iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
- 1,600
there was also some key members who WANTED to testify in the open, on record, who were not allowed to do that. seems they were blocking him the whole time. so if this person in question (i'll bet you know who i'm talking about) had such vital info, why has it been so hard for him to provide it to the very committee looking for the *cough cough* truth?Well there is an investigation, there were hearings, there were lies told by campaign members, there were resignations, firings, recusals, covered up meetings... I don't know what you think was fake about those reports... Perhaps some overblown analysis and presumptions by pundits but that's not fake news... I don't recall any major media organization present false evidence of collusion. If they did then please point to it.if you're gonna bitch about fake news, please tell me where the RUSSIA investigation against trump is these days.We aren't in court genius, we are in reality, well some of us are here. I use references to things that actually happened or things that were actually said. You can play the "Fake News" game all you want, it just proves your a Trump puppet. But even in biased or fake news articles the information can be fact checked and challenged. The is what debate is about, but you seem to prefer to take the lazy approach and not even engage as you hide behind the "fake news" claim. It doesn't get much weaker than thatYou mean media links you call facts? Has your delusion became that powerful so that you really believe it now? None of the SHIT you say, "prove" or post would stand in court.Unlike yourself I can back up most if not all of my statements with facts. Keep throwing out empty rhetoric that you can't back up, it just keeps your credibility in the gutter. Makes you an easy advisory in debate.Can't prove it. Even if I could and did, you would still deny it and lie. That's a proven trait of regressives.
seems like they've given up on that pile of shit and moved onto calling shrinks.
CNN makes shit up daily so i don't trust much of what they say or do anymore. if you need the list of CNN fake news, let me know. as far as i'm concerned, once you have quotes from people who admit that russia was a fake story that i'm sure you will call "fake news" because it's not "bad trump!". or that admit they helped hillary all they could, now what? are their stories FAKE NEWS but all BAD TRUMP is not? i find it very difficult to believe only 1 side would resort to using FAKE NEWS so you tell me who i'm supposed to believe and why?
i take my emotions out of this anymore and look at facts. i use my longstanding judgement for right and wrong and when people break the law, i don't give a rats unholy ass which "side" they are on - that needs to stop.
WE THE PEOPLE need to stop both sides from breaking the law and not show apathy when we hate the other side.
so to me the entire RUSSIA stance is fake news. no one gave a shit about russia until the democrats lost. kinda odd to me when i take my dogs out of the race.