I am asking Trump supporters to engage in an intellectual exercise.

[Dadoalex]

Is that what happened to you....? No water ?

Hey socky.
I'm not MAGAT.
Diving into empty pools is a MAGAT thing.
But then MAGATS don't have a giant mind to worry about.

And another thing...

 

[Woodznutz]

If she was raped she would have reported it immediately or soon after IMO.

True. That's when the 'evidence' is present. I doubt if rapists take the time to put on a condom.

 

[Lesh]

Yep, they changed the statue of limitations.

That’s called a technicality

It doesn’t change the fact that Trump raped that woman

Sad that rape doesn’t bother you

 

[Dadoalex]

https://media1.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExdDA3b2Fpa3k0NWdrZXFpbGI3ZXlhYXAyYzV2eGhuYjFrMWJoMjB4NyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/3o6fJ9Oi4zEBLjzCow/giphy.webp

Hey Socky sr.
I'm guessing you're not smart enough to post presentable gifs.
Yeah, that inability to count to to10 really weighs on you and your puppet.

 

[mudwhistle]

He said that what's he "likes to do". He never named one woman he did that with.

Trump is blowhard. In a private conversation he does what blowhard men do.....get all tough and stupid.

Not a surprize at all.

Little did he know this would come back to bite him in the ass the way it has.

He still has not learned to shut up.

He's a friggen politician.

You have to be able to talk to the pubic in a loud manner, or didn't you know that?

 

[Oddball]

Fascinating. So you're going with lowering the bar for who qualifies to be prez. If rape is OK is there anything that isn't.

Every accusation, a confession....

 

[mudwhistle]

True. That's when the 'evidence' is present. I doubt if rapists take the time to put on a condom.

Well, she did say she thought rape was sexy.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The complaint itself is several decades late. The opinion by the judge amounts to a bill of attainder against Trump. There is only one cause on how this case was even allowed to proceed. It passed a special law, The Adult Survivors Act. By its own terms the Act existed for SIX MONTHS before it expired. The entire lawsuit and everything associated with it is an egregious assault on our legal processes.

 

[Lesh]

If she was raped she would have reported it immediately or soon after IMO.

I think most people outside of your bubble know what’s going on here

Rapes are often not reported. Especially when they involve the rich and powerful

 

[Seymour Flops]

Right, so your justification is denial. Very common among MAGAists covering much more than Trump's rape of Carroll.

The evidence in that particular case consisted of one woman's long belated accusation, by which she hoped to profit.

That is the sum total of the evidence that Trump "raped" anyone. If a jury bought that, it says much more about the jury than about Trump.

 

[BrokeLoser]

The essential facts underlying the question I'm asking are as follows. The jury in the Carroll case found that Trump had committed sexual abuse, which Carroll had accused him of committing. In NY state, only penetration by a penis constitutes rape. But as the judge pointed out, a less technical, more commonplace understanding of rape includes cramming a finger inside a non-consenting person, which was the jury's finding.

Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

After Donald Trump was found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll, his legal team and his defenders lodged a frequent talking point.

Despite Carroll’s claims that Trump had raped her, they noted, the jury stopped short of saying he committed that particular offense. Instead, jurors opted for a second option: sexual abuse.

“This was a rape claim, this was a rape case all along, and the jury rejected that — made other findings,” his lawyer, Joe Tacopina, said outside the courthouse.

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

As Trumpists always do, most of you have chosen to assign bias as the motivating factor behind the verdict........because you must. The only alternative being to acknowledge the jury's finding of sexual abuse for finger cramming in a civil case makes the inveterately lying orange sack of shyte a man who raped a woman.

So, finally, the question I'd like you to think about is.......................

If a woman who is important in your life had a man force his stubby digit inside her, against her will (the jury's finding), would you vote for that man in a presidential election?

The ‘crime’ never happened and everyone sane knows it…The leftist koook took 24 years to report the ‘crime’, the wacko couldn’t remember when it happened, the loon said she was wearing a jacket that wasn’t even manufactured at the time of the ‘crime’.

 

[Lesh]

The evidence in that particular case consisted of one woman's long belated accusation, by which she hoped to profit.

That is the sum total of the evidence that Trump "raped" anyone. If a jury bought that, it says much more about the jury than about Trump.

The jury believed he raped her

End of story

 

[HikerGuy83]

Good on them. Rape shouldn't have a statute of limitations.

Keep crowing it.

 

[berg80]

If the jury condemns someone on flakey evidence, that’s a loss for our justice system

The jury found Carroll credible. Imagine that.

List of Trump's accusers and their allegations of sexual misconduct

At least 18 women have accused Donald Trump of varying inappropriate behavior, including allegations of sexual harassment or sexual assault. Here is a rundown.

abcnews.go.com

 

[HikerGuy83]

I see. So not only are you OK with rape, you're OK with forcing women to carry to term against their will. I sense you don't have a lot of respect for women.

Plenty of women in my life who know I respect and love them.

I also love and respect the constitution....something you wipe your ass with.

GFY

 

[Mac1958]

Yea, it;'s pretty stunning the "logic" employed by the average Trump supporter.

I've been studying this for over eight years, and I still have a long way to go. It would be much easier if they were better at articulating thoughts and perspectives without shallow talk radio platitudes and reflexive personal attacks.

I have several agreements with them in general. But this group pathology, I just don't get. Yet. Of course, others across the political spectrum are in the same boat.

 

[Oddball]

Rapes are often not reported. Especially when they involve the rich and powerful

You don't say!

 

[Oddball]

The jury found Carroll credible. Imagine that.

List of Trump's accusers and their allegations of sexual misconduct

At least 18 women have accused Donald Trump of varying inappropriate behavior, including allegations of sexual harassment or sexual assault. Here is a rundown.

abcnews.go.com

Civil suit of reputed "misconduct", not a criminal conviction for rape, lying asshole.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The jury believed he raped her

End of story

I don't.

That's what matters on this thread, since the question in the OP is for Trump supporters, not the jury.

 

[HikerGuy83]

That, of course, is your right. The jury disagreed.

And you are hiding under their skirts.

But you want others to be "intellectual" ????