Trump proven right--------again

[Redfish]

not yet. just pointing out that what he said is legal and has been done before by a democrat president.

Funny, I don't hear any whining from you libs about what Carter did, why is that?

and I dont hear anything from any of you RW's patting Reagan on the back for allowing refugees in the country either. Sad, not funny.

No one objects to legal immigration. All we expect is that immigrants follow our laws and are properly vetted by the government before being allowed in this country.

This is a public safety issue, not an immigration issue.

Reagan took care of the illegal aliens too.

Reagan is dead. The situation today is quite different. Reagan did not have Islamic terrorists to deal with.

I don't understand why you libs want to say that if Reagan did something, that makes it right. I thought you hated Reagan.

nah, Ronald didn't have a care in the world about Iran.

RWs confuse anyone that has a different opinion than they do as a LIB. They'll never understand people disagree with them because they're MORONS.

well we agree on one thing-----------you are a moron

 

[HappyJoy]

Not really. There are specific classes listed in the code, religion is not one of them.

Ok, then lets use "arab looking". you are splitting hairs and missing the point.

That's not a class either.

ok then you pick one. Syrian, Arabic speaking, goat loving, camel piss drinking, wife beating, sharia believers, murdering bastards.

your idiocy mandates absurdity.

Bigotry isn't a valid reason to limit immigration.

no, but religion based mass murder is a valid reason.

Once more with the grape analogy. If you have a bowl of 500 grapes and you know that 20 of them contain poison that will kill you, would just grab a handful and eat them?

You cited a law that has very specific criteria for what a "class" of immigrant is as somehow proving Trump correct. Yet, religion is not one of those classes. So, my answer to you is, I don't like grapes.

 

[Redfish]

the point is that it gives the president authority to make that decision.

Most of the European countries are wishing that their leaders had such authority and had exercised it.

Not really. There are specific classes listed in the code, religion is not one of them.

Ok, then lets use "arab looking". you are splitting hairs and missing the point.

That's not a class either.

ok then you pick one. Syrian, Arabic speaking, goat loving, camel piss drinking, wife beating, sharia believers, murdering bastards.

your idiocy mandates absurdity.

normal people would be embarrassed to express that type of bigotry.

amazing what anonymity allows ugly people to say.

I did not say that all muslims fit any of those descriptions. But some do and we have no way of sorting them out until they kill innocent americans---------------some of which will be liberal fools like you.

 

[Redfish]

Ok, then lets use "arab looking". you are splitting hairs and missing the point.

That's not a class either.

ok then you pick one. Syrian, Arabic speaking, goat loving, camel piss drinking, wife beating, sharia believers, murdering bastards.

your idiocy mandates absurdity.

Bigotry isn't a valid reason to limit immigration.

no, but religion based mass murder is a valid reason.

Once more with the grape analogy. If you have a bowl of 500 grapes and you know that 20 of them contain poison that will kill you, would just grab a handful and eat them?

You cited a law that has very specific criteria for what a "class" of immigrant is as somehow proving Trump correct. Yet, religion is not one of those classes. So, my answer to you is, I don't like grapes.

funny, I thought you were one of the posters who called muslim a race, not a religion.

which is it?

 

[HappyJoy]

Not really. There are specific classes listed in the code, religion is not one of them.

Ok, then lets use "arab looking". you are splitting hairs and missing the point.

That's not a class either.

ok then you pick one. Syrian, Arabic speaking, goat loving, camel piss drinking, wife beating, sharia believers, murdering bastards.

your idiocy mandates absurdity.

normal people would be embarrassed to express that type of bigotry.

amazing what anonymity allows ugly people to say.

I did not say that all muslims fit any of those descriptions. But some do and we have no way of sorting them out until they kill innocent americans---------------some of which will be liberal fools like you.

So, what you are really saying is you can't ban immigration based on religion and therefore Trump really is not correct at all.

 

[HappyJoy]

That's not a class either.

ok then you pick one. Syrian, Arabic speaking, goat loving, camel piss drinking, wife beating, sharia believers, murdering bastards.

your idiocy mandates absurdity.

Bigotry isn't a valid reason to limit immigration.

no, but religion based mass murder is a valid reason.

Once more with the grape analogy. If you have a bowl of 500 grapes and you know that 20 of them contain poison that will kill you, would just grab a handful and eat them?

You cited a law that has very specific criteria for what a "class" of immigrant is as somehow proving Trump correct. Yet, religion is not one of those classes. So, my answer to you is, I don't like grapes.

funny, I thought you were one of the posters who called muslim a race, not a religion.

which is it?

Did I? I don't think so. But for what it's worth, race isn't a class of immigrant according to the law you are talking about either.

 

[deltex1]

Here is number eight US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens. This law was written
in 1952. It was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, House and Senate,
and signed by a Democrat president.
"Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever
the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens
into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United
States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall
deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as
immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any
restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
All of the pundits that are claiming that what Trump said is dumb, stupid,
reckless, dangerous, and/or unconstitutional, need to educate themselves. It
is already the law of the land. And it was utilized by Jimmy Carter, no
less, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States, but he actually did
more. He made all Iranian students already here check in, and then he
deported a bunch. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas,
15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the United States, 1979. You probably
won't hear of this from our mainstream media (nor from our
narcissist-in-chief), but those are the facts.

pssssssssssst

Trump isn't the POTUS. He's not even a nominee for the next General election for POTUS.. but those are the facts.

I see Siete fumbled the topic..............again.

 

[jillian]

Here is number eight US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens. This law was written
in 1952. It was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, House and Senate,
and signed by a Democrat president.
"Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever
the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens
into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United
States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall
deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as
immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any
restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
All of the pundits that are claiming that what Trump said is dumb, stupid,
reckless, dangerous, and/or unconstitutional, need to educate themselves. It
is already the law of the land. And it was utilized by Jimmy Carter, no
less, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States, but he actually did
more. He made all Iranian students already here check in, and then he
deported a bunch. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas,
15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the United States, 1979. You probably
won't hear of this from our mainstream media (nor from our
narcissist-in-chief), but those are the facts.

pssssssssssst

Trump isn't the POTUS. He's not even a nominee for the next General election for POTUS.. but those are the facts.

I see Siete fumbled the topic..............again.

hahahahahahaha

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

and I dont hear anything from any of you RW's patting Reagan on the back for allowing refugees in the country either. Sad, not funny.

No one objects to legal immigration. All we expect is that immigrants follow our laws and are properly vetted by the government before being allowed in this country.

This is a public safety issue, not an immigration issue.

Reagan took care of the illegal aliens too.

Reagan is dead. The situation today is quite different. Reagan did not have Islamic terrorists to deal with.

I don't understand why you libs want to say that if Reagan did something, that makes it right. I thought you hated Reagan.

nah, Ronald didn't have a care in the world about Iran.

RWs confuse anyone that has a different opinion than they do as a LIB. They'll never understand people disagree with them because they're MORONS.

well we agree on one thing-----------you are a moron

Given the fact your ridiculous thread has crashed and burned, you're in no position to accuse others of being 'morons.'

 

[frigidweirdo]

Here is number eight US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens. This law was written
in 1952. It was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, House and Senate,
and signed by a Democrat president.
"Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever
the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens
into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United
States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall
deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as
immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any
restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
All of the pundits that are claiming that what Trump said is dumb, stupid,
reckless, dangerous, and/or unconstitutional, need to educate themselves. It
is already the law of the land. And it was utilized by Jimmy Carter, no
less, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States, but he actually did
more. He made all Iranian students already here check in, and then he
deported a bunch. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas,
15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the United States, 1979. You probably
won't hear of this from our mainstream media (nor from our
narcissist-in-chief), but those are the facts.

Except you've forgotten that the point isn't whether the US can stop individuals from entering the US, it's about whether to actively go out and cause hatred.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Here is number eight US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens. This law was written
in 1952. It was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, House and Senate,
and signed by a Democrat president.
"Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever
the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens
into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United
States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall
deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as
immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any
restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
All of the pundits that are claiming that what Trump said is dumb, stupid,
reckless, dangerous, and/or unconstitutional, need to educate themselves. It
is already the law of the land. And it was utilized by Jimmy Carter, no
less, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States, but he actually did
more. He made all Iranian students already here check in, and then he
deported a bunch. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas,
15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the United States, 1979. You probably
won't hear of this from our mainstream media (nor from our
narcissist-in-chief), but those are the facts.

pssssssssssst

Trump isn't the POTUS. He's not even a nominee for the next General election for POTUS.. but those are the facts.

not yet. just pointing out that what he said is legal and has been done before by a democrat president.

Funny, I don't hear any whining from you libs about what Carter did, why is that?

and I dont hear anything from any of you RW's patting Reagan on the back for allowing refugees in the country either. Sad, not funny.

No one objects to legal immigration. All we expect is that immigrants follow our laws and are properly vetted by the government before being allowed in this country.

This is a public safety issue, not an immigration issue.

But then Trump wants to stop people from entering the country who will follow the laws and would pass any vetting too.

 

[Missourian]

But then Trump wants to stop people from entering the country who will follow the laws and would pass any vetting too.

Link?

 

[frigidweirdo]

But then Trump wants to stop people from entering the country who will follow the laws and would pass any vetting too.

Link?

I'm sure you can find one.

 

[Missourian]

Link?

I'm sure you can find one.

Truth in advertising laws require me to post the following disclaimer.

You are full of shit.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Link?

I'm sure you can find one.

Truth in advertising laws require me to post the following disclaimer.

You are full of shit.

Not at all. I spend a lot of time on here and back things up, only to be debating with people who won't bother to source what they're saying. Then these very same people are the people demanding I source everything and anything I write, even things which are pretty obvious.

It's more I can't be bothered.

 

[Missourian]

Link?

I'm sure you can find one.

Truth in advertising laws require me to post the following disclaimer.

You are full of shit.

Not at all. I spend a lot of time on here and back things up, only to be debating with people who won't bother to source what they're saying. Then these very same people are the people demanding I source everything and anything I write, even things which are pretty obvious.

It's more I can't be bothered.

That was a lot of effort typing all that. Much more than it would have taken to back up your assertion.

Let me put it in a way even you can understand.

Link...or you're full of shit. Either/or. No grey area.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Link?

I'm sure you can find one.

Truth in advertising laws require me to post the following disclaimer.

You are full of shit.

Not at all. I spend a lot of time on here and back things up, only to be debating with people who won't bother to source what they're saying. Then these very same people are the people demanding I source everything and anything I write, even things which are pretty obvious.

It's more I can't be bothered.

That was a lot of effort typing all that. Much more than it would have taken to back up your assertion.

Let me put it in a way even you can understand.

Link...or you're full of shit. Either/or. No grey area.

Fine, you can think I'm full of shit, doesn't bother me.

 

[Missourian]

Link?

I'm sure you can find one.

Truth in advertising laws require me to post the following disclaimer.

You are full of shit.

Not at all. I spend a lot of time on here and back things up, only to be debating with people who won't bother to source what they're saying. Then these very same people are the people demanding I source everything and anything I write, even things which are pretty obvious.

It's more I can't be bothered.

That was a lot of effort typing all that. Much more than it would have taken to back up your assertion.

Let me put it in a way even you can understand.

Link...or you're full of shit. Either/or. No grey area.

Fine, you can think I'm full of shit, doesn't bother me.

I think you are full of shit because you are full of shit. Thanks for playing...here is your wonderful consolation prize.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I'm sure you can find one.

Truth in advertising laws require me to post the following disclaimer.

You are full of shit.

Not at all. I spend a lot of time on here and back things up, only to be debating with people who won't bother to source what they're saying. Then these very same people are the people demanding I source everything and anything I write, even things which are pretty obvious.

It's more I can't be bothered.

That was a lot of effort typing all that. Much more than it would have taken to back up your assertion.

Let me put it in a way even you can understand.

Link...or you're full of shit. Either/or. No grey area.

Fine, you can think I'm full of shit, doesn't bother me.

I think you are full of shit because you are full of shit. Thanks for playing...here is your wonderful consolation prize.

Consistent with many Trump supporters, you don't need evidence for your insults, but you "know" you're right about EVERYTHING.

 

[Redfish]

Here is number eight US Code 1182, inadmissible aliens. This law was written
in 1952. It was passed by a Democrat-controlled Congress, House and Senate,
and signed by a Democrat president.
"Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by president. Whenever
the president finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens
into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United
States, the president may, by proclamation, and for such period as he shall
deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as
immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose on the entry of aliens any
restrictions he may deem to be appropriate."
All of the pundits that are claiming that what Trump said is dumb, stupid,
reckless, dangerous, and/or unconstitutional, need to educate themselves. It
is already the law of the land. And it was utilized by Jimmy Carter, no
less, in 1979 to keep Iranians out of the United States, but he actually did
more. He made all Iranian students already here check in, and then he
deported a bunch. Seven thousand were found in violation of their visas,
15,000 Iranians were forced to leave the United States, 1979. You probably
won't hear of this from our mainstream media (nor from our
narcissist-in-chief), but those are the facts.

Except you've forgotten that the point isn't whether the US can stop individuals from entering the US, it's about whether to actively go out and cause hatred.

please explain how enforcing our immigration laws "causes hatred".

But I will tell you that I hate anyone who will come into this country and kill innocent americans in that name of their religion. Now, which religion does that? Christians? Hindus? Buddhists? Shintos? Atheists? NO, Muslims and only muslims do that.