I do and that was unconstitutional as well.
It was not unconstitutional. It has never been declared unconstitutional.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do and that was unconstitutional as well.
That's why when we discover Mexican illegals here we call up Mexico for them to send people over to deal with it. Logic!NEGATIVE….illegal trespassers are subject to the nation of which they have citizenship.
Sorry Humberto….here’s more free enlightenment for you.
If people are here illegally, their children should not automatically be citizens simply because they are born here. That is crazy.Anyone in the US is subject to its jurisdiction, unless via treaty as an ambassador, and even then are subject to the jurisdiction, but can have no action against them.
Else you couldn't arrest aliens who commit crimes here.
2020 was not a low turn out…in fact it was a record turn out at the time
It's not unconstitutional though, Snowflake.If people are here illegally, their children should not be citizens simply because they are born here. That is crazy.
Agree. You should also respect the intent of those words. Your problem is the same problem most leftists have. You twist the word's intent to fit your beliefs.I care about the words of the Constitution, those are what are important. Everything else is just opinion.
2016 was not. That is why Trump won states like Michigan and Pennsylvania.
The Comanche certainly agree with you.If people are here illegally, their children should not automatically be citizens simply because they are born here. That is crazy.
Hillary lost to Sanders in Michigan and Wisconsin. She lost to Trump in Michigan, and Wisconsin. She had to win Philadelphia by a large margin. She ignored Pennsylvania for California.
That's why she lost.
By whom?If you can read plain English, it is being interpreted correctly.
What are you talking about? Be specific.The Comanche certainly agree with you.
Then pass an AmendmentIf people are here illegally, their children should not automatically be citizens simply because they are born here. That is crazy.
Even obama himself said it was, DERPIt was not unconstitutional. It has never been declared unconstitutional.
Agree. You should also respect the intent of those words. Your problem is the same problem most leftists have. You twist the word's intent to fit your beliefs.
We are not overpopulated. When baby boomers die, we will be under populated. That will include even higher skill jobs. Generally the first generation of immigrants have low skills however succeeding generations generally have higher skill sets.
Keeping illegals in Mexico more than paid for the wall.It doesn't work that way but the gullible will eat it up.
Then he will make Mexico pay for the wall.................
What are you talkingEven obama himself said it was, DERP
The Constitution doesnt give the Executive branch the power to enact Naturalization laws. Those are left to Congress.
Michigan is a open primary state. I think a lot of Democrat turned out and voted for Trump. The turnout was low in each of these states and Clinton did not have a good ground game.
Funny how you think plain English can be reinterpreted.I take the words at their face value.
You are the one that is stuck on trying to assume intent.
What this does is open up the same Amendments for future reinterpretation based on a new opinion of what the intent was.
You will be the one squealing like a stuck pig when a future SCOTUS reinterprets the 2nd based on their view of the intent.
They explicitly agreed with you.What are you talking about? Be specific.