Trump will face unprecedented ethics decisions

And they apply to Trumps situation HOW? Be specific shit for brains.
OK! Here is the first full paragraph of the OP you fucking idiot!
There are two main legal issues he would have to avoid, ethics experts say: traditional prosecution under government bribery laws and a little-noticed provision in the Constitution known as the emoluments clause, which prohibits U.S. officials from taking money from foreign sources without the consent of Congress. If Trump committed an official act in exchange for a financial reward from another person or company, he could open himself up to prosecution or impeachment. Prosecutors would be called upon to demonstrate a quid pro quo relationship between a specific act and a material gain for the Trump organization. That probe could be conducted by Congress or as a criminal investigation within his Justice Department, where it might prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor.
If you had actually read and understood what it says you would have read that it speaks of emoluments and quid pro quos and not your supercilious alter topic of "...providing market rate consumers products and services...." Now go back and read my first post to you on this thread, fool! Find someone to explain the differences to you. It's about conflicts of interests, the appearance of or actual vis-à-vis Trump POTUS and the United States, that are at odds, you mother fucking IDIOT! Gawd Damn you can play stupid much better than most, Tex!

Name one consumer transaction that is not a quid pro quo. People are talking like his renting hotel rooms to foreign diplomats, at market rates, as an example of a violation. The violations you referred to would apply to anyone in government, yet I never heard anyone claiming maobama could be guilty from day one. That's what makes this bullshit so ridiculous.
You're being professionally obtuse now you fucking idiot. Again...

If you had actually read and understood what it says you would have read that it speaks of emoluments and quid pro quos and not your supercilious alter topic of "...providing market rate consumers products and services...." Now go back and read my first post to you on this thread, fool! Find someone to explain the differences to you. It's about conflicts of interests, the appearance of or actual vis-à-vis Trump POTUS and the United States, that are at odds, you mother fucking IDIOT! Gawd Damn you can play stupid much better than most, Tex!




You have yet to provide even ONE example where that MIGHT be the case. Come on fortune teller, put your rep on the line.

You have yet to provide even ONE example where that MIGHT be the case. Come on fortune teller, put your rep on the line.
You lack imagination, fool!? There have got to be thousands of ways to obtain kickbacks by selling influence of the office of POTUS, and that's just one GENERAL EXAMPLE of an unlawful ethics issue, you bloody fool! The means are at hand by the power of the office, given an unscrupulous bunch in the WH.

So fuck you very much I'm sure, you flaming idiot. Now disappear, you fucking gadfly!



So you got nothing except "maybes", "might bes", "could bes" and of course you never expressed such concern with the liar of the year currently in the WH. If you stupid fuckers didn't have your hypocrisy you'd be left with nothing at all. Get back to us when you got more than just speculative bullshit.
 
You lack imagination, fool!? There have got to be thousands of ways to obtain kickbacks by selling influence of the office of POTUS, and that's just one GENERAL EXAMPLE of an unlawful ethics issue, you bloody fool! The means are at hand by the power of the office, given an unscrupulous bunch in the WH.

So fuck you very much I'm sure, you flaming idiot. Now disappear, you fucking gadfly!


Just an example on the above that I recently read from a report....On the surface it sounds innocent enough....but it really isn't.....

Trump has been trying to build a huge office complex in Buenos Aires but has run into some bureaucratic snags... A few days ago the president of Argentina called Trump to congratulate him on his win......AND, sure enough Trump soon hit that president for a favor to remove those bureaucratic snags.....

Cute, isn't it?
 
You lack imagination, fool!? There have got to be thousands of ways to obtain kickbacks by selling influence of the office of POTUS, and that's just one GENERAL EXAMPLE of an unlawful ethics issue, you bloody fool! The means are at hand by the power of the office, given an unscrupulous bunch in the WH.

So fuck you very much I'm sure, you flaming idiot. Now disappear, you fucking gadfly!


Just an example on the above that I recently read from a report....On the surface it sounds innocent enough....but it really isn't.....

Trump has been trying to build a huge office complex in Buenos Aires but has run into some bureaucratic snags... A few days ago the president of Argentina called Trump to congratulate him on his win......AND, sure enough Trump soon hit that president for a favor to remove those bureaucratic snags.....

Cute, isn't it?

So what did the president of Argentina get in exchange? Answer: nothing. No quid pro quo, dumbass.
 
So what did the president of Argentina get in exchange? Answer: nothing. No quid pro quo, dumbass.


Stay dumb, Finger baby....I really don't give a fuck about how stupid you are and will die that way.
 
Donald Trump’s foundation admitted in an IRS tax filing to violating laws against charity leaders profiting off of their own charities, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.


It is further vindication for David Fahrenthold’s extensive reporting on the various abuses of the Trump Foundation. During the campaign, a Trump surrogate repeatedly attempted to portray Fahrenthold as a partisan hack and a liar, while denying the wrongdoing that the Post reporter had flagged.

ADVERTISING
inRead invented by Teads
The new filing, which the Post reports was posted on the nonprofit-tracking site GuideStar and uploaded by the Trump Foundation’s law firm, Morgan, Lewis and Bockius, offers further evidence for many of Fahrenthold’s allegations of self-dealing by the Trump Foundation.

Among the revelations in the report:

  • The foundation checked “yes” when asked if it had transferred “income or assets to a disqualified person,” e.g., Trump, his family, or his businesses.
  • The foundation checked “yes” when asked if it had previously engaged in acts of self-dealing.
  • The foundation admitted to owning a Tim Tebow football helmet and two portraits of Donald Trump that it had paid for with charitable contributions.
  • The foundation reported a $150,000 gift from the foundation of a powerful Ukrainian steel magnate, Viktor Pinchuk, who had also donated to Hillary Clinton’s foundation. This had helped raise conflict of interest questions for Clinton that Trump exploited on the campaign trail.
  • Pinchuk, who supports stronger ties between Ukraine and the West, told the Post through a spokesman that this money was given as part of an agreement for Trump to speak at a conference organized by the steel magnate. This happened in September 2015, while Trump was running for president.
  • The foundation took in $781,000 and gave away $896,000 in grants during 2015 and ended the year with $1.1 million in the bank.
  • The foundation gave money to several conservative nonprofits, including $10,000 to right-wing stunt journalism provocateur James O’Keefe.
In the document, which the Post hadn’t been able to verify had been set to the IRS, the Trump Foundation admits to violating the ban on self-dealing in previous years. However, as the Post notes, the foundation hadn’t put that in its forms in previous years.

This raised questions about why those previous disclosures, signed by Trump himself, had not been accurate.
 
Donald Trump’s foundation admitted in an IRS tax filing to violating laws against charity leaders profiting off of their own charities, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.


It is further vindication for David Fahrenthold’s extensive reporting on the various abuses of the Trump Foundation. During the campaign, a Trump surrogate repeatedly attempted to portray Fahrenthold as a partisan hack and a liar, while denying the wrongdoing that the Post reporter had flagged.

ADVERTISING
inRead invented by Teads
The new filing, which the Post reports was posted on the nonprofit-tracking site GuideStar and uploaded by the Trump Foundation’s law firm, Morgan, Lewis and Bockius, offers further evidence for many of Fahrenthold’s allegations of self-dealing by the Trump Foundation.

Among the revelations in the report:

  • The foundation checked “yes” when asked if it had transferred “income or assets to a disqualified person,” e.g., Trump, his family, or his businesses.
  • The foundation checked “yes” when asked if it had previously engaged in acts of self-dealing.
  • The foundation admitted to owning a Tim Tebow football helmet and two portraits of Donald Trump that it had paid for with charitable contributions.
  • The foundation reported a $150,000 gift from the foundation of a powerful Ukrainian steel magnate, Viktor Pinchuk, who had also donated to Hillary Clinton’s foundation. This had helped raise conflict of interest questions for Clinton that Trump exploited on the campaign trail.
  • Pinchuk, who supports stronger ties between Ukraine and the West, told the Post through a spokesman that this money was given as part of an agreement for Trump to speak at a conference organized by the steel magnate. This happened in September 2015, while Trump was running for president.
  • The foundation took in $781,000 and gave away $896,000 in grants during 2015 and ended the year with $1.1 million in the bank.
  • The foundation gave money to several conservative nonprofits, including $10,000 to right-wing stunt journalism provocateur James O’Keefe.
In the document, which the Post hadn’t been able to verify had been set to the IRS, the Trump Foundation admits to violating the ban on self-dealing in previous years. However, as the Post notes, the foundation hadn’t put that in its forms in previous years.

This raised questions about why those previous disclosures, signed by Trump himself, had not been accurate.




You lack imagination, fool!? There have got to be thousands of ways to obtain kickbacks by selling influence of the office of POTUS, and that's just one GENERAL EXAMPLE of an unlawful ethics issue, you bloody fool! The means are at hand by the power of the office, given an unscrupulous bunch in the WH.

So fuck you very much I'm sure, you flaming idiot. Now disappear, you fucking gadfly!


Just an example on the above that I recently read from a report....On the surface it sounds innocent enough....but it really isn't.....

Trump has been trying to build a huge office complex in Buenos Aires but has run into some bureaucratic snags... A few days ago the president of Argentina called Trump to congratulate him on his win......AND, sure enough Trump soon hit that president for a favor to remove those bureaucratic snags.....

Cute, isn't it?

So what did the president of Argentina get in exchange? Answer: nothing. No quid pro quo, dumbass.
 
This should be "fun"to watch.....

There are two main legal issues he would have to avoid, ethics experts say: traditional prosecution under government bribery laws and a little-noticed provision in the Constitution known as the emoluments clause, which prohibits U.S. officials from taking money from foreign sources without the consent of Congress. If Trump committed an official act in exchange for a financial reward from another person or company, he could open himself up to prosecution or impeachment. Prosecutors would be called upon to demonstrate a quid pro quo relationship between a specific act and a material gain for the Trump organization. That probe could be conducted by Congress or as a criminal investigation within his Justice Department, where it might prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor.

With a web of foreign business interests extending from Azerbaijan to Panama, Trump could find that the most minor contractual renewal turns into a new reason for concern. Even Trump’s oft-touted status as landlord to the Bank of China in Trump Tower could place him in jeopardy, if, for example, the state-backed bank agreed to pay above-market-rate rents in the future

Trump could remove these potential conflicts by selling his business empire and placing the proceeds in a blind trust.

Donald Trump Will Face Unprecedented Ethics Decisions as President

(which does NOT mean that his children would independently run the company.)

Thank God hillary wont have to face anymore ethic issues.....considering she has no ethics.
 
This should be "fun"to watch.....

There are two main legal issues he would have to avoid, ethics experts say: traditional prosecution under government bribery laws and a little-noticed provision in the Constitution known as the emoluments clause, which prohibits U.S. officials from taking money from foreign sources without the consent of Congress. If Trump committed an official act in exchange for a financial reward from another person or company, he could open himself up to prosecution or impeachment. Prosecutors would be called upon to demonstrate a quid pro quo relationship between a specific act and a material gain for the Trump organization. That probe could be conducted by Congress or as a criminal investigation within his Justice Department, where it might prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor.

With a web of foreign business interests extending from Azerbaijan to Panama, Trump could find that the most minor contractual renewal turns into a new reason for concern. Even Trump’s oft-touted status as landlord to the Bank of China in Trump Tower could place him in jeopardy, if, for example, the state-backed bank agreed to pay above-market-rate rents in the future

Trump could remove these potential conflicts by selling his business empire and placing the proceeds in a blind trust.

Donald Trump Will Face Unprecedented Ethics Decisions as President

(which does NOT mean that his children would independently run the company.)

Thank God hillary wont have to face anymore ethic issues.....considering she has no ethics.

You're right................Trump has said that he's not going to pursue charges against Hillary for her emails.
 
This should be "fun"to watch.....

There are two main legal issues he would have to avoid, ethics experts say: traditional prosecution under government bribery laws and a little-noticed provision in the Constitution known as the emoluments clause, which prohibits U.S. officials from taking money from foreign sources without the consent of Congress. If Trump committed an official act in exchange for a financial reward from another person or company, he could open himself up to prosecution or impeachment. Prosecutors would be called upon to demonstrate a quid pro quo relationship between a specific act and a material gain for the Trump organization. That probe could be conducted by Congress or as a criminal investigation within his Justice Department, where it might prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor.

With a web of foreign business interests extending from Azerbaijan to Panama, Trump could find that the most minor contractual renewal turns into a new reason for concern. Even Trump’s oft-touted status as landlord to the Bank of China in Trump Tower could place him in jeopardy, if, for example, the state-backed bank agreed to pay above-market-rate rents in the future

Trump could remove these potential conflicts by selling his business empire and placing the proceeds in a blind trust.

Donald Trump Will Face Unprecedented Ethics Decisions as President

(which does NOT mean that his children would independently run the company.)

Thank God hillary wont have to face anymore ethic issues.....considering she has no ethics.

You're right................Trump has said that he's not going to pursue charges against Hillary for her emails.

Whats that have to do with hillarys lack of ethics?
 
This should be "fun"to watch.....

There are two main legal issues he would have to avoid, ethics experts say: traditional prosecution under government bribery laws and a little-noticed provision in the Constitution known as the emoluments clause, which prohibits U.S. officials from taking money from foreign sources without the consent of Congress. If Trump committed an official act in exchange for a financial reward from another person or company, he could open himself up to prosecution or impeachment. Prosecutors would be called upon to demonstrate a quid pro quo relationship between a specific act and a material gain for the Trump organization. That probe could be conducted by Congress or as a criminal investigation within his Justice Department, where it might prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor.

With a web of foreign business interests extending from Azerbaijan to Panama, Trump could find that the most minor contractual renewal turns into a new reason for concern. Even Trump’s oft-touted status as landlord to the Bank of China in Trump Tower could place him in jeopardy, if, for example, the state-backed bank agreed to pay above-market-rate rents in the future

Trump could remove these potential conflicts by selling his business empire and placing the proceeds in a blind trust.

Donald Trump Will Face Unprecedented Ethics Decisions as President

(which does NOT mean that his children would independently run the company.)

Thank God hillary wont have to face anymore ethic issues.....considering she has no ethics.

You're right................Trump has said that he's not going to pursue charges against Hillary for her emails.

Whats that have to do with hillarys lack of ethics?

It shows that Trump doesn't have any follow through, even when he was talking about how bad and criminal Hillary's behavior was with her emails. If he's going to lie to you about criminal charges and just let her go, then he lacks ethics as well.
 
This should be "fun"to watch.....

There are two main legal issues he would have to avoid, ethics experts say: traditional prosecution under government bribery laws and a little-noticed provision in the Constitution known as the emoluments clause, which prohibits U.S. officials from taking money from foreign sources without the consent of Congress. If Trump committed an official act in exchange for a financial reward from another person or company, he could open himself up to prosecution or impeachment. Prosecutors would be called upon to demonstrate a quid pro quo relationship between a specific act and a material gain for the Trump organization. That probe could be conducted by Congress or as a criminal investigation within his Justice Department, where it might prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor.

With a web of foreign business interests extending from Azerbaijan to Panama, Trump could find that the most minor contractual renewal turns into a new reason for concern. Even Trump’s oft-touted status as landlord to the Bank of China in Trump Tower could place him in jeopardy, if, for example, the state-backed bank agreed to pay above-market-rate rents in the future

Trump could remove these potential conflicts by selling his business empire and placing the proceeds in a blind trust.

Donald Trump Will Face Unprecedented Ethics Decisions as President

(which does NOT mean that his children would independently run the company.)

Thank God hillary wont have to face anymore ethic issues.....considering she has no ethics.

You're right................Trump has said that he's not going to pursue charges against Hillary for her emails.

Whats that have to do with hillarys lack of ethics?

It shows that Trump doesn't have any follow through, even when he was talking about how bad and criminal Hillary's behavior was with her emails. If he's going to lie to you about criminal charges and just let her go, then he lacks ethics as well.

He was probably afraid he might commit suicide....
 
This should be "fun"to watch.....

There are two main legal issues he would have to avoid, ethics experts say: traditional prosecution under government bribery laws and a little-noticed provision in the Constitution known as the emoluments clause, which prohibits U.S. officials from taking money from foreign sources without the consent of Congress. If Trump committed an official act in exchange for a financial reward from another person or company, he could open himself up to prosecution or impeachment. Prosecutors would be called upon to demonstrate a quid pro quo relationship between a specific act and a material gain for the Trump organization. That probe could be conducted by Congress or as a criminal investigation within his Justice Department, where it might prompt the appointment of a special prosecutor.

With a web of foreign business interests extending from Azerbaijan to Panama, Trump could find that the most minor contractual renewal turns into a new reason for concern. Even Trump’s oft-touted status as landlord to the Bank of China in Trump Tower could place him in jeopardy, if, for example, the state-backed bank agreed to pay above-market-rate rents in the future

Trump could remove these potential conflicts by selling his business empire and placing the proceeds in a blind trust.

Donald Trump Will Face Unprecedented Ethics Decisions as President

(which does NOT mean that his children would independently run the company.)

Thank God hillary wont have to face anymore ethic issues.....considering she has no ethics.

You're right................Trump has said that he's not going to pursue charges against Hillary for her emails.

Whats that have to do with hillarys lack of ethics?

It shows that Trump doesn't have any follow through, even when he was talking about how bad and criminal Hillary's behavior was with her emails. If he's going to lie to you about criminal charges and just let her go, then he lacks ethics as well.

He was probably afraid he might commit suicide....

Shouldn't that be SHE might commit suicide instead of HE?
 
Thank God hillary wont have to face anymore ethic issues.....considering she has no ethics.

You're right................Trump has said that he's not going to pursue charges against Hillary for her emails.

Whats that have to do with hillarys lack of ethics?

It shows that Trump doesn't have any follow through, even when he was talking about how bad and criminal Hillary's behavior was with her emails. If he's going to lie to you about criminal charges and just let her go, then he lacks ethics as well.

He was probably afraid he might commit suicide....

Shouldn't that be SHE might commit suicide instead of HE?

No I got it right... Seems a lot of people commit suicide around the clintons.
 
You're right................Trump has said that he's not going to pursue charges against Hillary for her emails.

Whats that have to do with hillarys lack of ethics?

It shows that Trump doesn't have any follow through, even when he was talking about how bad and criminal Hillary's behavior was with her emails. If he's going to lie to you about criminal charges and just let her go, then he lacks ethics as well.

He was probably afraid he might commit suicide....

Shouldn't that be SHE might commit suicide instead of HE?

No I got it right... Seems a lot of people commit suicide around the clintons.

So..................if Trump commits suicide or ends up dying in his sleep like Scalia, are you going to accuse the Clintons of killing him?
 
So..................if Trump commits suicide or ends up dying in his sleep like Scalia, are you going to accuse the Clintons of killing him?


I'd place my bet on blaming Melania......The Trumpster wanted to grab other women's pussies while Melania was 8 months pregnant....those eastern Europeans don't forgive easily.
 
Whats that have to do with hillarys lack of ethics?

It shows that Trump doesn't have any follow through, even when he was talking about how bad and criminal Hillary's behavior was with her emails. If he's going to lie to you about criminal charges and just let her go, then he lacks ethics as well.

He was probably afraid he might commit suicide....

Shouldn't that be SHE might commit suicide instead of HE?

No I got it right... Seems a lot of people commit suicide around the clintons.

So..................if Trump commits suicide or ends up dying in his sleep like Scalia, are you going to accuse the Clintons of killing him?

Why not? The clintons do have a history after all.
 
So..................if Trump commits suicide or ends up dying in his sleep like Scalia, are you going to accuse the Clintons of killing him?


I'd place my bet on blaming Melania......The Trumpster wanted to grab other women's pussies while Melania was 8 months pregnant....those eastern Europeans don't forgive easily.

Maybe she'll make a phone call to Putin and get a KGB hit squad after him.
 
It shows that Trump doesn't have any follow through, even when he was talking about how bad and criminal Hillary's behavior was with her emails. If he's going to lie to you about criminal charges and just let her go, then he lacks ethics as well.

He was probably afraid he might commit suicide....

Shouldn't that be SHE might commit suicide instead of HE?

No I got it right... Seems a lot of people commit suicide around the clintons.

So..................if Trump commits suicide or ends up dying in his sleep like Scalia, are you going to accuse the Clintons of killing him?

Why not? The clintons do have a history after all.

Well, the people that you conservatives have accused the Clintons of killing, didn't have secret service protection. Trump does.
 

Forum List

Back
Top