Trump Needs To Clarify Businessman

[TNHarley]

We're talking MNCs that made it in the US and left.

left???? they had no choice thanks to liberal unions, liberal taxes, liberal deficits and liberal regulations. US firms must now be internationally competitive to survive.

Simple but a liberal or independent will lack the IQ to understand.

Bullshit! They made their billions in profit but that wasn't enough.
I can't wait till Trump tariffs their butts off.

The republicans would have to agree to that and it wont happen. Republicans like free trade

Foreign Trade deals are influenced by the President and all contain Fair Trade clauses.
Trump said he will nullify all of out Trade agreements and I haven't heard one attorney from either ideology say he's wrong.

Doesn't Congress have authority over tariffs?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Germany and Japan are competitive without selling out their competition.

always stupid!! BMW's biggest factory is in South Carolina, and thats a union free part of the USA.

See why we say stupid? What other conclusion is possible?

 

[TNHarley]

. Republicans like free trade

yes imagine if every individual, city, state, or country was not allowed to trade freely and had to make everything themselves. It would mean instant poverty for all but your liberal will lack the IQ to understand.

individual? city? state? huh?

 

[TNHarley]

We're talking MNCs that made it in the US and left.

left???? they had no choice thanks to liberal unions, liberal taxes, liberal deficits and liberal regulations. US firms must now be internationally competitive to survive.

Simple but a liberal or independent will lack the IQ to understand.

Bullshit! They made their billions in profit but that wasn't enough.
I can't wait till Trump tariffs their butts off.

The republicans would have to agree to that and it wont happen. Republicans like free trade

Foreign Trade deals are influenced by the President and all contain Fair Trade clauses.
Trump said he will nullify all of out Trade agreements and I haven't heard one attorney from either ideology say he's wrong.

why be stupid?? free trade between individuals or between countries is the same. You get richer not poorer by engaging.

Maybe your mother can explain it to you?

free trade can only ALWAYS work when labor is mobile. Labor isn't mobile. Sometimes nations need protectionism. Such as when they are struggling or trying to develop themselves.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Your phrase "internationally competitive" is pure Smoke and Mirrors for the sole purpose of using slave labor.

100% stupid. Bmw's biggest plant in world is in USA where there is no slave labor, and of course slave labor is illegal in China too.

Stupid much??

 

[Indeependent]

Germany and Japan are competitive without selling out their competition.

always stupid!! BMW's biggest factory is in South Carolina, and thats a union free part of the USA.

See why we say stupid? What other conclusion is possible?

China...No health benefits, no pensions, $13.00/day.
You are nothing more than a greedy, calculating Nazi.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Sometimes nations need protectionism.

dear, protecting a nation from competition makes it less competitive and more crippled.

want to write that 100 times each day until it sinks in??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

China...No health benefits, no pensions, $13.00/day.
.

dear, that's a blessing for American consumers. You must always remember that a business is for the benefit or customers not workers. Imagine a country where all the businesses were run for workers not customers??

See why we have to be 100% positive a liberal will be dull??

 

[Indeependent]

Sometimes nations need protectionism.

dear, protecting a nation from competition makes it less competitive and more crippled.

want to write that 100 times each day until it sinks in??

Want to list for me the actual nations that practice Free Trade the way the US does?

 

[Indeependent]

China...No health benefits, no pensions, $13.00/day.
.

dear, that's a blessing for American consumers. You must always remember that a business is for the benefit or customers not workers. Imagine a country where all the businesses were run for workers not customers??

See why we have to be 100% positive a liberal will be dull??

Governmental policy is for the "Common Welfare", not for the welfare of the few corporate entities.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You are nothing more than a greedy, calculating Nazi.

dear, conservatives are for freedom and free trade, libs and nazis want to control everything.

Even your insults show how stupid and liberal you are.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

China...No health benefits, no pensions, $13.00/day.
.

dear, that's a blessing for American consumers. You must always remember that a business is for the benefit or customers not workers. Imagine a country where all the businesses were run for workers not customers??

See why we have to be 100% positive a liberal will be dull??

Governmental policy is for the "Common Welfare", not for the welfare of the few corporate entities.

too stupid there are 30 million corporate entities in America, not a few

 

[TNHarley]

Sometimes nations need protectionism.

dear, protecting a nation from competition makes it less competitive and more crippled.

want to write that 100 times each day until it sinks in??

I have a thread on this in the economy forums. Go check it out.
Because I am pretty sure when we were using protectionism for 150 years it was our biggest growth in history. Also, see Japan. But take it to my thread

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Governmental policy is for the "Common Welfare",

and thats why the entire world is switching to free trade. Only you lack the IQ to understand it.

 

[Indeependent]

You are nothing more than a greedy, calculating Nazi.

dear, conservatives are for freedom and free trade, libs and nazis want to control everything.

Even your insults show how stupid and liberal you are.

Excuse me, you are the one who is constantly calling others "stupid".
You started the mud slinging.

 

[Indeependent]

China...No health benefits, no pensions, $13.00/day.
.

dear, that's a blessing for American consumers. You must always remember that a business is for the benefit or customers not workers. Imagine a country where all the businesses were run for workers not customers??

See why we have to be 100% positive a liberal will be dull??

Governmental policy is for the "Common Welfare", not for the welfare of the few corporate entities.

too stupid there are 30 million corporate entities in America, not a few

You know full well I'm talking about the Fortune 500, you slave loving Nazi scumbag.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Sometimes nations need protectionism.

dear, protecting a nation from competition makes it less competitive and more crippled.

want to write that 100 times each day until it sinks in??

I have a thread on this in the economy forums. Go check it out.
Because I am pretty sure when we were using protectionism for 150 years it was our biggest growth in history. Also, see Japan. But take it to my thread

idiotic, America was born trading with England and the entire world is now switching to it. ITs seems only America has so many stupid people who lack the IQ to understand something so simple. Here's the golden rule:

the more with whom you trade the richer you get no matter if they are across the street or across the world; the fewer with whom you trade the poorer you get. If you could not trade at all you'd have to make everything yourself and so starve to death or live a subsistence life style. Hence, the more with whom you trade the richer you get no matter if they are across the street or across the world.

Moreover, its exactly as Richard Nixon once said, "our goods have to be world class if we want to be a world class country". Imagine how backward our industry would be if it did not have to compete in the globalized market place? Our cars would be like soviet car were, i.e., you had to use a dip stick to check how much gasoline you had and back them up hill because carburetors were gravity fed. This is what the liberals, in effect, propose because they lack the ability to understand free trade.

 

[Indeependent]

Governmental policy is for the "Common Welfare",

and thats why the entire world is switching to free trade. Only you lack the IQ to understand it.

I noticed you didn't list what I ASKED BEFORE because the US is the ONLY nation that has gone full hog in Trade that is BAD for the overwhelming majority of Americans.
Now provide what I ASKED FOR.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Governmental policy is for the "Common Welfare",

and thats why the entire world is switching to free trade. Only you lack the IQ to understand it.

I noticed you didn't list what I ASKED BEFORE because the US is the ONLY nation that has gone full hog in Trade that is BAD for the overwhelming majority of Americans.
Now provide what I ASKED FOR.

100% stupid if trade was bad we would each have to make everything we consume all by ourselves.

Do you have the IQ to understand that??

 

[Indeependent]

Sometimes nations need protectionism.

dear, protecting a nation from competition makes it less competitive and more crippled.

want to write that 100 times each day until it sinks in??

I have a thread on this in the economy forums. Go check it out.
Because I am pretty sure when we were using protectionism for 150 years it was our biggest growth in history. Also, see Japan. But take it to my thread

idiotic, America was born trading with England and the entire world is now switching to it. ITs seems only America has so many stupid people who lack the IQ to understand something so simple. Here's the golden rule:

the more with whom you trade the richer you get no matter if they are across the street or across the world; the fewer with whom you trade the poorer you get. If you could not trade at all you'd have to make everything yourself and so starve to death or live a subsistence life style. Hence, the more with whom you trade the richer you get no matter if they are across the street or across the world.

Moreover, its exactly as Richard Nixon once said, "our goods have to be world class if we want to be a world class country". Imagine how backward our industry would be if it did not have to compete in the globalized market place? Our cars would be like soviet car were, i.e., you had to use a dip stick to check how much gasoline you had and back them up hill because carburetors were gravity fed. This is what the liberals, in effect, propose because they lack the ability to understand free trade.

John Adams saw what was happening and was revolted by it.
Very few are getting richer and you full well know that.
BTW, America was born by killing Brits in war.
Nixon did NOT provide an America that provided superior products, he provide an America that allowed Japan to send us Japan government (Socialist) subsidized cars that hurt American auto manufacturers.

You good with sound bites but your history is sorely lacking.