Trump Tries To Call Witness To Jan 6th Hearings

The simple fact of the matter is that if Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff weren't in Congress these hearings would never have happened...
And you can back that stupid bullshit up with....nothing?

More Trumper nonsense?
 
You want to talk about witness intimidation?

The committee sent Federal Marshalls to Cassidy Hutchinson's home to order her to testify. Then, before they let her speak publicly, they grilled her behind closed doors, eight different times, shaping her testimony into the supposed "bombshell" that Trump wanted to go to the Capital.

They got her to "name names" alright.
Is that what her legal counsel is claiming or is that just your weak attempt at relevancy?
 
And you can back that stupid bullshit up with....nothing?

More Trumper nonsense?

Again, you've proven to be too fucking stupid to have this conversation.

It's been explained to you. You just don't like what you've been told...
 
I'm not sure that you are correct about that, sir.

Here is Cornell Law School's reprint of 18 U.S. Code s/s 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or informant, and it says nothing like that.


Where did you get the information that "trying to contact," is the very definition of witness tampering?
All the sudden Dimtards want the rules for trials to apply.

Too fucking funny. :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
 
Wrong as always

As documented ON THIS VERY THREAD (you stupid fuck)...this is an official Federal proceeding and witness tampering IS a crime in THIS case

Fine. Then Adam Schiff goes to jail.

I told you fucktard, the box gets smaller.

That uncomfortable squirmy feeling you're getting is the box closing in on your miserable head.
 
Wrong. The law ONLY states that you can not protest outside a Justice's home. That is a violation of the First Amendment and SHOULD be overturned by a Court if challenged

THIS Court? HAHAHAHAHA

One supposed crime does not excuse another. That is a childish claim (also known as the PeeWee Herman Defense)

It IS irrelevant to this discussion
SCOTUS is not going to defend The Terrorism of The Brown Shirt Left. That is not "Free Speach"
 
All the sudden Dimtards want the rules for trials to apply.

Too fucking funny. :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
What a crackerjack legal team you boys have over here in Trumpland. On the ball as always.

Not really. Just the act of attempting to communicate with a witness can be seen as an effort to influence that witness. That is a federal felony.


“Section 1512 of Title 18 constitutes a broad prohibition against tampering with a witness, victim or informant. It proscribes conduct intended to illegitimately affect the presentation of evidence in Federal proceedings or the communication of information to Federal law enforcement officers. It applies to proceedings before Congress, executive departments, and administrative agencies, and to civil and criminal judicial proceedings, including grand jury proceedings. See 18 U.S.C. § 1515(a)(1). In addition, the section provides extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over the offenses created therein. See 18 U.S.C. § 1512(g); 128 Cong. Rec. H8469 (daily ed. Oct. 1, 1980); H. R. Rep. No. 1369, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 20-22 (1980).”
 
You misunderstand.

Think: contacting, instead of calling. Not, like, calling them up to testify. Phoning, etc.

They aren't his witnesses. They are the Committee's witnesses.
And this isn’t a trial.

Dimtards are wanting to have it both ways.
 
In a criminal prosecution, you flaming idiot. This is not that.

face-palm-gif.278959
Therefore, no way to tamper with a witness, Simp.
 

Forum List

Back
Top