Trump will bring down the Republican party

[Faun]

Gulp this down you puke traitor 73 straight months of job gains vs 800,000 losses per month with your pos

Yes 73 straight months of part-time, low-paying jobs. Have you noticed that the average wage has DROPPED $3,000 a year since Lame Duck President Obama took office. How is that good?

Also, you are somehow missing the lowest Labor Participation Rate since the '70's. Which makes for a sky-high real unemployment rate and far more people on the taxpayer teat. You've not noticed the miserable GDP numbers have you?

I'm curious, does childish name calling bother anyone or just make you look foolish?

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Seven of that 28 million don't want part time jobs and cannot find full time jobs.

Don't change the subject because you were caught telling a rightwingnut lie. In response to another poster pointing out the private sector has posted employment growth for an unprecedented 73 consecutive months, you falsely claimed they were part time jobs.

You're shown how that's utter bullshit as 99% of the jobs gained during that period were full time jobs, and you respond by trying to change the topic to part timers who want to work full time.

Meanwhile, that number is actually 6.1 million, not 7 million. It's down from 9.2 million over those 73 months. And as a percentage of the civilian noninsttutional population at 2.4%, it's not much higher than the pre-recession 1.9%.

Seven million of those working part time want full-time jobs and

well the bush stink is still there so turn around is fair play

How come you didn't mention the 8 or 9 tax increases under reagan and yes he did increase our debt and pub shut their big mouths then Now they open them Hypocrite

Yes, President Reagan did increase some taxes and lowered many others. Share with us specifically what taxes were raised and lowered. Obviously, President Reagan and his advisers did an extremely fine job in deciding what to raise and what to lower since his policies led to a quarter of a century of economic growth.

Really hard for you to swallow given the massive economic failure of Lame Duck President Obama along with the failure of his world policies.

Gulp this down you puke traitor 73 straight months of job gains vs 800,000 losses per month with your pos

Yes 73 straight months of part-time, low-paying jobs. Have you noticed that the average wage has DROPPED $3,000 a year since Lame Duck President Obama took office. How is that good?

Also, you are somehow missing the lowest Labor Participation Rate since the '70's. Which makes for a sky-high real unemployment rate and far more people on the taxpayer teat. You've not noticed the miserable GDP numbers have you?

I'm curious, does childish name calling bother anyone or just make you look foolish?

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Why are you afraid to use the REAL numbers from when Lame Duck President Obama took office?
Progressives do like to pick and choose their figures.

Full time (7,629,000) (6.5% increase)

Jan 2009: 115,818,000
Mar 2016: 123,447,000

Part time (1,441,000) (5.4% increase)
Jan 2009: 26,377,000
Mar 2016: 27,818,000

Then we have the Labor Participation Rate, the number of Americans, 16 years and older who are working.
Labor Participation Rate

Jan. 2009 65.7%
Mar. 2016: 63.0%

That translates to:
Not in the Labor Force

2009:...............81,659,000
March 2016.....93,482,000

Americans receiving Food Stamps

2009: 31,939,110
2016 45,800,000

Americans living below the poverty level

2009: 39,600,000
2014: 46,700,000 (Latest year I could find)

Do you know the primary difference between a child being raised in poverty and one being raised above the poverty line?

Here is a hint...if you reward bad behavior, why are you surprised when you have bad results?

Holyfuckingshit!

Now you're changing the topic again because you don't like getting caught in a lie.

And because I'm not letting you get away with your lie, let me remind you what you actually said....

In response to another poster pointing out how we are in the 73rd consecutive month of job growth in the private sector, you responded by falsely claiming those were part time jobs.

Maintaining relevance to the subject, I showed that 99% of the jobs gained since February, 2010 (73 months ago), were full time jobs, not part time jobs as you lied about.

Rather than simply admit you got caught, you're now trying to change that 73 month period being discussed to an 84 month period by backdating the start date to when Obama became president. But of course, that was not being discussed. The last 73 months of recovery was being discussed.

 

[Faun]

Bull Shit!!!

After the Dem Congress trashed the economy we hemorrhaged jobs, no thanks to increasing the minimum-wage and over regulation of lending which caused a run on banks and massive defaults when their threats to bring government action against banks that didn't lend to unqualified borrowers fell flat on it's face. If an unqualified borrower can't refinance his adjustable loan to a fixed loan, this is going to happen the minute interest rates start skyrocketing. There are reasons people are poor, and one of them is a lack of spending discipline.
Thank You ACORN and Dodd/Frank.

The Dem Congress did no such thing, ya moron. Republicans controlled Congress for 12 years while the housing markets ballooned out of control. By the time Democrats took control of the Congress, the damage to the housing markets was done.

Bull shit, dumbass.

George Bush warned the Dem led Congress 5 times that something needed to be done about the housing market. They ignored him every single time. it's all on them.

The video no LIB will ever want to watch:
Listen to Barney Frank. Fucking fag was too head over heels in love with his pool-boy at the time to be able to think straight apparently.

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

 

[PredFan]

The Dem Congress did no such thing, ya moron. Republicans controlled Congress for 12 years while the housing markets ballooned out of control. By the time Democrats took control of the Congress, the damage to the housing markets was done.

Bull shit, dumbass.

George Bush warned the Dem led Congress 5 times that something needed to be done about the housing market. They ignored him every single time. it's all on them.

The video no LIB will ever want to watch:
Listen to Barney Frank. Fucking fag was too head over heels in love with his pool-boy at the time to be able to think straight apparently.

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

And you are a partisan hack idiot.
Lying and denying is all you have.

The Dem Congress did no such thing, ya moron. Republicans controlled Congress for 12 years while the housing markets ballooned out of control. By the time Democrats took control of the Congress, the damage to the housing markets was done.

Bull shit, dumbass.

George Bush warned the Dem led Congress 5 times that something needed to be done about the housing market. They ignored him every single time. it's all on them.

The video no LIB will ever want to watch:
Listen to Barney Frank. Fucking fag was too head over heels in love with his pool-boy at the time to be able to think straight apparently.

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

And you are a partisan hack idiot. Lying and denying is all you have. You have been proven wrong but you don't have the intelligence or maturity to admit it. Typical liberal idiot. Go fuck yourself with a cactus, I have no more time to waste in your insipid nonsense.

 

[Faun]

Bull shit, dumbass.

George Bush warned the Dem led Congress 5 times that something needed to be done about the housing market. They ignored him every single time. it's all on them.

The video no LIB will ever want to watch:
Listen to Barney Frank. Fucking fag was too head over heels in love with his pool-boy at the time to be able to think straight apparently.

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

And you are a partisan hack idiot.
Lying and denying is all you have.

Bull shit, dumbass.

George Bush warned the Dem led Congress 5 times that something needed to be done about the housing market. They ignored him every single time. it's all on them.

The video no LIB will ever want to watch:
Listen to Barney Frank. Fucking fag was too head over heels in love with his pool-boy at the time to be able to think straight apparently.

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

And you are a partisan hack idiot. Lying and denying is all you have. You have been proven wrong but you don't have the intelligence or maturity to admit it. Typical liberal idiot. Go fuck yourself with a cactus, I have no more time to waste in your insipid nonsense.
View attachment 72817

LOLOLOLOL

Poor, deranged, rightie. You're so easily discombobulated.

 

[PredFan]

The video no LIB will ever want to watch:
Listen to Barney Frank. Fucking fag was too head over heels in love with his pool-boy at the time to be able to think straight apparently.

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

And you are a partisan hack idiot.
Lying and denying is all you have.

The video no LIB will ever want to watch:
Listen to Barney Frank. Fucking fag was too head over heels in love with his pool-boy at the time to be able to think straight apparently.

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

And you are a partisan hack idiot. Lying and denying is all you have. You have been proven wrong but you don't have the intelligence or maturity to admit it. Typical liberal idiot. Go fuck yourself with a cactus, I have no more time to waste in your insipid nonsense.
View attachment 72817

LOLOLOLOL

Poor, deranged, rightie. You're so easily discombobulated.

Look little man. You have been beaten and dismissed. Now, off you go!

 

[Faun]

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

And you are a partisan hack idiot.
Lying and denying is all you have.

Now if you could only explain how that video blocked actual legislation, you'd have a point.

But since you can't....

You DO know that legislation starts in congress right? Nothing to block because nothing was done. You are wrong, it is all on the Democrats. Admit it and move on.

You're fucking deranged.

Something needed to be done. That something was reform of the GSEs. But you're right when you say nothing was done. Regrettably for Republicans, nothing was done on their watch.

In typical fashion, Republicans and conservatives blame Democrats.

And you are a partisan hack idiot. Lying and denying is all you have. You have been proven wrong but you don't have the intelligence or maturity to admit it. Typical liberal idiot. Go fuck yourself with a cactus, I have no more time to waste in your insipid nonsense.
View attachment 72817

LOLOLOLOL

Poor, deranged, rightie. You're so easily discombobulated.

Look little man. You have been beaten and dismissed. Now, off you go!

LOLOL

You're not man enough to dismiss me.

Your unintended humor aside, you admit Republicans did nothing. You admit Democrats didn't need to block anything because Republicans did nothing...

... yet you idiotically blame Democrats.

 

[Markle]

Bull Shit!!!


After the Dem Congress trashed the economy we hemorrhaged jobs, no thanks to increasing the minimum-wage and over regulation of lending which caused a run on banks and massive defaults when their threats to bring government action against banks that didn't lend to unqualified borrowers fell flat on it's face. If an unqualified borrower can't refinance his adjustable loan to a fixed loan, this is going to happen the minute interest rates start skyrocketing. There are reasons people are poor, and one of them is a lack of spending discipline.

Thank You ACORN and Dodd/Frank.

The Dem Congress did no such thing, ya moron. Republicans controlled Congress for 12 years while the housing markets ballooned out of control. By the time Democrats took control of the Congress, the damage to the housing markets was done.

Are you proud of being ignorant about what caused the housing, mortgage, financial collapse? See Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.


Did Chris Dodd and Barney Frank, with their committees increase or decrease the percentage of subprime loans bought by Fannie and Freddie?

I guess no one to you that during years when the bubble was ballooning out of control, the committees Chris Dodd and Barney Frank were on.... were controlled by Republicans.

Missed out on those civics classes didn't you? Required no legislative action. Those changes came out of the committees. But you know that don't you?

At the same time, Barney Frank's lover was on the board of directors for Fannie Mae. So his lover got bonuses the more loans they bought.

Care to try to answer that question? Here to remind you....

Are you proud of being ignorant about what caused the housing, mortgage, financial collapse? See Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.

Did Chris Dodd and Barney Frank, with their committees increase or decrease the percentage of subprime loans bought by Fannie and Freddie?

Holyfuckingshit!

First of all, you insinuated Frank & Dodd, with their committees.... affected the peecentage subprime loans. But those committees were run by Republicans. Now you admit those committees actually passed those bills, having no effect on on subprime loans.

But more to the point... since you know the bills came out of committee, why did Senate leadership not put any of them on the legislative calendar for an up/down vote by the full Senate?

How did Barney Frank block any GSE reform in the House where such a bill did pass in the House, only to die in the Senate again where Senate leadership sat on the bill and like the Senate bills, wouldn't put it to a vote?

Please do your due diligence. The changes to the increase in the rate of subprime loans Fannie and Freddie did NOT require changes to the LAW. Where did you get that idea or do you simply not know any better?

You are really superficial in your knowledge of this issue aren't you? You believe the housing/mortgage/financial crash happened in the couple of years leading up to 2007 crash. How quaint!

Beginning in 1992 Congress pushed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase purchases of mortgages going to low to moderate income people. In 1996 HUD gave Fannie and Freddie an explicit target: 42% of their mortgage financing had to go to borrowers with incomes below the median. This target was increased to 50% in 2000 and 52% in 2005. In 1996 HUD required that 12% of all mortgages purchased by Freddie and Fannie had to be “special affordable” loans, meaning loans to borrowers with income less than 60% of their area’s median. The 12% dictum was increased to 20% in 2000 and 22% in 2005.


How Government Stoked the Mania

 

[Markle]

Yes 73 straight months of part-time, low-paying jobs. Have you noticed that the average wage has DROPPED $3,000 a year since Lame Duck President Obama took office. How is that good?

Also, you are somehow missing the lowest Labor Participation Rate since the '70's. Which makes for a sky-high real unemployment rate and far more people on the taxpayer teat. You've not noticed the miserable GDP numbers have you?

I'm curious, does childish name calling bother anyone or just make you look foolish?

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Seven of that 28 million don't want part time jobs and cannot find full time jobs.

Don't change the subject because you were caught telling a rightwingnut lie. In response to another poster pointing out the private sector has posted employment growth for an unprecedented 73 consecutive months, you falsely claimed they were part time jobs.

You're shown how that's utter bullshit as 99% of the jobs gained during that period were full time jobs, and you respond by trying to change the topic to part timers who want to work full time.

Meanwhile, that number is actually 6.1 million, not 7 million. It's down from 9.2 million over those 73 months. And as a percentage of the civilian noninsttutional population at 2.4%, it's not much higher than the pre-recession 1.9%.

Seven million of those working part time want full-time jobs and

Yes, President Reagan did increase some taxes and lowered many others. Share with us specifically what taxes were raised and lowered. Obviously, President Reagan and his advisers did an extremely fine job in deciding what to raise and what to lower since his policies led to a quarter of a century of economic growth.

Really hard for you to swallow given the massive economic failure of Lame Duck President Obama along with the failure of his world policies.

Gulp this down you puke traitor 73 straight months of job gains vs 800,000 losses per month with your pos

Yes 73 straight months of part-time, low-paying jobs. Have you noticed that the average wage has DROPPED $3,000 a year since Lame Duck President Obama took office. How is that good?

Also, you are somehow missing the lowest Labor Participation Rate since the '70's. Which makes for a sky-high real unemployment rate and far more people on the taxpayer teat. You've not noticed the miserable GDP numbers have you?

I'm curious, does childish name calling bother anyone or just make you look foolish?

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Why are you afraid to use the REAL numbers from when Lame Duck President Obama took office?
Progressives do like to pick and choose their figures.

Full time (7,629,000) (6.5% increase)

Jan 2009: 115,818,000
Mar 2016: 123,447,000

Part time (1,441,000) (5.4% increase)
Jan 2009: 26,377,000
Mar 2016: 27,818,000

Then we have the Labor Participation Rate, the number of Americans, 16 years and older who are working.
Labor Participation Rate

Jan. 2009 65.7%
Mar. 2016: 63.0%

That translates to:
Not in the Labor Force

2009:...............81,659,000
March 2016.....93,482,000

Americans receiving Food Stamps

2009: 31,939,110
2016 45,800,000

Americans living below the poverty level

2009: 39,600,000
2014: 46,700,000 (Latest year I could find)

Do you know the primary difference between a child being raised in poverty and one being raised above the poverty line?

Here is a hint...if you reward bad behavior, why are you surprised when you have bad results?

Holyfuckingshit!

Now you're changing the topic again because you don't like getting caught in a lie.

And because I'm not letting you get away with your lie, let me remind you what you actually said....

In response to another poster pointing out how we are in the 73rd consecutive month of job growth in the private sector, you responded by falsely claiming those were part time jobs.

Maintaining relevance to the subject, I showed that 99% of the jobs gained since February, 2010 (73 months ago), were full time jobs, not part time jobs as you lied about.

Rather than simply admit you got caught, you're now trying to change that 73 month period being discussed to an 84 month period by backdating the start date to when Obama became president. But of course, that was not being discussed. The last 73 months of recovery was being discussed.

Cute try. I was wrong in that most of the jobs created were part-time. Instead, the number of part-time jobs skyrocketed to record numbers and the number of people who wanted full time jobs but they were unavailable. You...childishly chose the wrong year for the beginning of the

Yes 73 straight months of part-time, low-paying jobs. Have you noticed that the average wage has DROPPED $3,000 a year since Lame Duck President Obama took office. How is that good?

Also, you are somehow missing the lowest Labor Participation Rate since the '70's. Which makes for a sky-high real unemployment rate and far more people on the taxpayer teat. You've not noticed the miserable GDP numbers have you?

I'm curious, does childish name calling bother anyone or just make you look foolish?

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Seven of that 28 million don't want part time jobs and cannot find full time jobs.

Don't change the subject because you were caught telling a rightwingnut lie. In response to another poster pointing out the private sector has posted employment growth for an unprecedented 73 consecutive months, you falsely claimed they were part time jobs.

You're shown how that's utter bullshit as 99% of the jobs gained during that period were full time jobs, and you respond by trying to change the topic to part timers who want to work full time.

Meanwhile, that number is actually 6.1 million, not 7 million. It's down from 9.2 million over those 73 months. And as a percentage of the civilian noninsttutional population at 2.4%, it's not much higher than the pre-recession 1.9%.

Seven million of those working part time want full-time jobs and

Yes, President Reagan did increase some taxes and lowered many others. Share with us specifically what taxes were raised and lowered. Obviously, President Reagan and his advisers did an extremely fine job in deciding what to raise and what to lower since his policies led to a quarter of a century of economic growth.

Really hard for you to swallow given the massive economic failure of Lame Duck President Obama along with the failure of his world policies.

Gulp this down you puke traitor 73 straight months of job gains vs 800,000 losses per month with your pos

Yes 73 straight months of part-time, low-paying jobs. Have you noticed that the average wage has DROPPED $3,000 a year since Lame Duck President Obama took office. How is that good?

Also, you are somehow missing the lowest Labor Participation Rate since the '70's. Which makes for a sky-high real unemployment rate and far more people on the taxpayer teat. You've not noticed the miserable GDP numbers have you?

I'm curious, does childish name calling bother anyone or just make you look foolish?

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Why are you afraid to use the REAL numbers from when Lame Duck President Obama took office?
Progressives do like to pick and choose their figures.

Full time (7,629,000) (6.5% increase)

Jan 2009: 115,818,000
Mar 2016: 123,447,000

Part time (1,441,000) (5.4% increase)
Jan 2009: 26,377,000
Mar 2016: 27,818,000

Then we have the Labor Participation Rate, the number of Americans, 16 years and older who are working.
Labor Participation Rate

Jan. 2009 65.7%
Mar. 2016: 63.0%

That translates to:
Not in the Labor Force

2009:...............81,659,000
March 2016.....93,482,000

Americans receiving Food Stamps

2009: 31,939,110
2016 45,800,000

Americans living below the poverty level

2009: 39,600,000
2014: 46,700,000 (Latest year I could find)

Do you know the primary difference between a child being raised in poverty and one being raised above the poverty line?

Here is a hint...if you reward bad behavior, why are you surprised when you have bad results?

Holyfuckingshit!

Now you're changing the topic again because you don't like getting caught in a lie.

And because I'm not letting you get away with your lie, let me remind you what you actually said....

In response to another poster pointing out how we are in the 73rd consecutive month of job growth in the private sector, you responded by falsely claiming those were part time jobs.

Maintaining relevance to the subject, I showed that 99% of the jobs gained since February, 2010 (73 months ago), were full time jobs, not part time jobs as you lied about.

Rather than simply admit you got caught, you're now trying to change that 73 month period being discussed to an 84 month period by backdating the start date to when Obama became president. But of course, that was not being discussed. The last 73 months of recovery was being discussed.

I was wrong in saying most of the jobs created were part-time jobs. I was right that the difference was not near as much as your alleged. Of course, you picked whatever year made you look best. Cute try.

Wow...amazing that someone would actually want to start when the figures when Lame Duck President Obama actually took office. I bet you would be agreeable to picking figures for the Bush administration from 2000 to 2007. Right?

I didn't catch your answer to your answer to these two questions. Nor did you have anything to say about the failure in the economy shown by the other economic figures I quoted.

Do you know the primary difference between a child being raised in poverty and one being raised above the poverty line?

Here is a hint...if you reward bad behavior, why are you surprised when you have bad results?

 

[Markle]

Faun, here are some ways for you to inform yourself.

From New York Times
Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending
Fannie Mae Eases Credit To Aid Mortgage Lending

From Bloomberg News
How the Democrats Created the Financial Crisis
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&refer=columnist_hassett&sid=aSKSoiNbnQY0

The Administration’s Unheeded Warnings About the Systemic Risk Posed by the GSEs, ie Fannie, Freddie etc.)
Just the Facts: The Administration's Unheeded Warnings About the Systemic Risk Posed by the GSEs

Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Democrats of Financial Crisis; Meltdown


The Wall Street Journal Barney’s Rubble
Barney's Rubble

Mashup of Maxine Waters & Barney Frank - Then Vs. Now

Embedded media from this media site is no longer available

The Bet That Blew Up Wall Street
Steve Kroft On Credit Default Swaps And Their Central Role In The Unfolding Economic Crisis
The Bet That Blew Up Wall Street

Bush Called For Reform 17 Times In 2008 ALONE, here dating back to 2001! Duplicate of Whitehouse.archives Bush Called For Reform 17 Times In 2008 | Sweetness & Light

 

[Faun]

The Dem Congress did no such thing, ya moron. Republicans controlled Congress for 12 years while the housing markets ballooned out of control. By the time Democrats took control of the Congress, the damage to the housing markets was done.

Are you proud of being ignorant about what caused the housing, mortgage, financial collapse? See Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.


Did Chris Dodd and Barney Frank, with their committees increase or decrease the percentage of subprime loans bought by Fannie and Freddie?

I guess no one to you that during years when the bubble was ballooning out of control, the committees Chris Dodd and Barney Frank were on.... were controlled by Republicans.

Missed out on those civics classes didn't you? Required no legislative action. Those changes came out of the committees. But you know that don't you?

At the same time, Barney Frank's lover was on the board of directors for Fannie Mae. So his lover got bonuses the more loans they bought.

Care to try to answer that question? Here to remind you....

Are you proud of being ignorant about what caused the housing, mortgage, financial collapse? See Chris Dodd and Barney Frank.

Did Chris Dodd and Barney Frank, with their committees increase or decrease the percentage of subprime loans bought by Fannie and Freddie?

Holyfuckingshit!

First of all, you insinuated Frank & Dodd, with their committees.... affected the peecentage subprime loans. But those committees were run by Republicans. Now you admit those committees actually passed those bills, having no effect on on subprime loans.

But more to the point... since you know the bills came out of committee, why did Senate leadership not put any of them on the legislative calendar for an up/down vote by the full Senate?

How did Barney Frank block any GSE reform in the House where such a bill did pass in the House, only to die in the Senate again where Senate leadership sat on the bill and like the Senate bills, wouldn't put it to a vote?

Please do your due diligence. The changes to the increase in the rate of subprime loans Fannie and Freddie did NOT require changes to the LAW. Where did you get that idea or do you simply not know any better?

You are really superficial in your knowledge of this issue aren't you? You believe the housing/mortgage/financial crash happened in the couple of years leading up to 2007 crash. How quaint!

Beginning in 1992 Congress pushed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to increase purchases of mortgages going to low to moderate income people. In 1996 HUD gave Fannie and Freddie an explicit target: 42% of their mortgage financing had to go to borrowers with incomes below the median. This target was increased to 50% in 2000 and 52% in 2005. In 1996 HUD required that 12% of all mortgages purchased by Freddie and Fannie had to be “special affordable” loans, meaning loans to borrowers with income less than 60% of their area’s median. The 12% dictum was increased to 20% in 2000 and 22% in 2005.


How Government Stoked the Mania

Wow, a rightwing publication blames the CRA. Didn't see that coming.

The CRA had little to do with the collapse. Only 6% of higher priced loans were CRA residential loans, 0% were commercial loans, 80% of lending institutions which doled out toxic subprime loans were not participating in the CRA, and the lenders who did write toxic subprime loans were able to get away with it due to lax regulations, compared to CRA loans which were heavily regulated.

Community Reinvestment Act had nothing to do with subprime crisis

The Community Reinvestment Act, passed in 1977, requires banks to lend in the low-income neighborhoods where they take deposits. Just the idea that a lending crisis created from 2004 to 2007 was caused by a 1977 law is silly. But it’s even more ridiculous when you consider that most subprime loans were made by firms that aren’t subject to the CRA. University of Michigan law professor Michael Barr testified back in February before the House Committee on Financial Services that 50% of subprime loans were made by mortgage service companies not subject comprehensive federal supervision and another 30% were made by affiliates of banks or thrifts which are not subject to routine supervision or examinations. As former Fed Governor Ned Gramlich said in an August, 2007, speech shortly before he passed away: “In the subprime market where we badly need supervision, a majority of loans are made with very little supervision. It is like a city with a murder law, but no cops on the beat.”

BusinessWeek via web.archive.org​

 

[Faun]

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Seven of that 28 million don't want part time jobs and cannot find full time jobs.

Don't change the subject because you were caught telling a rightwingnut lie. In response to another poster pointing out the private sector has posted employment growth for an unprecedented 73 consecutive months, you falsely claimed they were part time jobs.

You're shown how that's utter bullshit as 99% of the jobs gained during that period were full time jobs, and you respond by trying to change the topic to part timers who want to work full time.

Meanwhile, that number is actually 6.1 million, not 7 million. It's down from 9.2 million over those 73 months. And as a percentage of the civilian noninsttutional population at 2.4%, it's not much higher than the pre-recession 1.9%.

Seven million of those working part time want full-time jobs and

Gulp this down you puke traitor 73 straight months of job gains vs 800,000 losses per month with your pos

Yes 73 straight months of part-time, low-paying jobs. Have you noticed that the average wage has DROPPED $3,000 a year since Lame Duck President Obama took office. How is that good?

Also, you are somehow missing the lowest Labor Participation Rate since the '70's. Which makes for a sky-high real unemployment rate and far more people on the taxpayer teat. You've not noticed the miserable GDP numbers have you?

I'm curious, does childish name calling bother anyone or just make you look foolish?

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Why are you afraid to use the REAL numbers from when Lame Duck President Obama took office?
Progressives do like to pick and choose their figures.

Full time (7,629,000) (6.5% increase)

Jan 2009: 115,818,000
Mar 2016: 123,447,000

Part time (1,441,000) (5.4% increase)
Jan 2009: 26,377,000
Mar 2016: 27,818,000

Then we have the Labor Participation Rate, the number of Americans, 16 years and older who are working.
Labor Participation Rate

Jan. 2009 65.7%
Mar. 2016: 63.0%

That translates to:
Not in the Labor Force

2009:...............81,659,000
March 2016.....93,482,000

Americans receiving Food Stamps

2009: 31,939,110
2016 45,800,000

Americans living below the poverty level

2009: 39,600,000
2014: 46,700,000 (Latest year I could find)

Do you know the primary difference between a child being raised in poverty and one being raised above the poverty line?

Here is a hint...if you reward bad behavior, why are you surprised when you have bad results?

Holyfuckingshit!

Now you're changing the topic again because you don't like getting caught in a lie.

And because I'm not letting you get away with your lie, let me remind you what you actually said....

In response to another poster pointing out how we are in the 73rd consecutive month of job growth in the private sector, you responded by falsely claiming those were part time jobs.

Maintaining relevance to the subject, I showed that 99% of the jobs gained since February, 2010 (73 months ago), were full time jobs, not part time jobs as you lied about.

Rather than simply admit you got caught, you're now trying to change that 73 month period being discussed to an 84 month period by backdating the start date to when Obama became president. But of course, that was not being discussed. The last 73 months of recovery was being discussed.

Cute try. I was wrong in that most of the jobs created were part-time. Instead, the number of part-time jobs skyrocketed to record numbers and the number of people who wanted full time jobs but they were unavailable. You...childishly chose the wrong year for the beginning of the

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Seven of that 28 million don't want part time jobs and cannot find full time jobs.

Don't change the subject because you were caught telling a rightwingnut lie. In response to another poster pointing out the private sector has posted employment growth for an unprecedented 73 consecutive months, you falsely claimed they were part time jobs.

You're shown how that's utter bullshit as 99% of the jobs gained during that period were full time jobs, and you respond by trying to change the topic to part timers who want to work full time.

Meanwhile, that number is actually 6.1 million, not 7 million. It's down from 9.2 million over those 73 months. And as a percentage of the civilian noninsttutional population at 2.4%, it's not much higher than the pre-recession 1.9%.

Seven million of those working part time want full-time jobs and

Gulp this down you puke traitor 73 straight months of job gains vs 800,000 losses per month with your pos

Yes 73 straight months of part-time, low-paying jobs. Have you noticed that the average wage has DROPPED $3,000 a year since Lame Duck President Obama took office. How is that good?

Also, you are somehow missing the lowest Labor Participation Rate since the '70's. Which makes for a sky-high real unemployment rate and far more people on the taxpayer teat. You've not noticed the miserable GDP numbers have you?

I'm curious, does childish name calling bother anyone or just make you look foolish?

And where do you get this nonsense about the jobs gained during those 73 months are part time jobs???

Part time jobs (191,000)

2/2010: 27,627,000
3/2016: 27,818,000

Full time jobs (12,669,000)

2/2010: 110,778,000
3/2016: 123,447,000

99% of the 13 million jobs gained during those 73 months were full time jobs.

Where on Earth did you get your backwards information that they were part time jobs??

Why are you afraid to use the REAL numbers from when Lame Duck President Obama took office?
Progressives do like to pick and choose their figures.

Full time (7,629,000) (6.5% increase)

Jan 2009: 115,818,000
Mar 2016: 123,447,000

Part time (1,441,000) (5.4% increase)
Jan 2009: 26,377,000
Mar 2016: 27,818,000

Then we have the Labor Participation Rate, the number of Americans, 16 years and older who are working.
Labor Participation Rate

Jan. 2009 65.7%
Mar. 2016: 63.0%

That translates to:
Not in the Labor Force

2009:...............81,659,000
March 2016.....93,482,000

Americans receiving Food Stamps

2009: 31,939,110
2016 45,800,000

Americans living below the poverty level

2009: 39,600,000
2014: 46,700,000 (Latest year I could find)

Do you know the primary difference between a child being raised in poverty and one being raised above the poverty line?

Here is a hint...if you reward bad behavior, why are you surprised when you have bad results?

Holyfuckingshit!

Now you're changing the topic again because you don't like getting caught in a lie.

And because I'm not letting you get away with your lie, let me remind you what you actually said....

In response to another poster pointing out how we are in the 73rd consecutive month of job growth in the private sector, you responded by falsely claiming those were part time jobs.

Maintaining relevance to the subject, I showed that 99% of the jobs gained since February, 2010 (73 months ago), were full time jobs, not part time jobs as you lied about.

Rather than simply admit you got caught, you're now trying to change that 73 month period being discussed to an 84 month period by backdating the start date to when Obama became president. But of course, that was not being discussed. The last 73 months of recovery was being discussed.

I was wrong in saying most of the jobs created were part-time jobs. I was right that the difference was not near as much as your alleged. Of course, you picked whatever year made you look best. Cute try.

Wow...amazing that someone would actually want to start when the figures when Lame Duck President Obama actually took office. I bet you would be agreeable to picking figures for the Bush administration from 2000 to 2007. Right?

I didn't catch your answer to your answer to these two questions. Nor did you have anything to say about the failure in the economy shown by the other economic figures I quoted.

Do you know the primary difference between a child being raised in poverty and one being raised above the poverty line?

Here is a hint...if you reward bad behavior, why are you surprised when you have bad results?

You're delusional, I picked nothing. I responded to your lie about the jobs created during the last 73 months were part time jobs.

They weren't. 99% of those jobs, as you were shown, were indeed full time jobs.

Your claim I didn't respond to the other numbers you posted is also a lie. I did respond. In response to you pointing out the increase of SNAP participants and the increase in the poverty level, I pointed out the vast majority of those increases were due to the Great Recession.

 

[Faun]

Spot the disconnect....

First you claim no new laws were needed....

Please do your due diligence. The changes to the increase in the rate of subprime loans Fannie and Freddie did NOT require changes to the LAW. Where did you get that idea or do you simply not know any better?

Then you point out how Bush warned Congress that we needed new laws....

The Administration’s Unheeded Warnings About the Systemic Risk Posed by the GSEs, ie Fannie, Freddie etc.)

You're talking out of both sides of your mouth because you have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[Faun]

Bush Called For Reform 17 Times In 2008 ALONE, here dating back to 2001! Duplicate of Whitehouse.archives Bush Called For Reform 17 Times In 2008 | Sweetness & Light

You're calling yourself an idiot now as in post #267 you actually said no new laws were needed to reform the GSEs.

 

[beagle9]

Daughters husband just got a plant job in the industrial park around 3 months ago, and he quickly moved from temp to full time worker. He was working so hard, but undoubtedly harder and harder just wasn't good enough because he was laid off this week with the announcement that the plant is moving over seas. The bleeding of good jobs just keeps going and going. Is Trump right about these things, and what can he actually do to help out ? Why the undermining of the strength of the nation's economy, and the undermining of the stability of the nation's internal health by these industrialist in which keeps going on today ?

 

[beagle9]

The son & law got a job on his own, and it pay's $12.00 dollars an hour to start, then there is an evaluation after 90 days, and a raise accordingly... He works 4-10 hour days, so he has three days to do some part time if he wants too... The temp service offered him a job for $8.00 dollars an hour with no guarantee's.... Could you feed a family of five on $ $8.00 dollars an hour ? Hey it's not his fault the job's in so many categories aren't worth much anymore. He is trying as hard as he can, but many jobs these days are crap anymore. He is also training on heating and air now. Thank God. Side note on a different topic...Target is a great example of why this nation has made a huge mistake going corporation in so many ways. Shameful. We are going to keep it up, and we are going to invite pure hell to reign down upon this nation. We are just tempting the world to wrath.

 

[eddiew]

Daughters husband just got a plant job in the industrial park around 3 months ago, and he quickly moved from temp to full time worker. He was working so hard, but undoubtedly harder and harder just wasn't good enough because he was laid off this week with the announcement that the plant is moving over seas. The bleeding of good jobs just keeps going and going. Is Trump right about these things, and what can he actually do to help out ? Why the undermining of the strength of the nation's economy, and the undermining of the stability of the nation's internal health by these industrialist in which keeps going on today ?

It is a big problem but PLEASE don't blame Dems alone

 

[beagle9]

Daughters husband just got a plant job in the industrial park around 3 months ago, and he quickly moved from temp to full time worker. He was working so hard, but undoubtedly harder and harder just wasn't good enough because he was laid off this week with the announcement that the plant is moving over seas. The bleeding of good jobs just keeps going and going. Is Trump right about these things, and what can he actually do to help out ? Why the undermining of the strength of the nation's economy, and the undermining of the stability of the nation's internal health by these industrialist in which keeps going on today ?

It is a big problem but PLEASE don't blame Dems alone

. I don't know who to blame to tell you the truth... I just know this nation is being undermined terribly anymore. The more we cater to those who won't work or are worthless when they attempt it, the more weaker this nation becomes. If a foriegn country was to be successful at landing troops and equipment here, we may not have the will nor the strength to resist them any longer. We would be toast finally.