections via the coordinated intimidation of voters. As a result of their actions, they claim, the campaign was forced to cancel its stops in San Marcos and Austin out of fear for their safety.

Not Trump. Not Trump. The patriotic good Americans who violated the law. They are being sued.

Ok. Got it now? Biden campaign workers and ex-state lawmaker sue 'Trump Train' members involved in dangerous Texas highway incident
They are suing joe blow for "blocking" a campaign bus???

:laughing0301: :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:

That is even MORE stupid than I thought.

How pathetic. It will go NOWHERE!!!

A couple things. I doubt your abilities to think are significant. Second. It will drive the Trump Supporters first to a lawyer. And then to a different lawyer. The second one will be a Bankruptcy Attorney. Unless they decide to heed the advice of Abraham Lincoln and represent themselves.
So, you admit that the aim of this litigation is solely to harass and run up costs?

If you had the ability to think clearly, you would know what a stupid a move this is.

The intent of the litigation is to win money. To collect monetary compensation for damages. The purpose of nearly every lawsuit.
 




I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,




I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,

What is your point? One crime doesn't cancel out another. You are playing a very juvenile tit-for-tat game. I doubt that any of these people allegedly attempting to cause an auto accident in Texas even knew anything about any incidents in NYC or San Francisco. You seem like you are pro crime. I'm not. Somebody could have gotten seriously hurt or killed.
it does when theres one event on one side and hundreds on the other,,,
If you think that there has been only one incident created by trumpsters, you are seriously deluded. Scumbags like the proud boys, oath keepers and other thugs have been all over the place even before Jan. 6.
and yet you dont post a single one where they were the aggressors,,

while on the other hand I could post one every 10 minutes for 24 hrs straight,,

I'm not going to waste my time. You now as well as I do that these white-trash gangs, like the proud boys, oath keepers, "militias," kkk, are threatening and attacking people on the streets and on the internet, and slinging guns around. No decent well-brought-up person does these things.
 




I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,




I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,

What is your point? One crime doesn't cancel out another. You are playing a very juvenile tit-for-tat game. I doubt that any of these people allegedly attempting to cause an auto accident in Texas even knew anything about any incidents in NYC or San Francisco. You seem like you are pro crime. I'm not. Somebody could have gotten seriously hurt or killed.
it does when theres one event on one side and hundreds on the other,,,
If you think that there has been only one incident created by trumpsters, you are seriously deluded. Scumbags like the proud boys, oath keepers and other thugs have been all over the place even before Jan. 6.
and yet you dont post a single one where they were the aggressors,,

while on the other hand I could post one every 10 minutes for 24 hrs straight,,

I'm not going to waste my time. You now as well as I do that these white-trash gangs, like the proud boys, oath keepers, "militias," kkk, are threatening and attacking people on the streets and on the internet, and slinging guns around. No decent well-brought-up person does these things.
so you admit there is no proof to back up your claim,, at least your honest when you lie about something,,
 




I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,
Could you find on from a real media source? Those are all from RWNJ conspiracy theory sites.
there is video on tweeter in the link...tweeter! so it must be true
Tweeter isn't real news.
dont tell synthaholic that,, she lives on twitter news,,
She can do whatever she wants, so can you. But Twitter isn't news.
 




I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,
Could you find on from a real media source? Those are all from RWNJ conspiracy theory sites.
there is video on tweeter in the link...tweeter! so it must be true
Tweeter isn't real news.
dont tell synthaholic that,, she lives on twitter news,,
She can do whatever she wants, so can you. But Twitter isn't news.
when did I say she/we couldnt??

just saying she lives on twitter news, wouldnt want to break her heart and tell her its not news,,
 
This one will probably make it to Court. The Trump Train were explicit in their intention. To prevent the political rally and stop the bus from arriving.
There's no evidence of that and they cannot generally blame that on a political candidate who was not there, absent some concrete evidence Trump ordered them to "prevent" the bus from arriving.

They are suing the people in the Trump train. They can prove that easily. The idiots filmed themselves doing it snd posted it on their own accounts.
They are suing Trump. What does any of that prove regarding Trump himself?

Scooter. You have the news confused. Let’s go slowly so even you can understand. Several people in Congress are suing Trump and Giuliani for the 1/6 “protest” under the same law.

The people named in the Trump Train Lawsuit do not. Let me repeat. Do not. Let me bold this. Do not include Trump

Trump is not being sued. The Trump Fanboys are. The minions if you prefer.

From the news story.

The complaint alleges that the defendants -- named as Eliazar Cisneros, Hannah Ceh, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros, Dolores Park, and a Jane and John Doe -- conspired beforehand to surround and block the bus in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act, passed by Congress in 1871 to prohibit the obstruction of free and fair elections via the coordinated intimidation of voters. As a result of their actions, they claim, the campaign was forced to cancel its stops in San Marcos and Austin out of fear for their safety.

Not Trump. Not Trump. The patriotic good Americans who violated the law. They are being sued.

Ok. Got it now? Biden campaign workers and ex-state lawmaker sue 'Trump Train' members involved in dangerous Texas highway incident
They are suing joe blow for "blocking" a campaign bus???

:laughing0301: :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:

That is even MORE stupid than I thought.

How pathetic. It will go NOWHERE!!!
We will see, won't we? At least THAT lawsuit has been filed. How's the Babbitt lawsuit coming along?
 




I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,
Could you find on from a real media source? Those are all from RWNJ conspiracy theory sites.
there is video on tweeter in the link...tweeter! so it must be true
Tweeter isn't real news.
dont tell synthaholic that,, she lives on twitter news,,
She can do whatever she wants, so can you. But Twitter isn't news.
when did I say she/we couldnt??

just saying she lives on twitter news, wouldnt want to break her heart and tell her its not news,,
You're trying to deflect. I tried to defuse it, but you're insisting on your deflection so I'm stopping right here. Have a nice day.
 




I could do this all day long,,

but you go ahead with your singular event,,
Could you find on from a real media source? Those are all from RWNJ conspiracy theory sites.
there is video on tweeter in the link...tweeter! so it must be true
Tweeter isn't real news.
dont tell synthaholic that,, she lives on twitter news,,
She can do whatever she wants, so can you. But Twitter isn't news.
when did I say she/we couldnt??

just saying she lives on twitter news, wouldnt want to break her heart and tell her its not news,,
You're trying to deflect. I tried to defuse it, but you're insisting on your deflection so I'm stopping right here. Have a nice day.
if you were stopping you wouldnt have responded,,

and how am I deflecting when I agreed with you??
 
Was there not intentional bumping of the staff member's car that was following directly behind the bus?

Are you referring to the vehicle that looked like a white Forerunner behind the bus? Is that the one you're saying was bumped? One of the videos I watched showed that particular vehicle driving into the Trump supporter's lane, not the other way around.
I'm not going to argue minutiae. The intent is evident.
Dollars to donuts, there's a social media trail of those trump fluffers bragging about what they did and their intent.
 
This one will probably make it to Court. The Trump Train were explicit in their intention. To prevent the political rally and stop the bus from arriving.
There's no evidence of that and they cannot generally blame that on a political candidate who was not there, absent some concrete evidence Trump ordered them to "prevent" the bus from arriving.

They are suing the people in the Trump train. They can prove that easily. The idiots filmed themselves doing it snd posted it on their own accounts.
They are suing Trump. What does any of that prove regarding Trump himself?

Scooter. You have the news confused. Let’s go slowly so even you can understand. Several people in Congress are suing Trump and Giuliani for the 1/6 “protest” under the same law.

The people named in the Trump Train Lawsuit do not. Let me repeat. Do not. Let me bold this. Do not include Trump

Trump is not being sued. The Trump Fanboys are. The minions if you prefer.

From the news story.

The complaint alleges that the defendants -- named as Eliazar Cisneros, Hannah Ceh, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros, Dolores Park, and a Jane and John Doe -- conspired beforehand to surround and block the bus in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act, passed by Congress in 1871 to prohibit the obstruction of free and fair elections via the coordinated intimidation of voters. As a result of their actions, they claim, the campaign was forced to cancel its stops in San Marcos and Austin out of fear for their safety.

Not Trump. Not Trump. The patriotic good Americans who violated the law. They are being sued.

Ok. Got it now? Biden campaign workers and ex-state lawmaker sue 'Trump Train' members involved in dangerous Texas highway incident
They are suing joe blow for "blocking" a campaign bus???

:laughing0301: :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:

That is even MORE stupid than I thought.

How pathetic. It will go NOWHERE!!!

A couple things. I doubt your abilities to think are significant. Second. It will drive the Trump Supporters first to a lawyer. And then to a different lawyer. The second one will be a Bankruptcy Attorney. Unless they decide to heed the advice of Abraham Lincoln and represent themselves.
So, you admit that the aim of this litigation is solely to harass and run up costs?

If you had the ability to think clearly, you would know what a stupid a move this is.

The intent of the litigation is to win money. To collect monetary compensation for damages. The purpose of nearly every lawsuit.
And what damages are those?

Yeah. None.
 
This one will probably make it to Court. The Trump Train were explicit in their intention. To prevent the political rally and stop the bus from arriving.
There's no evidence of that and they cannot generally blame that on a political candidate who was not there, absent some concrete evidence Trump ordered them to "prevent" the bus from arriving.

They are suing the people in the Trump train. They can prove that easily. The idiots filmed themselves doing it snd posted it on their own accounts.
They are suing Trump. What does any of that prove regarding Trump himself?

Scooter. You have the news confused. Let’s go slowly so even you can understand. Several people in Congress are suing Trump and Giuliani for the 1/6 “protest” under the same law.

The people named in the Trump Train Lawsuit do not. Let me repeat. Do not. Let me bold this. Do not include Trump

Trump is not being sued. The Trump Fanboys are. The minions if you prefer.

From the news story.

The complaint alleges that the defendants -- named as Eliazar Cisneros, Hannah Ceh, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros, Dolores Park, and a Jane and John Doe -- conspired beforehand to surround and block the bus in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act, passed by Congress in 1871 to prohibit the obstruction of free and fair elections via the coordinated intimidation of voters. As a result of their actions, they claim, the campaign was forced to cancel its stops in San Marcos and Austin out of fear for their safety.

Not Trump. Not Trump. The patriotic good Americans who violated the law. They are being sued.

Ok. Got it now? Biden campaign workers and ex-state lawmaker sue 'Trump Train' members involved in dangerous Texas highway incident
They are suing joe blow for "blocking" a campaign bus???

:laughing0301: :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:

That is even MORE stupid than I thought.

How pathetic. It will go NOWHERE!!!
We will see, won't we? At least THAT lawsuit has been filed. How's the Babbitt lawsuit coming along?
Ask somebody with standing.
 
This one will probably make it to Court. The Trump Train were explicit in their intention. To prevent the political rally and stop the bus from arriving.
There's no evidence of that and they cannot generally blame that on a political candidate who was not there, absent some concrete evidence Trump ordered them to "prevent" the bus from arriving.

They are suing the people in the Trump train. They can prove that easily. The idiots filmed themselves doing it snd posted it on their own accounts.
They are suing Trump. What does any of that prove regarding Trump himself?

Scooter. You have the news confused. Let’s go slowly so even you can understand. Several people in Congress are suing Trump and Giuliani for the 1/6 “protest” under the same law.

The people named in the Trump Train Lawsuit do not. Let me repeat. Do not. Let me bold this. Do not include Trump

Trump is not being sued. The Trump Fanboys are. The minions if you prefer.

From the news story.

The complaint alleges that the defendants -- named as Eliazar Cisneros, Hannah Ceh, Joeylynn Mesaros, Robert Mesaros, Dolores Park, and a Jane and John Doe -- conspired beforehand to surround and block the bus in violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act, passed by Congress in 1871 to prohibit the obstruction of free and fair elections via the coordinated intimidation of voters. As a result of their actions, they claim, the campaign was forced to cancel its stops in San Marcos and Austin out of fear for their safety.

Not Trump. Not Trump. The patriotic good Americans who violated the law. They are being sued.

Ok. Got it now? Biden campaign workers and ex-state lawmaker sue 'Trump Train' members involved in dangerous Texas highway incident
They are suing joe blow for "blocking" a campaign bus???

:laughing0301: :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:

That is even MORE stupid than I thought.

How pathetic. It will go NOWHERE!!!

A couple things. I doubt your abilities to think are significant. Second. It will drive the Trump Supporters first to a lawyer. And then to a different lawyer. The second one will be a Bankruptcy Attorney. Unless they decide to heed the advice of Abraham Lincoln and represent themselves.
So, you admit that the aim of this litigation is solely to harass and run up costs?

If you had the ability to think clearly, you would know what a stupid a move this is.

The intent of the litigation is to win money. To collect monetary compensation for damages. The purpose of nearly every lawsuit.
And what damages are those?

Yeah. None.

Because of threats to their safety they were forced to cancel several political events. Which is a violation of the KKK act. So. Damages confirmed.

Face it. The law doesn’t say what you think it does. And the Trump Heroes are going to be left spinning in the wind watching their retirements evaporate.
 
Nope. I'm just not going to waste my time arguing with right-wing.morons. If you haven't heard of these hoodlums by now, you must been living in the south pole all of this time.
 
Nope. I'm just not going to waste my time arguing with right-wing.morons. If you haven't heard of these hoodlums by now, you must been living in the south pole all of this time.
if they were that well known you should be able to post dozens of examples of them starting trouble like I did with antifa and BLM,,,

but alas you have nothing,,
 
The outcome if this lawsuit, if the complaint states a claim for which relief can be granted, will depend on what the plaintiffs can prove by a preponderance of the evidence (not beyond a reasonable doubt). There is video, perhaps other videos, and there was someone following the bus in another vehicle.

The defendants' depositions should be interesting.
 
The outcome if this lawsuit, if the complaint states a claim for which relief can be granted, will depend on what the plaintiffs can prove by a preponderance of the evidence (not beyond a reasonable doubt). There is video, perhaps other videos, and there was someone following the bus in another vehicle.

The defendants' depositions should be interesting.
yes but driving by a van flying a trump flag doesn’t violate the law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top