GWV5903
Gold Member
Zero convictionsTry to keep up here ok.
4 separate indictments containing a total of 91 felony charges.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Zero convictionsTry to keep up here ok.
4 separate indictments containing a total of 91 felony charges.
Don't let me hear you cry about rich people being above the law or draining the swamp while at the same time defending the worst swamp creature.Zero convictions
So no link.He should have been convicted by the Senate after he was impeached for it but Mitch said he was no longer president. If Mitch would have convicted Trump of this would you have accepted that?
Mitch McConnell backed down from voting to convict Trump of inciting an insurrection because he 'didn't get to be leader by voting with 5 people in the conference,' book says. McConnell was ready to vote to convict Trump of inciting the Capitol riot, a forthcoming book says.
"If this isn't impeachable, I don't know what is," he told two longtime advisors over a Chick-fil-A lunch in Kentucky on January 10, 2021, the book says.
McConnell also believed, it adds, that a conviction vote for Trump would be bipartisan and that it may even be enough to bar Trump from holding public office again.
McConnell ultimately voted against convicting Trump on February 13, 2021, despite blaming him for the attack.
"There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day," McConnell said on the Senate floor that day. "The people who stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president.
In that same speech, McConnell repeated the very same argument put forward by his Republican colleagues — that a former president cannot and should not face conviction from the Senate.
"If President Trump were still in office, I would have carefully considered whether the House managers proved their specific charge," he said. "But in this case, that question is moot. Because former President Trump is constitutionally not eligible for conviction."
Even Mitch agrees with us.
I know you’re such a choirboy, next you’ll start defending Hunter as a board member of BurismaDon't let me hear you cry about rich people being above the law or draining the swamp while at the same time defending the worst swamp creature.
I was just going to bring him up. You guys claim white privilege doesn't exist but there it is smacking you in the face. It's kind of hard when Trump and his kids are playing the same game.I know you’re such a choirboy, next you’ll start defending Hunter as a board member of Burisma
Won't make a bit of difference to you MAGAt Trumptards even WHEN he is officially convicted.Zero convictions
Not guilty. It's still America, despite the efforts of you fascist Dimwingers.Won't make a bit of difference to you MAGAt Trumptards even WHEN he is officially convicted.
You'll just move the goalpost again and continue making excuses for the convicted felon.
So....yeah....he's guilty.
We are just awaiting the trials and the official sentencing.
Pass the popcorn please.
Or we want the Supreme Court to go on record defending his bad behavior.Won't make a bit of difference to you MAGAt Trumptards even WHEN he is officially convicted.
You'll just move the goalpost again and continue making excuses for the convicted felon.
So....yeah....he's guilty.
We are just awaiting the trials and the official sentencing.
Pass the popcorn please.
After looking at the evidence against him yourself, do you honestly believe he'll be found not guilty?Not guilty. It's still America, despite the efforts of you fascist Dimwingers.
Just can’t stop being a fuckup eh nostra.Link us up to him being found guilty in a court of law for "crimes against democracy", Simp.
That is your claim.
So you have no link either, huh vermin?Just can’t stop being a fuckup eh nostra.
I have no doubt a jury pool that is 95% Dimwinger will convict, and it will be overturned when it gets to a real court, Simp.After looking at the evidence against him yourself, do you honestly believe he'll be found not guilty?
J6So you have no link either, huh vermin?
So you've seen the DOJ's evidence?He is guilty
Only defense that will matter will be the one presented in court.Pretty funny though watching you MAGAt Trumptard's evolving defenses and explanations for your orange cat turd king though.
IIRC, the 'book' from the Civil War.Oh it's based in law. We're doing it by the book.
The same should have applied to Bill Clinton, a sitting president. You'll never get a bipartisan vote to convict unless the guy did something egregious.....big time.He should have been convicted by the Senate after he was impeached for it but Mitch said he was no longer president.
Just like all the other Senate votes to convict.....LOLMcConnell ultimately voted against convicting Trump on February 13, 2021, despite blaming him for the attack.
Benny Thompson destroyed all the evidence.
You have a problem with a book written during the Civil War but hang your hat on the Constitution?So you've seen the DOJ's evidence?
Only defense that will matter will be the one presented in court.
IIRC, the 'book' from the Civil War.
The same should have applied to Bill Clinton, a sitting president. You'll never get a bipartisan vote to convict unless the guy did something egregious.....big time.
Just like all the other Senate votes to convict.....LOL
Yea but not because he wasn't guilty. They said "he wasn't president anymore. If he was we'd have some balls and convict him. But he's not so I don't have to. This way I don't piss off his supporters""So you've seen the DOJ's evidence?
Only defense that will matter will be the one presented in court.
IIRC, the 'book' from the Civil War.
The same should have applied to Bill Clinton, a sitting president. You'll never get a bipartisan vote to convict unless the guy did something egregious.....big time.
Just like all the other Senate votes to convict.....LOL
That does not matter. Your TDS crowd are the ones filing to have Trump removed from ballots, not Smith or Willis.....that get by you?The SCOTUS will probably not rule on the insurrection question....since that isn't even language used in Jack Smith's indictments or Fanni Willis'.