Trump supporters: What do you think of this information?

[45thPatriot]

I wouldn't try to convince someone like you of anything.

Well if you hope to win an election in the near future you might want to address the obvious

 

[theHawk]

I'll keep this as short and clean as I can. I'll leave everything that led to the attack on Capitol out of it:

We know that...

1. President Trump sat in the dining room next to the Oval Office for about two hours during the attack on the Capitol
2. Virtually everyone around him was pleading with him to do whatever it took to stop the attack
3. A wide variety of political allies were texting his Chief of Staff, pleading with him as well
4. With the Media Room and national cameras not 60 seconds from him, he refused to act, and instead chose to watch Fox News as it covered the attack

And here's a very, very specific question: What do you think of his refusal? Do you feel it was justified? Do you believe any of the above is fake news?

Trump 'chose not to act' as mob attacked, Jan. 6 committee says

The House Jan. 6 committee held a second prime-time hearing to focus on the 187 minutes after President Donald Trump told supporters to march on the U.S. Capitol.

abcnews.go.com

What do you think of it Mac? Do you believe all these stories?

 

[jc456]

Yes, I know, the peaceful protestors were the victims. Got it.

well they were protesting correct? Did police interfere in the protest?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

1) Yes you did briefly answer that before desperately trying to change the subject.

I "briefly" answered your question? Tell you what, this time read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y: I...do...not...support...Trump.

There, does that fit into your time limit? Does it need more words? Is it too concise for you?

2) Democrat hypocrisy is the topic to you because you’re desperately trying to change the subject.

I didn't say Democrat hypocrisy is the topic, I said it was pertinent to the topic.

3) Your support for Trump is exactly why you’re desperately trying to change the subject away from Trump.

So then, apparently I DO have to tell you multiple times I don't support Trump.

4) You’re not being objective in discussing the topic. If you were, you wouldn’t (again) desperately attempt to change the subject.

Give it up already.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

What about Chaz and the 2020 riots? You’re so desperate to change the subject so be very specific about the point you’re trying to make.

What exactly should Democrats have done?

You mean other than try to stop it? Gee, I don't know; advise them in insipid speeches not to resort to violence and then lamely denounce the violence and destruction when they do it anyway?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

They were also saying it while they were happily doing it and bragging about it. So that excuse isn't going to fly.

They were happily doing it and bragging about it because they thought they were doing it at Trump's behest.

Well, better clean out your ear balls, then.

You can do better than that.

 

[XponentialChaos]

It was a weak analogy you came up with.

The fact remains. You demand proof of everything, except when it comes to the motives of the your side, where you just assume the best and give them a pass.

I assume that the restaurant owner must have been trying to swindle me. It’s the only possible explanation. All the other hundred times that I’ve been there with no issue was just to earn my trust. Just so that he can get me the next time. That son of a bitch.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Seems hard to credit. Seems more like stonewalling.

I’ve already addressed it.

 

[XponentialChaos]

You mean other than try to stop it? Gee, I don't know; advise them in insipid speeches not to resort to violence and then lamely denounce the violence and destruction when they do it anyway?

Biden did do that.

Fact check: Joe Biden has condemned violent protests in the last three months

Tens of thousands of social media users are posting memes that claim that Democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden, has been silent for over three months on the issues of rioting and violence and has only just denounced them because of a dip in the polls. This claim is false: Joe Biden has...

www.reuters.com

This is what you were so desperately trying to change the subject to?

 

[XponentialChaos]

I "briefly" answered your question? Tell you what, this time read it v-e-r-y s-l-o-w-l-y: I...do...not...support...Trump.

There, does that fit into your time limit? Does it need more words? Is it too concise for you?


I didn't say Democrat hypocrisy is the topic, I said it was pertinent to the topic.


So then, apparently I DO have to tell you multiple times I don't support Trump.




Give it up already.

1. You answered that question. I asked you a follow-up question that you refused to answer and instead decided to pivot. So snarky because you’re trying so hard to change the subject.

2. It’s pertinent to the topic to you because you’re desperately trying to steer the conversation away from Trump - a man you supported and voted for. Maybe you don’t support him now but you did support him and you’re more than happy to run interference for him to try to change the subject.

3. Maybe you don’t now. But you did. “Not that it is pertinent to this discussion but I supported Trump while he was in office.”

 

[Correll]

What? I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.

Now I have to explain METAPHORS to you people. Incredible.

Play with someone else.

Dude. You were not clear. I'm guessing what you are trying to say.

Metaphor? Yes we wanted Trump to be aggressive, ie a "Bull in a china shop".

A leader aggressive pursuing his agenda, ie our interests does not justify the hysteria and hate and violence and political warfare we are seeing from your side.


What I see are people that have convinced themselves that there is no way for their opposition to ever be legitimate. You want us to not ever have a voice again.


That's the issue, not Trump.

 

[Delldude]

You mean like when you brought up Ray Epps regarding my signature despite the fact that there is zero evidence of him committing any of that?

Whoops! I noticed you abandoned that sinking ship as well.

Just video evidence......

 

[Correll]

A spokesperson for Gaetz told Newsweek that the congressman voted against the bill because of the "government's failure to accurately and specifically define human trafficking," which he claimed "allows this legislation to act as a backdoor loophole for illegal immigration and amnesty."

That seems a valid concern.

 

[XponentialChaos]

Just video evidence......

There’s zero video evidence of him committing violence, looting, arson, or destruction.

Whoops! Abandon ship!

 

[Delldude]

There’s zero video evidence of him committing violence, looting, arson, or destruction.

Whoops! Abandon ship!

Just inciting......

 

[XponentialChaos]

Just inciting......

Inciting peaceful protest, sure.

My signature doesn’t say anything about inciting. And you were trying to connect Ray Epps to my signature? Whoops! LoL

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

That seems a valid concern.

Possibly..................IF, he had any proof.

 

[Correll]

I assume that the restaurant owner must have been trying to swindle me. It’s the only possible explanation. All the other hundred times that I’ve been there with no issue was just to earn my trust. Just so that he can get me the next time. That son of a bitch.

Did the restaurant owner admit that he was trying to swindle you and request to let you have the meal for free? And then you insisted on paying for it anyways?

Cause then we are starting to make this analogy fit.

Also, you should have several hundred friends who's bills are also being handled by the same owner, AND you should just assume that even though he admitted to swindling you, that it was a one off, and isolated incident, no matter what the other bills look like.

 

[Correll]

I’ve already addressed it.

Yes. I know. What you said doesn't change the fact that your words contradict themselves.

 

[Correll]

Possibly..................IF, he had any proof.

Women that were trafficed here illegally, do you want them deported, or do you want to allow them to stay?