Trump supporters: What do you think of this information?

[LeftofLeft]

The attack on the Capitol lasted 187 minutes. Trump is guilty.

Guilty of what? Negligence? Nan Pelosi is not far behind. If all things point to Trump being guilty, then why did the Democrats structure the January 6th Committee with Republicans having no say, no cross examination, and Nancy Pelosi being off limits? This made the January 6 Committee less than credible.

Trump is done. It’s time to move on. As for the Capitol, it was a riot that was brought under control and the Election was certified after sun down.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yea, but without all the bombast of Trump. He'll be just like every other boring Republican.

DeSantis is just as dishonest and as much a liar as Trump – and just as reprehensible.

Like Trump, DeSantis would run a campaign based on white grievance politics, racist replacement theory, anti-immigrant nativism, fearmongering and lies about ‘CRT,’ ‘woke,’ and the country being ‘taken away’ from ‘real Americans.’

 

[Flash]

Potatohead supporters.

What do you think of the fact that we have massive inflation?

What do you think of declining family income?

What do you think of gas at the pump being too expensive for many working families?

What do you think of the Democrats stealing the 2020 election?

What do you think of the Democrats using our taxpayer's money to pay off Democrat special interest groups?

What do you think of the millions of Illegals flooding across the border?

What do you think of our near recession economy?

What do you think of nobody wanting to join Potatohead's woke military?

What do you think of that Ho joke of a VP?

What do you think of the corruption of the Biden family selling out to foreign interest?

What do you think of our massive failure in Afghanistan?

What do you think of the very low approval rate of the senile incompetent joke of a President?

Everything is either Trump's or Putin's fault, right?

 

[Mac1958]

Potatohead supporters.

What do you think of the fact that we have massive inflation?

What do you think of declining family income?

What do you think of gas at the pump being too expensive for many working families?

What do you think of the Democrats stealing the 2020 election?

What do you think of the Democrats using our taxpayer's money to pay off Democrat special interest groups?

What do you think of the millions of Illegals flooding across the border?

What do you think of our near recession economy?

What do you think of nobody wanting to join Potatohead's woke military?

What do you think of that Ho joke of a VP?

What do you think of the corruption of the Biden family selling out to foreign interest?

What do you think of our massive failure in Afghanistan?

What do you think of the very low approval rate of the senile incompetent joke of a President?

Everything is either Trump's or Putin's fault, right?

Wow, you really put in a lot of work there just to change the subject.

"A" for effort!

 

[Curried Goats]

DeSantis is just as dishonest and as much a liar as Trump – and just as reprehensible.

Like Trump, DeSantis would run a campaign based on white grievance politics, racist replacement theory, anti-immigrant nativism, fearmongering and lies about ‘CRT,’ ‘woke,’ and the country being ‘taken away’ from ‘real Americans.’

I get that buddy, I'm not denying that. What I'm telling you is that DeSantis doesn't have half of Trumps charisma.

 

[Correll]

Wow, you really put in a lot of work there just to change the subject.

"A" for effort!

What do you think would have happened if dems accepted from republicans that we disavow the 1/6 riot and we just moved on as a people?

 

[Redfish]

I'll keep this as short and clean as I can. I'll leave everything that led to the attack on Capitol out of it:

We know that...

1. President Trump sat in the dining room next to the Oval Office for about two hours during the attack on the Capitol
2. Virtually everyone around him was pleading with him to do whatever it took to stop the attack
3. A wide variety of political allies were texting his Chief of Staff, pleading with him as well
4. With the Media Room and national cameras not 60 seconds from him, he refused to act, and instead chose to watch Fox News as it covered the attack

And here's a very, very specific question: What do you think of his refusal? Do you feel it was justified? Do you believe any of the above is fake news?

Trump 'chose not to act' as mob attacked, Jan. 6 committee says

The House Jan. 6 committee held a second prime-time hearing to focus on the 187 minutes after President Donald Trump told supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol.

abcnews.go.com

how exactly do you know that? CNN tell ya?, DNC tell ya? Pelosi tell ya? Yes, its all fake news. "peacefully and patriotically" something you dem/libs are unable to understand.

 

[Curried Goats]

how exactly do you know that? CNN tell ya?, DNC tell ya? Pelosi tell ya? Yes, its all fake news. "peacefully and patriotically" something you dem/libs are unable to understand.

Life long Republicans who worked in his administration told us during the hearings.... let me guess, you haven't watched a second of it but you imagine yourself informed.

 

[Mac1958]

Life long Republicans who worked in his administration told us during the hearings.... let me guess, you haven't watched a second of it but you imagine yourself informed.

It's a waste of time with them. They didn't see a thing.

They don't care. Trump supported the attack, and so did they.

 

[Curried Goats]

It's a waste of time with them. They didn't see a thing.

They don't care. Trump supported the attack, and so did they.

Yea, I'm just wondering if they're ever going to realize what being too afraid to speak up for what they really stand for says about them and about whether or not their balls have dropped yet.

 

[j-mac]

What does that deflection have to do with Trump’s refusal to act on Jan 6?

Do you think Trump acted correctly under the circumstances

It may help if you described what exactly you think that the POTUS should have done on Jan 6, 2021? Lay out for us a timeline of actions he should have taken to satisfy you.

Now, I am sure you will give some snarky little bitch answer to the question I asked here without answering it...And, I am not going to play 20 questions with you, so if you could just answer the question that'd be great....Thanks...

 

[easyt65]

It has been proven Trump recommended prior to 6Jan the National Guard be called up.
- This has been confirmed by numerous people to include Gen Milley.

Had the National Guard been called and used 6 Jan would NEVER have happened.


DESPITE THE CAPITOL POLICE CHIEF TESTIFYING / DECLARING HE REQUESTED NATIONAL GUARD SUPPORT SIX (6) TIMES BOTH PRIOR TO AND DURING 6 JAN...

The Sergeants at Arms for the House and Senate made the call / decision & said 'NO'

Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, 'NO'.

The DC Mayor refused and said, 'NO'.

....THEIR REPORTED READON WAS 'AESTHETICS'.

President Trump did his part. He told them how to make sure 6 Jan Would not happen.
- They did not listen - THAT IS NOT HIS FAULT!

On 6 Jan he asked his supporters to PEACEFULLY WALK down to the Capitol to support their representatives

None of Trump's supporters were at the Capitol when the violence at the Caitol started (but the FBI & BLM were)

None of the protestors who started the violence at the Capitol were at Trump's rally.

There were no National Guard protecting the Capitol
-- This was NOT Trump's fault or doing

Despite being warned nearly 2 weeks before 6 Jan of potential violence, there weren't enough Capitol Police on site, there was no Capitol Police leadership on site, there were no DC Police on site
-- NONE of this was Trump's responsibility or fault

President Trump urged protestors to GO HOME, obey the law, remain peaceful, respect the Police - the transcripts and witnesses confirm this EVEN THOUGH THE 6 JAN COMMITTEE ATTEMPTED TO CRIMINALLY MODIFY/ OMIT THE EVIDENCE & LIE

AGAIN - BOTTOM LINE - AFTER BEING WARNED OF POSSIBLE VIOLENCE 2 WEEKS PRIOR TO JAN 6, AFTER TRUMP RECOMMENDED CALLING IN THE NATIONAL GUARD, DESPITE THE CAPITOL POLICE CHIEF BEGGING FOR NATIONAL GUARD SUPPORT, THE3 SERGEANTS AT ARMS, PELOSI, & DC MAYOR MADE THE DECISION NOT TO DO SO.

HAD THE NATIONAL GUARD BEEN CALLED AND ON-HAND TO DEFEND THE CAPITOL 6 JAN WOULD HAVE NEVER HAPPENED!

View attachment 673260
'B...b...but Truuuuuuuuuuump!'


View attachment 673261

 

[Correll]

It's a waste of time with them. They didn't see a thing.

They don't care. Trump supported the attack, and so did they.

Trump explicitly called for a peaceful protest, and I have condemned the 1/6 riot many times.


You are lying.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The truth is democrats are abusing their powers in the largest way since this country was formed. The founders screwed up, I must admit, because they made it so the House can legally abuse their power in any way they see fit with a simple vote of 218-217. You'll understand much better after the midterms when Republicans legally abuse their power in any way they see fit for partisan political gain.

The truth is that Trump supporters, Republicans, and others on the right are lying about Democrats ‘abusing’ power.

An investigation into the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy is perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted.

An investigation into Trump’s role and responsibility into fomenting and facilitating the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy is perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted.

An investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn a fair, accurate, and lawful election via a failed coup attempt is perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted.

And an investigation into Trump’s willful inaction and dereliction of duty to stop the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy is perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted.

That Trump supporters, Republicans, and others on right find the facts and evidence of the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy embarrassing and politically damaging to the conservative agenda isn’t ‘justification’ to ignore, diminish, or otherwise undermine the hearings and the facts the committee has presented.

 

[j-mac]

It's a waste of time with them. They didn't see a thing.

They don't care. Trump supported the attack, and so did they.

Supported it in what way?

 

[j-mac]

The truth is that Trump supporters, Republicans, and others on the right are lying about Democrats ‘abusing’ power.

An investigation into the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy is perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted.

An investigation into Trump’s role and responsibility into fomenting and facilitating the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy is perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted.

An investigation into Trump’s efforts to overturn a fair, accurate, and lawful election via a failed coup attempt is perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted.

And an investigation into Trump’s willful inaction and dereliction of duty to stop the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy is perfectly appropriate, lawful, and warranted.

That Trump supporters, Republicans, and others on right find the facts and evidence of the 1/6 rightwing terrorist attack on America’s democracy embarrassing and politically damaging to the conservative agenda isn’t ‘justification’ to ignore, diminish, or otherwise undermine the hearings and the facts the committee has presented.

Boy, when you guy's are fed a narrative you really run with it don't you?

 

[easyt65]

FACT:

HAD PELOSI, THE DC MAYOR, & THE 2 SERGEANTS AT ARMS FOLLOWED TRUMP'S CONFIRMED RECOMMENDATION TO HAVE THE NATIONAL GUARD ON-HAND ON 6 JAN THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO 6 JAN CAPITOL BREACH.

FACT:

THE CAPITOL POLICE CHIEF DECLARED HE REQUESTED NATIONAL GUARD ASSISTANCE 6 TIMES - 3 BEFORE 6 JAN & 3 DURING - AND WAS DENIED / DELAYED EVERY TIME

FACT:

THE FBI TESTIFIED IT HAD PEOPLE AT THE CAPITOL PRIOR TO 6 JAN AND BOTH IN / AT THE CAPITOL ON 6 JAN: REFUSED TO NAME THE OPERATION NAME; REFUSED TO SAY WHO AUTHORIZED IT AND / OR NAME NAMES OF AGENTS THERE ON 6 JAN...

FACT:

AS PER THE LINK / ARTICLE: AN FBI WHISTLEBLOER RELEASED INTERNAL FBI MEMOS EXPOSING THE FACT THAT THE FBI HAD UNFILTRATED THE PROUD BOYS AND THE FBI'S ASSESSMENT WAS THAT THE PROUD BOYS DID NOTHING ILLEGAL


FACT:

IF NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS WOULD HAVE BEEN THERE THEY WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE 6 JAN BREACH...

UNDERCOVER FBI AGENTS WERE NOT THERE TO STOP THE PROTEST / CAPITOL BREACH - MADE NO ATTEMPT TO STOP IT

THIS IS ALSO BASIC COMMON SENSE

 

[Correll]

FACT:

HAD PELOSI, THE DC MAYOR, & THE 2 SERGEANTS AT ARMS FOLLOWED TRUMP'S CONFIRMED RECOMMENDATION TO HAVE THE NATIONAL GUARD ON-HAND ON 6 JAN THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO 6 JAN CAPITOL BREACH.

FACT:

THE CAPITOL POLICE CHIEF DECLARED HE REQUESTED NATIONAL GUARD ASSISTANCE 6 TIMES - 3 BEFORE 6 JAN & 3 DURING - AND WAS DENIED / DELAYED EVERY TIME

FACT:

THE FBI TESTIFIED IT HAD PEOPLE AT THE CAPITOL PRIOR TO 6 JAN AND BOTH IN / AT THE CAPITOL ON 6 JAN: REFUSED TO NAME THE OPERATION NAME; REFUSED TO SAY WHO AUTHORIZED IT AND / OR NAME NAMES OF AGENTS THERE ON 6 JAN...

FACT:

AS PER THE LINK / ARTICLE: AN FBI WHISTLEBLOER RELEASED INTERNAL FBI MEMOS EXPOSING THE FACT THAT THE FBI HAD UNFILTRATED THE PROUD BOYS AND THE FBI'S ASSESSMENT WAS THAT THE PROUD BOYS DID NOTHING ILLEGAL


FACT:

IF NATIONAL GUARD TROOPS WOULD HAVE BEEN THERE THEY WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THE 6 JAN BREACH...

UNDERCOVER FBI AGENTS WERE NOT THERE TO STOP THE PROTEST / CAPITOL BREACH - MADE NO ATTEMPT TO STOP IT

THIS IS ALSO BASIC COMMON SENSE

I really would like to know what the FBI informants saw or did that day.

 

[easyt65]

The truth is that Trump supporters, Republicans, and others on the right are lying about Democrats ‘abusing’ power.

"Attempting a political coup; 2 Impeachments based on zero crime / evidence / witnesses; getting caught manufacturing fake evidence in an attempt to overthrow the US govt by attempting to illegally oust a sitting President; 'Get Trump 3.0' Kabuki political theater after 6 years.....IS NOT ABUSING POWER! MEAN TWEETS ... MEAN TWEETS...AAAAAARGH!"


Says the sheep defending Democrats proven to have perpetrated / participated in the proven / confirmed largest, most seditious, criminal political scandal in US history....




Thank you for proving you have zero credibility & are not worth listening to

 

[j-mac]

My thoughts on this Hunter stuff is that it isn't Hunter himself but rather Biden himself...Garland is refusing to prosecute Hunter Biden, for what he cites as "concern about how it will effect the midterms".... Think about that for a second....

Is that what we expect from the AG of the United States? Political consideration?

We all know the real crime behind what Hunter Biden was involved in was access to the then VP, now the POTUS.

Over the past 5.5 years we have been subjected to Democrat led scandal and investigation over pure nothingburgers. First was Russia, now J6. We need to take that page out of their playbook, only going after President Biden not on some fabricated pipe dream, but an actual threat to American security, in that our President is compromised by funneling money from our biggest enemy, China, through his son Hunter to enrich himself, and in turn being beholden to China...

When Republican's win back the majorities in the House and Senate, the question remains, will Republican's have the fortitude to go after Biden, like they did Trump, and still do?

On that front, my guess would be no....Very disappointing....