Trump Owns the Left

there was also some key members who WANTED to testify in the open, on record, who were not allowed to do that. seems they were blocking him the whole time. so if this person in question (i'll bet you know who i'm talking about) had such vital info, why has it been so hard for him to provide it to the very committee looking for the *cough cough* truth?

CNN makes shit up daily so i don't trust much of what they say or do anymore. if you need the list of CNN fake news, let me know. as far as i'm concerned, once you have quotes from people who admit that russia was a fake story that i'm sure you will call "fake news" because it's not "bad trump!". or that admit they helped hillary all they could, now what? are their stories FAKE NEWS but all BAD TRUMP is not? i find it very difficult to believe only 1 side would resort to using FAKE NEWS so you tell me who i'm supposed to believe and why?

i take my emotions out of this anymore and look at facts. i use my longstanding judgement for right and wrong and when people break the law, i don't give a rats unholy ass which "side" they are on - that needs to stop.

WE THE PEOPLE need to stop both sides from breaking the law and not show apathy when we hate the other side.

so to me the entire RUSSIA stance is fake news. no one gave a shit about russia until the democrats lost. kinda odd to me when i take my dogs out of the race.
To say there is no politics being played with the Russia story would not be honest. To say there is no story with the Russia situation would also not be honest.
again - since no one cared until they lost - i question whether or not there *IS* a story.

but if we must look at russia, fine. look away and dig deep. ANY ONE AT ANY TIME having questionable dealings with them - bring 'em out and let's look. i will not subscribe to a 1 sided vendetta against 1 person that hides behind the guise of someone doing something wrong that as of yet we have zero physical evidence of it.

yet when we have it for the liberal side, deflect, diminish and deny.
Of course the dems jumped on the Russia story because it worked to their advantage. That doesn't mean there was nothing there. You can't deny that there were several lies and cover ups coming from the Trump campaign about this issue. Either they all lied and jeopardized their careers and credibility to cover for Trump and save him from bad press or there was more there. Thats being exposed and investigated. I agree it is way overblown. But im not naive enough to say that there is nothing going on.

I don't really know if we can say that actual foreign interference in our election is a small matter regardless of whether there was collusion or not.
The biggest threat would be hacking and changing votes. funding facebook ad campaigns I don't think warrants an act of war. We can be grown ups and decide what ads to believe or not and we can work to expose the sources of political ads so we can gauge credibility behind the information sources.

There were ads that played to people fears to help influence a vote. But I do agree with your first line.
 
Well there is an investigation, there were hearings, there were lies told by campaign members, there were resignations, firings, recusals, covered up meetings... I don't know what you think was fake about those reports... Perhaps some overblown analysis and presumptions by pundits but that's not fake news... I don't recall any major media organization present false evidence of collusion. If they did then please point to it.
there was also some key members who WANTED to testify in the open, on record, who were not allowed to do that. seems they were blocking him the whole time. so if this person in question (i'll bet you know who i'm talking about) had such vital info, why has it been so hard for him to provide it to the very committee looking for the *cough cough* truth?

CNN makes shit up daily so i don't trust much of what they say or do anymore. if you need the list of CNN fake news, let me know. as far as i'm concerned, once you have quotes from people who admit that russia was a fake story that i'm sure you will call "fake news" because it's not "bad trump!". or that admit they helped hillary all they could, now what? are their stories FAKE NEWS but all BAD TRUMP is not? i find it very difficult to believe only 1 side would resort to using FAKE NEWS so you tell me who i'm supposed to believe and why?

i take my emotions out of this anymore and look at facts. i use my longstanding judgement for right and wrong and when people break the law, i don't give a rats unholy ass which "side" they are on - that needs to stop.

WE THE PEOPLE need to stop both sides from breaking the law and not show apathy when we hate the other side.

so to me the entire RUSSIA stance is fake news. no one gave a shit about russia until the democrats lost. kinda odd to me when i take my dogs out of the race.
To say there is no politics being played with the Russia story would not be honest. To say there is no story with the Russia situation would also not be honest.
again - since no one cared until they lost - i question whether or not there *IS* a story.

but if we must look at russia, fine. look away and dig deep. ANY ONE AT ANY TIME having questionable dealings with them - bring 'em out and let's look. i will not subscribe to a 1 sided vendetta against 1 person that hides behind the guise of someone doing something wrong that as of yet we have zero physical evidence of it.

yet when we have it for the liberal side, deflect, diminish and deny.
Of course the dems jumped on the Russia story because it worked to their advantage. That doesn't mean there was nothing there. You can't deny that there were several lies and cover ups coming from the Trump campaign about this issue. Either they all lied and jeopardized their careers and credibility to cover for Trump and save him from bad press or there was more there. Thats being exposed and investigated. I agree it is way overblown. But im not naive enough to say that there is nothing going on.

I don't really know if we can say that actual foreign interference in our election is a small matter regardless of whether there was collusion or not.
Like Obama using my taxes to interfere with the elections of a democracy?

Obama admin. sent taxpayer money to campaign to oust Netanyahu
 
To rub salt in the left's wounds as punishment for 8 years of Obama.
Easy answer to that statement... Grow up

Hey now that Dem's have a lot of time on their hands, you know after losing the House, Senate, and White House they can focus on women's issues...oh wait WeinStein. :eusa_think: Dem's just can't catch a break lately.
Do you really think you are making an intelligent argument? Like a rich liberal hollywood donor has anything to do with people who fight for legislation that will help women? again, i'll say... grow up

Which one, it seems like some new liberal women abuser surfaces every other day. Rush commented this morning that now liberals are accusing Weinstein of being a racist because he never abused any black women, man the left have come unglued. :laugh:
You are talking about one dipshit. How in the world does that encompass an entire ideology comprised of millions of people? Does Trump access hollywood video or Oreilly's antics at Fox news represent the values of all conservatives? of course not.

Your side is the self appointed defender of women, Dem's have serious egg on their faces. The code of silence on Dem's abusing women has broken wide open and the most senior leaders in the Dem party including two presidents were pals with these people, ouch! lol
 
Thats how Trump has been trying to brand them. Fact is people have been skeptical of the media even before Trump, he is just going all in with the "Fake News" narrative so he can hide behind it when his bullshit gets exposed. And people like you are falling for it, hook line and sinker... I take everything that I hear from the media with a grain of salt, but in between the bias pundit analysis (which is being incorrectly called "fake news") there are facts, there are interviews, there are videos, speeches, statements, reporting on actual events. If you aren't able to discern your own truth and reality from new reports then that speaks volumes to your cognitive ability. But if you think you are getting it by only listening to Trump then that is even more pathetic. Can you admit that he is all smoke and mirrors, speaking more half truths and outright lies than any of the major media companies.

This is the liberal media's own doing, they have been lying, twisting, and spinning for decades now well its caught up to them. The boy who cried wolf lesson.
"liberal media" Try media dude... Both sides have been doing the exact same thing

The old 'both sides do it' deflection. Dude do you deny that the vast majority of media like 95% are not liberal? :eusa_hand:
I think it is the nature of media who thrive off ratings, advertising $$, and conflict. Whether it is liberal or conservative that is the nature of the business... And yes the majority of the media personalities lean liberal. There is a bias in the media that focus in opposition of Trump. Being overwhelmingly critical of the administration in power is not the same as FAKE. I'm actually fine with our media being critical of those in power. We don't need a bunch of Hannities kissing Trumps ass. Thats not real news either

Don't make the mistake of assuming most Americans are as well informed as you or I they are not. Most Americans are too busy with their jobs and families to pay much attention, the liberal media takes advantage of this. They spew twisted half truths which many Americans just assumed were true because they heard it on the news, they continue to spew the talking point until its debunked but by then its too late, they have fooled many Americans who will never read the retraction buried on page 29.

Trump has upset this scheme, we have a POTUS who finally calls the liberal media out on this crap and the American people have begun to question anything the liberal media reports now after discovering they were being lied to.
He does call the media out and he calls bureaucrats in Washington out which is a good thing... The problem is he calls all these people out while doing the same thing. He spreads more fake news than any media entity. and he hides behind the fake news label to dodge accountability for his actions. Please tell me you can see that.
 
To say there is no politics being played with the Russia story would not be honest. To say there is no story with the Russia situation would also not be honest.
again - since no one cared until they lost - i question whether or not there *IS* a story.

but if we must look at russia, fine. look away and dig deep. ANY ONE AT ANY TIME having questionable dealings with them - bring 'em out and let's look. i will not subscribe to a 1 sided vendetta against 1 person that hides behind the guise of someone doing something wrong that as of yet we have zero physical evidence of it.

yet when we have it for the liberal side, deflect, diminish and deny.
Of course the dems jumped on the Russia story because it worked to their advantage. That doesn't mean there was nothing there. You can't deny that there were several lies and cover ups coming from the Trump campaign about this issue. Either they all lied and jeopardized their careers and credibility to cover for Trump and save him from bad press or there was more there. Thats being exposed and investigated. I agree it is way overblown. But im not naive enough to say that there is nothing going on.

I don't really know if we can say that actual foreign interference in our election is a small matter regardless of whether there was collusion or not.
The biggest threat would be hacking and changing votes. funding facebook ad campaigns I don't think warrants an act of war. We can be grown ups and decide what ads to believe or not and we can work to expose the sources of political ads so we can gauge credibility behind the information sources.

There were ads that played to people fears to help influence a vote. But I do agree with your first line.
I just think people are smarter than that and anybody whose vote was influenced by an ad they saw on Facebook is far and few in between. Plus, we have freedom of speech in this country. Anybody could have legally posted those ads. While it may not be legit for foreign governments to post those ads, I still don't think it is an end of the world scenario like some are making it out to be.
 
The left were sure Hillary would win, when the unfathomable happened and Trump won it was such a shock to their system its like they have PTSD. Then Trump openly mocked them and called them names, it was too much for the snowflakes to handle.
Ok, that may have happened to some... Wasn't my reality nor the reality of anybody that I personally know. But who gives a shit? Its been 9 months and you are still reveling in this over dramatized victory? Whats the point of statements like you just made? Grow up.

To rub salt in the left's wounds as punishment for 8 years of Obama.

I guess you right wingers love mediocrity and sorry governance because Obama was a great president.

Americans in 30 states chose not to continue Obama's policies, guess he wasn't that great.

No, more than 63 million Americans chose to continue Obamas polices and 60 million did not. Had Obama been able to run for a third term, he would have won in a landslide.

LOL your evidence that Obama would have won is that Trump actually won, brilliant! And congratulations Hillary won California, she scored a field goal while Trump made 4 touchdowns :laugh:
 
Thats how Trump has been trying to brand them. Fact is people have been skeptical of the media even before Trump, he is just going all in with the "Fake News" narrative so he can hide behind it when his bullshit gets exposed. And people like you are falling for it, hook line and sinker... I take everything that I hear from the media with a grain of salt, but in between the bias pundit analysis (which is being incorrectly called "fake news") there are facts, there are interviews, there are videos, speeches, statements, reporting on actual events. If you aren't able to discern your own truth and reality from new reports then that speaks volumes to your cognitive ability. But if you think you are getting it by only listening to Trump then that is even more pathetic. Can you admit that he is all smoke and mirrors, speaking more half truths and outright lies than any of the major media companies.

This is the liberal media's own doing, they have been lying, twisting, and spinning for decades now well its caught up to them. The boy who cried wolf lesson.
"liberal media" Try media dude... Both sides have been doing the exact same thing

The old 'both sides do it' deflection. Dude do you deny that the vast majority of media like 95% are not liberal? :eusa_hand:
I think it is the nature of media who thrive off ratings, advertising $$, and conflict. Whether it is liberal or conservative that is the nature of the business... And yes the majority of the media personalities lean liberal. There is a bias in the media that focus in opposition of Trump. Being overwhelmingly critical of the administration in power is not the same as FAKE. I'm actually fine with our media being critical of those in power. We don't need a bunch of Hannities kissing Trumps ass. Thats not real news either

Don't make the mistake of assuming most Americans are as well informed as you or I they are not. Most Americans are too busy with their jobs and families to pay much attention, the liberal media takes advantage of this. They spew twisted half truths which many Americans just assumed were true because they heard it on the news, they continue to spew the talking point until its debunked but by then its too late, they have fooled many Americans who will never read the retraction buried on page 29.

Trump has upset this scheme, we have a POTUS who finally calls the liberal media out on this crap and the American people have begun to question anything the liberal media reports now after discovering they were being lied to.

There is no liberal media. I'm not questioning anything after I hear what Trump says out of his own mouth. He does what he does, we see it or hear it, He then says he didn't do it and that the media is lying on him, then some of us are stupid enough to doubt the media like he tells you to.
 
Easy answer to that statement... Grow up

Hey now that Dem's have a lot of time on their hands, you know after losing the House, Senate, and White House they can focus on women's issues...oh wait WeinStein. :eusa_think: Dem's just can't catch a break lately.
Do you really think you are making an intelligent argument? Like a rich liberal hollywood donor has anything to do with people who fight for legislation that will help women? again, i'll say... grow up

Which one, it seems like some new liberal women abuser surfaces every other day. Rush commented this morning that now liberals are accusing Weinstein of being a racist because he never abused any black women, man the left have come unglued. :laugh:
You are talking about one dipshit. How in the world does that encompass an entire ideology comprised of millions of people? Does Trump access hollywood video or Oreilly's antics at Fox news represent the values of all conservatives? of course not.

Your side is the self appointed defender of women, Dem's have serious egg on their faces. The code of silence on Dem's abusing women has broken wide open and the most senior leaders in the Dem party including two presidents were pals with these people, ouch! lol
The "code" was broken by liberals and has been perpetuated by liberals. So this imaginary war that you think the "Right" is winning on this issue doesn't really exist. Liberals are just as quick if not quicker to expose and demonize these people that abuse women, no matter what their ideology
 
Trump plays the left like a fiddle
BBDF4989-F49B-4B26-AD87-1A59F8818750.gif
 
To rub salt in the left's wounds as punishment for 8 years of Obama.

I guess you right wingers love mediocrity and sorry governance because Obama was a great president.

Americans in 30 states chose not to continue Obama's policies, guess he wasn't that great.
They decided not to vote for Hillary... Saying it was all a rebuke of Obama is a stretch... He was elected for two terms and ended his presidency with a pretty high approval rate.

Tell Obama, he was the one who went on national TV and told the American people his policies and legacy was on the line.

No I'm telling you because you are silly enough to think Trump got the majority of the peoples vote when he didn't.

Trump won 30 states, do you understand what a majority is?
 
again - since no one cared until they lost - i question whether or not there *IS* a story.

but if we must look at russia, fine. look away and dig deep. ANY ONE AT ANY TIME having questionable dealings with them - bring 'em out and let's look. i will not subscribe to a 1 sided vendetta against 1 person that hides behind the guise of someone doing something wrong that as of yet we have zero physical evidence of it.

yet when we have it for the liberal side, deflect, diminish and deny.
Of course the dems jumped on the Russia story because it worked to their advantage. That doesn't mean there was nothing there. You can't deny that there were several lies and cover ups coming from the Trump campaign about this issue. Either they all lied and jeopardized their careers and credibility to cover for Trump and save him from bad press or there was more there. Thats being exposed and investigated. I agree it is way overblown. But im not naive enough to say that there is nothing going on.

I don't really know if we can say that actual foreign interference in our election is a small matter regardless of whether there was collusion or not.
The biggest threat would be hacking and changing votes. funding facebook ad campaigns I don't think warrants an act of war. We can be grown ups and decide what ads to believe or not and we can work to expose the sources of political ads so we can gauge credibility behind the information sources.

There were ads that played to people fears to help influence a vote. But I do agree with your first line.
I just think people are smarter than that and anybody whose vote was influenced by an ad they saw on Facebook is far and few in between. Plus, we have freedom of speech in this country. Anybody could have legally posted those ads. While it may not be legit for foreign governments to post those ads, I still don't think it is an end of the world scenario like some are making it out to be.

There are a lot of people who aren't. That's why Trump is the president,
 
Hey now that Dem's have a lot of time on their hands, you know after losing the House, Senate, and White House they can focus on women's issues...oh wait WeinStein. :eusa_think: Dem's just can't catch a break lately.
Do you really think you are making an intelligent argument? Like a rich liberal hollywood donor has anything to do with people who fight for legislation that will help women? again, i'll say... grow up

Which one, it seems like some new liberal women abuser surfaces every other day. Rush commented this morning that now liberals are accusing Weinstein of being a racist because he never abused any black women, man the left have come unglued. :laugh:
You are talking about one dipshit. How in the world does that encompass an entire ideology comprised of millions of people? Does Trump access hollywood video or Oreilly's antics at Fox news represent the values of all conservatives? of course not.

Your side is the self appointed defender of women, Dem's have serious egg on their faces. The code of silence on Dem's abusing women has broken wide open and the most senior leaders in the Dem party including two presidents were pals with these people, ouch! lol
The "code" was broken by liberals and has been perpetuated by liberals. So this imaginary war that you think the "Right" is winning on this issue doesn't really exist. Liberals are just as quick if not quicker to expose and demonize these people that abuse women, no matter what their ideology

It only took decades of powerful liberals forcing women to put out sexually to get jobs or keep from getting black listed before liberals finally took pity on women and exposed it. /sarcasm
 
I guess you right wingers love mediocrity and sorry governance because Obama was a great president.

Americans in 30 states chose not to continue Obama's policies, guess he wasn't that great.
They decided not to vote for Hillary... Saying it was all a rebuke of Obama is a stretch... He was elected for two terms and ended his presidency with a pretty high approval rate.

Tell Obama, he was the one who went on national TV and told the American people his policies and legacy was on the line.

No I'm telling you because you are silly enough to think Trump got the majority of the peoples vote when he didn't.

Trump won 30 states, do you understand what a majority is?

Yeah and since some of the states have fewer people than one city does in others, the majority equals the number of people in the united states who voted total, This means Trump did not get the majority of the votes of all America citizens who voted.
 
This is the liberal media's own doing, they have been lying, twisting, and spinning for decades now well its caught up to them. The boy who cried wolf lesson.
"liberal media" Try media dude... Both sides have been doing the exact same thing

The old 'both sides do it' deflection. Dude do you deny that the vast majority of media like 95% are not liberal? :eusa_hand:
I think it is the nature of media who thrive off ratings, advertising $$, and conflict. Whether it is liberal or conservative that is the nature of the business... And yes the majority of the media personalities lean liberal. There is a bias in the media that focus in opposition of Trump. Being overwhelmingly critical of the administration in power is not the same as FAKE. I'm actually fine with our media being critical of those in power. We don't need a bunch of Hannities kissing Trumps ass. Thats not real news either

Don't make the mistake of assuming most Americans are as well informed as you or I they are not. Most Americans are too busy with their jobs and families to pay much attention, the liberal media takes advantage of this. They spew twisted half truths which many Americans just assumed were true because they heard it on the news, they continue to spew the talking point until its debunked but by then its too late, they have fooled many Americans who will never read the retraction buried on page 29.

Trump has upset this scheme, we have a POTUS who finally calls the liberal media out on this crap and the American people have begun to question anything the liberal media reports now after discovering they were being lied to.
He does call the media out and he calls bureaucrats in Washington out which is a good thing... The problem is he calls all these people out while doing the same thing. He spreads more fake news than any media entity. and he hides behind the fake news label to dodge accountability for his actions. Please tell me you can see that.

Who is to blame for Trump becoming president? Yes the liberal media and Washington establishment. Don't fault Trump for the American people getting so fed up with the liberal media and DC establishment's BS that they voted for a guy like Trump. A fitting punishment imo.
 
Of course the dems jumped on the Russia story because it worked to their advantage. That doesn't mean there was nothing there. You can't deny that there were several lies and cover ups coming from the Trump campaign about this issue. Either they all lied and jeopardized their careers and credibility to cover for Trump and save him from bad press or there was more there. Thats being exposed and investigated. I agree it is way overblown. But im not naive enough to say that there is nothing going on.

I don't really know if we can say that actual foreign interference in our election is a small matter regardless of whether there was collusion or not.
The biggest threat would be hacking and changing votes. funding facebook ad campaigns I don't think warrants an act of war. We can be grown ups and decide what ads to believe or not and we can work to expose the sources of political ads so we can gauge credibility behind the information sources.

There were ads that played to people fears to help influence a vote. But I do agree with your first line.
I just think people are smarter than that and anybody whose vote was influenced by an ad they saw on Facebook is far and few in between. Plus, we have freedom of speech in this country. Anybody could have legally posted those ads. While it may not be legit for foreign governments to post those ads, I still don't think it is an end of the world scenario like some are making it out to be.

There are a lot of people who aren't. That's why Trump is the president,
If you think Trump is President because of 100k of Facebook ads placed by the Russians then you should look a little harder at the situation
 
Do you really think you are making an intelligent argument? Like a rich liberal hollywood donor has anything to do with people who fight for legislation that will help women? again, i'll say... grow up

Which one, it seems like some new liberal women abuser surfaces every other day. Rush commented this morning that now liberals are accusing Weinstein of being a racist because he never abused any black women, man the left have come unglued. :laugh:
You are talking about one dipshit. How in the world does that encompass an entire ideology comprised of millions of people? Does Trump access hollywood video or Oreilly's antics at Fox news represent the values of all conservatives? of course not.

Your side is the self appointed defender of women, Dem's have serious egg on their faces. The code of silence on Dem's abusing women has broken wide open and the most senior leaders in the Dem party including two presidents were pals with these people, ouch! lol
The "code" was broken by liberals and has been perpetuated by liberals. So this imaginary war that you think the "Right" is winning on this issue doesn't really exist. Liberals are just as quick if not quicker to expose and demonize these people that abuse women, no matter what their ideology

It only took decades of powerful liberals forcing women to put out sexually to get jobs or keep from getting black listed before liberals finally took pity on women and exposed it. /sarcasm

Is that what O'Rielly did? How about Roger Ailes.? Trump?
 
This is the liberal media's own doing, they have been lying, twisting, and spinning for decades now well its caught up to them. The boy who cried wolf lesson.
"liberal media" Try media dude... Both sides have been doing the exact same thing

The old 'both sides do it' deflection. Dude do you deny that the vast majority of media like 95% are not liberal? :eusa_hand:
I think it is the nature of media who thrive off ratings, advertising $$, and conflict. Whether it is liberal or conservative that is the nature of the business... And yes the majority of the media personalities lean liberal. There is a bias in the media that focus in opposition of Trump. Being overwhelmingly critical of the administration in power is not the same as FAKE. I'm actually fine with our media being critical of those in power. We don't need a bunch of Hannities kissing Trumps ass. Thats not real news either

Don't make the mistake of assuming most Americans are as well informed as you or I they are not. Most Americans are too busy with their jobs and families to pay much attention, the liberal media takes advantage of this. They spew twisted half truths which many Americans just assumed were true because they heard it on the news, they continue to spew the talking point until its debunked but by then its too late, they have fooled many Americans who will never read the retraction buried on page 29.

Trump has upset this scheme, we have a POTUS who finally calls the liberal media out on this crap and the American people have begun to question anything the liberal media reports now after discovering they were being lied to.

There is no liberal media.

Seek medical treatment immediately. :cuckoo:
 
Do you really think you are making an intelligent argument? Like a rich liberal hollywood donor has anything to do with people who fight for legislation that will help women? again, i'll say... grow up

Which one, it seems like some new liberal women abuser surfaces every other day. Rush commented this morning that now liberals are accusing Weinstein of being a racist because he never abused any black women, man the left have come unglued. :laugh:
You are talking about one dipshit. How in the world does that encompass an entire ideology comprised of millions of people? Does Trump access hollywood video or Oreilly's antics at Fox news represent the values of all conservatives? of course not.

Your side is the self appointed defender of women, Dem's have serious egg on their faces. The code of silence on Dem's abusing women has broken wide open and the most senior leaders in the Dem party including two presidents were pals with these people, ouch! lol
The "code" was broken by liberals and has been perpetuated by liberals. So this imaginary war that you think the "Right" is winning on this issue doesn't really exist. Liberals are just as quick if not quicker to expose and demonize these people that abuse women, no matter what their ideology

It only took decades of powerful liberals forcing women to put out sexually to get jobs or keep from getting black listed before liberals finally took pity on women and exposed it. /sarcasm
You’re right, the Lins should adopt the Fox News model. Real stand up people over there. Can we stop playing the partisan games now?
 
If you think Trump is President because of 100k of Facebook ads placed by the Russians then you should look a little harder at the situation
If you think Trump lost the popular vote by 10 million overall because of Immigrants voting you need to look a little harder at the situation
 

Forum List

Back
Top