Trump Says He Will Be Filing a “Major Motion” Soon in Response to FBI Raid on Mar-a-Lago

[Nostra]

Judicial.

Moron.

 

[pknopp]

Hillary was investigated, but Comey said that no prosecutor would charge her with a crime. Remember that, dumbass?

No, he said that if it had been almost anyone else other than Hillary they would have likely been charged with a crime.

 

[CowboyTed]

Hillary was investigated, but Comey said that no prosecutor would charge her with a crime. Remember that, dumbass?

Yes I know...

There was enough evidence of a crime...

So what are Trumpster bringing it up every chance they can get... They bring up Hillary continuously....

Trump could always have assigned a prosecutor who would have charged her..

 

[pknopp]

Yes I know...

There was enough evidence of a crime...

So what are Trumpster bringing it up every chance they can get... They bring up Hillary continuously....

Trump could always have assigned a prosecutor who would have charged her..

It is what he ran on doing. He even stated it to her in the debates.

 

[CowboyTed]

No, he said that if it had been almost anyone else other than Hillary they would have likely been charged with a crime.

Trump could have assigned a a prosecutor in the morning...

That is how simple it would have been...

It was a made up. If they prosecuted it was a pretty simple defense, her two predecessors used private servers..

Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice used private accounts for classified emails

Hillary Clinton’s campaign has seized on findings that Rice and Powell were sent sensitive national security information to nongovernment email addresses

www.theguardian.com

This would suggest common practice set up by predecessors.. So you want a judge to convict Hillary for something others are doing as well...

No way you getting a conviction for that...

 

[pknopp]

Trump could have assigned a a prosecutor in the morning...

That is how simple it would have been...

It was a made up. If they prosecuted it was a pretty simple defense, her two predecessors used private servers..

Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice used private accounts for classified emails

Hillary Clinton’s campaign has seized on findings that Rice and Powell were sent sensitive national security information to nongovernment email addresses

www.theguardian.com

This would suggest common practice set up by predecessors.. So you want a judge to convict Hillary for something others are doing as well...

No way you getting a conviction for that...

It wasn't the same thing that Hillary did (for one they never destroyed anything) but prosecute them also if what they did was illegal.

 

[CowboyTed]

It wasn't the same thing that Hillary did (for one they never destroyed anything) but prosecute them also if what they did was illegal.

Totally agree with you... No one is above the law.

I think some people are so happy with there leaders acting above the law they presume the other side must be doing it as well... They still think Hillary is some master criminal (while also being too stupid to run government) when they have no evidence... All these crimes and not a shred of evidence... So they invent stories why they are right rather than admit they have been fooled..

 

[pknopp]

Totally agree with you... No one is above the law.

I think some people are so happy with there leaders acting above the law they presume the other side must be doing it as well... They still think Hillary is some master criminal (while also being too stupid to run government) when they have no evidence... All these crimes and not a shred of evidence... So they invent stories why they are right rather than admit they have been fooled..

Destroying evidence is a criminal act.

 

[Marener]

Destroying evidence is a criminal act.

The FBI tried that angle and it didn’t work out. Clinton didn’t delete the emails and when she did tell them to delete the emails, there was no investigation.

 

[pknopp]

The FBI tried that angle and it didn’t work out. Clinton didn’t delete the emails and when she did tell them to delete the emails, there was no investigation.

Hillary could have shot someone in Times Square and got out of any charges. Trump seems to have misappropriated his statement.

 

[Marener]

Hillary could have shot someone in Times Square and got out of any charges. Trump seems to have misappropriated his statement.

Or someone was shot on 5th avenue and conservatives say it was Clinton and refuse to believe any facts to the contrary.

Then they get mad because Clinton isn’t prosecuted for a crime that was investigated and not warranted.

 

[struth]

It wasn't the same thing that Hillary did (for one they never destroyed anything) but prosecute them also if what they did was illegal.

The FBI reports say she did destroy emails: FBI report: Platte River Network employee used BleachBit to delete old Clinton e-mails

FBI report: Platte River Network employee used BleachBit to delete old Clinton e-mails
According to the FBI documents, in December 2014, former chief of staff Cheryl Mills told a Platte River employee that Clinton no longer needed access to e-mails older than 60 days. She also instructed the person modify the e-mail retention policy on Clinton’s server to reflect this change. An unknown Clinton staff member said “sh/e did not want the .PST file after the export and wanted it removed from the PRN server.” But the Platte River employee didn’t delete the files or make the retention-policy change until four months later.
...
BleachBit is software that scrubs a file out of existence to “prevent recovery” and “hide traces of files deleted by other applications,” according to Bleachbit.org’s site

 

[pknopp]

Or someone was shot on 5th avenue and conservatives say it was Clinton and refuse to believe any facts to the contrary.

I can't speak for whoever it is you are noting.

Then they get mad because Clinton isn’t prosecuted for a crime that was investigated and not warranted.

It was warranted. Destroying evidence is a crime.

 

[Marener]

I can't speak for whoever it is you are noting.

It was warranted. Destroying evidence is a crime.

The facts don’t line up with your allegation.

 

[eagle1462010]

The president has to TAKE CARE of the Law of the land.... Look up the TAKE CARE CLAUSE of the constitution......no president is above the Law. The presidential records act, under the law, requires the president, to turn over all records in the whitehouse and on his personal phones, that involved him being president, and not personal messages involving going to exercising class with his daughter....the law, is spelled out.

This is NOT as Richard Nixon always claimed...if the President does it, then it is not illegal....that was shot down Constitutionally, long ago!

Your case is actually about personal items and emails of the president....there are laws that define what is a personal item and not a government item, that Presidents are suppose to follow....for each individual document.

There are items that are government items that are very personal to our presidents... In that case, there are also laws that govern this... The president is suppose to present to the archives the original govt item where they want to keep the original....like Kim j Un's letter......in those cases the National Archives may allow a president to keep the government item, once they make a copy, for their records.

Trump is NOT following the Take Care Clause to follow ALL the Laws of the United States!

Tell that to Biden and the DNC who ignore our laws on the border every day.

 

[CowboyTed]

Tell that to Biden and the DNC who ignore our laws on the border every day.

First, he is not breaking the law... Concentrating on enforcing some laws over another is his choice...

By the way could you tell us what laws he isn't enforcing...

If the people who come to the border are looking for Asylum, do you know what the US government is meant to do?

 

[bodecea]

The case still says the president has the unquestionable ability to decide what is personal and what is not.

.

Not true....MAGA,-liars

 

[bodecea]

He stole stuff from work and was repeatedly asked to give it back...

His lawyers said it was all back.

They got information it wasn't and they went in to get it... Guess what! There was US people's property there...

How do you think this would have worked if you stole shit from work?

MAGA-CULTISTS believe their orange godlet is above the law.

 

[AsherN]

Do not tell me you're going to claim Maralago is a "public" place. That's nuts even for you

There are different definition of a public space. I the broadest sense, it is a place that is accessible non-exclusively by persons. In a place like MAL, it means any place not marked private or any room not occupied by a guest. The the property is a private club does not matter. It simply shifts the definition of public from anybody to any member of the club.

 

[Clipper]

The President has sole and complete authority to deem any document his personal property.

The only "motion" that Trump is going to engage in is moving his right hand up & down.