Trump won't enforce sanctions that passed Congress 517-5

[martybegan]

Around the same time he started selling weapons to the Ukrainians and also released the info on multiple Russians as REQUIRED by the law.

But refuses to enforce sanctions. Why? Because he owes Russia. The sanctions that passed Congress 517-5 were because Russia hacked the election. Why would Trump not enforce those sanctions? Because he owes Russia.

The law doesn't require him to impose sanctions under it, it gives him the option.

Trump is the head of the executive branch, so it is his job to execute the laws Congress passed. He refuses to do so, why? Simple; he owes it to Russia not to because they got him elected. What other reason could there be to not enforce sanctions that passed 99% of Congress?

Why would he sell weapons to Russia's current enemy if he is a collaborator?

Are we entirely sure those weapons will end up in the hands of those in the Ukraine fighting Russian occupation? FUCK NO.

He's been enforcing other sanctions, and again, he's followed the letter of the law, identifying several people purportedly involved in the shenanigans.

Show me where in the law the sanctions you are yammering about HAVE TO BE ENFORCED.

And nice weasel answer on the last part, fuck-boi

 

[martybegan]

Why would he sell weapons to Russia's current enemy if he is a collaborator?

Any escalation in the Ukrainian conflict actually HELPS Putin to remain in power.

Wow, that is some serious delusional spin.

 

[martybegan]

Why would he sell weapons to Russia's current enemy if he is a collaborator?

Any escalation in the Ukrainian conflict actually HELPS Putin to remain in power.

It is not like the Ukrainians have a chance of beating Russia, no matter what we give them.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

And another round of spin.

Anything to fit the narrative in your addled little mind.

 

[martybegan]

Why would he sell weapons to Russia's current enemy if he is a collaborator?

Any escalation in the Ukrainian conflict actually HELPS Putin to remain in power.

It is not like the Ukrainians have a chance of beating Russia, no matter what we give them.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

No doubt, that is TRUE.......The Ukrainian forces don't have a chance against the Red Army.......

However, having a conflict of this magnitude helps Putin be the "war-time" president" and helps his domestic approval ratings....just like GWB's approval in 2004, based on the faulty theory that a nation does not change "horses in mid-stream" especially during a conflict.

1989 called, it want's its Army name back.

 

[Tehon]

ho is this person described in this section that Trumpet is supposed to sanction? Do you have a name?

How about you scroll down to the subsection of the law where it specifically talks about who/what is being sanctioned. It's in the freaking bill you guys linked to. Why are you being so lazy?

How about a name?

 

[The Derp]

He's been enforcing other sanctions, and again, he's followed the letter of the law, identifying several people purportedly involved in the shenanigans.

The other sanctions are unrelated to the 2016 election meddling and were imposed by Obama. The sanctions Trump refuses to enforce are those specifically tied to the 2016 election meddling. You gotta ask, why? The answer is pretty obvious; Trump won't sanction Russia for helping him win in 2016. Why else would he not enforce sanctions that Congress passed 517-5?

Show me where in the law the sanctions you are yammering about HAVE TO BE ENFORCED.

It is literally the President's job to execute the law. The law ITSELF is literally called "Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act".

 

[The Derp]

ho is this person described in this section that Trumpet is supposed to sanction? Do you have a name?

How about you scroll down to the subsection of the law where it specifically talks about who/what is being sanctioned. It's in the freaking bill you guys linked to. Why are you being so lazy?

How about a name?

Wow, guy, you can't scroll down on a webpage to find out yourself?

Here's a list of people Obama had put sanctions on that Congress upheld through the law:

(5) On December 29, 2016, President Obama issued an annex to
Executive Order No. 13694, which authorized sanctions on the
following entities and individuals:
(A) The Main Intelligence Directorate (also known as
Glavnoe Razvedyvatel'noe Upravlenie or the GRU) in
Moscow, Russian Federation.
(B) The Federal Security Service (also known as
Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti or the FSB) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(C) The Special Technology Center (also known as
STLC, Ltd. Special Technology Center St. Petersburg) in
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
(D) Zorsecurity (also known as Esage Lab) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(E) The autonomous noncommercial organization known
as the Professional Association of Designers of Data
Processing Systems (also known as ANO PO KSI) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(F) Igor Valentinovich Korobov.
(G) Sergey Aleksandrovich Gizunov.
(H) Igor Olegovich Kostyukov.
(I) Vladimir Stepanovich Alexseyev.

 

[gipper]

All bullshit. None of our business. Ukraine was a coup done by Obama's people.

Please stop talking about something you have no fucking clue about.

Obama's people committed a coup in Ukraine. Write it down. Believe it. FACT!!!

They were Ukranians dumb-ass, there were no Americans or any other foreigners in the uprising.

A
Why are you spending your time pushing Russian propaganda?

Apparently you do not how coups are started. You might educate yourself on the workings and actions of the CIA. When you get done, let me know and I will school you further.

Apparently you don't know the meaning of the words "Obama's people committed a coup in Ukraine."

They DIDN'T, Ukrainians committed the coup, so please stop spreading bullshit.

So you think the people as a whole started the coup. LMFAO.

 

[The Derp]

Please stop talking about something you have no fucking clue about.

Obama's people committed a coup in Ukraine. Write it down. Believe it. FACT!!!

They were Ukranians dumb-ass, there were no Americans or any other foreigners in the uprising.

A
Why are you spending your time pushing Russian propaganda?

Apparently you do not how coups are started. You might educate yourself on the workings and actions of the CIA. When you get done, let me know and I will school you further.

Apparently you don't know the meaning of the words "Obama's people committed a coup in Ukraine."

They DIDN'T, Ukrainians committed the coup, so please stop spreading bullshit.

So you think the people as a whole started the coup. LMFAO.

So because you think the United States tried to do a coup in Ukraine, that justifies Russia hacking our elections and flooding social media with propaganda?

When did you start being a Russian apologist?

 

[gipper]

Obama's people committed a coup in Ukraine. Write it down. Believe it. FACT!!!

They were Ukranians dumb-ass, there were no Americans or any other foreigners in the uprising.

A
Why are you spending your time pushing Russian propaganda?

Apparently you do not how coups are started. You might educate yourself on the workings and actions of the CIA. When you get done, let me know and I will school you further.

Apparently you don't know the meaning of the words "Obama's people committed a coup in Ukraine."

They DIDN'T, Ukrainians committed the coup, so please stop spreading bullshit.

So you think the people as a whole started the coup. LMFAO.

So because you think the United States tried to do a coup in Ukraine, that justifies Russia hacking our elections and flooding social media with propaganda?

When did you start being a Russian apologist?

Silly wrong

 

[Tehon]

ho is this person described in this section that Trumpet is supposed to sanction? Do you have a name?

How about you scroll down to the subsection of the law where it specifically talks about who/what is being sanctioned. It's in the freaking bill you guys linked to. Why are you being so lazy?

How about a name?

Wow, guy, you can't scroll down on a webpage to find out yourself?

Here's a list of people Obama had put sanctions on that Congress upheld through the law:

(5) On December 29, 2016, President Obama issued an annex to
Executive Order No. 13694, which authorized sanctions on the
following entities and individuals:
(A) The Main Intelligence Directorate (also known as
Glavnoe Razvedyvatel'noe Upravlenie or the GRU) in
Moscow, Russian Federation.
(B) The Federal Security Service (also known as
Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti or the FSB) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(C) The Special Technology Center (also known as
STLC, Ltd. Special Technology Center St. Petersburg) in
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
(D) Zorsecurity (also known as Esage Lab) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(E) The autonomous noncommercial organization known
as the Professional Association of Designers of Data
Processing Systems (also known as ANO PO KSI) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(F) Igor Valentinovich Korobov.
(G) Sergey Aleksandrovich Gizunov.
(H) Igor Olegovich Kostyukov.
(I) Vladimir Stepanovich Alexseyev.

Those are past findings related to Ukraine. I want to know who you believe is supposed to be sanctioned by the new law. You are claiming Trumpet is in violation of the law, you must know why.

Are you just playing stupid?

 

[eddiew37]

Grow up we interfere with foreign electons/politics and foreign countries do the same. Unless they tampered with the voting machines or prevented people from voting (using force) then it isn't worth going after them.

More excuses..."wah, we do it to others"...yeah, and they hate us for it. So help me understand your logic here; because we "meddled" in other elections, that makes it OK for Russia to meddle in ours?

That is the position you want to have here?

That's how their minds work Clinton got a BJ so now trump can grab pussy and violate women

 

[Wyatt earp]

He's been enforcing other sanctions, and again, he's followed the letter of the law, identifying several people purportedly involved in the shenanigans.

The other sanctions are unrelated to the 2016 election meddling and were imposed by Obama. The sanctions Trump refuses to enforce are those specifically tied to the 2016 election meddling. You gotta ask, why? The answer is pretty obvious; Trump won't sanction Russia for helping him win in 2016. Why else would he not enforce sanctions that Congress passed 517-5?

Show me where in the law the sanctions you are yammering about HAVE TO BE ENFORCED.

It is literally the President's job to execute the law. The law ITSELF is literally called "Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act".

Yum you do know Trump could of removed Obama's sanctions at any time right?

 

[jillian]

Why won't he enforce those sanctions on Russia? Because he owes it to them not to.

There is no other reason for Trump refusing to enforce sanctions on Russia for hacking the 2016 election that passed Congress 517-5.

At this point, anyone still defending Trump and this action is a collaborator too.

can you imagine if Barack Obama did that?



damn, they're sad.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Grow up we interfere with foreign electons/politics and foreign countries do the same. Unless they tampered with the voting machines or prevented people from voting (using force) then it isn't worth going after them.

More excuses..."wah, we do it to others"...yeah, and they hate us for it. So help me understand your logic here; because we "meddled" in other elections, that makes it OK for Russia to meddle in ours?

That is the position you want to have here?

That's how their minds work Clinton got a BJ so now trump can grab pussy and violate women

When did Trump do it as president in the oval office, with a candle stick?

 

[gipper]

ho is this person described in this section that Trumpet is supposed to sanction? Do you have a name?

How about you scroll down to the subsection of the law where it specifically talks about who/what is being sanctioned. It's in the freaking bill you guys linked to. Why are you being so lazy?

How about a name?

Wow, guy, you can't scroll down on a webpage to find out yourself?

Here's a list of people Obama had put sanctions on that Congress upheld through the law:

(5) On December 29, 2016, President Obama issued an annex to
Executive Order No. 13694, which authorized sanctions on the
following entities and individuals:
(A) The Main Intelligence Directorate (also known as
Glavnoe Razvedyvatel'noe Upravlenie or the GRU) in
Moscow, Russian Federation.
(B) The Federal Security Service (also known as
Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti or the FSB) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(C) The Special Technology Center (also known as
STLC, Ltd. Special Technology Center St. Petersburg) in
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation.
(D) Zorsecurity (also known as Esage Lab) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(E) The autonomous noncommercial organization known
as the Professional Association of Designers of Data
Processing Systems (also known as ANO PO KSI) in Moscow,
Russian Federation.
(F) Igor Valentinovich Korobov.
(G) Sergey Aleksandrovich Gizunov.
(H) Igor Olegovich Kostyukov.
(I) Vladimir Stepanovich Alexseyev.

Those are past findings related to Ukraine. I want to know who you believe is supposed to be sanctioned by the new law. You are claiming Trumpet is in violation of the law, you must know why.

Are you just playing stupid?

He’s not playing.

 

[The Derp]

They were Ukranians dumb-ass, there were no Americans or any other foreigners in the uprising.

A
Why are you spending your time pushing Russian propaganda?

Apparently you do not how coups are started. You might educate yourself on the workings and actions of the CIA. When you get done, let me know and I will school you further.

Apparently you don't know the meaning of the words "Obama's people committed a coup in Ukraine."

They DIDN'T, Ukrainians committed the coup, so please stop spreading bullshit.

So you think the people as a whole started the coup. LMFAO.

So because you think the United States tried to do a coup in Ukraine, that justifies Russia hacking our elections and flooding social media with propaganda?

When did you start being a Russian apologist?

Silly wrong

But you are a Russian apologist. Amazing how Conservatives are willing to apologize for Russia just so they don't have to admit that Russia helped their guy Trump win.

 

[Flash]

Is that like Obama not enforcing the immigration laws that were passed by Congress?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Why won't he enforce those sanctions on Russia? Because he owes it to them not to.

There is no other reason for Trump refusing to enforce sanctions on Russia for hacking the 2016 election that passed Congress 517-5.

At this point, anyone still defending Trump and this action is a collaborator too.

can you imagine if Barack Obama did that?



damn, they're sad.

Did what, ignore congress? He has his hence man Harry Reid to do that.

 

[The Derp]

Those are past findings related to Ukraine

WRONG. Check the date; December 29th, 2016. That was in response to Russia's election hacking. And in order for your argument to work, you must prove those are "past findings related to Ukraine". You can't and won't be able to, because they're not.

I want to know who you believe is supposed to be sanctioned by the new law. You are claiming Trumpet is in violation of the law, you must know why.

I already provided you with the list of sanctions Obama imposed via executive order on 12/29/16. The law itself (the one you refuse to scroll through and read in order to answer your stupid questions)

Are you just playing stupid?

No, but you sure are.

(3) On April 1, 2015, President Obama issued Executive Order
No. 13694 (80 Fed. Reg. 18077; relating to blocking the property
of certain persons engaging in significant malicious cyber-
enabled activities), which authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney General and the
Secretary of State, to impose sanctions on persons determined to
be engaged in malicious cyber-hacking.

(4) On July 26, 2016, President Obama approved a
Presidential Policy Directive on United States Cyber Incident
Coordination, which states, ``certain cyber incidents that have
significant impacts on an entity, our national security, or the
broader economy require a unique approach to response efforts''.

(5) On December 29, 2016, President Obama issued an annex to
Executive Order No. 13694, which authorized sanctions on the
following entities and individuals (Already provided that list).

And here's where the law codifies those sanctions from Executive Orders:

CODIFICATION OF SANCTIONS
RELATING TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
(a) Codification.--United States sanctions provided for in Executive
Order No. 13660 (79 Fed. Reg. 13493; relating to blocking property of
certain persons contributing to the situation in Ukraine), Executive
Order No. 13661 (79 Fed. Reg. 15535; relating to blocking property of
additional persons contributing to the situation in Ukraine), Executive
Order No. 13662 (79 Fed. Reg. 16169; relating to blocking property of
additional persons contributing to the situation in Ukraine), Executive
Order No. 13685 (79 Fed. Reg. 77357; relating to blocking property of
certain persons and prohibiting certain transactions with respect to the
Crimea region of Ukraine), Executive Order No. 13694 (80 Fed. Reg.
18077; relating to blocking the property of certain persons engaging in significant malicious cyber-
enabled activities), and Executive Order No. 13757 (82 Fed. Reg. 1;
relating to taking additional steps to address the national emergency
with respect to significant malicious cyber-enabled activities), as in
effect on the day before the date of the enactment of this Act,
including with respect to all persons sanctioned under such Executive
orders, shall remain in effect except as provided in subsection (b).
(b) <<NOTE: Notice.>> Termination of Certain Sanctions.--Subject to
section 216, the President may terminate the application of sanctions
described in subsection (a) that are imposed on a person in connection
with activity conducted by the person if the President submits to the
appropriate congressional committees a notice that--
(1) the person is not engaging in the activity that was the
basis for the sanctions or has taken significant verifiable
steps toward stopping the activity; and
(2) the President has received reliable assurances that the
person will not knowingly engage in activity subject to
sanctions described in subsection (a) in the future.

#1 and #2 have never been submitted by Trump, yet he's refusing to impose the sanctions codified by Congress in a 517-5 vote.

So why are you pretending to be stupid, fat, and lazy?