Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Facebook & Google have become the modern day public square. They MUST be regulated as such.I don’t think you even understand the first amendment. No crime is being committed if a Tweet is being deleted by the company itself. His first amendment right would only be being violated if he was being charged with a crime for the Tweet.1st Amendment is being abusedSo what was the illegal activity you are now conveniently claiming has been going on all this time?It’s about damn time.
The a private company isn't the government.
The government can't stop free speech.
A private company can block all the speech they want.
There is no law or regulation that requires a private company to respect anyone's right to free speech.
Read, drunkard. What Warren proposed did not regulate the CONTENT.Umm wut???You realize that has nothing to do with regulating content, right?Trump wants to control our internet like they do in china. He’s just using the dems as an excuse to do it.
Zuckerberg Hates Warren’s Plan to Break Up Facebook. She Doesn’t Care. (Published 2019)
In leaked audio, Mark Zuckerberg said he would sue over Elizabeth Warren’s antitrust plan if she was elected president. She shot back.www.nytimes.com
Breaking up Facebook is not regulating them? You smoking crack?
Breaking them up is regulating them, dykeRead, drunkard. What Warren proposed did not regulate the CONTENT.Umm wut???You realize that has nothing to do with regulating content, right?Trump wants to control our internet like they do in china. He’s just using the dems as an excuse to do it.Zuckerberg Hates Warren’s Plan to Break Up Facebook. She Doesn’t Care. (Published 2019)
In leaked audio, Mark Zuckerberg said he would sue over Elizabeth Warren’s antitrust plan if she was elected president. She shot back.
Breaking up Facebook is not regulating them? You smoking crack?
So, you'd be for faux, breightbart, the federalist, redstate, daily wire, gateway pundit, and all the rest of the alt-right crap having to post both sides as well?Government is supposed to protect our free speech when it’s being banned. HELL YEA!Right lord knows you all love big government when it fits your agenda! The agenda in this case is simply to justify Trump whining about these companies. Of course, Trump said nothing about anti-trust laws in his post so you just wasted your time posting this.FINALLY! Let’s get some anti-trust laws in there let’s get conservatives again! Hell yes FREEDOM!!That’s right the whiny little bitch is going to try and stop tech giants! Stop what you ask? No one knows. Neither does Trump. His dumb ass will forget he even said this by next week.
Trump threatens Twitter and Facebook over 'illegal situation' as US coronavirus death toll nears 90,000
Donald Trump has vowed to "remedy" what he called the "command and control" of social media and web giants Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Google by what he called the "Radical Left".Commenting on a video showing part of a speech by Michelle Malkin, who has been criticised for backing white...www.yahoo.com
Is this fascist? No not in my opinion. Perhaps if someone smart and effective was in charge I would call it that. This is just bullshit noise that intimidates no one and we’ll be quickly forgotten.
Meanwhile, the US death toll from COVID is at 90,000.
You aren't all that smart, are you.Breaking them up is regulating them, dykeRead, drunkard. What Warren proposed did not regulate the CONTENT.Umm wut???You realize that has nothing to do with regulating content, right?Trump wants to control our internet like they do in china. He’s just using the dems as an excuse to do it.Zuckerberg Hates Warren’s Plan to Break Up Facebook. She Doesn’t Care. (Published 2019)
In leaked audio, Mark Zuckerberg said he would sue over Elizabeth Warren’s antitrust plan if she was elected president. She shot back.
Breaking up Facebook is not regulating them? You smoking crack?
Because such an overt, deliberate action would confirm what we all know it's true.Why haven’t they banned Trump’s fatass?
Exactly. You, like them, want to shut down speech you don't like.My god I wish they would.
They are alt right? Huh breibart is an alternative to the right? Um ok and I have no idea what your talking about ..So, you'd be for faux, breightbart, the federalist, redstate, daily wire, gateway pundit, and all the rest of the alt-right crap having to post both sides as well?Government is supposed to protect our free speech when it’s being banned. HELL YEA!Right lord knows you all love big government when it fits your agenda! The agenda in this case is simply to justify Trump whining about these companies. Of course, Trump said nothing about anti-trust laws in his post so you just wasted your time posting this.FINALLY! Let’s get some anti-trust laws in there let’s get conservatives again! Hell yes FREEDOM!!That’s right the whiny little bitch is going to try and stop tech giants! Stop what you ask? No one knows. Neither does Trump. His dumb ass will forget he even said this by next week.
Trump threatens Twitter and Facebook over 'illegal situation' as US coronavirus death toll nears 90,000
Donald Trump has vowed to "remedy" what he called the "command and control" of social media and web giants Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Google by what he called the "Radical Left".Commenting on a video showing part of a speech by Michelle Malkin, who has been criticised for backing white...
Is this fascist? No not in my opinion. Perhaps if someone smart and effective was in charge I would call it that. This is just bullshit noise that intimidates no one and we’ll be quickly forgotten.
Meanwhile, the US death toll from COVID is at 90,000.
Cool. Then the feds can also regulate your posts on this message board.Facebook & Google have become the modern day public square. They MUST be regulated as such.
That trump is a fountain of lies, misinformation, and slanderous personal attacks? Got it.Because such an overt, deliberate action would confirm what we all know it's true.
Yes – it’s the same idiotic nonsense conservatives have been propagating for years: the ridiculous lie that social media are conspiring to ‘silence’ conservative voices, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.Anyone seen that Malkin vid that's in question--the one Trump forwarded that got taken down by Facebook?
That's why he's mad today.
And this is an example of the rightwing idiocy propagating that lie.That's absolutely true. Large digital media corporations need to be regulated. They are benefiting from tax breaks while at the same time engaging in mass coordinated censorship.
Great news!
Hope regulation comes very very soon for these tech tyrants fascists/socialists scum!
lolPlaces like YouTube,Facebook and Twitter acting like publishers when they are benefitting from government protections for claiming they are a public platform.So what was the illegal activity you are now conveniently claiming has been going on all this time?It’s about damn time.
True idiocy.Teddy Roosevelt was one of our greatest presidents for two reasons...national parks and his battle against the trusts.
Relevant reading...
100 Years of The National Park Service Is Enough...Privatize The Monopolized Lands
By Chris Rossini Today marks 100 years of the U.S. National Park Service. In other words it's long past the time to get rid of another bad idea: the belief that government should block off large...www.ronpaullibertyreport.com
Another Scam of the Super-Rich - LewRockwell
Recently by Gary North: ‘Dr. Deflation’ Changes His Mind After 27+ Years Ken Burns is at it again. This time, it is a PBS series on the national parks. He subtitles it “America’s Greatest Idea.” The national parks are not America’s greatest idea. They are the super-rich’s greatest idea . . . for...www.lewrockwell.com
The national parks are not America's greatest idea. They are the super-rich's greatest idea . . . for themselves.
The super rich love nature. Anyway, they love owning big chunks of nature. But they face competition. The masses can buy property right next door. Land developers buy up acreage and build condos or even worse, time-shares. Then Mr. and Mrs. Sack Lunch buy the condos and move in. They litter the area with themselves. The super-rich want privacy. [...]
So, John D. Rockefeller, Jr. devised a plan to get this. He began this just after the turn of the century in 1900. He bought up property in Maine. So did his peers — the younger super-rich. Then they gave the surrounding land to the National Park Service...This was for The People. The People could come and visit, but they could not come and stay...They have run this restricted-access land scheme over and over since 1906.
“…legitimate legal arguments for the regulation of large digital media corporations.”"The Radical Left is in total command & control of Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Google. The Administration is working to remedy this illegal situation. Stay tuned, and send names & events. Thank you Michelle!"I doubt that part concerns him.That's absolutely true. Large digital media corporations need to be regulated. They are benefiting from tax breaks while at the same time engaging in mass coordinated censorship.
I think so. I think there are very real rumblings and very legitimate legal arguments for the regulation of large digital media corporations.
In modern society there can be a legal equivalency to utilities. A serious legal challenge is coming.
Yes and? I specifically said CONTENT, lush.Breaking them up is regulating them, dykeRead, drunkard. What Warren proposed did not regulate the CONTENT.Umm wut???You realize that has nothing to do with regulating content, right?Trump wants to control our internet like they do in china. He’s just using the dems as an excuse to do it.Zuckerberg Hates Warren’s Plan to Break Up Facebook. She Doesn’t Care. (Published 2019)
In leaked audio, Mark Zuckerberg said he would sue over Elizabeth Warren’s antitrust plan if she was elected president. She shot back.
Breaking up Facebook is not regulating them? You smoking crack?
need to be regulated.
Regulations be damned.
I thought trump and trumpians loved the recent stretch of regulations being slashed,
and NOW you support regulations that benefit your agenda. lol.
This shit isn’t complicated...Trump deregulates biz to help good real Americans and he regulates biz to help good real Americans.
Remember, he intends to ONLY govern for good real AMERICANS.
Sucks for you huh?
Like not being liable for comments made in a public platform environment ( which they hide behind when it’s convenient). By censoring opinions related to politics, and/or entertainment etc...they are no longer a public platform. They are a publisher and should not be exempt from such scrutiny.lolPlaces like YouTube,Facebook and Twitter acting like publishers when they are benefitting from government protections for claiming they are a public platform.So what was the illegal activity you are now conveniently claiming has been going on all this time?It’s about damn time.
Benefiting from “government protections” – like the First Amendment.
Too funny.
What does that mean? Publishers are not required to publish materials they don't want to publish. If they came out tomorrow and said all posts on 17th century french poetry are banned forever, there isnt a damn thing anyone can do about it. If Random House came out tomorrow and said they are no longer going to use their owned resources to publish books about the utter nonsense that is homeopathy, there is not a damn thing anyone can do about it.By censoring opinions related to politics, and/or entertainment etc...they are no longer a public platform. They are a publisher and should not be exempt from such scrutiny.
