Trump supporters will be facing a "conflict of hypocrisy"

[nat4900]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

 

[martybegan]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

The AG's office will appeal these to a higher court, which will issue a stay in deference to the Executive Branch.

These judges are likely hack Obama or leftover Clinton Appointees, and will be overturned, or at least Stayed.

In any event, you idiots loved the old AG defying authority, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

 

[easyt65]

Trump supporters will be facing a "conflict of hypocrisy"

Something Democrats EMBRACE every day...

 

[PurpleOwl]

Who really thinks confederate flag waving neo nazis give a shit about the US constitution, in the first place

 

[Auld Phart]

Who really thinks confederate flag waving neo nazis give a shit about the US constitution, in the first place

People NOT off their medications?

 

[nat4900]

These judges are likely hack Obama or leftover Clinton Appointees, and will be overturned, or at least Stayed.

Read uo, ignorant one....The federal judge in Washington who issued a block on Trump's ban was appointed by GWB......

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Who really thinks confederate flag waving neo nazis give a shit about the US constitution, in the first place

Certainly not the Commie American flag burners.

 

[PredFan]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

Meh, I don't care. Thus judges order does nothing at all to change the most important thing; Trump does not have to take in any Syrian Refugees. The judge cannot order him to do so. If they jump on a plane or a boat and come here, he can deport them or hold them in camps until they get deported. None of that is stopped by this judges order.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The AG's office will appeal these to a higher court, which will issue a stay in deference to the Executive Branch.

These judges are likely hack Obama or leftover Clinton Appointees, and will be overturned, or at least Stayed.

In any event, you idiots loved the old AG defying authority, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

GWB appointed one of the judges you are blasting, not Obama. You continue to love Big Government presidents being unleashed by Big Government federal judges. You are no libertarian.

 

[OldLady]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

Meh, I don't care. Thus judges order does nothing at all to change the most important thing; Trump does not have to take in any Syrian Refugees. The judge cannot order him to do so. If they jump on a plane or a boat and come here, he can deport them or hold them in camps until they get deported. None of that is stopped by this judges order.

Why is that?

 

[Iceweasel]

These judges are likely hack Obama or leftover Clinton Appointees, and will be overturned, or at least Stayed.

Read uo, ignorant one....The federal judge in Washington who issued a block on Trump's ban was appointed by GWB......

Bush the liberal? It figures.

 

[mudwhistle]

I'm not sure what a "Conflict of hypocrisy" means, if it has anything to do with irony, or whatever, but I think liberals live in hypocrisy every day and just push it aside. What really triggers their anger is when someone points it out and they can't push it away anymore. Then they have to run to their safe-zone and talk with other folks of like minds and soon they feel all better.

 

[mudwhistle]

The AG's office will appeal these to a higher court, which will issue a stay in deference to the Executive Branch.

These judges are likely hack Obama or leftover Clinton Appointees, and will be overturned, or at least Stayed.

In any event, you idiots loved the old AG defying authority, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

GWB appointed one of the judges you are blasting, not Obama. You continue to love Big Government presidents being unleashed by Big Government federal judges. You are no libertarian.

It's a false stereotype to think that Bush only picked judges that would never take a bribe.

 

[The Breeze]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

When the dust settles you and the judge are going to be sorely disappointed.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The AG's office will appeal these to a higher court, which will issue a stay in deference to the Executive Branch.

These judges are likely hack Obama or leftover Clinton Appointees, and will be overturned, or at least Stayed.

In any event, you idiots loved the old AG defying authority, what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

GWB appointed one of the judges you are blasting, not Obama. You continue to love Big Government presidents being unleashed by Big Government federal judges. You are no libertarian.

It's a false stereotype to think that Bush only picked judges that would never take a bribe.

Drink more coffee. That is not the OP. Nothing indicates that judges right or left are being bribed on immigration.

 

[nat4900]

It's a false stereotype to think that Bush only picked judges that would never take a bribe.

How "true" some of those Syrian kids constantly offer bribes to federal judges...
Now THAT has to stop.

 

[nat4900]

When the dust settles you and the judge are going to be sorely disappointed.

So, lets do a hypocrisy meter evaluation.......

Federal judge that opposes Trump.........Bad
Federal judge who supports Trump (like Gorshun)......Good

Do I have it pretty much the way your half brain functions?

 

[The Breeze]

When the dust settles you and the judge are going to be sorely disappointed.

So, lets do a hypocrisy meter evaluation.......

Federal judge that opposes Trump.........Bad
Federal judge who supports Trump (like Gorshun)......Good

Do I have it pretty much the way your half brain functions?

Have to tried stomping your feet a long with your whine? Maybe that will help.

 

[TooTall]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

Two liberal unelected Judges do not make immigration law. The appeal will solve that problem within a week.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.

Please show us where ignoring federal judges is unconstitutional.