Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not even sex. It's sexual orientation, whatever that is. Who is gay? What is the clinical definition of gay? Can you tell a gay person just by looking at them? Do people even know they are gay? Is gay a category like black, or more a category like liberal--something people experiment with that represents a taste preference? Should we have non discrimination in traffic lights because some people prefer blue and yellow over red and green?And there it is! "Special" rights. The same qualifier used by a previous generation of Conservatives who resisted guaranteeing rights to American citizens who happened to be of a different race than their own. Conservatives are't happy about universal rights for anyone different than themselves. And they tell us that they are not greedy.They have never been excluded. Gay men have been free to marry any woman they wanted since America was founded. Gay women have been free to marry any man they wanted since America was founded.
They been EQUAL in every way. What you want is what Dumbocrats always want - special rights and privileges for their special interests.
are sex and race the same thing? your analogy sucks, and as usual, so do you
And there it is! "Special" rights. The same qualifier used by a previous generation of Conservatives who resisted guaranteeing rights to American citizens who happened to be of a different race than their own. Conservatives are't happy about universal rights for anyone different than themselves. And they tell us that they are not greedy.
are sex and race the same thing? your analogy sucks, and as usual, so do you
No, but marriage is the same thing and equal protection under the laws is the same thing
And there it is! "Special" rights. The same qualifier used by a previous generation of Conservatives who resisted guaranteeing rights to American citizens who happened to be of a different race than their own. Conservatives are't happy about universal rights for anyone different than themselves. And they tell us that they are not greedy.
are sex and race the same thing? your analogy sucks, and as usual, so do you
No, but marriage is the same thing and equal protection under the laws is the same thing
No one brings up the argument the siblings aren't discriminated against because they can't marry each other. It's a stupid argument because marriage laws should discriminate against parings that are an offense against nature. One of the main purposes of marriage laws is to sanction those arrangement society finds acceptable and reject those it finds unacceptable.
Your problem is that you have been unable to prove your hatred in a court of law. There is no proof that homosexuality is an offense against nature. Just because you find it "yucky" is no reason to push your hatred onto others
Oh puhleeze. The courts in this country are infested with liberal judges. Nothing that comes out of them has any bearing on reality.
There is all the proof in the world that homosexuality is an offense against nature. The fact that they fail to reproduce is irrefutable evidence. Normal people find it "yucky" because that's the way nature created them. If they didn't find it "yucky" then it wouldn't be long before the human race came to an end.
And there it is! The leftist lie that homosexuals are a race. Wrong. Segregation laws were unConstitution because they treated some men differently than other men. Relationships are not protected because relationships aren't citizens, citizens have relationships. To some people it's apparently rocket science.And there it is! "Special" rights. The same qualifier used by a previous generation of Conservatives who resisted guaranteeing rights to American citizens who happened to be of a different race than their own. Conservatives are't happy about universal rights for anyone different than themselves. And they tell us that they are not greedy.
are sex and race the same thing? your analogy sucks, and as usual, so do you
No, but marriage is the same thing and equal protection under the laws is the same thing
Marriage is the legal union of two people of the opposite sex. Gays have always been given equal marriage rights, as long as they marry someone of the opposite sex.
if two gay men or two gay women want to commit to each other for life, great, society should provide a legal vehicle that will allow them to do that and to have the same rights as a man/woman married couple. But a gay union is NOT a marriage.
Wow, three fallacies in one post. Rabbi Rules!Your problem is that you have been unable to prove your hatred in a court of law. There is no proof that homosexuality is an offense against nature. Just because you find it "yucky" is no reason to push your hatred onto others
Oh puhleeze. The courts in this country are infested with liberal judges. Nothing that comes out of them has any bearing on reality.
There is all the proof in the world that homosexuality is an offense against nature. The fact that they fail to reproduce is irrefutable evidence. Normal people find it "yucky" because that's the way nature created them. If they didn't find it "yucky" then it wouldn't be long before the human race came to an end.
The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
Your problem is that you have been unable to prove your hatred in a court of law. There is no proof that homosexuality is an offense against nature. Just because you find it "yucky" is no reason to push your hatred onto others
Oh puhleeze. The courts in this country are infested with liberal judges. Nothing that comes out of them has any bearing on reality.
There is all the proof in the world that homosexuality is an offense against nature. The fact that they fail to reproduce is irrefutable evidence. Normal people find it "yucky" because that's the way nature created them. If they didn't find it "yucky" then it wouldn't be long before the human race came to an end.
The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
Wow, three fallacies in one post. Rabbi Rules!Oh puhleeze. The courts in this country are infested with liberal judges. Nothing that comes out of them has any bearing on reality.
There is all the proof in the world that homosexuality is an offense against nature. The fact that they fail to reproduce is irrefutable evidence. Normal people find it "yucky" because that's the way nature created them. If they didn't find it "yucky" then it wouldn't be long before the human race came to an end.
The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
My analogy shows that no matter what, the Conservatives can be relied upon to provide resistance to the notion of equal justice under law and personal freedoms for all American citizens.And there it is! "Special" rights. The same qualifier used by a previous generation of Conservatives who resisted guaranteeing rights to American citizens who happened to be of a different race than their own. Conservatives are't happy about universal rights for anyone different than themselves. And they tell us that they are not greedy.They have never been excluded. Gay men have been free to marry any woman they wanted since America was founded. Gay women have been free to marry any man they wanted since America was founded.
They been EQUAL in every way. What you want is what Dumbocrats always want - special rights and privileges for their special interests.
are sex and race the same thing? your analogy sucks, and as usual, so do you
Wow, three fallacies in one post. Rabbi Rules!The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
Come on Rabbi....tell us the one about how gays are allowed to marry people of the opposite sex again
We need a good laugh
That's the problem with treating sexual relationships like a race. I've known people that had homosexual relationships when younger and are now totally straight. Are men in prison that engage in it homosexuals? Many would say no. It's left to the individual to define who or what he is. And what about bisexuals?It's not even sex. It's sexual orientation, whatever that is. Who is gay? What is the clinical definition of gay? Can you tell a gay person just by looking at them? Do people even know they are gay? Is gay a category like black, or more a category like liberal--something people experiment with that represents a taste preference? Should we have non discrimination in traffic lights because some people prefer blue and yellow over red and green?
Your problem is that you have been unable to prove your hatred in a court of law. There is no proof that homosexuality is an offense against nature. Just because you find it "yucky" is no reason to push your hatred onto others
Oh puhleeze. The courts in this country are infested with liberal judges. Nothing that comes out of them has any bearing on reality.
There is all the proof in the world that homosexuality is an offense against nature. The fact that they fail to reproduce is irrefutable evidence. Normal people find it "yucky" because that's the way nature created them. If they didn't find it "yucky" then it wouldn't be long before the human race came to an end.
The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
Is it illegal to be a homosexual?And there it is! The leftist lie that homosexuals are a race. Wrong. Segregation laws were unConstitution because they treated some men differently than other men. Relationships are not protected because relationships aren't citizens, citizens have relationships. To some people it's apparently rocket science.And there it is! "Special" rights. The same qualifier used by a previous generation of Conservatives who resisted guaranteeing rights to American citizens who happened to be of a different race than their own. Conservatives are't happy about universal rights for anyone different than themselves. And they tell us that they are not greedy.
Oh puhleeze. The courts in this country are infested with liberal judges. Nothing that comes out of them has any bearing on reality.
There is all the proof in the world that homosexuality is an offense against nature. The fact that they fail to reproduce is irrefutable evidence. Normal people find it "yucky" because that's the way nature created them. If they didn't find it "yucky" then it wouldn't be long before the human race came to an end.
The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
Why is the word "marriage" so critical to the gay agenda? Why doesn't a civil union give you what you want?
answer: because the gay agenda is not about equal rights, its about forced societal acceptance of a deviant lifestyle.
Oh puhleeze. The courts in this country are infested with liberal judges. Nothing that comes out of them has any bearing on reality.
There is all the proof in the world that homosexuality is an offense against nature. The fact that they fail to reproduce is irrefutable evidence. Normal people find it "yucky" because that's the way nature created them. If they didn't find it "yucky" then it wouldn't be long before the human race came to an end.
The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
The Supreme Court only has 4 conservative judges. As for the rest of your arguments, they've been posted in this forum hundreds of times, and I've disposed of them just as many times. If the government made people get a fertility test to get married, turds like you would be first in line to object.
Is it illegal to be a homosexual?And there it is! The leftist lie that homosexuals are a race. Wrong. Segregation laws were unConstitution because they treated some men differently than other men. Relationships are not protected because relationships aren't citizens, citizens have relationships. To some people it's apparently rocket science.And there it is! "Special" rights. The same qualifier used by a previous generation of Conservatives who resisted guaranteeing rights to American citizens who happened to be of a different race than their own. Conservatives are't happy about universal rights for anyone different than themselves. And they tell us that they are not greedy.
The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
The Supreme Court only has 4 conservative judges. As for the rest of your arguments, they've been posted in this forum hundreds of times, and I've disposed of them just as many times. If the government made people get a fertility test to get married, turds like you would be first in line to object.
Are you advocating fertility tests but the mean old liberals won't let you?
My analogy shows that no matter what, the Conservatives can be relied upon to provide resistance to the notion of equal justice under law and personal freedoms for all American citizens.And there it is! "Special" rights. The same qualifier used by a previous generation of Conservatives who resisted guaranteeing rights to American citizens who happened to be of a different race than their own. Conservatives are't happy about universal rights for anyone different than themselves. And they tell us that they are not greedy.
are sex and race the same thing? your analogy sucks, and as usual, so do you
The Supreme Court s infested with conservative judges and they ruled against DOMA
Many marriages fail to reproduce and we have no laws against them. Is the marriage between two 70 year olds an offense against nature?
If I find sex between two obese people to be yucky, do I get to force the government to ban them from being married?
Why is the word "marriage" so critical to the gay agenda? Why doesn't a civil union give you what you want?
answer: because the gay agenda is not about equal rights, its about forced societal acceptance of a deviant lifestyle.
Answer: when straight marriages are only considered civil unions, they will have equal protection under the law
Nobody is stopping you from hating gays. They are just stopping you from forcing your hatred onto the government
