Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Still unable to understand the topic?Oh, that must have cut to the core....It'd be nice if you'd type english...But, I understand, you have nothing in response, so you think being creative with insult is the ticket....Like most third graders, you'd be wrong.
What has Trump been convicted of?Still unable to understand the topic?
What's wrong ape boy?
Brain too small and some stuff fell out when you dug the ear boogers out for licking?
The topic my moronic butt sniffer is "Trump as convict."
WHEN....What has Trump been convicted of?
You never said WHEN.WHEN....
Still having those language problems?
WHEN
THOU ART A FOOLIt is good to see that some of our patriots in Congress are preparing for the future.
Many people have pointed out the various logistical challenges of putting our national orange menace in prison if and when he is finally convicted on any one (or more) of his numerous felony charges.
Now Bennie Thompson and other dems have come up with a solution.
Just treat him like anybody else once he's convicted.
BRILLIANT!
“It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality,” the Mississippi lawmaker said. “Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment —and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them.”
He named his bill the Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act — or the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act.
You’re on your own: Dems want to send Trump to prison without Secret Service protection
Key Democrats revealed new legislation Friday that would strip former President Donald Trump of his Secret Service agents if he is convicted and sentenced to prison.www.washingtontimes.com
Hitler was never convicted either...What crimes have ANYONE named Clinton (other than Roger) been convicted of?
None?
OK then.
View attachment 934838
For what crime?Actually you should support that law, for when Biden gets impeached and sent to jail.
Think long term.
What are you, like 5 years old?The premise my Tiny Minded Ape Like Poop Thrower
She later recanted saying 'the only reason I signed it because I was threatened'.No, there's something.
Lewinski saved Clinton's DNA on her little blue dress. Trump, on the other hand, has a letter from his "victim" that says, IT NEVER HAPPENED.
Democrats treat Trump no different than Democrats treated Dred Scott in court.
How did that turn out.
This is a law that definitely needs to be passed! Trump deserves a big black cell mate named Bubba!It is good to see that some of our patriots in Congress are preparing for the future.
Many people have pointed out the various logistical challenges of putting our national orange menace in prison if and when he is finally convicted on any one (or more) of his numerous felony charges.
Now Bennie Thompson and other dems have come up with a solution.
Just treat him like anybody else once he's convicted.
BRILLIANT!
“It is regrettable that it has come to this, but this previously unthought-of scenario could become our reality,” the Mississippi lawmaker said. “Therefore, it is necessary for us to be prepared and update the law so the American people can be assured that protective status does not translate into special treatment —and that those who are sentenced to prison will indeed serve the time required of them.”
He named his bill the Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act — or the DISGRACED Former Protectees Act.
You’re on your own: Dems want to send Trump to prison without Secret Service protection
Key Democrats revealed new legislation Friday that would strip former President Donald Trump of his Secret Service agents if he is convicted and sentenced to prison.
It's not an argument. It's a fact. Anything Trump took with him was declassified, as only a president can do unilaterally.
Joe Biden does not direct, nor influence, nor control, the actions of the DOJ. Nor do you have any proof of such. Given the voluminous record of Trump's crimes, for which there is substantial probable cause, no motivation of 'politics' can be ascribed. Criminals, candidates or not, must be treated like any other criminal. That they happen to be members of the opposing party is, therefore, and incidental and inadvertent fact.The only reason Trump never made a big show of declassifying everything, before the Biden Adm hatched this document scheme, was nobody ever had to deal with a criminal in the White House trying to eliminate his primary political opponent using the courts before.
Your claim has no merit for the following reasons:Every document Trump had was a copy of documents that were already in the archives, except gifts Trump collected during his presidency and newspaper clippings.
So says a banana republican, how quaint.This is Banana Republic type actions.
That's consistent with banana republicanism, cute. You condemn it, then you become it. Brilliant. Did this occur to you all by yourself, or did your puppet masters assist you on this epiphanic moment of stable geniusness?I suggest that after the next election that everyone in the prior administration be taken out back and shot like they do in 3rd World countries.
Please note, Democrat Joe Biden is a descendent of slave owners!Please note that Democrats in modernity were not descendents of Democrats of the antebellum and postbellum eras, same goes for Repubs.
And who, among is, isn't?Please note, Democrat Joe Biden is a descendent of slave owners!
Remember;
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,”
“History never repeats itself. Man always does.”
Democrats treat Trump no different than Democrats treated Dred Scott in court.
Do you contradict yourself all the time? Do you always post your feelings proving yourself ignorant? I easily proved you are wrong. I can easily prove everything you post is wrong.And who, among is, isn't?
Please note that Democrats in modernity were not descendents of Democrats of the antebellum and postbellum eras, same goes for Repubs.
Rumpole, your view is hypocrisy (if not a deliberate lie) which I just proved in post, #118A president who would exact a blanket declassification regime without implementing memorialization protocols is derelict, and treasonous, in my view.
Rumpole, you ignore pertinent facts. Oh, wait, I am wrong. Rumpole is completely ignorant of the pertinent facts relevant to the charges of the espionage act Trump is charged with.Here are some pertinent facts you are ignoring:
