Trump supporters will be facing a "conflict of hypocrisy"

[nat4900]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

~~~~ La la la la la ----weee shall overrrr coommmeeee weeee shall overrrr
coooo mmmeeeeee

Be "proud" right wingers that you have this "caliber of intelligence" on your side....LOL

 

[irosie91]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

~~~~ La la la la la ----weee shall overrrr coommmeeee weeee shall overrrr
coooo mmmeeeeee

Be "proud" right wingers that you have this "caliber of intelligence" on your side....LOL

thank you------I do simple knitting and crochet too

 

[nat4900]

thank you------I do simple knitting and crochet too

I have a strong feeling that the adjective "SIMPLE" fits all aspects of how your half brain functions.

 

[Rustic]

The AG's office will appeal these to a higher court, which will issue a stay in deference to the Executive Branch.

These judges are likely hack Obama or leftover Clinton Appointees, and will be overturned, or at least Stayed.

In any event, you idiots loved the old AG defying authority, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

GWB appointed one of the judges you are blasting, not Obama. You continue to love Big Government presidents being unleashed by Big Government federal judges. You are no libertarian.

George W. Bush is and was a progressive… Dip shit

 

[talksalot]

President Trump could have avoided a lot of this conflict if he were black.

True, its tough to be president when you're orange.

If only orange were a minority so the race card could be played....

 

[Avatar4321]

The ban isn't unconstitutional. You have yet to articulate any grounds it is unconstitutional under. There is no conflict

 

[nat4900]

If only orange were a minority so the race card could be played....

yeah....that whole race issue was just silly, right?

 

[nat4900]

The ban isn't unconstitutional. You have yet to articulate any grounds it is unconstitutional under. There is no conflict

Trump's OWN state department has just reversed Trump's visa cancellations......Amazing...LOL

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Elections have consequences

Trump won

 

[kaz]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

As stupid as you think the questions by Democrats will be, the real questions they ask will be even more stupid than that

 

[miketx]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

Trump supporters are facing 8 years of rebuilding our country after the stain left behind from your kind.

 

[kaz]

If only orange were a minority so the race card could be played....

yeah....that whole race issue was just silly, right?

It's not silly, the subjugation of blacks by the left is not funny at all. You're vindictive, cruel bastards

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Better find it.

Because those terms are the only important ones for the next four years....

And when the SCOTUS goes really conservative.....well, you might not want to lose it for a long long very long time.

An honest admission that this country will be fucked up until rump is tired of boosting his ego...

BTW, even when Gorshun get confirmed, and if Kennedy and Souter do not retire, decisions will STILL be 5-4 for sanity.......But, yes, the NEXT justice may tilt the insanity to you right wingers.

Ginsburg does not last two years....let alone four.

Kiss it good bye.

 

[kaz]

The ban isn't unconstitutional. You have yet to articulate any grounds it is unconstitutional under. There is no conflict

Trump's OWN state department has just reversed Trump's visa cancellations......Amazing...LOL

How "is it" amazing that "the State" Department is "following" the judge's "ruling." They "have no" choice unless "it's" overturned. "You" just "get dumber" and dumber

 

[talksalot]

If only orange were a minority so the race card could be played....

yeah....that whole race issue was just silly, right?

Hardly. It's what got Obama elected. It certainly wasn't his qualifications.

 

[miketx]

 

[kaz]

Better find it.

Because those terms are the only important ones for the next four years....

And when the SCOTUS goes really conservative.....well, you might not want to lose it for a long long very long time.

An honest admission that this country will be fucked up until rump is tired of boosting his ego...

BTW, even when Gorshun get confirmed, and if Kennedy and Souter do not retire, decisions will STILL be 5-4 for sanity.......But, yes, the NEXT justice may tilt the insanity to you right wingers.

Ginsburg does not last two years....let alone four.

Kiss it good bye.

I hope you're right

 

[Avatar4321]

Please show us where ignoring federal judges is unconstitutional.

Well, following THAT "logic", there is NO ONE who can challenge a despot's decision...If judges cannot callsomething unconstitutional, who the fuck can?

Anyone can call something unconstitutional. It's backing it up that is the problem for you. Which I probably why none of you could give me a reason it was unconstitutional on the thread I started asking that exact question.

 

[PredFan]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

Meh, I don't care. Thus judges order does nothing at all to change the most important thing; Trump does not have to take in any Syrian Refugees. The judge cannot order him to do so. If they jump on a plane or a boat and come here, he can deport them or hold them in camps until they get deported. None of that is stopped by this judges order.

Why is that?

I suppose it has to do with the way the EO was written. It didn't just ban refugees, it banned travel. IMO, though I liked it, it was too much for people to accept. All I wanted was us to stop taking on Syrian refugees.

 

[Avatar4321]

President Trump could have avoided a lot of this conflict if he were black.

True, its tough to be president when you're orange.

Orange lives matter. Stop being a racist