Canon Shooter
Diamond Member
- Jan 7, 2020
- 17,673
- 14,519
No. It means they understand the law while you do not.
Okay, dumbass. Believe what you will...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. It means they understand the law while you do not.
And you can back that stupid bullshit up with....nothing?The simple fact of the matter is that if Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff weren't in Congress these hearings would never have happened...
Is that what her legal counsel is claiming or is that just your weak attempt at relevancy?You want to talk about witness intimidation?
The committee sent Federal Marshalls to Cassidy Hutchinson's home to order her to testify. Then, before they let her speak publicly, they grilled her behind closed doors, eight different times, shaping her testimony into the supposed "bombshell" that Trump wanted to go to the Capital.
They got her to "name names" alright.
Again..."poopeyhead" for all it's accuracyNo, i'm calling you a Stalinist scumbag and a supporter of terrorists and terrorism.
I believe what I know to be true. What reality is also showing to be true.Okay, dumbass. Believe what you will...
Not a trial, so no witness tampering.Yes, it is the truth that Trump trying to contact the witness is the very definition of witness tampering.
And you can back that stupid bullshit up with....nothing?
More Trumper nonsense?
It's deadly accurateAgain..."poopeyhead" for all it's accuracy
Wrong as alwaysIf it isn’t a trial you can’t have witness tampering, Simp.
Ohhh...nothingAgain, you've proven to be too fucking stupid to have this conversation.
It's been explained to you. You just don't like what you've been told...
Ohhh...nothing
I see
All the sudden Dimtards want the rules for trials to apply.I'm not sure that you are correct about that, sir.
Here is Cornell Law School's reprint of 18 U.S. Code s/s 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or informant, and it says nothing like that.
![]()
18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
www.law.cornell.edu
Where did you get the information that "trying to contact," is the very definition of witness tampering?
Then try one more time..I mean if you have anything worth sayingAgain, dipshit, it's been explained to you.
It's not my fault you're too stupid to comprehend it...
Wrong as always
As documented ON THIS VERY THREAD (you stupid fuck)...this is an official Federal proceeding and witness tampering IS a crime in THIS case
As documented ON THIS VERY THREAD (you stupid fuck)...this is an official Federal proceeding and witness tampering IS a crime in THIS case
Can you fucking READ asshole?All the sudden Dimtards want the rules for trials to apply.
SCOTUS is not going to defend The Terrorism of The Brown Shirt Left. That is not "Free Speach"Wrong. The law ONLY states that you can not protest outside a Justice's home. That is a violation of the First Amendment and SHOULD be overturned by a Court if challenged
THIS Court? HAHAHAHAHA
One supposed crime does not excuse another. That is a childish claim (also known as the PeeWee Herman Defense)
It IS irrelevant to this discussion
What a crackerjack legal team you boys have over here in Trumpland. On the ball as always.All the sudden Dimtards want the rules for trials to apply.
Too fucking funny.![]()
![]()
![]()
Not really. Just the act of attempting to communicate with a witness can be seen as an effort to influence that witness. That is a federal felony.
“Section 1512 of Title 18 constitutes a broad prohibition against tampering with a witness, victim or informant. It proscribes conduct intended to illegitimately affect the presentation of evidence in Federal proceedings or the communication of information to Federal law enforcement officers. It applies to proceedings before Congress, executive departments, and administrative agencies, and to civil and criminal judicial proceedings, including grand jury proceedings. See 18 U.S.C. § 1515(a)(1). In addition, the section provides extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over the offenses created therein. See 18 U.S.C. § 1512(g); 128 Cong. Rec. H8469 (daily ed. Oct. 1, 1980); H. R. Rep. No. 1369, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 20-22 (1980).”
And this isn’t a trial.You misunderstand.
Think: contacting, instead of calling. Not, like, calling them up to testify. Phoning, etc.
They aren't his witnesses. They are the Committee's witnesses.
Box?Fine. Then Adam Schiff goes to jail.
I told you fucktard, the box gets smaller.
That uncomfortable squirmy feeling you're getting is the box closing in on your miserable head.
Therefore, no way to tamper with a witness, Simp.In a criminal prosecution, you flaming idiot. This is not that.
![]()