Trump desire to suspend the Constitution is not a deal breaker to Republicans

[Faun]

well, for one, we all SAW with our own (you would say lying) eyes the ballots being re-inserted OVER and OVER again at the State Farm arena in (pretty sure it was) Fulton County, GA

Now we're supposed to believe that in the same, once - red state, the people elected a freak who almost ran over his wife with a car, someone who wants abortion up until the 9th month (whereas only something like 5% of Americans agree), someone who is buddies with the crazy pastor from Hell Jeremiah Wright who once said God d*** America!

Of course you're lying at worst, misguided at best. The proof of which is twofold....

First, had the same ballots been counted over and over again, as you assert, there would have been more votes than voters in Georgia. That did not happen.

Secondly, Georgia did a complete hand recount. The recount very closely matched the tabulation count. Had the same ballots been counted over and over again, as you assert, the hand count would have resulted in a significantly lower number of votes than the tabulation count. That also did not happen.

See that? This is exactly why folks on the right are laughed at over election fraud. Y'all keep citing debunked bullshit claims of fraud. That's why most people believe the 2020 election was legit.

 

[iceberg]

Thanks. When there is no evidence just keep accusing the other side of slander.

Trump has always been innocent of any allegations aimed at him since he was 18 years old.

oh i doubt that is even possibly true. also, quite the odd thing to say. nothing anyone has ever said about you in almost 60 years has ever been true.

that's funny.

 

[Mac1958]

They're actually, literally going after the Constitution now. Right out in the open.

Based on accusations that they can't even prove in court.

This is a sickness.

 

[rightwinger]

you are so full of it. For one thing, whether it is absolutely proven or not is IRRELEVANT in light of the fact of: MASSIVE accusations from CREDIBLE sources.

But most of all:

THERE HAS BEEN FRAUD proven.

But as per usual, the ostrich dimrats refuse to see the elephant in the room. Actually, they can't help but see it but they deny, deny, deny...

They are reality deniers

Presidential elections are decided on a state by state basis.
Out of 50 states, not a single state found evidence of massive fraud. 50 States certified the results and declared them valid.

The only massive fraud in 2020 came from Donald J Trump as he tried to steal the election

 

[notmyfault2020]

Secondly, Georgia did a complete hand recount. The recount very closely matched the tabulation count.

oh, so they recounted the fake ballots

whew!

OK, maybe we election deniers can now move on! The fake ballots were re-counted! probably by the same counters as the first time!

 

[notmyfault2020]

Presidential elections are decided on a state by state basis.
Out of 50 states, not a single state found evidence of massive fraud. 50 States certified the results and declared them valid.

The only massive fraud in 2020 came from Donald J Trump as he tried to steal the election

Right. Everyone is 100% honest and upstanding.... except of course

Trump

When it comes to Trump, all naivete' RE how honest people are goes OUT the window.

 

[Lastamender]

I hate to tell you this.

Trump had plenty of lawyers to sue after November 3rd. They did. Over 60 courts, 60 Judges and then the SC.

None of the Judges in all courts, be it Republican or Democratic appointed Judges, and there were some Trump appointed as well......could find any evidence, because the Lawyers showed NO evidence of fraud, or anything.


The 3 States recounted and found NOTHING.
Actually they found even more votes for Biden.

Those 147 Republicans were following the Trump formula of alleging and inciting that Trump might have won and there was fraud.


There was no fraud. The States knew it. The House knew it, the Senate knew it. Trump knew it.

Wanting to win and then losing is not the same as there being fraud.


They could not prove fraud, and neither have you.

I hate to tell you this but this has nothing to do with anything except Congressmen violating their oath of office by voting not to investigate. You can shove all of that other tired bullshit back up your ass.

 

[BlindBoo]

They're actually, literally going after the Constitution now. Right out in the open.

Based on accusations that they can't even prove in court.

This is a sickness.

The fascist are coalescing in their dance with the devil.

 

[Faun]

oh, so they recounted the fake ballots

whew!

OK, maybe we election deniers can now move on! The fake ballots were re-counted! probably by the same counters as the first time!

LOL

So now that your claim was shown to be bullshit, you're changing your claim. You said they were counting ballots over and over. Now you change to they counted fake ballots.

What fake ballots? From where did they come? Post proof....

 

[Lastamender]

FruitLoops, they already had immunity. Read the Constitution some time.

How can our Constitution give immunity to traitors? Explain.

 

[Faun]

How can our Constitution give immunity to traitors? Explain.

It can't. They're not traitors unless convicted of such. They're certainly not traitors simply because you call them traitors.

 

[notmyfault2020]

LOL

So now that your claim was shown to be bullshit, you're changing your claim. You said they were counting ballots over and over. Now you change to they counted fake ballots.

What fake ballots? From where did they come? Post proof....

you wouldn't believe any evidence if Jesus Christ appeared before you in a cloud of holy smoke and said, Yes, my child, the election was stolen and here is all the proof you need.

Then hands you Mollie Hemingway's book which, in actuality, you wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Lastamender]

LOL

You already proved they had no evidence on which to base an investigation.

No they did not. At that time every swing state was in court fighting not to release ballots or data for inspection. You cannot investigatewe what theywill not give you. And,again, a moot point. The only thing that matters is one quarter of the Congress wanted to investigate to save our Constitution the others refused and sided with the alleged enemy.

 

[Lastamender]

So? It takes 218 votes in the House for a measure to pass? They were partisan votes. They weren't required to present any new evidence, and they never did. They just bloviated and rehashed the unproven allegations that had been unsuccessful in the states courts.

They were not allowed to present their evidence you incredibly stupid fool.

 

[rightwinger]

Right. Everyone is 100% honest and upstanding.... except of course

Trump

When it comes to Trump, all naivete' RE how honest people are goes OUT the window.

Trump took advantage of his right to challenge elections in any state he had issues with
He filed over 60 legal claims which were found to have no merit

That confirms there was no massive fraud

For Trump to declare otherwise is MASSIVE FRAUD on his part

 

[Faun]

you wouldn't believe any evidence if Jesus Christ appeared before you in a cloud of holy smoke and said, Yes, my child, the election was stolen and here is all the proof you need.

LOLOLOL

You're not posting any evidence. Post something.

You posted a baseless claim that ballots were counted multiple times at the State Farm Arena. There's no evidence that happened. Even worse, there's physical evidence that did not happen.

When shown how that evidence debunks your claims, rather than accept you were wrong, you shift your claim of fraud from ballots were being counted over and over ... to ... fake ballots were counted. Why on Earth would anyone in their right mind accept that bullshit claim when all you did was change your first claim to something else, equally as baseless as your first claim?

Even worse for you, when challenged to corroborate your claim with some evidence, instead of providing even a shred of evidence, you fall back on the fallacy that I simply won't believe any evidence -- despite the fact that you posted no evidence.

Again, this is why people laugh at folks crying fraud.

Try again -- you [now] claim fake ballots were scanned at the State Farm Arena. Show some evidence, anything, that demonstrates that...

 

[BlindBoo]

They were not allowed to present their evidence you incredibly stupid fool.

They've had almost two years since their treachery to present it. They still have nothing but the same failed allegations.

 

[Faun]

No they did not. At that time every swing state was in court fighting not to release ballots or data for inspection. You cannot investigatewe what theywill not give you. And,again, a moot point. The only thing that matters is one quarter of the Congress wanted to investigate to save our Constitution the others refused and sided with the alleged enemy.

FruitLoops, they claimed they had evidence of fraud. They based their claim of being in possession of evidence of fraud as the basis for holding an investigation.

YOU proved that was a bullshit claim on their part since you couldn't find any of their purported evidence. And rather than accept your own unwitting confession that they had no evidence, you made up the moronic excuse that they did have evidence; but you can't find it because they never made it public. As if they would sit on evidence for two years and not use it to show the election was stolen.

You're out of your fucking mind, FruitLoops.

 

[Faun]

They were not allowed to present their evidence you incredibly stupid fool.

Who stopped them from handing their evidence over to Fox News so that America could see there really was fraud???

The truth is -- they couldn't do that because they had no evidence. They were just trying to stall certification to whip up more doubt about the legitimacy of the election.