JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,520
- 2,165
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know what the stated "purpose" is, please explain exactly how the function will achieve that purpose in practical terms.If the insistence remains that "Mexico Pay" for this wall of dubious effectiveness, why not just discontinue the payment of the nearly $1 billion a year we send to Mexico in economic and military aid? All in all it's a pretty stupid idea to build a wall whose primary value will be providing a canvas for graffiti artists and giving extremists on both sides of the border something to blow holes in but if it must be built at least cutting foreign aid to Mexico will hurt those in the Mexican Government the most.
Tariffs on Mexican goods is nothing more than a tax increase on an already over-taxed American Citizenry coupled with an old, proven to do more harm than good, economic central planning stunt that has consistently failed to achieve positive results in developed economies, it actually ends up making our economy less efficient since it artificially diverts resources into domestic production that the market has already proven to be inefficient.
First of all, you are wrong about the purpose and function of the wall.
STRAW MAN ALERT! Who said anything about not wanting to end the flow of illegal immigration?It will end the flow of illegal immigration on our southern border. For whatever reason, liberals don't want that to happen.
STRAW MAN ALERT! Who the fuck are you talking about ? I've been a declared enemy of the welfare state from day one and I've never advocated open borders.God only knows why. You're sitting here in a country drowning in debt, unable to pay for the massive entitlements you've heaped on it's shoulders, and you want to open the doors and let anyone in the fucking world come on in and sign up for their benefits.
STRAW MAN ALERT! I've never even got remotely close to advocating or "bitching" about any of this, unless you're talking about advocating the complete elimination of the minimum wage in which case, guilty as charged.You're constantly bitching about the minimum wage and poor working families while flooding our workforce with cheap undocumented labor that doesn't contribute to the tax base while using all our services. It goes beyond being moronic. It's outright mentally retarded.
First thing you've said in the post that's correct, I should've said $0.5 billion a year, what's the difference how long it takes to "pay" for it? It's all symbolic anyways and apparently you're unaware that the bulk of our "aid" ends up in the pockets of the those running the Mexican government, at least this way you're not attempting to crash the general Mexican economy via market manipulation while at the same time adding new taxes on American Citizens and making our economy less efficient in the process.US economic and military aid to Mexico is $419 million. That won't pay for a wall and wouldn't pay for a wall in 20 years. In the meantime, you would have a border nation unable to adequately defend it's sovereignty against foreign attack and people literally starving and dying from disease in the streets.
STRAW MAN ALERT! I never gave any indication that I have a "love affair" with confiscated drug money or remittances back to Mexico, however your claim of $14 billion seized from "El Chapo" is wildly inaccurate from everything I've read about this, secondly even if it was accurate you'd have to get the courts or congressional action to divert it to the appropriate agencies for use on the "wall" as far as remittances go, how do you figure it's fair or just to put additional taxes on the money that AMERICAN CITIZENS choose to send out of the country? Aren't the American people already taxed enough without the federal government making up new subjective "sin taxes" to rob us further?So.... I don't know what you love affair with confiscated drug money or remittances back to Mexico is about, but I think it's a much smarter plan than yours. And here's the deal... you don't have any political power anymore. So, there's that.
Uh-huh and that involves what exactly?How would I do it?
In every way. At once.
No, it won't. Why? Because many miles of the terrain prevent the building of the wall.The wall will not stop the flow of illegal immigration.
Yes it will. IDIOT.
I am not going to argue what your limited brain does not get. You are sounding like Correll, for heaven's sake.
You want to really get immigration down to a trickle? Follow my comments in #13 above.
STRAW MAN ALERT! Who said anything about not wanting to end the flow of illegal immigration?
I see you have developed a love affair with straw man construction, I have an interesting proposal for you, it might be a bit extreme but I think it's a worthwhile; how about you show me the same courtesy that I've shown you and actually take the time to read what I wrote instead of just attempting to manufacture what my opinions, philosophy and positions are out of thin air? maybe just try it out for a fucking change of pace, K?Just out of curiosity how would you go about "removing them" and "stop more of that ilk"? Do you think a "wall" will do that?
FYI: you don't really need "military grade explosives" to blow holes in a concrete wall, commercial grade or even homemade stuff will do the trick and I'm sure extremists/vandals/etc.., on both side of the border can get their hands on what they need if they have a mind to.
Tell ya what buddy... why don't you and a group of your militant libs march on down there and try blowing a hole in the wall and let's see what happens next?
STRAW MAN ALERT! I never gave any indication that I have a "love affair" with confiscated drug money or remittances back to Mexico, however your claim of $14 billion seized from "El Chapo" is wildly inaccurate from everything I've read about this, secondly even if it was accurate you'd have to get the courts or congressional action to divert it to the appropriate agencies for use on the "wall" as far as remittances go, how do you figure it's fair or just to put additional taxes on the money that AMERICAN CITIZENS choose to send out of the country? Aren't the American people already taxed enough without the federal government making up new subjective "sin taxes" to rob us further?
Uh-Huh, in other words, you're embarrassed that you've been called on your numerous attempts at substituting a fallacy for an actual argument and thus won't even attempt explain yourself or do the honest thing and just admit it.STRAW MAN ALERT! Who said anything about not wanting to end the flow of illegal immigration?
It's glaringly obvious, dipshit.
Uh-Huh, in other words, you're embarrassed that you've been called on your numerous attempts at substituting a fallacy for an actual argument and thus won't even attempt explain yourself or do the honest thing and just admit it.STRAW MAN ALERT! Who said anything about not wanting to end the flow of illegal immigration?
It's glaringly obvious, dipshit.
Well, I had taken you for a rather principled and reasonable poster (a rarity around here) , guess I was wrong .......ah well, one more for the flame bait file.
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." -- Socrates
Umm..yeah you were attempting to attribute those "claims" (along with a bunch of other nonsensical horseshit that I never said) TO ME during your foaming at the mouth because I had the temerity to disagree with you, straw man construction orgy.Uh-Huh, in other words, you're embarrassed that you've been called on your numerous attempts at substituting a fallacy for an actual argument and thus won't even attempt explain yourself or do the honest thing and just admit it.STRAW MAN ALERT! Who said anything about not wanting to end the flow of illegal immigration?
It's glaringly obvious, dipshit.
Well, I had taken you for a rather principled and reasonable poster (a rarity around here) , guess I was wrong .......ah well, one more for the flame bait file.
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." -- Socrates
Well look at the fucking board, dumbass! If you can HONESTLY try to claim that no one is suggesting we not end the flow of illegal immigration,
LOL, "resistance to the wall" ....because I question the potential effectiveness and value for the money of the wall? what the fuck are you advocating? Is it mindless agreement with any proposal as long as it comes out of the mouth of a politician with the right letter behind his/her name? I've been asking the question of why this wall is the best strategy in terms of effectiveness and value for the money to be spent for accomplishing the goal and so far NOBODY has been able to answer that, all I get from "wall builders" is lame attempts at personal insults and fallacies because I have the impertinence to question what those in power are proposing.you must be smoking some really good shit. What the hell is all this resistance to the wall about? !
Oh yeah... dodge and weave bitch! Trump does it to you again! lol
You know, you shouldn't run out there spouting off your nonsense too early because this is what might happen to you. You all jumped on this 20% tax thing and it turns out that was one of numerous ideas. Now you're trying to cover your asses by spinning it into Trump getting cold feet. No.. Trump just punked your ass! BOOM!![]()
Oh yeah... dodge and weave bitch! Trump does it to you again! lol
You know, you shouldn't run out there spouting off your nonsense too early because this is what might happen to you. You all jumped on this 20% tax thing and it turns out that was one of numerous ideas. Now you're trying to cover your asses by spinning it into Trump getting cold feet. No.. Trump just punked your ass! BOOM!![]()
Cool, nice to hear that, just out of curiosity are all the other "numerous ideas" as idiotic as this one?
"Whenever someone starts talking about 'fair competition' or indeed, about 'fairness' in general, it is time to keep a sharp eye on your wallet, for it is about to be picked." -- Murray N. Rothbard
Uh-huh and that involves what exactly?How would I do it?
In every way. At once.
*BINGO*, if you want to effectively eliminate illegal immigration you can't do it when you have a gigantic welfare state in place because it's a HUGE magnet for illegal immigrants, it's too bad nobody in power is proposing any significant curtailment of the existing welfare state (quite the opposite actually).Oh yeah... dodge and weave bitch! Trump does it to you again! lol
You know, you shouldn't run out there spouting off your nonsense too early because this is what might happen to you. You all jumped on this 20% tax thing and it turns out that was one of numerous ideas. Now you're trying to cover your asses by spinning it into Trump getting cold feet. No.. Trump just punked your ass! BOOM!![]()
Cool, nice to hear that, just out of curiosity are all the other "numerous ideas" as idiotic as this one?
"Whenever someone starts talking about 'fair competition' or indeed, about 'fairness' in general, it is time to keep a sharp eye on your wallet, for it is about to be picked." -- Murray N. Rothbard
I was hoping one of the other ideas was outlaw anchor babies and stop all welfare, food stamps and free healthcare. Everyone who has a job, gets a green card. No job, go home.
LOL, I don't care about most peoples opinions here, most of it is just nonsensical noise and bullshit but for the sake of discussion what does your "every way" proposal involve? It's not a trap if that's what you're worried about.Uh-huh and that involves what exactly?How would I do it?
In every way. At once.
You don't care about my opinion on this. Cut to your point.
LOL, I don't care about most peoples opinions here, most of it is just nonsensical noise and bullshit but for the sake of discussion what does your "every way" proposal involve? It's not a trap if that's what you're worried about.Uh-huh and that involves what exactly?How would I do it?
In every way. At once.
You don't care about my opinion on this. Cut to your point.![]()