Trump supporters: If Trump broke the law, should he be held legally accountable?

Senate Judiciary what? Lol. Well it is partisan when you idiots are in control. That's the god damn problem
The Senate judiciary committee report.
The FBI did to the Senate Intelligence Committee what the Department of Justice and FBI had previously done to the FISA Court: mischaracterize, mislead and lie. The characterizations regarding the dossier were completely out of touch with reality in terms of what the Russian sub-source actually said to the FBI.
 
Anyone who thinks that a FISA warrant on a nobody with noted ties to Russia in any way equates to a warrant on a former President is a liar or an imbecile… or both
 
Nope, it was already proven a lie and the entire Russian collusion was a lie. The current grifter in office is mad that the ukraine pig trough is being closed down.
It’s FACT that Manafort gave internal polling data to a Russian agent he had worked with for years
 
Anyone who thinks that a FISA warrant on a nobody with noted ties to Russia in any way equates to a warrant on a former President is a liar or an imbecile… or both
Wait, was this the guy whose noted ties to Russia were due to his working secretly for the CIA, and that the FBI lied about doing that?

If the FBI has a warrant to spy on a guy near the president, it effectively has permission to spy on the president. They lied to get exactly that.

Keep saying that they didn't lie. It makes me laugh.
 
Wait, was this the guy whose noted ties to Russia were due to his working secretly for the CIA, and that the FBI lied about doing that?

If the FBI has a warrant to spy on a guy near the president, it effectively has permission to spy on the president. They lied to get exactly that.

Keep saying that they didn't lie. It makes me laugh.
No.
 
Dems just don't get it. We're so sick of RINOs like Romney, McCain, Kinzinger, and Cheney. In Trump we finally have a real Republican to stand up for us.
 
Oh, it wasn't the guy that they FBI altered an email to say that he did not work for U.S. intelligence when it originally said that he did? The guy they wanted a FISA warrant on, so they could spy on Trump?

You sure?
 
We need to trust the legal system or we don’t need to follow the law?

Lotta black folks don’t trust the system. Should laws not apply to them?
Our legal system is based on the premise of "Equal Justice", Lesh! When you lose that...the system fails.
 
Oh, it wasn't the guy that they FBI altered an email to say that he did not work for U.S. intelligence when it originally said that he did? The guy they wanted a FISA warrant on, so they could spy on Trump?

You sure?
What are you babbling about? Page had been investigated back in 2013 for trying to work with Russian agents.

THEY thought he was too dumb to use
 
Our legal system is based on the premise of "Equal Justice", Lesh! When you lose that...the system fails.
As noted...lotsa folks don't see that equal justice.

Does that mean they can ignore the law?

What's "unequal" here?
 
Oh, it wasn't the guy that they FBI altered an email to say that he did not work for U.S. intelligence when it originally said that he did? The guy they wanted a FISA warrant on, so they could spy on Trump?

You sure?
How do you spy on Trump using a guy who no longer works for him?
 
What are you babbling about? Page had been investigated back in 2013 for trying to work with Russian agents.

THEY thought he was too dumb to use
Oh, so you are not talking about "Individual # 1?"

Prior to the submission of the fourth FISA application, and after Individual #1 stated publicly that he/she had assisted the U.S. government in the past, an FBI Supervisory Special Agent (“SSA”) asked Clinesmith to inquire with the OGA as to whether Individual #1 had ever been a “source” for the OGA. On June 15, 2017, Clinesmith sent an email to a liaison at the OGA (“OGA Liaison”) seeking clarification as to whether Individual #1 was an OGA source, and the OGA Liaison responded via email to Clinesmith.

On June 19, 2017, Clinesmith altered the email he received from the OGA Liaison by adding the words “not a source,” and then forwarded the email to the FBI SSA. Relying on the altered email, on June 29, 2017, the SSA signed and submitted the fourth FISA application to the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The application did not include Individual #1’s history or status with the OGA.


 
Last edited:
Fine, let's see if you are on the same page when the gop investigations start next year and the assholes you shill for are being put under the microscope.

Pepperidge Farms will remember.
Like those who Lied before Congress.Like National Intelligence Dir. James Clapper.
Like CIA's John Brennan.Like FBI's James Comey.
Or how Lois Lerner behaved when subpoena'd to appear in court.
She took the Fifth.But not before reading a written statement.
Or the best example of priviledge.Hillary's refusal to hand over
33,000 E-mails.Instead she bleached records and broke her blackberry{s}.
 
Oh, so you are not talking about "Individual # 1?"

Prior to the submission of the fourth FISA application, and after Individual #1 stated publicly that he/she had assisted the U.S. government in the past, an FBI Supervisory Special Agent (“SSA”) asked Clinesmith to inquire with the OGA as to whether Individual #1 had ever been a “source” for the OGA. On June 15, 2017, Clinesmith sent an email to a liaison at the OGA (“OGA Liaison”) seeking clarification as to whether Individual #1 was an OGA source, and the OGA Liaison responded via email to Clinesmith. On June 19, 2017, Clinesmith altered the email he received from the OGA Liaison by adding the words “not a source,” and then forwarded the email to the FBI SSA. Relying on the altered email, on June 29, 2017, the SSA signed and submitted the fourth FISA application to the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. The application did not include Individual #1’s history or status with the OGA.

A. He ONLY added "not a source". There is no accusation that he altered any other part...ie. he did not CHANGE "was a source..." We don't know what the reply said. Only that he took it upon himself to ADD "not a source"

B. The FISA warrant would still likely been granted since being a source or not...years prior had no bearing on what "Individual 1" was doing currently
 

Forum List

Back
Top