Trump supporters will be facing a "conflict of hypocrisy"

[nat4900]

I never argued that trump was qualified. In fact I argued repeatedly against electing him. Though he is clearly more qualified that Hillary was.

Actually his ONLY qualification was that he was NOT Hillary......

 

[Sun Devil 92]

I never argued that trump was qualified. In fact I argued repeatedly against electing him. Though he is clearly more qualified that Hillary was.

Actually his ONLY qualification was that he was NOT Hillary......

He met constitutional muster.....

What qualifications did he not have.

Not being Hillary is not a qualificiation.

Hell of a good reason to vote for him....but not a qualification.

The left morons.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I never argued that trump was qualified. In fact I argued repeatedly against electing him. Though he is clearly more qualified that Hillary was.

Actually his ONLY qualification was that he was NOT Hillary......

And what better qualification to have than that???

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Obama bans Iraq, Venezuela... no leftist violent riots.

Trump bans list of countries composed by Obama... OUTRAGE!

Now, who are the hypocritical ones?

I'll type real slow so that you can keep up......

With Obama in 2011 there was a SPECIFIC threat.......A plot was uncovered and people arrested (Trump does NOT have that)

Second, Obama’s order put a pause on refugee processing, whereas Trump’s halt in entries applies to ALL non-U.S. visitors.

All non-US visitors? Are we turning away Canadians too???

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Don't no about hypocrisy, even if you were for the ban, you should be willing to admit that it was put together in haste with out crossing all the T"s and dotting the I's and that caused a large part of the problem. Trump and most of the republicans need to slow down & do it right. a feeding frenzy of power is not good for Americans.

I think the speed and haste is Trump trying to come through with the promises he made to us. Is that such a bad thing?

I can't think of a President in recent times that got so much accomplished in his first two weeks in office.

 

[LuckyDuck]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

If there were a Muslim ban, as you say, why are 50 Muslim nations not on the list of restricted travel?

 

[ColonelAngus]

I don't mind if Trump is overly anxious to meet his campaign promises.

That is rare among elected officials.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No, but he did have a record of having shady friends like domestic terrorists, real estate crooks, anti-American preachers, and a history of using illegal recreational narcotics.

You forgot the part about "grabbing pussies"........LOL

Yes, the left holds Trump accountable for what he says. We hold the left accountable for what they do.

 

[EnterSandman]

President Trump could have avoided a lot of this conflict if he were black.

True, its tough to be president when you're orange.

Haven't you herd, Orange is the new Black.

 

[Muhammed]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

There is no Muslim ban EO, jackass.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Don't no about hypocrisy, even if you were for the ban, you should be willing to admit that it was put together in haste with out crossing all the T"s and dotting the I's and that caused a large part of the problem. Trump and most of the republicans need to slow down & do it right. a feeding frenzy of power is not good for Americans.

I think the speed and haste is Trump trying to come through with the promises he made to us. Is that such a bad thing?

I can't think of a President in recent times that got so much accomplished in his first two weeks in office.

What Trump....and we....need is a sustained level of success.

 

[nat4900]

There is no Muslim ban EO, jackass.

Well,, "good news".....Please tell THAT to all the Muslims that were banned....They'd be happy to personally thank you.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Don't no about hypocrisy, even if you were for the ban, you should be willing to admit that it was put together in haste with out crossing all the T"s and dotting the I's and that caused a large part of the problem. Trump and most of the republicans need to slow down & do it right. a feeding frenzy of power is not good for Americans.

I think the speed and haste is Trump trying to come through with the promises he made to us. Is that such a bad thing?

I can't think of a President in recent times that got so much accomplished in his first two weeks in office.

What Trump....and we....need is a sustained level of success.

There is no such thing as a sustained level of success--only attempts at it. But if Trump continues that goal, it's beneficial to everybody in the US. He will not be successful at everything he tries.

 

[martybegan]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

The AG's office will appeal these to a higher court, which will issue a stay in deference to the Executive Branch.

These judges are likely hack Obama or leftover Clinton Appointees, and will be overturned, or at least Stayed.

In any event, you idiots loved the old AG defying authority, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

The old AG and POTUS didn't entertain such chaos and impose it on the public. Trump is keeping with his tradition of lawsuit frenzies. He's a fucking drama queen, unless you haven't noticed.

He doesn't give a damn if he ties the government in knots over his bullshit.

Donald Trump: Three decades
4,095 lawsuits
USA TODAY Network: Dive into Donald Trump's thousands of lawsuits

Blah blah blah, Trump is a meanie, blah blah blah.