Unless you're gay, on the dole, or a commie why would you vote Democrat ?

[bripat9643]

When "marriage" means everything then it means nothing.

yep, destroying the culture is one of the goals of progressives. destroying marriage is step one.

Where do you get this crap from? We want to destroy the country we founded eh? God you people are morons.

Yes, you do. You think this country is the focus of evil. You despise every principle it was founded on. You won't rest until the United States is brought down.

 

[bripat9643]

My analogy shows that no matter what, the Conservatives can be relied upon to provide resistance to the notion of equal justice under law and personal freedoms for all American citizens.

wrong, conservatives want everyone to have equal justice, freedom,rights, and opportunity. Everyone equal, no special rights.

BTW, marriage is not a right. Society as a whole decides what the word "marriage" means. How do you feel about bigamy and polygamy? better think about it, because if gay marriage is allowed then there is absolutely no legal defense to block all forms of "marriage".

Why would you deny the rights and beliefs and justice to a man and 3 women who are committed to each other and want to marry? That will be the argument, get ready.

Marriage is a contract establishing a new legal entity. It is a bi-lateral contract. That means two people and only two people. Polygamy is a separate issue as it is not, by definition, bi-lateral.

If two sober, tax paying, law abiding adults without an existing next of kin relationship want to legally establish that next of kin relationship, what real harm will befall all other marriages? Will they be rendered legally exempt?

In other words, marriage is for two people because marriage is for two people. idiotic.

Why should an existing next of kin relationship be a barrier? Don't all you "gay marriage" turds claim that marriage has nothing to do with procreation?

Your arguments are utterly vapid and easily exploded.

 

[007]

are conservatives a threat to their communities? are churches a threat to their communities?

Often enough...

Probably not as often as you are.

 

[Nosmo King]

No. ANy other stupid questions?

Are homosexuals a threat to their communities?

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

If it is agreed that homosexuality is not a criminal offense and that homosexuals themselves do not pose a threat to the community, why exempt them from the rights and pro ledges and benefits of contract law? Will extending that basic right to law abiding citizens damage your marriage? Or the marriages of any other American? Will marriage equality spell the end of all marriages? What's the real threat posed by marriage equality? Isn't the marriage contract itself a benefit to society? Isn't marriage seen as a stabilizing force in society? If law abiding citizens want to take advantage of such an institution, wouldn't that provide for a more stabile society?

Or is it really the fear and suspicion of homosexuals that is keeping fearful people opposed to extending rights to all law abiding citizens?

 

[The Rabbi]

Are homosexuals a threat to their communities?

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

AIDS is not gay-related. It's more common in homosexuals here, that's all.

Of course not.
CDC ? Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men ? Gender ? Risk ? HIV/AIDS

Oops.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

are conservatives a threat to their communities? are churches a threat to their communities?

Often enough...

Probably not as often as you are.

If you mean the community of morons like you I live in, you're right, I'm a threat.

 

[The Rabbi]

wrong, conservatives want everyone to have equal justice, freedom,rights, and opportunity. Everyone equal, no special rights.

BTW, marriage is not a right. Society as a whole decides what the word "marriage" means. How do you feel about bigamy and polygamy? better think about it, because if gay marriage is allowed then there is absolutely no legal defense to block all forms of "marriage".

Why would you deny the rights and beliefs and justice to a man and 3 women who are committed to each other and want to marry? That will be the argument, get ready.

Marriage is a contract establishing a new legal entity. It is a bi-lateral contract. That means two people and only two people. Polygamy is a separate issue as it is not, by definition, bi-lateral.

If two sober, tax paying, law abiding adults without an existing next of kin relationship want to legally establish that next of kin relationship, what real harm will befall all other marriages? Will they be rendered legally exempt?

In other words, marriage is for two people because marriage is for two people. idiotic.

Why should an existing next of kin relationship be a barrier? Don't all you "gay marriage" turds claim that marriage has nothing to do with procreation?

Your arguments are utterly vapid and easily exploded.

That formulation would be discriminatory according to the packers because it would mean one woman, the sister, would not have the same rights as the non sister.

 

[bripat9643]

Are homosexuals a threat to their communities?

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

AIDS is not gay-related. It's more common in homosexuals here, that's all.

The only people who get aids are gay men, IV drug abusers, and their partners. They account for 99.9% of all HIV infections. The chances of a male getting HIV from a female via sexual intercourse are less than the chances of getting hit by a meteorite.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

AIDS is not gay-related. It's more common in homosexuals here, that's all.

Of course not.
CDC ? Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men ? Gender ? Risk ? HIV/AIDS

Oops.

Doesn't make it gay-related. Cancer isn't age-related but older people have higher rates of it. Learn how math works.

 

[Nosmo King]

wrong, conservatives want everyone to have equal justice, freedom,rights, and opportunity. Everyone equal, no special rights.

BTW, marriage is not a right. Society as a whole decides what the word "marriage" means. How do you feel about bigamy and polygamy? better think about it, because if gay marriage is allowed then there is absolutely no legal defense to block all forms of "marriage".

Why would you deny the rights and beliefs and justice to a man and 3 women who are committed to each other and want to marry? That will be the argument, get ready.

Marriage is a contract establishing a new legal entity. It is a bi-lateral contract. That means two people and only two people. Polygamy is a separate issue as it is not, by definition, bi-lateral.

If two sober, tax paying, law abiding adults without an existing next of kin relationship want to legally establish that next of kin relationship, what real harm will befall all other marriages? Will they be rendered legally exempt?

In other words, marriage is for two people because marriage is for two people. idiotic.

Why should an existing next of kin relationship be a barrier? Don't all you "gay marriage" turds claim that marriage has nothing to do with procreation?

Your arguments are utterly vapid and easily exploded.

Next of kin has nothing to do with procreation, it has to do with benefits and taxation. There is no procreation requirement for a marriage license. Such licenses are extended to the elderly and there is no prerequisite of fertility.

 

[The Rabbi]

Are homosexuals a threat to their communities?

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

If it is agreed that homosexuality is not a criminal offense and that homosexuals themselves do not pose a threat to the community, why exempt them from the rights and pro ledges and benefits of contract law? Will extending that basic right to law abiding citizens damage your marriage? Or the marriages of any other American? Will marriage equality spell the end of all marriages? What's the real threat posed by marriage equality? Isn't the marriage contract itself a benefit to society? Isn't marriage seen as a stabilizing force in society? If law abiding citizens want to take advantage of such an institution, wouldn't that provide for a more stabile society?

Or is it really the fear and suspicion of homosexuals that is keeping fearful people opposed to extending rights to all law abiding citizens?

They are already fully entitled to all the rights and privielges of this society. Why would you think they aren't?

 

[The Rabbi]

AIDS is not gay-related. It's more common in homosexuals here, that's all.

Of course not.
CDC ? Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men ? Gender ? Risk ? HIV/AIDS

Oops.

Doesn't make it gay-related. Cancer isn't age-related but older people have higher rates of it. Learn how math works.

It is spread largely by gay sex. I think you need a refresher course in biology, as well as reading.

 

[Nosmo King]

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

If it is agreed that homosexuality is not a criminal offense and that homosexuals themselves do not pose a threat to the community, why exempt them from the rights and pro ledges and benefits of contract law? Will extending that basic right to law abiding citizens damage your marriage? Or the marriages of any other American? Will marriage equality spell the end of all marriages? What's the real threat posed by marriage equality? Isn't the marriage contract itself a benefit to society? Isn't marriage seen as a stabilizing force in society? If law abiding citizens want to take advantage of such an institution, wouldn't that provide for a more stabile society?

Or is it really the fear and suspicion of homosexuals that is keeping fearful people opposed to extending rights to all law abiding citizens?

They are already fully entitled to all the rights and privielges of this society. Why would you think they aren't?

Because they are denied a marriage license. Any other stupid questions?

 

[rightwinger]

No. ANy other stupid questions?

Are homosexuals a threat to their communities?

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

Then wouldn't it be in societies interest to encourage gays to enter the monogamous relationships that marriage provides?

 

[The Rabbi]

If it is agreed that homosexuality is not a criminal offense and that homosexuals themselves do not pose a threat to the community, why exempt them from the rights and pro ledges and benefits of contract law? Will extending that basic right to law abiding citizens damage your marriage? Or the marriages of any other American? Will marriage equality spell the end of all marriages? What's the real threat posed by marriage equality? Isn't the marriage contract itself a benefit to society? Isn't marriage seen as a stabilizing force in society? If law abiding citizens want to take advantage of such an institution, wouldn't that provide for a more stabile society?

Or is it really the fear and suspicion of homosexuals that is keeping fearful people opposed to extending rights to all law abiding citizens?

They are already fully entitled to all the rights and privielges of this society. Why would you think they aren't?

Because they are denied a marriage license. Any other stupid questions?

Two straight men applying for a marriage license will be denied too. A brother and a sister will be denied too. A man already married to another woman will be denied too.
So no one is being denied anything, Ralphie.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Marriage is a contract establishing a new legal entity. It is a bi-lateral contract. That means two people and only two people. Polygamy is a separate issue as it is not, by definition, bi-lateral.

If two sober, tax paying, law abiding adults without an existing next of kin relationship want to legally establish that next of kin relationship, what real harm will befall all other marriages? Will they be rendered legally exempt?

In other words, marriage is for two people because marriage is for two people. idiotic.

Why should an existing next of kin relationship be a barrier? Don't all you "gay marriage" turds claim that marriage has nothing to do with procreation?

Your arguments are utterly vapid and easily exploded.

That formulation would be discriminatory according to the packers because it would mean one woman, the sister, would not have the same rights as the non sister.

All it has to be, but you morons don't qualify, is Two Adults who are free to marry. That's it boys, deal with it.

 

[Nosmo King]

Of course not.
CDC ? Fact Sheet - Gay and Bisexual Men ? Gender ? Risk ? HIV/AIDS

Oops.

Doesn't make it gay-related. Cancer isn't age-related but older people have higher rates of it. Learn how math works.

It is spread largely by gay sex. I think you need a refresher course in biology, as well as reading.

See sub-Saharan Africa. Who needs a refresher course today? Those who stopped studying in 1986.

 

[jillian]

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

AIDS is not gay-related. It's more common in homosexuals here, that's all.

The only people who get aids are gay men, IV drug abusers, and their partners. They account for 99.9% of all HIV infections. The chances of a male getting HIV from a female via sexual intercourse are less than the chances of getting hit by a meteorite.

well, that's a lie.....

and it is more likely a woman gets HIV from a man.... but not impossible.

ignorance is death.... you should do something about that.

 

[KNB]

"The chances of a straight man getting AIDS from a woman are close to nil"?

And you're telling someone to take a biology class?

Kill yourselves. Not kidding. Please get off of our planet.

 

[The Rabbi]

Are homosexuals a threat to their communities?

Depends. Look at the extra expenditures in health care for gay related diseases, AIDS being only one.
Where are you going with this crap?

Then wouldn't it be in societies interest to encourage gays to enter the monogamous relationships that marriage provides?

It's certainly an argument. Of course no one is saying they cannot enter into monogamous relationships now. And gay marriages occur in every state of the union. I've never seen someone go to jail for it.

Of course on the other side the gay lifestyle requires multiple sex partners, and male gay partners are notoriously unfaithful.