Twitter Attacks Lawyer Representing American Patriot, Kyle Rittenhouse

Kyle Rittenhouse was breaking WI gun laws and playing soldier.

No law abiding gun owner should supporting him
Yes

he committed a class a misdemeanor which is punishable by up to 9 months in jail

but murder?

no way

He was breaking the law.

If he had obeyed the law he would not have killed anyone.

Can a person breaking into your house shoot you and call it self defense?
 

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....
Kyle Rittenhouse was breaking WI gun laws and playing soldier.

No law abiding gun owner should supporting him
Why not?
Because he was NOT a law abiding gun owner.

You can't say you support people breaking gun laws and then say you want people who commit crimes with guns to go to jail.

That is the very definition of hypocrisy.
 

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....
Kyle Rittenhouse was breaking WI gun laws and playing soldier.

No law abiding gun owner should supporting him
Why not?

Isn't defending your neighborhood when a riot hits and police are defunded exactly what the 2A is for?
It wasn't his neighborhood or his property and he was breaking WI gun laws.

If he was in his parents home and shot an intruder there would be no issues.

But he went to another state violated that states gun laws and randomly decided to defend some boarded up building saying it was his "job" even though the actual owner of the property did not ask him to "protect" it.
 
Since when is a murderer a "patriot"?
He is when he is a Rightwinger.

Self-defense is not murder, as you will soon learn.

When the police did not show up to defend the community against the Molotov bombers, this 17 year old did. A hero, he probably saved lives, and children from the pedophile.

You wanted vigilante justice now you got it, real justice as well. Be happy with it.
Ah yes...the fictional Molotov. He is no hero, he is just another killer.

The Molotov that was thrown at him is now fictional?

What in the fuck?

You can always guarantee these 3rd worldists who are incapable of living productive life in modern society to back the pedophiles and criminals and root against the Americans and American heroes.
Most people don’t confuse Molotov cocktails with plastic bags and statutory rape with pedophilia.
Most people realize that a dde who molested five boys, none older than age 11, is, in fect, a pedophile.

Pre-sentence report...
118615395_10221084085124306_8954506357306712238_n.jpg
Agree. All that has come out and been substantiated over time. The guy was a piece of crap, no wonder his sister said she did not want a go fund me done for him. But even pieces of crap have rights under the law. None of this was known at the time of the incident. It isn’t up to mobs to execute people and it isn’t up to vigilantes to pass sentence on someone outside the law.

The arguments in this case keep evolving.

First, insufficient evidence as to what happened.
Then, claims of Molotov cocktail and self defense.
Then criminal record comes out.
Then killing justified because Rosenbaum is a piece of crap.

The ONLY justification for a civilian killing another is self defense or defense of another. Not to pass judgement of a person and decide he or she is worthy of death.

That is not lawlesshe’s.

And frankly, makes me wonder if we are going to enter into an era of an eye for an eye of extrajudicial killings.

Rittenhouse killed two, he and his lawyer is getting death threats.
Reinoehl Killed one, his estranged sister and her family are getting death threats.

Two increasingly radicalized ideologies clashing in our cities. No one in leadership toning down the rhetoric.






He wasn't executed. He was killed while trying to murder a 17 year old. His actions placed him in front of that muzzle.

Here you are, finally acknowledging that the guy was a fucking pervert, after defending him for days even after it was WELL documented he was a fucking violent felon, and now, here you are attacking a 17 year old for defending himself and accusing that 17 year old of executing a poor defenceless protester.

It was NOT well documented to begin with. Linking to a state sex offender registry that doesn’t show hI’m in it is not well documented.

I don’t know about you, but I really try to make sure of the facts before accusing dead people of serious crimes because the first thing you guys do is immediately try shred the character of the victims. Dead people can not defend themselves. First thing you guys do, every time as if that justifies the killing.

And you still are trying to claim all three were violent felons, when one was only convicted of a misdeamenor (as far as I can find) along the same lines as Kyle, and the other was trying to stop an active shooter (from the perspective he saw at the situation from).

I did not say he executed them. I said killed.

So get this through your skull, the 17 year old has NO prior record, and the THREE people he shot, were ALL convicted felons.

Prior record changes nothing. It has no bearing in and of itself on whether or not you have the right to kill someone. A record does not give the right to kill. ONLY self defense does.

And Kyle CAN make a reasonable for self defense. Likewise a reasonable argument can be made that Huber was trying to take down an active shooter(an action you guys would call heroic if he was on of yours). But Huber is dead. Can’t speak for himself.

On the felon bit. You claim all three are “convicted felons” but all I can find on Grosskreutz is having a gun while intoxicated. You have something else?

And you insist on attacking the ONE person in this drama who isn't a CONVICTED FELON.

Are you seriously making an argument that it is ok for a “non-felon” can go and shoot someone, and get away with it solely because the victim was a felon?

Kyle will likely walk on the most serious charges. Self defense is reasonable with Rosenbaum and Huber. But less so with the guy he wounded, who had his hands in the air and was not pointing the gun at Rittenhouse when Rittenhouse shot him. And he won’t walk on the charge of illegal possession of a fire arm.

Wake. The. Fuck. Up.

I do not support lawlessness or vigilanteism.

I can't buy the self-defense argument in these circumstances, particularly since Huber and Grosskreutz were trying to take down an active shooter. Poor Mr. Huber tried to do it unarmed. But right-wingers yell "self defense!" every damned time someone other than a right-winger gets shot. This is really getting boring. It totally lacks credibility.

The argument that Rittenhouse was a hero for shooting Rosenbaum because Rosenbaum had a record is totally absurd, since Rittenhouse could not have known of it at the time. To the best of my knowledge, the two did not know each other. One cannot seriously attribute a motive to a shooter who had no knowledge of his victim. The people contending this are complete assholes. There is nothing to suggest that he knew any of the three people he shot.

The Kenosha cops could have prevented this whole thing if they had just done their jobs and cleared the streets. The cops in the armed vehicles had the last clear chance. Talk about cops refusing to protect their city.

I can buy the self defense argument when you try to look at from Rittenhouse’s perspective.

Shooting #1...don’t know for sure, let the courts decide that one.

Shooting #2...Huber was trying to disarm him. He had no way of knowing Huber’s intentions.

Shooting #3...the guy had a gun, but had his hands in the air, gun pointing up, backing away. The claim is Kyle thought he made a threatening move and shot him.

It is all about perspective, and those who proclaim Kyle a hero Or a villain, are only willing to see ONE perspective. And keep in mind this is a 17 yr old NOT a seasoned adult.

Here is another perspective.

Huber and Grosskreutz (thoroughly demonized and deemed worthy of killing by thr right) .... what was THEIR perspective?

Gunshots.

Someone yelling “hey, that guy shot someone” and seeing a guy jogging down the street with a gun.

Huber and Grosskreutz trying time take down an active shooter.

If Huber and Grosskreutz were rightwing militants and Kyle a protester...who would would the rabid right label a hero? The villain? They would all over that video of Kyle punching the girl.

It is pretty fucked up frankly. The only real villains are the people who allowed an illegally armed 17 yr old to be in that situation In the first place.






And all the while you ignore the simple fact that the 17 year old was RUNNING AWAY!.

How can you be so blind?
he was running away because people saw him kill a man and those people were chasing him to stop him from killing anyone else.
 
he was running away because people saw him kill a man and those people were chasing him to stop him from killing anyone else
No evidence of Kyle killing anyone. 16 shots were fired by various people. Do you read yet? Experience tells me one like you could gain valuable knowledge if he reads!

BTW, when did you decide to throw out our constitution? Curious
 
he was running away because people saw him kill a man and those people were chasing him to stop him from killing anyone else
The irony there that you’re ok with them being vigilanties but not for Kyle? Hmm you are officially demofk!
 
he was running away because people saw him kill a man and those people were chasing him to stop him from killing anyone else
The irony there that you’re ok with them being vigilanties but not for Kyle? Hmm you are officially demofk!

They always side with the pedos and looters over decent people trying to defend America. That's because they are anti-American 3rd worldists and socialists.
 

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....
Kyle Rittenhouse was breaking WI gun laws and playing soldier.

No law abiding gun owner should supporting him
Why not?

Because we are a nation of LAWS - Not vigilanteism.
People seem to think that if has a criminal record (either real or fake)....it is ok to kill them. They have no rights.

Extrajudicial killings equal “hero”.
Not everyone with a criminal record is a bad guy but almost all bad guys will have a criminal record.

Including Donald. As "Individual 1" he is guilty of the felony campaign finance fraud that landed his fixer in prison. Letticia James will hit him with the indictment on that and many other of his crimes the last week of January. He is also guilty of running a fraudulent university and fraudulent charity, for which he paid millions in fines.
 
Extrajudicial killings equal “hero”.

I will not go that far, those some others appear willing to do so.

Extrajudicial killings of criminals is what happens when the official form of justice fails.

We should be able to leave it to the police and the courts to deal with destructive and violent criminals; but where these criminal are allowed to run amok, and the police and courts are either unwilling or unable to do anything about them, you can hardly condemn the people for doing what needs to be done.

That is not the way our system of government works. Nobody is judge, jury and executioner. Vigilanteism as a system of government breeds lawlessness and tinhorn dictators. You seem to be okay with that, which calls immediate attention to our sad state of affairs.

trump-jail-hill.jpg
 
Extrajudicial killings equal “hero”.

I will not go that far, those some others appear willing to do so.

Extrajudicial killings of criminals is what happens when the official form of justice fails.

We should be able to leave it to the police and the courts to deal with destructive and violent criminals; but where these criminal are allowed to run amok, and the police and courts are either unwilling or unable to do anything about them, you can hardly condemn the people for doing what needs to be done.

That is not the way our system of government works. Nobody is judge, jury and executioner. Vigilanteism as a system of government breeds lawlessness and tin horn dictators. You seem to be okay with that, which calls immediate attention to our sad state of affairs.

trump-jail-hill.jpg

The rioters are committing vigilante justice, and it is YOU that is fine with it.

Kyle was just defending himself against them. This is just regular justice and heroism.
 
People seem to think that if has a criminal record (either real or fake)....it is ok to kill them. They have no rights.

Extrajudicial killings equal “hero”.

No, they're simply noting that the three thugs that attacked Kyle were slimeballs.

So it's not okay to attack a man who just shot somebody? Sorry that won't fly in court, but once Little Kyle is imprisoned for life, perhaps the two of you can become pen pals.
 
People seem to think that if has a criminal record (either real or fake)....it is ok to kill them. They have no rights.

Extrajudicial killings equal “hero”.

No, they're simply noting that the three thugs that attacked Kyle were slimeballs.

So it's not okay to attack a man who just shot somebody? Sorry that won't fly in court, but once Little Kyle is imprisoned for life, perhaps the two of you can become pen pals.
When you shoot someone in self defense you have violated NO LAW and anyone that attacks you for it can be shot too.
 
But who makes that decision? And how? And what accountability is there?

Proper accountability would have to take the form of the mayors who ordered police to stand down to be arrested, and criminally tried for malfeasance and as accessories to the crimes committed by the subhuman pieces of shit whose side they took against that of the actual human beings that they were elected to serve.

Jailing and/or killing political opponents is what they do in Russia, Turkey and NoKo. Move there.
 
But who makes that decision? And how? And what accountability is there?

Proper accountability would have to take the form of the mayors who ordered police to stand down to be arrested, and criminally tried for malfeasance and as accessories to the crimes committed by the subhuman pieces of shit whose side they took against that of the actual human beings that they were elected to serve.

Jailing and/or killing political opponents is what they do in Russia, Turkey and NoKo. Move there.
Jailing rioters looters arsonists and murderers is not political.
 
can't buy the self-defense argument in these circumstances, particularly since Huber and Grosskreutz were trying to take down an active shooter
Who fired the first shot Sherlock? Did you read that?
Rittenhouse did, moron. He was already a murderer, having killed Rosenbaum and people were shouting down the street that Rittenhouse was the killer. The "self defense" argument is pure horseshit. There is no reason for me to believe your baloney. What was this out-of-state, underage kid doing in Kenosha with an AR-15? What in the hell was anyone doing in Kenosha with an assault weapon? What in the hell were the Kenosha cops doing in refusing to kick them out?
Rittenhouse did, moron. He was already a murderer…

Once again, in order to be a murderer, one has to kill a human being. He didn't kill any human beings; he only killed subhuman criminal pieces of shit.
On other threads, you have indicated that you are a Christian. Live it for once. You want to drag any faith that we want to have in being a citizen of the U.S.A. into the sewer. You want to drag the Christian faith into the sewer. You want to drag all Americans of European descent into the sewer. Please try to find some sense of humility and shame. We are not all like you.

Doesn't sound very "Christian" to me either. :oops:

He didn't kill any human beings; he only killed subhuman criminal pieces of @shit.
 

"Twitter locked the account of John Pierce, the lead defense lawyer for Kyle Rittenhouse, over a tweet comparing Rittenhouse to the “unknown patriot” who fired the opening shot of the Battle of Concord on April 19th, 1775 that started the American Revolutionary War. This is the second time in two days that a lawyer on Rittenhouse’s defense team has been censored by Twitter. On September 1, defense lawyer Lin Wood was locked out of his account after advocating for his client. Twitter later reinstated the account, admitting the suspension was a mistake."

View attachment 384419

All the guy said is that Kyle will go down in history along side of the patriot who fired the shot heard around the world -- what Kyle did was just that important....and he will be remembered along side of other Revolutionary patriots like Crispus Attucks and Peter Salem....

Twitter is actively trying to censor the defense efforts of Kyle and violating the free speech of him and his legal defense team -- it is past time now that Trump nationalizes Twitter and Facebook so everyone's speech can be heard, no government censorship -- except for socialist liberal lies and propaganda...no more shutting down people's political speech, no more deleting QAnon posts just because JFK Jr. is still alive and will announce his support for Trump in 2020 -- Now there is some political speech that does need to be cracked down on, like speech that disagrees with real Americans -- and I trust the Trump admin will decide what is best when it comes to that....
Kyle Rittenhouse was breaking WI gun laws and playing soldier.

No law abiding gun owner should supporting him
Why not?

Because we are a nation of LAWS - Not vigilanteism.
People seem to think that if has a criminal record (either real or fake)....it is ok to kill them. They have no rights.

Extrajudicial killings equal “hero”.
Not everyone with a criminal record is a bad guy but almost all bad guys will have a criminal record.

Including Donald. As "Individual 1" he is guilty of the felony campaign finance fraud that landed his fixer in prison. Letticia James will hit him with the indictment on that and many other of his crimes the last week of January. He is also guilty of running a fraudulent university and fraudulent charity, for which he paid millions in fines.
Off topic
 

Forum List

Back
Top