Trump outs Whistleblower!

Trump once again violated the law. Because Trumpers think Trump is above the law or that the law does not apply to Trump they laugh. It is a sorry state of affairs. Pelosi's strategy is right. Hang tight to the Impeachment articles because more are sure to follow. Trump can't help but to trample on the law.


How do you figure?

The WB law - if it applies- is designed to protect the whistleblower's identity from the boss.

Trump is the boss, if he already knows it, the WB isn't protected anyhow.
Trump is the chief enforcer of the law. He intentionally outed the name of the Whistleblower in his capacity as POTUS as retribution against the whistleblower, thus once again violating his oath of office for the upteenth time.



BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
 
Trump once again violated the law. Because Trumpers think Trump is above the law or that the law does not apply to Trump they laugh. It is a sorry state of affairs. Pelosi's strategy is right. Hang tight to the Impeachment articles because more are sure to follow. Trump can't help but to trample on the law.


How do you figure?

The WB law - if it applies- is designed to protect the whistleblower's identity from the boss.

Trump is the boss, if he already knows it, the WB isn't protected anyhow.
Trump is the chief enforcer of the law. He intentionally outed the name of the Whistleblower in his capacity as POTUS as retribution against the whistleblower, thus once again violating his oath of office for the upteenth time.



BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.
 
Trump once again violated the law. Because Trumpers think Trump is above the law or that the law does not apply to Trump they laugh. It is a sorry state of affairs. Pelosi's strategy is right. Hang tight to the Impeachment articles because more are sure to follow. Trump can't help but to trample on the law.


How do you figure?

The WB law - if it applies- is designed to protect the whistleblower's identity from the boss.

Trump is the boss, if he already knows it, the WB isn't protected anyhow.
Trump is the chief enforcer of the law. He intentionally outed the name of the Whistleblower in his capacity as POTUS as retribution against the whistleblower, thus once again violating his oath of office for the upteenth time.



BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.


How do you know the man whose name was mentioned in the tweeted article was the WB?

Even Adam Schiff said he didn't know who it was?
 
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.
You guys are hilarious the way you all mouth Schiff-Pelosi talking points so unironically.
There is no whistleblower and never was one. The democrats can't or won't produce this key part of their scheme.
 
Trump once again violated the law. Because Trumpers think Trump is above the law or that the law does not apply to Trump they laugh. It is a sorry state of affairs. Pelosi's strategy is right. Hang tight to the Impeachment articles because more are sure to follow. Trump can't help but to trample on the law.


How do you figure?

The WB law - if it applies- is designed to protect the whistleblower's identity from the boss.

Trump is the boss, if he already knows it, the WB isn't protected anyhow.
Trump is the chief enforcer of the law. He intentionally outed the name of the Whistleblower in his capacity as POTUS as retribution against the whistleblower, thus once again violating his oath of office for the upteenth time.



BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.


How do you know the man whose name was mentioned in the tweeted article was the WB?

Even Adam Schiff said he didn't know who it was?
The why did Trump retweet the article?
 
How do you figure?

The WB law - if it applies- is designed to protect the whistleblower's identity from the boss.

Trump is the boss, if he already knows it, the WB isn't protected anyhow.
Trump is the chief enforcer of the law. He intentionally outed the name of the Whistleblower in his capacity as POTUS as retribution against the whistleblower, thus once again violating his oath of office for the upteenth time.



BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.


How do you know the man whose name was mentioned in the tweeted article was the WB?

Even Adam Schiff said he didn't know who it was?
The why did Trump retweet the article?

Apparently thought the article would be of interest to the teeming masses who follow him on Twitter.

Also, thought it would be a good way to troll the libs.

Certainly doesn't mean that he knew the individual was the WB, just that he was someone who was speculated to be the WB.
 
Trump is the chief enforcer of the law. He intentionally outed the name of the Whistleblower in his capacity as POTUS as retribution against the whistleblower, thus once again violating his oath of office for the upteenth time.



BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.


How do you know the man whose name was mentioned in the tweeted article was the WB?

Even Adam Schiff said he didn't know who it was?
The why did Trump retweet the article?

Apparently thought the article would be of interest to the teeming masses who follow him on Twitter.

Also, thought it would be a good way to troll the libs.

Certainly doesn't mean that he knew the individual was the WB, just that he was someone who was speculated to be the WB.
So, Trump put an innocent man's life in jeopardy to troll Democrats? Is that what you are saying?
 
BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.


How do you know the man whose name was mentioned in the tweeted article was the WB?

Even Adam Schiff said he didn't know who it was?
The why did Trump retweet the article?

Apparently thought the article would be of interest to the teeming masses who follow him on Twitter.

Also, thought it would be a good way to troll the libs.

Certainly doesn't mean that he knew the individual was the WB, just that he was someone who was speculated to be the WB.
So, Trump put an innocent man's life in jeopardy to troll Democrats? Is that what you are saying?


No one's life is in jeopardy at all, don't be so melodramatic. The man is likely to be hailed as a liberal hero if anything.
 
So, Trump put an innocent man's life in jeopardy to troll Democrats? Is that what you are saying?
No one's life is in danger though it wouldn't be above all the Schiff heads in the impeachment gang to make a hit and blame Trump for it.
 
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.


How do you know the man whose name was mentioned in the tweeted article was the WB?

Even Adam Schiff said he didn't know who it was?
The why did Trump retweet the article?

Apparently thought the article would be of interest to the teeming masses who follow him on Twitter.

Also, thought it would be a good way to troll the libs.

Certainly doesn't mean that he knew the individual was the WB, just that he was someone who was speculated to be the WB.
So, Trump put an innocent man's life in jeopardy to troll Democrats? Is that what you are saying?


No one's life is in jeopardy at all, don't be so melodramatic. The man is likely to be hailed as a liberal hero if anything.
If he is not the whistleblower why would he be a hero?
 
How do you know the man whose name was mentioned in the tweeted article was the WB?

Even Adam Schiff said he didn't know who it was?
The why did Trump retweet the article?

Apparently thought the article would be of interest to the teeming masses who follow him on Twitter.

Also, thought it would be a good way to troll the libs.

Certainly doesn't mean that he knew the individual was the WB, just that he was someone who was speculated to be the WB.
So, Trump put an innocent man's life in jeopardy to troll Democrats? Is that what you are saying?


No one's life is in jeopardy at all, don't be so melodramatic. The man is likely to be hailed as a liberal hero if anything.
If he is not the whistleblower why would he be a hero?


Because he is thought to be the WB, a case of stolen valor.
 
Trumpers only care about wiNniNg!!! The Trump haters continue to spike the football on symbolic crap like this impeachment sham that gets train wrecked in early 2020!!! And the President gets to tweetily-dum all day about the House's abuse of power.

But let's face it.....all along, watching the heads explode over his tweets is amusing as fuck!!:flirtysmile4:
Winning what??
 
Trump once again violated the law. Because Trumpers think Trump is above the law or that the law does not apply to Trump they laugh. It is a sorry state of affairs. Pelosi's strategy is right. Hang tight to the Impeachment articles because more are sure to follow. Trump can't help but to trample on the law.


How do you figure?

The WB law - if it applies- is designed to protect the whistleblower's identity from the boss.

Trump is the boss, if he already knows it, the WB isn't protected anyhow.
Trump is the chief enforcer of the law. He intentionally outed the name of the Whistleblower in his capacity as POTUS as retribution against the whistleblower, thus once again violating his oath of office for the upteenth time.



BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.

If he would have been the first to say who the whistle blower was, then he would have "outed" him, however he was retweeting a story already outing the whistle blower, so he "outed" no one because it already had happened. Is he the actual whistle blower?
 
Pretty funny to think that some unknown who demands anonymity but wants to make devastating charges is protected by law to remain anonymous.
I would call that more democrat cheating and witch hunting.
 
Trump once again violated the law. Because Trumpers think Trump is above the law or that the law does not apply to Trump they laugh. It is a sorry state of affairs. Pelosi's strategy is right. Hang tight to the Impeachment articles because more are sure to follow. Trump can't help but to trample on the law.


How do you figure?

The WB law - if it applies- is designed to protect the whistleblower's identity from the boss.

Trump is the boss, if he already knows it, the WB isn't protected anyhow.
Trump is the chief enforcer of the law. He intentionally outed the name of the Whistleblower in his capacity as POTUS as retribution against the whistleblower, thus once again violating his oath of office for the upteenth time.



BTW, the libs can't prove that the man mentioned is actually the whistleblower and that Trump knew he was the WB.

If the man isn't the WB, he isn't protected. Unless Trump actually knew the man was the WB , he didn't do anything here.
Either you expect a President to uphold the law or you do not. Trump knew who the whistlblower was and outed him. If the Whistleblower is killed or injured we will know who to blame for making him a target.
All of those TV personalities and entertainers and politicians who have bloviated for years against Trump and deplorables and caused many altercations, injuries, property destruction and deaths are being held in high esteem.
 

Forum List

Back
Top