Trump Wins Again

[jc456]

So, what is Trump's record now.... 53 - 0?

Every time somebody says he's gonna lose, he wins. Every time somebody says he's doing it wrong, turns out he's doing it right.

Interesting article.

Of course, dims won't have a clue since Comedy Central never covers economics; but for you people that care....

Trump's trade war hurting China more than US, IMF says

Since the U.S.-China trade warOpens a New Window. began more than a year ago, President TrumpOpens a New Window. has maintained that billions of dollars in tariffs are hurting Beijing more than Washington – and on Tuesday, the president’s argument received some support from the International Monetary Fund.

In its update to the biannual World Economic Outlook, the Washington-based IMF upgraded its forecast of U.S. growth to 2.6 percent from 2.3 percent, while lowering its outlook for Chinese growth. It also noted that growth was "better than expected" in the U.S.

But in the country-by-country evaluation, the IMF said it expects the effect of tit-for-tat tariffs and weakening external demand to add pressure to China’s already-cooling economy.

Me:

Meanwhile, our Markets are setting records. Our Job Growth is off the scale, wages are up for the Working man and woman for the first time in decades........

And China is slowing down dramatically. They still have growth but it's not enough. Not for them. They're so far behind that they need double-digit growth to even begin to catch up.

Who was it in here that kept telling us how badly Trump, and us, were going to lose the Trade War?

hmmmmm...... Bet it was some dimocraps that are hiding in the weeds.

Not only is Trump always right but

dimocraps are always wrong

About everything

Put Simply, Bill Clinton allowed China & Mexico to Raid The US of it's wealth to help his Wall Street Buddies move manufacturing jobs overseas so they could shut down US plants and pay slaves, slave labor simply to increase their profit margins.

They robbed Peter to pay Paul.

Now the president is trying to put a stop to that.

shit put people in poverty.

 

[sealybobo]

So, what is Trump's record now.... 53 - 0?

Every time somebody says he's gonna lose, he wins. Every time somebody says he's doing it wrong, turns out he's doing it right.

Interesting article.

Of course, dims won't have a clue since Comedy Central never covers economics; but for you people that care....

Trump's trade war hurting China more than US, IMF says

Since the U.S.-China trade warOpens a New Window. began more than a year ago, President TrumpOpens a New Window. has maintained that billions of dollars in tariffs are hurting Beijing more than Washington – and on Tuesday, the president’s argument received some support from the International Monetary Fund.

In its update to the biannual World Economic Outlook, the Washington-based IMF upgraded its forecast of U.S. growth to 2.6 percent from 2.3 percent, while lowering its outlook for Chinese growth. It also noted that growth was "better than expected" in the U.S.

But in the country-by-country evaluation, the IMF said it expects the effect of tit-for-tat tariffs and weakening external demand to add pressure to China’s already-cooling economy.

Me:

Meanwhile, our Markets are setting records. Our Job Growth is off the scale, wages are up for the Working man and woman for the first time in decades........

And China is slowing down dramatically. They still have growth but it's not enough. Not for them. They're so far behind that they need double-digit growth to even begin to catch up.

Who was it in here that kept telling us how badly Trump, and us, were going to lose the Trade War?

hmmmmm...... Bet it was some dimocraps that are hiding in the weeds.

Not only is Trump always right but

dimocraps are always wrong

About everything

Job growth is off the scale? I thought the numbers were similar to Obama's jobs numbers.

 

[jc456]

Who can hurt the other the most.

And we consider this leadership?

definitely, you should learn that jobs that leave the US cost taxpayers welfare, food stamps and lost buildings. why are you against american jobs. Never understood why an american roots against americans. funny you all are.

We have done nothing about that.

you missed two years of trump then.

 

[basquebromance]

"I've been successful because i'm incredibly smart, i follow my own instincts even when folks say i'm wrong. i know what the hell i'm doing. i dont need to listen to anyone's advice...political consultants are just Beltway whores" - President Trump

that apparently only works when you're running for president...and get help from The Russians!

 

[jc456]

"I've been successful because i'm incredibly smart, i follow my own instincts even when folks say i'm wrong. i know what the hell i'm doing. i dont need to listen to anyone's advice...political consultants are just Beltway whores" - President Trump

that apparently only works when you're running for president...and get help from The Russians!

who did that?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Silly me. I though the purpose of the trade war was to help America, not hurt America less than China.

Why is it you commies always want to settle for bad deals?

.

you mean the deals that drove the US to 121 straight months of economic expansion, the longest in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that drove the US to the longest period of positive job growth in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that brought the UE rate under 4 and gave us sustained low unemployment?

you mean the deals that has caused more open job positions than people to fill them?

Those "bad" deals?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So, what is Trump's record now.... 53 - 0?

Every time somebody says he's gonna lose, he wins. Every time somebody says he's doing it wrong, turns out he's doing it right.

Interesting article.

Of course, dims won't have a clue since Comedy Central never covers economics; but for you people that care....

Trump's trade war hurting China more than US, IMF says

Since the U.S.-China trade warOpens a New Window. began more than a year ago, President TrumpOpens a New Window. has maintained that billions of dollars in tariffs are hurting Beijing more than Washington – and on Tuesday, the president’s argument received some support from the International Monetary Fund.

In its update to the biannual World Economic Outlook, the Washington-based IMF upgraded its forecast of U.S. growth to 2.6 percent from 2.3 percent, while lowering its outlook for Chinese growth. It also noted that growth was "better than expected" in the U.S.

But in the country-by-country evaluation, the IMF said it expects the effect of tit-for-tat tariffs and weakening external demand to add pressure to China’s already-cooling economy.

Me:

Meanwhile, our Markets are setting records. Our Job Growth is off the scale, wages are up for the Working man and woman for the first time in decades........

And China is slowing down dramatically. They still have growth but it's not enough. Not for them. They're so far behind that they need double-digit growth to even begin to catch up.

Who was it in here that kept telling us how badly Trump, and us, were going to lose the Trade War?

hmmmmm...... Bet it was some dimocraps that are hiding in the weeds.

Not only is Trump always right but

dimocraps are always wrong

About everything

Job growth is off the scale? I thought the numbers were similar to Obama's jobs numbers.

They are lower than that.

 

[OKTexas]

Silly me. I though the purpose of the trade war was to help America, not hurt America less than China.

Why is it you commies always want to settle for bad deals?

.

you mean the deals that drove the US to 121 straight months of economic expansion, the longest in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that drove the US to the longest period of positive job growth in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that brought the UE rate under 4 and gave us sustained low unemployment?

you mean the deals that has caused more open job positions than people to fill them?

Those "bad" deals?

Nope, the bad deal that allowed the theft of trillions in intellectual property and technology, that did nothing but strengthen our enemies. Carry on commie.

.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Silly me. I though the purpose of the trade war was to help America, not hurt America less than China.

Why is it you commies always want to settle for bad deals?

.

you mean the deals that drove the US to 121 straight months of economic expansion, the longest in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that drove the US to the longest period of positive job growth in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that brought the UE rate under 4 and gave us sustained low unemployment?

you mean the deals that has caused more open job positions than people to fill them?

Those "bad" deals?

Nope, the bad deal that allowed the theft of trillions in intellectual property and technology, that did nothing but strengthen our enemies. Carry on commie.

.

So, those things that I listed are bad?

You want those things to end?

 

[Rambunctious]

The people in the know are saying China will give in during talks this week because they no longer think that Trump will be impeached or beaten in 2020...that means NK knows it too.....Trump could have a double victory just before the 2020 election......

 

[OKTexas]

So, what is Trump's record now.... 53 - 0?

Every time somebody says he's gonna lose, he wins. Every time somebody says he's doing it wrong, turns out he's doing it right.

Interesting article.

Of course, dims won't have a clue since Comedy Central never covers economics; but for you people that care....

Trump's trade war hurting China more than US, IMF says

Since the U.S.-China trade warOpens a New Window. began more than a year ago, President TrumpOpens a New Window. has maintained that billions of dollars in tariffs are hurting Beijing more than Washington – and on Tuesday, the president’s argument received some support from the International Monetary Fund.

In its update to the biannual World Economic Outlook, the Washington-based IMF upgraded its forecast of U.S. growth to 2.6 percent from 2.3 percent, while lowering its outlook for Chinese growth. It also noted that growth was "better than expected" in the U.S.

But in the country-by-country evaluation, the IMF said it expects the effect of tit-for-tat tariffs and weakening external demand to add pressure to China’s already-cooling economy.

Me:

Meanwhile, our Markets are setting records. Our Job Growth is off the scale, wages are up for the Working man and woman for the first time in decades........

And China is slowing down dramatically. They still have growth but it's not enough. Not for them. They're so far behind that they need double-digit growth to even begin to catch up.

Who was it in here that kept telling us how badly Trump, and us, were going to lose the Trade War?

hmmmmm...... Bet it was some dimocraps that are hiding in the weeds.

Not only is Trump always right but

dimocraps are always wrong

About everything

Job growth is off the scale? I thought the numbers were similar to Obama's jobs numbers.

They are lower than that.

But better quality.

.

 

[Meathead]

Who can hurt the other the most.

And we consider this leadership?

Have you been in a closet all your life?

 

[OKTexas]

Silly me. I though the purpose of the trade war was to help America, not hurt America less than China.

Why is it you commies always want to settle for bad deals?

.

you mean the deals that drove the US to 121 straight months of economic expansion, the longest in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that drove the US to the longest period of positive job growth in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that brought the UE rate under 4 and gave us sustained low unemployment?

you mean the deals that has caused more open job positions than people to fill them?

Those "bad" deals?

Nope, the bad deal that allowed the theft of trillions in intellectual property and technology, that did nothing but strengthen our enemies. Carry on commie.

.

So, those things that I listed are bad?

You want those things to end?

There's no indication they will end, BTW you forgot to mention the non-management wage growth is much better under Trump than your mulatto messiah.

.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Silly me. I though the purpose of the trade war was to help America, not hurt America less than China.

Why is it you commies always want to settle for bad deals?

.

you mean the deals that drove the US to 121 straight months of economic expansion, the longest in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that drove the US to the longest period of positive job growth in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that brought the UE rate under 4 and gave us sustained low unemployment?

you mean the deals that has caused more open job positions than people to fill them?

Those "bad" deals?

Nope, the bad deal that allowed the theft of trillions in intellectual property and technology, that did nothing but strengthen our enemies. Carry on commie.

.

So, those things that I listed are bad?

You want those things to end?

There's no indication they will end, BTW you forgot to mention the non-management wage growth is much better under Trump than your mulatto messiah.

.

They are a result of the current trade deals, and you say the current trade deals are bad.

Oh yeah...massive shit after the election for non-management wage growth...

 

[Siete]

Trump Wins Again


BUT HE ONLY HAS TO LOSE ONCE.

ponder that -

 

[OKTexas]

Why is it you commies always want to settle for bad deals?

.

you mean the deals that drove the US to 121 straight months of economic expansion, the longest in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that drove the US to the longest period of positive job growth in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that brought the UE rate under 4 and gave us sustained low unemployment?

you mean the deals that has caused more open job positions than people to fill them?

Those "bad" deals?

Nope, the bad deal that allowed the theft of trillions in intellectual property and technology, that did nothing but strengthen our enemies. Carry on commie.

.

So, those things that I listed are bad?

You want those things to end?

There's no indication they will end, BTW you forgot to mention the non-management wage growth is much better under Trump than your mulatto messiah.

.

They are a result of the current trade deals, and you say the current trade deals are bad.

Oh yeah...massive shit after the election for non-management wage growth...


View attachment 270684

If you hold a ruler up to the graph, the Trump years have a greater rate of growth. Carry on commie.

.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

you mean the deals that drove the US to 121 straight months of economic expansion, the longest in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that drove the US to the longest period of positive job growth in the history of the country?

you mean the deals that brought the UE rate under 4 and gave us sustained low unemployment?

you mean the deals that has caused more open job positions than people to fill them?

Those "bad" deals?

Nope, the bad deal that allowed the theft of trillions in intellectual property and technology, that did nothing but strengthen our enemies. Carry on commie.

.

So, those things that I listed are bad?

You want those things to end?

There's no indication they will end, BTW you forgot to mention the non-management wage growth is much better under Trump than your mulatto messiah.

.

They are a result of the current trade deals, and you say the current trade deals are bad.

Oh yeah...massive shit after the election for non-management wage growth...


View attachment 270684

I hate graphs without reference numbers on both axes. If you hold a ruler up to the graph, the Trump years have a greater rate of growth. Carry on commie.

.

It has reference numbers on both axis. There was no change after the election, no matter how much you pretend there was.

 

[OKTexas]

Nope, the bad deal that allowed the theft of trillions in intellectual property and technology, that did nothing but strengthen our enemies. Carry on commie.

.

So, those things that I listed are bad?

You want those things to end?

There's no indication they will end, BTW you forgot to mention the non-management wage growth is much better under Trump than your mulatto messiah.

.

They are a result of the current trade deals, and you say the current trade deals are bad.

Oh yeah...massive shit after the election for non-management wage growth...


View attachment 270684

I hate graphs without reference numbers on both axes. If you hold a ruler up to the graph, the Trump years have a greater rate of growth. Carry on commie.

.

It has reference numbers on both axis. There was no change after the election, no matter how much you pretend there was.

Not on the right side, of course you'd post something with one sided references. The ruler test proves my point. Carry on commie.

.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Who can hurt the other the most.

And we consider this leadership?

Beats bending over and grabbing ankles like his predecessor practiced.

I thought Trump was the "great negotiator"?

WTF do you think negotiating entails?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

So, those things that I listed are bad?

You want those things to end?

There's no indication they will end, BTW you forgot to mention the non-management wage growth is much better under Trump than your mulatto messiah.

.

They are a result of the current trade deals, and you say the current trade deals are bad.

Oh yeah...massive shit after the election for non-management wage growth...


View attachment 270684

I hate graphs without reference numbers on both axes. If you hold a ruler up to the graph, the Trump years have a greater rate of growth. Carry on commie.

.

It has reference numbers on both axis. There was no change after the election, no matter how much you pretend there was.

Not on the right side, of course you'd post something with one sided references. The ruler test proves my point. Carry on commie.


.

The right side is not an axis. There is a Y-axis and an X-axis...both are labeled. There is nothing to be added to the right side, it would just mirror the left.

Have you never seen a graph before? Did you even take high school Algebra?

The fact you need a ruler test prove there has not been "much better growth".