Trump to Cut Food Stamps Budget by 25%

So you believe an elderly woman that worked two and three minimum wage jobs her whole life and paid into Social security is a drain on you? She collects about $800.00 a month and doesn't have money in the bank as she spent it all taking care of her children and even a couple of her grandchildren (with her minimum wage job & with no assistance as it wasn't available then in her state).

Not sure what factories you are talking about the ones here that close a few years back paid $6 to $8 at the most for the majority of their labor.

That is accurate. An elderly single woman we know applied. She made less than $800.00 a month from her Social Security and she said she got a letter back that she was not eligible at all because she did not have any housing expenses.


About 5 years ago a dying Aunt was making less than $600 a month SS and got less than $200 a month SNAP. Sad how we treat the poorest among US



Of these millionaires, over 22,000 families paid less than 15 percent of income in Federal income and employee payroll taxes — and 1,470 managed to pay no federal income taxes on their million-plus-dollar incomes, according to the IRS.”
Hyping stats about the ‘Buffett Rule’

BUT WE NEED TO GUT TAXES ON THE RICHEST EVEN MORE?


"In other words, a person in the top 0.001 percent income bracket -- who would have an adjusted gross income of at least $62,000,000 -- pays the nearly same effective tax rate as somebody in the top 20 percent bracket who makes $85,000 in adjusted gross income."
As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.




2016-02-07%2B22-23-43%2B%25D0%25A1%25D1%2582%25D1%2580%25D1%2583%25D0%25BA%25D1%2582%25D1%2583%25D1%2580%25D0%25B0%2B%25D0%25B1%25D0%25BE%25D0%25BB%25D1%258C%25D1%2588%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B3%25D0%25BE%2B%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B1%25D0%25BC%25D0%25B0%25D0%25BD%25D0%25B0%2B%2B%2BOff%25D1%2581%25D1%258F%25D0%25BD%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B0%2B-%2BGoogle%2BChrome.png


OH MY GOD!!!

You mean we treated all our citizens equally and fairly ....... makes you just want to throw up, doesn't it?


EQUALLY AND FAIRLY? LMAOROG


The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston


Six American families paid no federal income taxes in 2009 while making something on the order of $200 million each.


In addition to the six who paid no tax, another 110 families paid 15 percent or less in federal income taxes. That's the same federal tax rate as a single worker who made $61,500 in 2009.

Overall, the top 400 paid an average income tax rate of 19.9 percent, the same rate paid by a single worker who made $110,000 in 2009. The top 400 earned five times that much every day.

Just 82 of the top 400 were taxed in accord with the Buffett rule, which proposes a minimum tax of 30 percent on annual incomes greater than $1 million.
The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston




“Of these millionaires, over 22,000 families paid less than 15 percent of income in Federal income and employee payroll taxes — and 1,470 managed to pay no federal income taxes on their million-plus-dollar incomes, according to the IRS.”
Hyping stats about the ‘Buffett Rule’




Sure Bubs, Sure

So about Corp taxes REALLY falling on the poor as YOUR premise was, going to address that CAPITAL COVERS 82% OF THE BURDEN, YOU KNOW THE RICH?


OR ARE YOU GOING TO RUN TO YOUR SAFE SPACE AGAIN BUBS?


A question what is 15% of 50,000?

Answer $5,500


What is 15% of 500 million dollars

Answer $55,000,000

So who pays more the person who pays five thousand five hundred dollars or the one who pays 55 million dollars


.
.


Don't understand how progressive taxes work and economists measure revenues to the treasury (GDP) huh Bubba?





wealth-graphic2.jpg



Again who pays more the person who pays $5,500 in taxes or the person who pays 55 million in taxes


A simple yes or no answer will do



.
 
Great job of telling HALF the story .....

Let's see if we can figure this out.

1) Trump proposes federal tax cuts.

2) Trump proposes cutting federal programs, shifting some to states. This is done 1) to help offset the decrease in tax revenue, and 2) to transfer administration of programs to a more local, and thus more responsive, state government.

3) People receive a federal tax break.

4) The state, given its new mandates, has to assume responsibility for those programs removed from the federal budget.

5) Some states - probably, most - will raise taxes to provide those services in a manner acceptable to, and appropriate for, the people of their particular state.

6) Delivery of the product - let say, food stamps - immediately becomes more efficient by the removal of the federal bureaucracy that administers "one size fits all" programs (Notice that we currently spend $4.9 billion administering the federal program)

7) States will tailor these program to fit their particular circumstance. For example, Alabama may choose to limit food stamps to those who make less than $20K, while New York, with its higher cost of living, may choose to provide food stamps to those making less than $50K, a decision that will be reviewed, and agreed upon, by those people responsible for funding the program in their particular state.

And, this is a problem how, again?

HISTORY, Bubs say you are full of SHIT


When it Comes to Helping the Poor, Block Grants Are an Epic Failure
When it comes to helping the poor, block grants are an epic failure



How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant
How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.
Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

Red States Spent $2 Billion in 2015 to Screw the Poor

....Here's what this means: the states that refuse to expand Medicaid are denying health care to the needy and paying about $2 billion for the privilege. Try to comprehend the kind of people who do this.
Red states spent $2 billion in 2015 to screw the poor

7258febaaac04bcca8321890e376eb1d.jpg





Zzzzzzzzzz yea we don't have any poor ass blacks in red States either.





.

The red state welfare queens that suck off the teet of the blue states? I'm sure you have plenty Bubs, though states like Alaska, the biggest per capita has few :)


A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Most Federally Dependent States


Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State
Total Score
‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank
‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Your report is bullshit States like New Mexico has Los Alamos national laboratory dumb fuck.





View attachment 128268





.


AND? Texas has the most military bases? Your point?

http://www.ncsl.org/research/military-and-veterans-affairs/military-s-impact-on-state-economies.aspx



Your fucking report is bullshit and skewed .

.


.
 
Booze and smokes, with government money, and on Medicare. And yet you have a problem with food stamps and section eight.



He paid more then his fair share into Social Security....that was his money ..


.

He didn't pay in jackshit. He has to be at least 65, started working before Ronnie took office. Any idea what the income cap on Social Security was before Reagan?


He said he was retired, how old is he?

Edit : just checked he says he is 66


.

.

I retired when 59 with no pension or severance pay. I never inherited one penny and was homeless twice in my long life. When I turned 62 I took SSA early retirement because I paid into it. When signing up I asked the lady behind the bullet proof glass in the SS office, "Can I take everything out that I put in as a lump sum." She smiled and said no.
I didn't want to "retire" at 62, but was forced to. I was denied 3 times for disability even though I could not move my point finger at all...trigger finger they call it...nor could pick anything up or write or use my hands at all, nor walk very well. I asked them "would YOU hire someone that cannot use their hands? Of course not. What makes you think anyone else will?" and they just shrugged. So...here I am at almost 65 and barely making it. Homeless twice in my life too..once when I was in my 20's so it was no big deal. Again, this past September when the landlord asked for his house back although we had a verbal agreement that we could live there until we died. I should have gotten it in writing, but he was a "friend" and I took him for his word. 12 years and 9 months later and us investing our money in his house thinking it would be our house for our lifetime....he went back on his word. Not so much fun, being homeless, 65 and 70 years old, living in a car. So now all our SS goes on rent and the EBT card goes on food..or what little we can get with 170 bucks a month. The rest is for gas and taking care of our other basic needs not covered with assistance.

And you want to give the Cheeto a "chance"? Seriously have you learned NOTHING about what policy the GOP party has? Hint it's ALWAYS going to gut the safety net for the poorest while those "job creators" are paying about 40% of the EFFECTIVE tax rates they did 1945-1980 while we grew the middle class! Since then (Reaganomics)over 95% of ALL gains went to the top 10% of US
 
He didn't pay in jackshit. He has to be at least 65, started working before Ronnie took office. Any idea what the income cap on Social Security was before Reagan?


He said he was retired, how old is he?

Edit : just checked he says he is 66


.

.

I retired when 59 with no pension or severance pay. I never inherited one penny and was homeless twice in my long life. When I turned 62 I took SSA early retirement because I paid into it. When signing up I asked the lady behind the bullet proof glass in the SS office, "Can I take everything out that I put in as a lump sum." She smiled and said no.


No kidding they hope you due before collecting all your SS.



.

I hit it big during the crash of 08 and never went to college or read Stock Market for Dummies. I paid all capital gains which was abhorrent and unjustified. Trying to get me is an exercise in futility.


Dumbass, why is capital gains taxes "abhorrent and unjustified"? You know it';s NEW MONEY right?

Dumbass is my middle name. I took a lot of risk in 08 and could have lost it all. Risk Management should be my middle name.
 
About 5 years ago a dying Aunt was making less than $600 a month SS and got less than $200 a month SNAP. Sad how we treat the poorest among US



Of these millionaires, over 22,000 families paid less than 15 percent of income in Federal income and employee payroll taxes — and 1,470 managed to pay no federal income taxes on their million-plus-dollar incomes, according to the IRS.”
Hyping stats about the ‘Buffett Rule’

BUT WE NEED TO GUT TAXES ON THE RICHEST EVEN MORE?


"In other words, a person in the top 0.001 percent income bracket -- who would have an adjusted gross income of at least $62,000,000 -- pays the nearly same effective tax rate as somebody in the top 20 percent bracket who makes $85,000 in adjusted gross income."
As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.




2016-02-07%2B22-23-43%2B%25D0%25A1%25D1%2582%25D1%2580%25D1%2583%25D0%25BA%25D1%2582%25D1%2583%25D1%2580%25D0%25B0%2B%25D0%25B1%25D0%25BE%25D0%25BB%25D1%258C%25D1%2588%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B3%25D0%25BE%2B%25D0%25BE%25D0%25B1%25D0%25BC%25D0%25B0%25D0%25BD%25D0%25B0%2B%2B%2BOff%25D1%2581%25D1%258F%25D0%25BD%25D0%25BA%25D0%25B0%2B-%2BGoogle%2BChrome.png


OH MY GOD!!!

You mean we treated all our citizens equally and fairly ....... makes you just want to throw up, doesn't it?


EQUALLY AND FAIRLY? LMAOROG


The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston


Six American families paid no federal income taxes in 2009 while making something on the order of $200 million each.


In addition to the six who paid no tax, another 110 families paid 15 percent or less in federal income taxes. That's the same federal tax rate as a single worker who made $61,500 in 2009.

Overall, the top 400 paid an average income tax rate of 19.9 percent, the same rate paid by a single worker who made $110,000 in 2009. The top 400 earned five times that much every day.

Just 82 of the top 400 were taxed in accord with the Buffett rule, which proposes a minimum tax of 30 percent on annual incomes greater than $1 million.
The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston




“Of these millionaires, over 22,000 families paid less than 15 percent of income in Federal income and employee payroll taxes — and 1,470 managed to pay no federal income taxes on their million-plus-dollar incomes, according to the IRS.”
Hyping stats about the ‘Buffett Rule’




Sure Bubs, Sure

So about Corp taxes REALLY falling on the poor as YOUR premise was, going to address that CAPITAL COVERS 82% OF THE BURDEN, YOU KNOW THE RICH?


OR ARE YOU GOING TO RUN TO YOUR SAFE SPACE AGAIN BUBS?


A question what is 15% of 50,000?

Answer $5,500


What is 15% of 500 million dollars

Answer $55,000,000

So who pays more the person who pays five thousand five hundred dollars or the one who pays 55 million dollars


.
.


Don't understand how progressive taxes work and economists measure revenues to the treasury (GDP) huh Bubba?





wealth-graphic2.jpg



Again who pays more the person who pays $5,500 in taxes or the person who pays 55 million in taxes


A simple yes or no answer will do



.



I get it Bubs, you LOVE you some simple *shaking head*

Unlike CONservatives BS that fits on bumper stickers, Governance requires a little more than right wing simplicity!
 
HISTORY, Bubs say you are full of SHIT


When it Comes to Helping the Poor, Block Grants Are an Epic Failure
When it comes to helping the poor, block grants are an epic failure



How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant
How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.
Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

Red States Spent $2 Billion in 2015 to Screw the Poor

....Here's what this means: the states that refuse to expand Medicaid are denying health care to the needy and paying about $2 billion for the privilege. Try to comprehend the kind of people who do this.
Red states spent $2 billion in 2015 to screw the poor

7258febaaac04bcca8321890e376eb1d.jpg





Zzzzzzzzzz yea we don't have any poor ass blacks in red States either.





.

The red state welfare queens that suck off the teet of the blue states? I'm sure you have plenty Bubs, though states like Alaska, the biggest per capita has few :)


A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Most Federally Dependent States


Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State
Total Score
‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank
‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Your report is bullshit States like New Mexico has Los Alamos national laboratory dumb fuck.





View attachment 128268





.


AND? Texas has the most military bases? Your point?

http://www.ncsl.org/research/military-and-veterans-affairs/military-s-impact-on-state-economies.aspx



Your fucking report is bullshit and skewed .

.

.


Good refutation BUBBA, REAL DETAILED :)
 
He said he was retired, how old is he?

Edit : just checked he says he is 66


.

.

I retired when 59 with no pension or severance pay. I never inherited one penny and was homeless twice in my long life. When I turned 62 I took SSA early retirement because I paid into it. When signing up I asked the lady behind the bullet proof glass in the SS office, "Can I take everything out that I put in as a lump sum." She smiled and said no.


No kidding they hope you due before collecting all your SS.



.

I hit it big during the crash of 08 and never went to college or read Stock Market for Dummies. I paid all capital gains which was abhorrent and unjustified. Trying to get me is an exercise in futility.


Dumbass, why is capital gains taxes "abhorrent and unjustified"? You know it';s NEW MONEY right?

Dumbass is my middle name. I took a lot of risk in 08 and could have lost it all. Risk Management should be my middle name.

Got it, like the typical right winger you'll ignore the question. AGAIN why don't you think you should pay taxes on your NEWLY CREATED INCOME CALLED CAPITAL GAINS??
 
No more food stamps, EBT or section 8 housing. I am a family of one who is happily retired and my only income is SSA retirement and the stipend is less than 17k per year which keeps me in booze and smokes. SS sent me a letter saying that I qualify for food stamps but I wadded up the letter and threw it away. I have witnessed food stamp fraud more than once and hate cheaters.

Booze and smokes, with government money, and on Medicare. And yet you have a problem with food stamps and section eight.



He paid more then his fair share into Social Security....that was his money ..


.

He didn't pay in jackshit. He has to be at least 65, started working before Ronnie took office. Any idea what the income cap on Social Security was before Reagan?
What the heck are you talking about? I started working at 16 and paid into it , it's his money, and my money when I decide to collect it. That's why we are forced to pay into it. I wasn]t given a choice

Take 1977, the maximum income taxed by Social Security was $16,500 and the total rate was less than twelve percent with the employer paying half that. Which means even if he made a million dollars that year he paid no more than six percent of $16,500.
OK, I started working in 1970, not many made a million dollars, I made a decent salary (worked for Verizon until I retired), never made enough to not pay into SS, but enough to support myself and my son. Never asked any one for anything, but why shouldn't I get what was promised to me? it's my money, the Gov't, nor anyone else worked for it, I did.
 
He paid more then his fair share into Social Security....that was his money ..


.

He didn't pay in jackshit. He has to be at least 65, started working before Ronnie took office. Any idea what the income cap on Social Security was before Reagan?


He said he was retired, how old is he?

Edit : just checked he says he is 66


.

.

I retired when 59 with no pension or severance pay. I never inherited one penny and was homeless twice in my long life. When I turned 62 I took SSA early retirement because I paid into it. When signing up I asked the lady behind the bullet proof glass in the SS office, "Can I take everything out that I put in as a lump sum." She smiled and said no.
I didn't want to "retire" at 62, but was forced to. I was denied 3 times for disability even though I could not move my point finger at all...trigger finger they call it...nor could pick anything up or write or use my hands at all, nor walk very well. I asked them "would YOU hire someone that cannot use their hands? Of course not. What makes you think anyone else will?" and they just shrugged. So...here I am at almost 65 and barely making it. Homeless twice in my life too..once when I was in my 20's so it was no big deal. Again, this past September when the landlord asked for his house back although we had a verbal agreement that we could live there until we died. I should have gotten it in writing, but he was a "friend" and I took him for his word. 12 years and 9 months later and us investing our money in his house thinking it would be our house for our lifetime....he went back on his word. Not so much fun, being homeless, 65 and 70 years old, living in a car. So now all our SS goes on rent and the EBT card goes on food..or what little we can get with 170 bucks a month. The rest is for gas and taking care of our other basic needs not covered with assistance.

And you want to give the Cheeto a "chance"? Seriously have you learned NOTHING about what policy the GOP party has? Hint it's ALWAYS going to gut the safety net for the poorest while those "job creators" are paying about 40% of the EFFECTIVE tax rates they did 1945-1980 while we grew the middle class! Since then (Reaganomics)over 95% of ALL gains went to the top 10% of US


WWII and lack of regulations and rules grew the Middle class, any Yahoo could of started a machine shop company in his garage in the 1950s and created a million dollar empire.


.
 
Trump budget will reportedly cut food stamps by 25 percent

The above isn't the only news source I found with the same story.

Great job of telling HALF the story .....

Let's see if we can figure this out.

1) Trump proposes federal tax cuts.

2) Trump proposes cutting federal programs, shifting some to states. This is done 1) to help offset the decrease in tax revenue, and 2) to transfer administration of programs to a more local, and thus more responsive, state government.

3) People receive a federal tax break.

4) The state, given its new mandates, has to assume responsibility for those programs removed from the federal budget.

5) Some states - probably, most - will raise taxes to provide those services in a manner acceptable to, and appropriate for, the people of their particular state.

6) Delivery of the product - let say, food stamps - immediately becomes more efficient by the removal of the federal bureaucracy that administers "one size fits all" programs (Notice that we currently spend $4.9 billion administering the federal program)

7) States will tailor these program to fit their particular circumstance. For example, Alabama may choose to limit food stamps to those who make less than $20K, while New York, with its higher cost of living, may choose to provide food stamps to those making less than $50K, a decision that will be reviewed, and agreed upon, by those people responsible for funding the program in their particular state.

And, this is a problem how, again?

HISTORY, Bubs say you are full of SHIT


When it Comes to Helping the Poor, Block Grants Are an Epic Failure
When it comes to helping the poor, block grants are an epic failure



How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant
How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.
Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

Red States Spent $2 Billion in 2015 to Screw the Poor

....Here's what this means: the states that refuse to expand Medicaid are denying health care to the needy and paying about $2 billion for the privilege. Try to comprehend the kind of people who do this.
Red states spent $2 billion in 2015 to screw the poor

7258febaaac04bcca8321890e376eb1d.jpg





Zzzzzzzzzz yea we don't have any poor ass blacks in red States either.





.

The red state welfare queens that suck off the teet of the blue states? I'm sure you have plenty Bubs, though states like Alaska, the biggest per capita has few :)


A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Most Federally Dependent States


Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State
Total Score
‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank
‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Your report is bullshit States like New Mexico has Los Alamos national laboratory dumb fuck.





View attachment 128268





.

You expect me to "believe" a self reported survey that CONservatives will admit they suck off the Gov't teet? Yeah, I know Pews study!
 
OH MY GOD!!!

You mean we treated all our citizens equally and fairly ....... makes you just want to throw up, doesn't it?


EQUALLY AND FAIRLY? LMAOROG


The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston


Six American families paid no federal income taxes in 2009 while making something on the order of $200 million each.


In addition to the six who paid no tax, another 110 families paid 15 percent or less in federal income taxes. That's the same federal tax rate as a single worker who made $61,500 in 2009.

Overall, the top 400 paid an average income tax rate of 19.9 percent, the same rate paid by a single worker who made $110,000 in 2009. The top 400 earned five times that much every day.

Just 82 of the top 400 were taxed in accord with the Buffett rule, which proposes a minimum tax of 30 percent on annual incomes greater than $1 million.
The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston




“Of these millionaires, over 22,000 families paid less than 15 percent of income in Federal income and employee payroll taxes — and 1,470 managed to pay no federal income taxes on their million-plus-dollar incomes, according to the IRS.”
Hyping stats about the ‘Buffett Rule’




Sure Bubs, Sure

So about Corp taxes REALLY falling on the poor as YOUR premise was, going to address that CAPITAL COVERS 82% OF THE BURDEN, YOU KNOW THE RICH?


OR ARE YOU GOING TO RUN TO YOUR SAFE SPACE AGAIN BUBS?


A question what is 15% of 50,000?

Answer $5,500


What is 15% of 500 million dollars

Answer $55,000,000

So who pays more the person who pays five thousand five hundred dollars or the one who pays 55 million dollars


.
.


Don't understand how progressive taxes work and economists measure revenues to the treasury (GDP) huh Bubba?





wealth-graphic2.jpg



Again who pays more the person who pays $5,500 in taxes or the person who pays 55 million in taxes


A simple yes or no answer will do



.



I get it Bubs, you LOVE you some simple *shaking head*

Unlike CONservatives BS that fits on bumper stickers, Governance requires a little more than right wing simplicity!


The founding fathers didn't create the government to become a huge bureaucratic shit hole with career politicians who don't have to follow their own rules ass wipe..




.
 
Great job of telling HALF the story .....

Let's see if we can figure this out.

1) Trump proposes federal tax cuts.

2) Trump proposes cutting federal programs, shifting some to states. This is done 1) to help offset the decrease in tax revenue, and 2) to transfer administration of programs to a more local, and thus more responsive, state government.

3) People receive a federal tax break.

4) The state, given its new mandates, has to assume responsibility for those programs removed from the federal budget.

5) Some states - probably, most - will raise taxes to provide those services in a manner acceptable to, and appropriate for, the people of their particular state.

6) Delivery of the product - let say, food stamps - immediately becomes more efficient by the removal of the federal bureaucracy that administers "one size fits all" programs (Notice that we currently spend $4.9 billion administering the federal program)

7) States will tailor these program to fit their particular circumstance. For example, Alabama may choose to limit food stamps to those who make less than $20K, while New York, with its higher cost of living, may choose to provide food stamps to those making less than $50K, a decision that will be reviewed, and agreed upon, by those people responsible for funding the program in their particular state.

And, this is a problem how, again?

HISTORY, Bubs say you are full of SHIT


When it Comes to Helping the Poor, Block Grants Are an Epic Failure
When it comes to helping the poor, block grants are an epic failure



How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant
How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.
Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

Red States Spent $2 Billion in 2015 to Screw the Poor

....Here's what this means: the states that refuse to expand Medicaid are denying health care to the needy and paying about $2 billion for the privilege. Try to comprehend the kind of people who do this.
Red states spent $2 billion in 2015 to screw the poor

7258febaaac04bcca8321890e376eb1d.jpg





Zzzzzzzzzz yea we don't have any poor ass blacks in red States either.





.

The red state welfare queens that suck off the teet of the blue states? I'm sure you have plenty Bubs, though states like Alaska, the biggest per capita has few :)


A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Most Federally Dependent States


Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State
Total Score
‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank
‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Your report is bullshit States like New Mexico has Los Alamos national laboratory dumb fuck.





View attachment 128268





.

You expect me to "believe" a self reported survey that CONservatives will admit they suck off the Gov't teet? Yeah, I know Pews study!


So now all blacks live in mansions?


Where?



.
 
He didn't pay in jackshit. He has to be at least 65, started working before Ronnie took office. Any idea what the income cap on Social Security was before Reagan?


He said he was retired, how old is he?

Edit : just checked he says he is 66


.

.

I retired when 59 with no pension or severance pay. I never inherited one penny and was homeless twice in my long life. When I turned 62 I took SSA early retirement because I paid into it. When signing up I asked the lady behind the bullet proof glass in the SS office, "Can I take everything out that I put in as a lump sum." She smiled and said no.
I didn't want to "retire" at 62, but was forced to. I was denied 3 times for disability even though I could not move my point finger at all...trigger finger they call it...nor could pick anything up or write or use my hands at all, nor walk very well. I asked them "would YOU hire someone that cannot use their hands? Of course not. What makes you think anyone else will?" and they just shrugged. So...here I am at almost 65 and barely making it. Homeless twice in my life too..once when I was in my 20's so it was no big deal. Again, this past September when the landlord asked for his house back although we had a verbal agreement that we could live there until we died. I should have gotten it in writing, but he was a "friend" and I took him for his word. 12 years and 9 months later and us investing our money in his house thinking it would be our house for our lifetime....he went back on his word. Not so much fun, being homeless, 65 and 70 years old, living in a car. So now all our SS goes on rent and the EBT card goes on food..or what little we can get with 170 bucks a month. The rest is for gas and taking care of our other basic needs not covered with assistance.

And you want to give the Cheeto a "chance"? Seriously have you learned NOTHING about what policy the GOP party has? Hint it's ALWAYS going to gut the safety net for the poorest while those "job creators" are paying about 40% of the EFFECTIVE tax rates they did 1945-1980 while we grew the middle class! Since then (Reaganomics)over 95% of ALL gains went to the top 10% of US


WWII and lack of regulations and rules grew the Middle class, any Yahoo could of started a machine shop company in his garage in the 1950s and created a million dollar empire.


.




LMAOROG, Sure Bubs, sure.

OK, give me 3 policies the GOP has given US the past 50 years that worked as promised IF you expect me to believe ANYTHING you say on the economy or history. Just 3???
 
EQUALLY AND FAIRLY? LMAOROG


The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston


Six American families paid no federal income taxes in 2009 while making something on the order of $200 million each.


In addition to the six who paid no tax, another 110 families paid 15 percent or less in federal income taxes. That's the same federal tax rate as a single worker who made $61,500 in 2009.

Overall, the top 400 paid an average income tax rate of 19.9 percent, the same rate paid by a single worker who made $110,000 in 2009. The top 400 earned five times that much every day.

Just 82 of the top 400 were taxed in accord with the Buffett rule, which proposes a minimum tax of 30 percent on annual incomes greater than $1 million.
The fortunate 400: David Cay Johnston




“Of these millionaires, over 22,000 families paid less than 15 percent of income in Federal income and employee payroll taxes — and 1,470 managed to pay no federal income taxes on their million-plus-dollar incomes, according to the IRS.”
Hyping stats about the ‘Buffett Rule’




Sure Bubs, Sure

So about Corp taxes REALLY falling on the poor as YOUR premise was, going to address that CAPITAL COVERS 82% OF THE BURDEN, YOU KNOW THE RICH?


OR ARE YOU GOING TO RUN TO YOUR SAFE SPACE AGAIN BUBS?


A question what is 15% of 50,000?

Answer $5,500


What is 15% of 500 million dollars

Answer $55,000,000

So who pays more the person who pays five thousand five hundred dollars or the one who pays 55 million dollars


.
.


Don't understand how progressive taxes work and economists measure revenues to the treasury (GDP) huh Bubba?





wealth-graphic2.jpg



Again who pays more the person who pays $5,500 in taxes or the person who pays 55 million in taxes


A simple yes or no answer will do



.



I get it Bubs, you LOVE you some simple *shaking head*

Unlike CONservatives BS that fits on bumper stickers, Governance requires a little more than right wing simplicity!


The founding fathers didn't create the government to become a huge bureaucratic shit hole with career politicians who don't have to follow their own rules ass wipe..




.


The guys who tried that "states rights": Articles of CONfederation but gave it up for the BIG FEDERAL GOV'T CONSTITUTION???
 
HISTORY, Bubs say you are full of SHIT


When it Comes to Helping the Poor, Block Grants Are an Epic Failure
When it comes to helping the poor, block grants are an epic failure



How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant
How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.
Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

Red States Spent $2 Billion in 2015 to Screw the Poor

....Here's what this means: the states that refuse to expand Medicaid are denying health care to the needy and paying about $2 billion for the privilege. Try to comprehend the kind of people who do this.
Red states spent $2 billion in 2015 to screw the poor

7258febaaac04bcca8321890e376eb1d.jpg





Zzzzzzzzzz yea we don't have any poor ass blacks in red States either.





.

The red state welfare queens that suck off the teet of the blue states? I'm sure you have plenty Bubs, though states like Alaska, the biggest per capita has few :)


A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Most Federally Dependent States


Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State
Total Score
‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank
‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Your report is bullshit States like New Mexico has Los Alamos national laboratory dumb fuck.





View attachment 128268





.

You expect me to "believe" a self reported survey that CONservatives will admit they suck off the Gov't teet? Yeah, I know Pews study!


So now all blacks live in mansions?


Where?



.

Are you just an alt right grand wizard Bubba?
 
Great job of telling HALF the story .....

Let's see if we can figure this out.

1) Trump proposes federal tax cuts.

2) Trump proposes cutting federal programs, shifting some to states. This is done 1) to help offset the decrease in tax revenue, and 2) to transfer administration of programs to a more local, and thus more responsive, state government.

3) People receive a federal tax break.

4) The state, given its new mandates, has to assume responsibility for those programs removed from the federal budget.

5) Some states - probably, most - will raise taxes to provide those services in a manner acceptable to, and appropriate for, the people of their particular state.

6) Delivery of the product - let say, food stamps - immediately becomes more efficient by the removal of the federal bureaucracy that administers "one size fits all" programs (Notice that we currently spend $4.9 billion administering the federal program)

7) States will tailor these program to fit their particular circumstance. For example, Alabama may choose to limit food stamps to those who make less than $20K, while New York, with its higher cost of living, may choose to provide food stamps to those making less than $50K, a decision that will be reviewed, and agreed upon, by those people responsible for funding the program in their particular state.

And, this is a problem how, again?

HISTORY, Bubs say you are full of SHIT


When it Comes to Helping the Poor, Block Grants Are an Epic Failure
When it comes to helping the poor, block grants are an epic failure



How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant
How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.
Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

Red States Spent $2 Billion in 2015 to Screw the Poor

....Here's what this means: the states that refuse to expand Medicaid are denying health care to the needy and paying about $2 billion for the privilege. Try to comprehend the kind of people who do this.
Red states spent $2 billion in 2015 to screw the poor

7258febaaac04bcca8321890e376eb1d.jpg





Zzzzzzzzzz yea we don't have any poor ass blacks in red States either.





.

The red state welfare queens that suck off the teet of the blue states? I'm sure you have plenty Bubs, though states like Alaska, the biggest per capita has few :)


A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Most Federally Dependent States


Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State
Total Score
‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank
‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Your report is bullshit States like New Mexico has Los Alamos national laboratory dumb fuck.





View attachment 128268





.

You expect me to "believe" a self reported survey that CONservatives will admit they suck off the Gov't teet? Yeah, I know Pews study!



Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.
 
Booze and smokes, with government money, and on Medicare. And yet you have a problem with food stamps and section eight.



He paid more then his fair share into Social Security....that was his money ..


.

He didn't pay in jackshit. He has to be at least 65, started working before Ronnie took office. Any idea what the income cap on Social Security was before Reagan?
What the heck are you talking about? I started working at 16 and paid into it , it's his money, and my money when I decide to collect it. That's why we are forced to pay into it. I wasn]t given a choice

Take 1977, the maximum income taxed by Social Security was $16,500 and the total rate was less than twelve percent with the employer paying half that. Which means even if he made a million dollars that year he paid no more than six percent of $16,500.
OK, I started working in 1970, not many made a million dollars, I made a decent salary (worked for Verizon until I retired), never made enough to not pay into SS, but enough to support myself and my son. Never asked any one for anything, but why shouldn't I get what was promised to me? it's my money, the Gov't, nor anyone else worked for it, I did.

I also want to repeal property tax and eliminate eminent domain.
 
Last edited:
Zzzzzzzzzz yea we don't have any poor ass blacks in red States either.





.

The red state welfare queens that suck off the teet of the blue states? I'm sure you have plenty Bubs, though states like Alaska, the biggest per capita has few :)


A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Most Federally Dependent States


Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State
Total Score
‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank
‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Your report is bullshit States like New Mexico has Los Alamos national laboratory dumb fuck.





View attachment 128268





.

You expect me to "believe" a self reported survey that CONservatives will admit they suck off the Gov't teet? Yeah, I know Pews study!


So now all blacks live in mansions?


Where?



.

Are you just an alt right grand wizard Bubba?



I live in the real world, you don't



.
 
HISTORY, Bubs say you are full of SHIT


When it Comes to Helping the Poor, Block Grants Are an Epic Failure
When it comes to helping the poor, block grants are an epic failure



How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant
How States Use Federal and State Funds Under the TANF Block Grant


Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

In the red states, government is cheaper, which means the people who live there pay lower taxes. But they also get a lot less in return. The unemployment checks run out more quickly and the schools generally aren’t as good. Assistance with health care, child care, and housing is skimpier, if it exists at all. The result of this divergence is that one half of the country looks more and more like Scandinavia, while the other increasingly resembles a social Darwinist’s paradise.
Blue States are from Scandinavia, Red States are from Guatemala

Red States Spent $2 Billion in 2015 to Screw the Poor

....Here's what this means: the states that refuse to expand Medicaid are denying health care to the needy and paying about $2 billion for the privilege. Try to comprehend the kind of people who do this.
Red states spent $2 billion in 2015 to screw the poor

7258febaaac04bcca8321890e376eb1d.jpg





Zzzzzzzzzz yea we don't have any poor ass blacks in red States either.





.

The red state welfare queens that suck off the teet of the blue states? I'm sure you have plenty Bubs, though states like Alaska, the biggest per capita has few :)


A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

A New Report Proves Republican Governed Red States Are Economic Parasites

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Most Federally Dependent States


Rank
(1 = Most Dependent)

State
Total Score
‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank
‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank

1 Kentucky 76.16 6 5
2 Mississippi 75.59 7 1
3 New Mexico 73.88 3 17
4 Alabama 72.45 4 14
5 West Virginia 68.97 5 15
6 South Carolina 68.17 2 31
7 Montana 65.91 14 4
8 Tennessee 61.76 20 3
9 Maine 61.02 13 9
10 Indiana 59.18 7 23
11 Arizona 59.08 15 11
12 Louisiana 55.39 40 2
13 South Dakota 53.57 24 7
14 Missouri 52.66 31 6
15 Oregon 51.51 23 10
16 Georgia 49.81 34 8
17 Idaho 49.64 19 19
18 Vermont 49.56 18 20
19 Wyoming 48.80 26 12
20 Maryland 48.18 11 32
21 Oklahoma 47.78 21 18
22 Pennsylvania 46.15 17 30
23 Alaska 45.81 10 40
24 Rhode Island 45.05 36 16
25 Florida 43.84 27 22
26 Ohio 42.25 45 13
27 Arkansas 42.12 38 21
28 North Carolina 41.63 32 25
29 Hawaii 41.63 9 46
30 Iowa 41.38 33 26
31 Wisconsin 41.09 16 38
32 North Dakota 40.46 1 50
33 Michigan 40.43 35 27
34 New York 37.65 44 24
35 Texas 36.81 42 28
36 Washington 35.32 30 33
37 Colorado 35.20 29 34
38 Virginia 34.43 12 49
39 Nebraska 33.78 47 29
40 Utah 33.28 28 35
41 New Hampshire 31.11 37 36
42 Connecticut 27.80 22 48
43 Massachusetts 27.36 46 37
44 Nevada 26.94 25 47
45 Kansas 25.39 39 45
46 California 25.36 41 43
47 Illinois 23.96 48 41
48 New Jersey 23.84 49 39
49 Minnesota 23.09 43 44
50 Delaware 21.32 50 42

2017’s Most & Least Federally Dependent States



Your report is bullshit States like New Mexico has Los Alamos national laboratory dumb fuck.





View attachment 128268





.

You expect me to "believe" a self reported survey that CONservatives will admit they suck off the Gov't teet? Yeah, I know Pews study!



Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.



Yeah, your BS noted snowflake....
 

Forum List

Back
Top