Unless you're gay, on the dole, or a commie why would you vote Democrat ?

They are already fully entitled to all the rights and privielges of this society. Why would you think they aren't?
Because they are denied a marriage license. Any other stupid questions?

Two straight men applying for a marriage license will be denied too. A brother and a sister will be denied too. A man already married to another woman will be denied too.
So no one is being denied anything, Ralphie.
Marriage Equality states don't ask if you are gay.
A brother and a sister shouldn't be. That's Icky is not a rational argument to deny equal rights.
Yeah, we call the Bigamy and it's Illegal.
And yes, they are.
 
Doesn't make it gay-related. Cancer isn't age-related but older people have higher rates of it. Learn how math works.

It is spread largely by gay sex. I think you need a refresher course in biology, as well as reading.
See sub-Saharan Africa. Who needs a refresher course today? Those who stopped studying in 1986.

We dont live n sub Saharan Africa, dufus. And if you try that gay shit there they'll stone your ass.
 
They are already fully entitled to all the rights and privielges of this society. Why would you think they aren't?
Because they are denied a marriage license. Any other stupid questions?

Two straight men applying for a marriage license will be denied too. A brother and a sister will be denied too. A man already married to another woman will be denied too.
So no one is being denied anything, Ralphie.
There is no need for siblings to marry. They already enjoy a next of kin relationship. Polygamy is not a marriage because the marriage contract is a bi-lateral contract. Polygamy is incorporation, a different form of contract all together.

Stop muddying the waters with such easily dismissed straw man arguments. Incredibly, it makes you sound even stupider!
 
"The chances of a straight man getting AIDS from a woman are close to nil"?

And you're telling someone to take a biology class?

Kill yourselves. Not kidding. Please get off of our planet.

Provide proof or shut the fuck up.
 
Marriage is a contract establishing a new legal entity. It is a bi-lateral contract. That means two people and only two people. Polygamy is a separate issue as it is not, by definition, bi-lateral.

If two sober, tax paying, law abiding adults without an existing next of kin relationship want to legally establish that next of kin relationship, what real harm will befall all other marriages? Will they be rendered legally exempt?

In other words, marriage is for two people because marriage is for two people. idiotic.

Why should an existing next of kin relationship be a barrier? Don't all you "gay marriage" turds claim that marriage has nothing to do with procreation?

Your arguments are utterly vapid and easily exploded.
Next of kin has nothing to do with procreation, it has to do with benefits and taxation. There is no procreation requirement for a marriage license. Such licenses are extended to the elderly and there is no prerequisite of fertility.

ROFL! The reason next of kin are not allowed to marry is because any offspring from such a union have much greater odds of suffering from birth defects. All these "next of kin" arguments are pure bullshit. If procreation isn't an issue for getting a marriage license, then there is absolutely no reason to bar siblings from getting married. None. However, the apologists for gay marriage know well that their entire case for gay marriage founders on this issue. Hence they invent this bogus "next of kin" logic that is never used in any legal document regarding marriage.
 
Because they are denied a marriage license. Any other stupid questions?

Two straight men applying for a marriage license will be denied too. A brother and a sister will be denied too. A man already married to another woman will be denied too.
So no one is being denied anything, Ralphie.
There is no need for siblings to marry. They already enjoy a next of kin relationship. Polygamy is not a marriage because the marriage contract is a bi-lateral contract. Polygamy is incorporation, a different form of contract all together.

Stop muddying the waters with such easily dismissed straw man arguments. Incredibly, it makes you sound even stupider!

So now people must have a need before they can marry? Who the fuck made you dictator of this country?
As for polygamy, your argument is mere assertion. Marriage probably occurs polygamously in the world more often than just with two people.
 
It is spread largely by gay sex. I think you need a refresher course in biology, as well as reading.
See sub-Saharan Africa. Who needs a refresher course today? Those who stopped studying in 1986.

We dont live n sub Saharan Africa, dufus. And if you try that gay shit there they'll stone your ass.
AIDS! AIDS, you moron! Are you they last person believing that AIDS is exclusive to the Gay community? Are you the last person to realize that the HIV virus does not know if it's host is straight or gay?
 
"The chances of a straight man getting AIDS from a woman are close to nil"?

And you're telling someone to take a biology class?

Kill yourselves. Not kidding. Please get off of our planet.

Provide proof or shut the fuck up.
You're the one making a retarded claim, bitch.

YOU provide proof that it is nearly impossible for straight people to get AIDS, or shut the fuck up.

Go to college, because obviously the synagogue has failed you.
 
Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

Then wouldn't it be in societies interest to encourage gays to enter the monogamous relationships that marriage provides?

It's certainly an argument. Of course no one is saying they cannot enter into monogamous relationships now. And gay marriages occur in every state of the union. I've never seen someone go to jail for it.

Of course on the other side the gay lifestyle requires multiple sex partners, and male gay partners are notoriously unfaithful.

And lesbians have the lowest incidence of sexually transmitted diseases of any group.
 
"The chances of a straight man getting AIDS from a woman are close to nil"?

And you're telling someone to take a biology class?

Kill yourselves. Not kidding. Please get off of our planet.

The fact has been documented. Of course, those who defend the homosexual lifestyle will never admit it.
 
See sub-Saharan Africa. Who needs a refresher course today? Those who stopped studying in 1986.

We dont live n sub Saharan Africa, dufus. And if you try that gay shit there they'll stone your ass.
AIDS! AIDS, you moron! Are you they last person believing that AIDS is exclusive to the Gay community? Are you the last person to realize that the HIV virus does not know if it's host is straight or gay?

Your reading abilities on display again. Where did I say AIDS was exclusive to the gay community? Post the source or shut the fuck up.
 
"The chances of a straight man getting AIDS from a woman are close to nil"?

And you're telling someone to take a biology class?

Kill yourselves. Not kidding. Please get off of our planet.

Provide proof or shut the fuck up.
You're the one making a retarded claim, bitch.

YOU provide proof that it is nearly impossible for straight people to get AIDS, or shut the fuck up.

Go to college, because obviously the synagogue has failed you.

I did. See the link to CDC I posted.
Your turn. You wont. Because you couldn't find proof of anything if your life depended on it and because this particular proposition is unprovable.
 
"The chances of a straight man getting AIDS from a woman are close to nil"?

And you're telling someone to take a biology class?

Kill yourselves. Not kidding. Please get off of our planet.

The fact has been documented. Of course, those who defend the homosexual lifestyle will never admit it.

Provide proof since the "fact" has been "documented".
 
Marriage is a contract establishing a new legal entity. It is a bi-lateral contract. That means two people and only two people. Polygamy is a separate issue as it is not, by definition, bi-lateral.

If two sober, tax paying, law abiding adults without an existing next of kin relationship want to legally establish that next of kin relationship, what real harm will befall all other marriages? Will they be rendered legally exempt?
You are just making stuff up. A contract is not limited to two parties, it's whoever wants to sign the contract. Many rental leases have more than two parties, for example. There never was a block to two men or more in making up a legal contract between themselves. Gay marriage is designed to promote the idea that there is no significant difference between homosexual and heterosexual relationships. And the last I heard, people are still being made the old fashioned way.
 
"The chances of a straight man getting AIDS from a woman are close to nil"?

And you're telling someone to take a biology class?

Kill yourselves. Not kidding. Please get off of our planet.

Provide proof or shut the fuck up.
You're the one making a retarded claim, bitch.

YOU provide proof that it is nearly impossible for straight people to get AIDS, or shut the fuck up.

Go to college, because obviously the synagogue has failed you.

I said it is nearly impossible for a male to get HIV by having sex with a female. He can get it in other ways, like from abusing IV drugs. A female can get HIV by having sex with a male. Even so, she has to have sex with an infected male many many times to contract the disease.
 

Forum List

Back
Top