Trump May Not Last A Year His Supreme Court Pick Shouldn't Last Generations

[skews13]

“The Senate is not a rubber stamp, and the Constitution does not require the Senate to give a nominee a vote,” McConnell insisted last year. “Let’s keep working together to get our economy moving again and make our country safer, instead of endlessly debating an issue where we don’t agree.”

Let’s call that the “McConnell Rule” on judicial nominations and, out of courtesy, stick to it as long as McConnell controls the Senate.

The Senate should table Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court until both political parties are prepared to search for a consensus candidate the American people can wholeheartedly support, and until some semblance of stability is restored in Washington, D.C.

Otherwise, Americans face the very real prospect of having a president who may not survive his first year — let alone his first term — cast his shadow over the legitimacy of our nation’s highest court for decades to come.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-a-year-his-supreme-court-pick-shouldntLssast

 

[depotoo]

You are a glutton for punishment, aren't you? Lol

PAGE NOT FOUND | 404

Sorry, we could not find the page you requested.
You can try search to find what you want.

 

[Doc1]

A "consensus" candidate, what a maroon. You lost kid, deal with it.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

A "consensus" candidate, what a maroon. You lost kid, deal with it.

Clearly she can not

 

[JoeMoma]

“The Senate is not a rubber stamp, and the Constitution does not require the Senate to give a nominee a vote,” McConnell insisted last year. “Let’s keep working together to get our economy moving again and make our country safer, instead of endlessly debating an issue where we don’t agree.”

Let’s call that the “McConnell Rule” on judicial nominations and, out of courtesy, stick to it as long as McConnell controls the Senate.

The Senate should table Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court until both political parties are prepared to search for a consensus candidate the American people can wholeheartedly support, and until some semblance of stability is restored in Washington, D.C.

Otherwise, Americans face the very real prospect of having a president who may not survive his first year — let alone his first term — cast his shadow over the legitimacy of our nation’s highest court for decades to come.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-a-year-his-supreme-court-pick-shouldntLssast

And since the republicans control the senate, they can simply change the rules so that a majority vote confirms a supreme court nomination.

 

[jwoodie]

“The Senate is not a rubber stamp, and the Constitution does not require the Senate to give a nominee a vote,” McConnell insisted last year. “Let’s keep working together to get our economy moving again and make our country safer, instead of endlessly debating an issue where we don’t agree.”

Let’s call that the “McConnell Rule” on judicial nominations and, out of courtesy, stick to it as long as McConnell controls the Senate.

The Senate should table Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court until both political parties are prepared to search for a consensus candidate the American people can wholeheartedly support, and until some semblance of stability is restored in Washington, D.C.

Otherwise, Americans face the very real prospect of having a president who may not survive his first year — let alone his first term — cast his shadow over the legitimacy of our nation’s highest court for decades to come.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-a-year-his-supreme-court-pick-shouldntLssast

OK, Brainiac: Do you want a Supreme Court Justice to APPLY CURRENT LAW or to MAKE NEW LAW? Or is that too difficult a question for you?

 

[martybegan]

“The Senate is not a rubber stamp, and the Constitution does not require the Senate to give a nominee a vote,” McConnell insisted last year. “Let’s keep working together to get our economy moving again and make our country safer, instead of endlessly debating an issue where we don’t agree.”

Let’s call that the “McConnell Rule” on judicial nominations and, out of courtesy, stick to it as long as McConnell controls the Senate.

The Senate should table Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court until both political parties are prepared to search for a consensus candidate the American people can wholeheartedly support, and until some semblance of stability is restored in Washington, D.C.

Otherwise, Americans face the very real prospect of having a president who may not survive his first year — let alone his first term — cast his shadow over the legitimacy of our nation’s highest court for decades to come.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-a-year-his-supreme-court-pick-shouldntLssast

Do you think Pence would nominate someone else? because even if by some miracle you idiots figured out how to get rid of Trump, all you would get is Pence.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Trump is illigetimate and so is Pence. The connections and corruption is so thick in the campaign that if Pence missed it...did he really miss it? C'Mon

 

[Auld Phart]

Trump is illigetimate and so is Pence. The connections and corruption is so thick in the campaign that if Pence missed it...did he really miss it? C'Mon

As illegitimate as Hillary had she been elected

 

[TooTall]

Trump is illigetimate and so is Pence. The connections and corruption is so thick in the campaign that if Pence missed it...did he really miss it? C'Mon

306 electoral votes say Trump and Pence are completely legitimate.

 

[jwoodie]

Trump is illigetimate and so is Pence. The connections and corruption is so thick in the campaign that if Pence missed it...did he really miss it? C'Mon

Do you notice how fewer and fewer people are bothering to respond to your blather?

 

[Snouter]

Gorsuch is badsass! HE totally pwnd the intoxicated Leahy dude and is now dealing with homosexual neocon Lisa Graham.

 

[martybegan]

Trump is illigetimate and so is Pence. The connections and corruption is so thick in the campaign that if Pence missed it...did he really miss it? C'Mon

Not even close, they won the electoral college and were sworn in.

 

[TheOldSchool]

“The Senate is not a rubber stamp, and the Constitution does not require the Senate to give a nominee a vote,” McConnell insisted last year. “Let’s keep working together to get our economy moving again and make our country safer, instead of endlessly debating an issue where we don’t agree.”

Let’s call that the “McConnell Rule” on judicial nominations and, out of courtesy, stick to it as long as McConnell controls the Senate.

The Senate should table Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court until both political parties are prepared to search for a consensus candidate the American people can wholeheartedly support, and until some semblance of stability is restored in Washington, D.C.

Otherwise, Americans face the very real prospect of having a president who may not survive his first year — let alone his first term — cast his shadow over the legitimacy of our nation’s highest court for decades to come.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-a-year-his-supreme-court-pick-shouldntLssast

There should be a minimum 293 day boycott. Remember that some repukes were saying they would block a nomination for 4 years if Hillary won? Fuck those bastards. Make them give up the nuclear option.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Trump worked with Russia, in my book that's not cool for America...it's super cool for Russia tho. Investigated by the FBI and just so happened to have his staff full of Russian cocksuckers...but he didn't know?

Then goes, Manafort? I hardly knew the guy!

Flynn? The old head of the NSA we nominated? He was just a volunteer!

Who? Harvey Mage? Harvard Sage? Oh, Carter Page? Who is that guy? We authorized a trip to Russia for him but what does that mean?

 

[TooTall]

“The Senate is not a rubber stamp, and the Constitution does not require the Senate to give a nominee a vote,” McConnell insisted last year. “Let’s keep working together to get our economy moving again and make our country safer, instead of endlessly debating an issue where we don’t agree.”

Let’s call that the “McConnell Rule” on judicial nominations and, out of courtesy, stick to it as long as McConnell controls the Senate.

The Senate should table Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court until both political parties are prepared to search for a consensus candidate the American people can wholeheartedly support, and until some semblance of stability is restored in Washington, D.C.

Otherwise, Americans face the very real prospect of having a president who may not survive his first year — let alone his first term — cast his shadow over the legitimacy of our nation’s highest court for decades to come.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-a-year-his-supreme-court-pick-shouldntLssast

The Senate should vote up or down on the SC nominee the President sent them.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Gorsuch will be confirmed. Then Kennedy's replacement. When Ginsburg dies, her replacement will be confirmed too.

 

[Snouter]

Mentally ill dude with the Dick Cheney avatar photoshopped with clown stuff, thanks for your commentary! Did you know Don;t TAZE ME BROH deleted my thread pointing out democrat Leahy was fucking loaded (the dude was wasted) when questioning our new Supreme Court justice?

 

[ClosedCaption]

“The Senate is not a rubber stamp, and the Constitution does not require the Senate to give a nominee a vote,” McConnell insisted last year. “Let’s keep working together to get our economy moving again and make our country safer, instead of endlessly debating an issue where we don’t agree.”

Let’s call that the “McConnell Rule” on judicial nominations and, out of courtesy, stick to it as long as McConnell controls the Senate.

The Senate should table Judge Gorsuch’s nomination to the Supreme Court until both political parties are prepared to search for a consensus candidate the American people can wholeheartedly support, and until some semblance of stability is restored in Washington, D.C.

Otherwise, Americans face the very real prospect of having a president who may not survive his first year — let alone his first term — cast his shadow over the legitimacy of our nation’s highest court for decades to come.

http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-bl...-a-year-his-supreme-court-pick-shouldntLssast

The Senate should vote up or down on the SC nominee the President sent them.

Nope, you've shown that those aren't the new rules.

 

[Snouter]

ClosedCaption, what high school did you attend?