Trump supporters will be facing a "conflict of hypocrisy"

Two liberal unelected Judges do not make immigration law.


Moron....the federal judge in WA who issued the block on Trump's Muslim ban was appointed by right wing GWB......
 
Please show us where ignoring federal judges is unconstitutional.


Well, following THAT "logic", there is NO ONE who can challenge a despot's decision...If judges cannot callsomething unconstitutional, who the fuck can?
 
Activist judges hiding behind the Constitution is hilarious. The Constitution says nothing about a lack of borders or open borders. Get a grip on reality.
 
Activist judges hiding behind the Constitution is hilarious. The Constitution says nothing about a lack of borders or open borders. Get a grip on reality.


Another right wing nitwit chimes in..."activist judges" like Gorsuch (and the late-lamented, Scalia,) however, are OK in the SCOTUS?
 
Please show us where ignoring federal judges is unconstitutional.


Well, following THAT "logic", there is NO ONE who can challenge a despot's decision...If judges cannot callsomething unconstitutional, who the fuck can?

You can challenge it......Andrew Jackson was quite clear on that.

Doesn't mean you have to listen to it.....he was quite clear on that too.

We are talking federal judges only......so do your homework and the answer will come to you.

Maybe.
 
Activist judges hiding behind the Constitution is hilarious. The Constitution says nothing about a lack of borders or open borders. Get a grip on reality.


Another right wing nitwit chimes in..."activist judges" like Gorsuch (and the late-lamented, Scalia,) however, are OK in the SCOTUS?

If you don't understand a term look it up. Your alternative facts make you look stupid.
 
Activist judges hiding behind the Constitution is hilarious. The Constitution says nothing about a lack of borders or open borders. Get a grip on reality.


Another right wing nitwit chimes in..."activist judges" like Gorsuch (and the late-lamented, Scalia,) however, are OK in the SCOTUS?

Tell us Nattie...how's it feel.

On November 7th...the left wing agenda was all teed up and ready to go.

On November 9th....colleges were offering counseling to you and your friends because you can't accept that you really are bunch of moron.
 
Activist judges hiding behind the Constitution is hilarious. The Constitution says nothing about a lack of borders or open borders. Get a grip on reality.


Another right wing nitwit chimes in..."activist judges" like Gorsuch (and the late-lamented, Scalia,) however, are OK in the SCOTUS?

Tell us Nattie...how's it feel.

On November 7th...the left wing agenda was all teed up and ready to go.

On November 9th....colleges were offering counseling to you and your friends because you can't accept that you really are bunch of moron.

Apparently he specializes in rioting 101. Not learning anything in class.
 
If you don't understand a term look it up.


True......I have misplaced my right wing, Moron to English dictionary, to look up your stupid terms.

Better find it.

Because those terms are the only important ones for the next four years....

And when the SCOTUS goes really conservative.....well, you might not want to lose it for a long long very long time.
 
Moron will probably sue me when his house burns down. Not enough sense to drag it outside first.
 
Trump supporters don't ever have conflicts of hypocrisy. They see hypocrisy as a virtue, a resume builder, a necessary qualification for office. Complete shameless hypocrisy demonstrates one's absolute devotion to the Trump cult, and that's all the cultists care about.
 
With two federal judges issuing a halt to Trump's Muslim ban EO, on the basis that the executive office is acting OUTSIDE of the Constitution, is a serious setback for the WH and could lead to a constitutional crisis if Trump decides to ignore the federal courts' block on the ban.

What is rather interesting for Trump backers to contemplate is that IF they choose to criticize or ignore the federal courts' ruling, they are actually UNDERMINING their own rhetoric that Neil Gorsuch should be appointed to the SCOTUS because he is a staunch supporter of the Constitution.....

Logic would then have it that one of the FIRST questions that senators will be asking of Gorsuch during his upcoming hearings, will be....DO YOU, SIR, SUPPORT WHAT FEDERAL JUDGES HAVE DECIDED, OR DO YOU, SIR, FOLLOW BLINDLY WHAT YOU POLITICAL LEANINGS DICTATE?

The response would be both interesting and entertaining.


~~~~ La la la la la ----weee shall overrrr coommmeeee weeee shall overrrr
coooo mmmeeeeee
 
Better find it.

Because those terms are the only important ones for the next four years....

And when the SCOTUS goes really conservative.....well, you might not want to lose it for a long long very long time.


An honest admission that this country will be fucked up until rump is tired of boosting his ego...

BTW, even when Gorshun get confirmed, and if Kennedy and Souter do not retire, decisions will STILL be 5-4 for sanity.......But, yes, the NEXT justice may tilt the insanity to you right wingers.
 
Trump supporters don't ever have conflicts of hypocrisy. They see hypocrisy as a virtue, a resume builder, a necessary qualification for office. Complete shameless hypocrisy demonstrates one's absolute devotion to the Trump cult, and that's all the cultists care about.


Indeed, Jim Jones would have loved to have these right wingers with him in Guyana.
 
President Trump could have avoided a lot of this conflict if he were black.
 

Forum List

Back
Top