- Thread starter
- #41
Someone brought up. Trump. Which has no relevance in this thread.Thats cool I guess, but it literally has nothing at all to do with my post, or the OP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone brought up. Trump. Which has no relevance in this thread.Thats cool I guess, but it literally has nothing at all to do with my post, or the OP.
We are not a democratic any thing. We are a Republic governed by a Constitution that protects individual rights. A democracy doesn't do that if the majority of the people says they don't want that
Which is why we America is a Republic.This is talking point #1 for Dems lately and it's an utter load of shit. There's no "tyranny of the minority". The minority can pass no laws. They can't force anything on the majority. But sometimes the majority can't either. Sometimes they need more than a simple majority to pass laws and make the changes they want. That's by design and it's a good thing. There is nothing tyrannical about it. On the contrary, it prevents tyranny.
Gotcha. No I was not referring to Trump, just gerrymandering.Someone brought up. Trump. Which has no relevance in this thread.
That's a pretty good description of the debate. Traditionally at least. Republicans recognize that the majority of us aren't qualified to operate a republic, and running it by majority rule would be a disaster.But that is what Republicans want to do. Remove the voter from the operation of a Republic.
No we aren'tSurely, we are!
But we've been through all of this before and no need to waste my time with you on it, again!
It wasn't you that brought up Trump.Gotcha. No I was not referring to Trump, just gerrymandering.
The sheep needs to be armed with a stronger Bill of Rights at both the Federal and state level. Originally the BoR was not meant as a the only rights, but as a failsafe, with the remainder of rights protected by the State. That has not happened properly, and those states need stronger BoRs.Yes it is. But a Republic is two wolves and a well armed sheep voting for what is for dinner
I don't really care what label you slap on it. Most people don't agree on the definition of those terms anyway, so it's kind of pointless to argue over it.Which is why we America is a Republic.
this is fair.I don't really care what label you slap on it. Most people don't agree on the definition of those terms anyway, so it's kind of pointless to argue over it.
What do you mean by minority rule? Can you cite an incident where the minority pass news laws, or in any way forced change on the majority?Because it's better than minority rule....
States have bill of rights. The original bill of rights are very clear. But when people try to twist, or, redefine the meaning of certain words it does make the bill of rights weak.The sheep needs to be armed with a stronger Bill of Rights at both the Federal and state level. Originally the BoR was not meant as a the only rights, but as a failsafe, with the remainder of rights protected by the State. That has not happened properly, and those states need stronger BoRs.
Surely, we are!
But we've been through all of this before and no need to waste my time with you on it, again!
States have bill of rights. The original bill of rights are very clear. But when people try to twist, or, redefine the meaning of certain words it does make the bill of rights weak.
Israel's isn't. The UK doesn't really have a constitution. And constitutions aren't just limited to Republics, you can be a constitutional monarchy for instance. Republics also aren't synonyms for everything that's good and holy. Take The Peoples Republic of China. How in love are you with that Republic?So much stupid is right
A Republic is governed by a constitution or charter try again
They aren't a RepublicIsrael's isn't. The UK doesn't really have a constitution. And constitutions aren't just limited to Republics, you can be a constitutional monarchy for instance. Republics also aren't synonyms for everything that's good and holy. Take The Peoples Republic of China. How in love are you with that Republic?
What argument are you actually trying to make? I don't have a problem with the Constitution, a government of the people (especially a browning people), democracy (elections) or the rule of law.
I mean Presidents who were elected by the electoral College but lose the popular vote.What do you mean by minority rule? Can you cite an incident where the minority pass news laws, or in any way forced change on the majority?
in a democracy it is a form of government governed by the will of the majority.
BS. You vote for reps right now but you want a Pure Democracy which leads to the Tryanny of 50 plus 1 over 50 minus 1Republicans act like Democracy and a Republic are mutually exclusive.
You can’t operate our Republic without Democracy.
But that is what Republicans want to do. Remove the voter from the operation of a Republic.