Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I am not sure, but Bob Blaylock seems to be expressing LDS doctrine where they proxy baptize the dead who were not LDS in this life. They believe they have access to these souls, where after they are proxy baptized, can hear LDS doctrine being preached to them. After hearing, souls can either accept or decline.And there you have it.
See? @Meriweather
The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that God has covenants with other faiths and that, as Jesus noted, there are other flocks. Only God knows who, if anyone, is in hell. The Holy Spirit has ways of reaching those that religion fails.I wouldn't know.
Not mine.
I don’t know. You can ask him if you want.I am not sure, but Bob Blaylock seems to be expressing LDS doctrine where they proxy baptize the dead who were not LDS in this life. They believe they have access to these souls, where after they are proxy baptized, can hear LDS doctrine being preached to them. After hearing, souls can either accept or decline.
LDS appear to believe they can still come knocking at one's door after they have passed on.
That's like saying one's fellow high school graduates disagree on what comes next or which is the better college. But beyond that...Your fellow Christians disagree with you on the question I asked.
Worldwide, the largest Christian denomination are Catholic/Orthodox who are taught what I was taught. Therefore, I do agree with the majority, or the majority agrees with me, however you wish to phrase it.I’m just saying that the majority of Christians disagree with the answer you gave me.
I’m just going with what the vast majority of Christians believe.That's like saying one's fellow high school graduates disagree on what comes next or which is the better college. But beyond that...
Forget about what "fellow Christians" say.
What say you?
I doubt the majority believe a non-believer can go to Heaven without accepting Jesus Christ as their lord and savior.Worldwide, the largest Christian denomination are Catholic/Orthodox who are taught what I was taught. Therefore, I do agree with the majority, or the majority agrees with me, however you wish to phrase it.
You should ask Jesus. You can you know
She's a nice woman, but very liberal. Tries hard to not ruffle feathers. It's better to be firmly grounded in GOD'S WordI’m just going with what the vast majority of Christians believe.
If you disagree with them, then I think it’s on you to make a compelling case for them, not me.
Using the same book, you’re coming up with very different answers from what the rest of them believe.
I don’t hear voices in my head.You should ask Jesus. You can you know
Apparently you two are very split on GOD’s Word.She's a nice woman, but very liberal. Tries hard to not ruffle feathers. It's better to be firmly grounded in GOD'S Word
I see no harm in non-Catholic Christians believing what they wish. They read the verse in English from the view of Modern Western Culture and were satisfied.I’m just going with what the vast majority of Christians believe.
If you disagree with them, then I think it’s on you to make a compelling case for them, not me.
I am not sure, but Bob Blaylock seems to be expressing LDS doctrine where they proxy baptize the dead who were not LDS in this life. They believe they have access to these souls, where after they are proxy baptized, can hear LDS doctrine being preached to them. After hearing, souls can either accept or decline.
LDS appear to believe they can still come knocking at one's door after they have passed on.
Grin. I am probably more conservative than most. Firmly grounded? I would say I am, after decades of research and investigation, deeply rooted in the word of God as presented by the original authors as opposed to the English/Modern Western Culture views.She's a nice woman, but very liberal. Tries hard to not ruffle feathers. It's better to be firmly grounded in GOD'S Word
Speak to Jesus? You mean like a one-on-one conversation?How is that you two can speak to Jesus and be told completely different answers?
I don’t see harm in it either. But you are arriving at COMPLETELY different answers to a very big question.I see no harm in non-Catholic Christians believing what they wish. They read the verse in English from the view of Modern Western Culture and were satisfied.
That’s what Carlin appears to be saying.Speak to Jesus? You mean like a one-on-one conversation?
You can read His answer. But I bet you'll deny He actually said it thoughI don’t hear voices in my head.
She doesn't agree with the teachings of her own church. But that's all I'll say.I don’t see harm in it either. But you are arriving at COMPLETELY different answers to a very big question.
As you said earlier, their position doesn’t make sense. “(I am surprised it makes sense to so many non-Catholic Christians!)”
Well, it doesn’t make sense to me either. Contradicting each other isn’t exactly clarifying this.
If the answer can be read then why are you two coming up with different answers?You can read His answer. But I bet you'll deny He actually said it though
