Dale Smith
Platinum Member
Yes China is largely an export driven economy that sells globally not just to the U.S. they have a low cost manufacturing base and hold trillions of dollars in U.S. debt not to mention tight government control on their economy and their population, they can weather the storm because they have a population that largely has a low standard of living, how long do you think the American Citizenry is going to stand for very high unemployment and a rapidly declining standard of living?My ideas on trade have been the same since before Donald got on the scene. He is just relaying what I already think about.Yes it will hurt the Chinese economy but they are in a position to absolutely DEVASTATE our economy if we back them into a corner, do you really want to put your and your families standard of living at risk based on Donald the Demagogues laughably simplistic "plan" ? He's got nothing to lose whereas you and your family have everything to lose when it turns out that the Chinese aren't going to sit idly by while we openly attack their economy and violate our trade agreements.We have a 400 something billion dollar deficit with them a YEAR. I think that is something important to remember.For starters they'll slap comparable import duties on our exports and thus cost U.S. Exporters jobs, they're also likely to cut back on government purchases from U.S. companies which will end up costing more jobs and finally they could easily stop/cut-back on lending our Federal Government money and/or dump treasuries on the open market.What are they going to do though?
If they dump it, they will lose billions.
China doesn't like losing money. That much is certain lol.
We would have to have them on a ledge of a cliff to do those things. IMO
We could devastate them too. Do you not understand what missing 500 billion dollars a year would do to their economy? They are an export economy.. They know that. That's why they are trying to shift to a consumer based economy. lol
Hardships now would be fine with me if that means my kids will have a future that doesn't include stocking foreign junk for artificial wages.
I try to look long term.
The Chinese have been subsidizing OUR standard of living by deferring consumption and loaning us the goods and money that WE need to maintain our standard of living, now You and Trump want to openly challenge them to take away the punch bowl? What exactly do you think that's going to accomplish? Do You think suddenly manufacturers are going to ignore the fact that they cannot be globally competitive by manufacturing goods in the U.S.? Are you prepared for the possibility that the Chinese may well decide to crash our bond markets by dumping all the U.S. debt they hold?
Trump's "plan" doesn't address the root causes of the problems heck it doesn't even address the symptoms of it, it's simply the same old protectionist demagoguery wrapped in a bad hair cut.
No, China has been subsidizing USA.INC's propensity to keep spending money that they then skim off the top and buy up stocks and other money making assets that they keep offshore. China hasn't done a damn thing for us serfs but steal jobs from us in order to make money for USA.INC that has controlling interests in the Fortune 500 companies that offshore jobs to them. USA.INC owes them the money......us serfs do not owe them a thing nor are we beholding to them. Your beloved "gubermint" put themselves in that position and if Trump is legit, he can dissolve this corporation and consolidate the vast hidden holdings of this corporate entity that attempted to pass it's self off as a legitimate governmental body and square the debt with China....and then say "BTW, you can't pawn off your cheaply made goods on our shores anymore with slave labor".......it's not that tough to figure out. Do away with the Fed bank, confiscate their ill-gotten wealth after a thorough audit and use it to rebuild the crumbling infrastructure, overhaul the educational system and stop paying people to sit on their asses by paying them a living wage that they will have to work for. It's not a complicated matter.