Trump guilty of battery and defamation of E Jean Carroll

The diary the FBI was so desperate to get, the one she left at rehab. Even though you 'read on the internet' that Trump was found guilty, the jury did NOT find him guilty of sexual abuse he was found liable for battery and defamation.

Your source is a random wordpress blog, backed by nothing. There is no evidence that Ashley Biden wrote that, or that the diary ever existed. And as all good conspiracies are wot to do, you've added layers of embellishment, now claiming that the FBI was 'desperate' for a diary that there's no evidence ever existed.

I don't need embellishment. The jury's verdict that the preponderance of the evidence proved that Trump both sexually abused and defamed Jean Caroll is all a rational person needs.

An actual court case, actual evidence, an actual verdict. Compared with baseless claims on a random wordpress blog, backed by nothing.

Our sources are not equal.
 
Your source is a random wordpress blog, backed by nothing. There is no evidence that Ashley Biden wrote that, or that the diary ever existed. And as all good conspiracies are wot to do, you've added layers of embellishment, now claiming that the FBI was 'desperate' for a diary that there's no evidence ever existed.

I don't need embellishment. The jury's verdict that the preponderance of the evidence proved that Trump both sexually abused and defamed Jean Caroll is all a rational person needs.

An actual court case, actual evidence, an actual verdict. Compared with baseless claims on a random wordpress blog.

Our sources are not equal.
You're in denial of the diary that nails your hero Biden. You are the one embellishing the verdict on the Trump trial. Your sources are bullshit.
 
That's a racist post and comment, Trump's Scottish (Ginger Heritage) is constantly being taunted for the color of his heritage genetic skin, if you did that with any other figure of any other race-color that would would be deemed racist, therefore you are the racists you so love to hate.-BUSTED!
triggered :p

CHEETOH.JPG
 
All reasonable, sensible people with standards and moral believe, of course, its legit.

Only those who believe their norms of depravity are normal, such as hashev, think the jury was crooked.
False. The jury didn’t have to be crooked. Just misled NY-ers.

The verdict still makes no sense. Even if they made a coherent determination on “sexual abuse” (which is a contrary to fact hypothesis), that still doesn’t explain how he defamed her by denying her claim of rape.

It makes no logical and no legal sense to assert that if you deny a claim of rape, you can even possibly be liable for defamation for denying the claim — especially when same jury agrees that the rape claim wasn’t established.

This is one of the reasons this case has a good prospect for getting overturned on appeal.
 
Last edited:
You're in denial of the diary that nails your hero Biden. You are the one embellishing the verdict on the Trump trial. Your sources are bullshit.

What diary? Again, your source is a random wordpress blog, backed by nothing.

Mine? The actual verdict that the preponderance of the evidence proved Trump sexually abused and defamed Caroll. No embellishment necessary.

Asked on its verdict sheet whether Carroll, 79, had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll,” the nine-person jury checked the box that said “no.” Asked whether Carroll had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll,” the jury checked the box that said “yes.” Both allegations were elements of Carroll’s battery claim.


Why would I or any rational person ignore the actual verdict and instead believe a random wordpress blog post backed by nothing?
 
False. The jury didn’t have to be crooked. Just misled NY-era.

The verdict still makes no sense. Even if they made a coherent determination on “sexual abuse” (which is a contrary to fact hypothesis), that still doesn’t explain how he defamed her by denying her claim of rape.

It makes no logical and no legal sense to assert that if you deny a claim of rape, you can even possibly be liable for defamation for denying the claim — especially when same jury agrees that the rape claim wasn’t established.

This is one of the reasons this cape has a good propapext for getting overturned on appeal.
overturned or not he has earned the title SEXUAL PREDATOR and that is a FACT

WILL THE ORANGE CHEETOH SEXUAL PREDATOR HAVE TO REGISTER? :p :D
 
overturned or not he has earned the title SEXUAL PREDATOR and that is a FACT

WILL THE ORANGE CHEETOH SEXUAL PREDATOR HAVE TO REGISTER? :p :D

Yup. No one could be held liable for calling Trump a sexual predator after that verdict.
 
'Being Trump' wasn't a claim that the jury was asked to consider. Rape, Battery, Sexual Abuse and Defamation were.

The jury found that the preponderance of evidence proved that Trump committed Sexual Abuse and Defamation against Jean Caroll.

Time for a new conspiracy, tinfoil! Preferably from a source you've never read. Not so much as the first two sentences.
You do not get it. What else is new?
 
overturned or not he has earned the title SEXUAL PREDATOR and that is a FACT

No. It’s a lie. You don’t know the difference. :abgg2q.jpg:
WILL THE ORANGE CHEETOH SEXUAL PREDATOR HAVE TO REGISTER?
Again, you asshole, the answer doesn’t change. Nobody has to register who hasn’t been convicted of a sex crime. And there is no sex crime conviction.

You’re already an established retard. No need to highlight.
 
Why would he apologize when he has no recollection of this sexual attack. I guess the attack was not not that noteworthy. There have been so many why would we expect him to remember this one.
As many other liberals, floppy ^ presumes guilt.
 
The diary the FBI was so desperate to get, the one she left at rehab. Even though you 'read on the internet' that Trump was found guilty, the jury did NOT find him guilty of sexual abuse he was found liable for battery and defamation.....You didn't even read the OP did you?

The jury found the former US president liable for sexual abuse and defamation in the civil case.
 
What diary? Again, your source is a random wordpress blog, backed by nothing.

Mine? The actual verdict that the preponderance of the evidence proved Trump sexually abused and defamed Caroll. No embellishment necessary.

Asked on its verdict sheet whether Carroll, 79, had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll,” the nine-person jury checked the box that said “no.” Asked whether Carroll had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll,” the jury checked the box that said “yes.” Both allegations were elements of Carroll’s battery claim.


Why would I or any rational person ignore the actual verdict and instead believe a random wordpress blog post backed by nothing?
You didn’t even read your own link. You just went with the false headline.
 

Forum List

Back
Top