You're being professionally obtuse now you fucking idiot. Again...OK! Here is the first full paragraph of the OP you fucking idiot!And they apply to Trumps situation HOW? Be specific shit for brains.
If you had actually read and understood what it says you would have read that it speaks of emoluments and quid pro quos and not your supercilious alter topic of "...providing market rate consumers products and services...." Now go back and read my first post to you on this thread, fool! Find someone to explain the differences to you. It's about conflicts of interests, the appearance of or actual vis-à-vis Trump POTUS and the United States, that are at odds, you mother fucking IDIOT! Gawd Damn you can play stupid much better than most, Tex!There are two main legal issues he would have to avoid, ethics experts say: traditional prosecution under government bribery laws and a little-noticed provision in the Constitution known as the emoluments clause, which prohibits U.S. officials from taking money from foreign sources without the consent of Congress. If Trump committed an official act in exchange for a financial reward from another person or company, he could open himself up to prosecution or impeachment. Prosecutors would be called upon to demonstrate a quid pro quo relationship between a specific act and a material gain for the Trump organization. That probe could be conducted by Congress or as a criminal investigation within his Justice Department, where it might prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor.
Name one consumer transaction that is not a quid pro quo. People are talking like his renting hotel rooms to foreign diplomats, at market rates, as an example of a violation. The violations you referred to would apply to anyone in government, yet I never heard anyone claiming maobama could be guilty from day one. That's what makes this bullshit so ridiculous.
If you had actually read and understood what it says you would have read that it speaks of emoluments and quid pro quos and not your supercilious alter topic of "...providing market rate consumers products and services...." Now go back and read my first post to you on this thread, fool! Find someone to explain the differences to you. It's about conflicts of interests, the appearance of or actual vis-à-vis Trump POTUS and the United States, that are at odds, you mother fucking IDIOT! Gawd Damn you can play stupid much better than most, Tex!
You have yet to provide even ONE example where that MIGHT be the case. Come on fortune teller, put your rep on the line.
You lack imagination, fool!? There have got to be thousands of ways to obtain kickbacks by selling influence of the office of POTUS, and that's just one GENERAL EXAMPLE of an unlawful ethics issue, you bloody fool! The means are at hand by the power of the office, given an unscrupulous bunch in the WH.You have yet to provide even ONE example where that MIGHT be the case. Come on fortune teller, put your rep on the line.
So fuck you very much I'm sure, you flaming idiot. Now disappear, you fucking gadfly!
So you got nothing except "maybes", "might bes", "could bes" and of course you never expressed such concern with the liar of the year currently in the WH. If you stupid fuckers didn't have your hypocrisy you'd be left with nothing at all. Get back to us when you got more than just speculative bullshit.