Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ooohhhhh Guy Catcher....here is the left-wing thug himself openly admitting that he acted unprovoked. I am still at a 100% rate of proving you wrong!!!The only thing obvious in your post(s) is you're a damn liar. You have no idea and no evidence to prove what happened before the first frame of the video. So why not be honest for once? Your mendacity is obvious to everyone.You just answered your own question. If this was a "set up" - the video would have been ready to roll and it would have captured that animal assaulting the child.no video showed the hat being "ripped off" of the kids head.
This may have been a set up, given that the cell phone video's owner is not in evidence.
In addition - look closely at the child in yellow. There is nothing but pure shock on his face. This wasn't a "set up" you partisan hack. They had no idea this was coming. None. And it's obvious to anyone who isn't a left-wing idiot attempting to excuse and defend this behavior.
Man who attacked Texas teen for wearing āMAGAā hat speaks out, explains why he stole the hatJimenez characterized his actions on Wednesday as a ālapse of judgementā and āout of character,ā according to KSAT. But he admittedly became enraged when he saw the teenagerās āMAGAā hat, likening the headwear to hooded caps work by the Ku Klux Klan.
The KKK were Democrats too. Like Kino. Republicans have always enraged them.Ooohhhhh Guy Catcher....here is the left-wing thug himself openly admitting that he acted unprovoked. I am still at a 100% rate of proving you wrong!!!The only thing obvious in your post(s) is you're a damn liar. You have no idea and no evidence to prove what happened before the first frame of the video. So why not be honest for once? Your mendacity is obvious to everyone.You just answered your own question. If this was a "set up" - the video would have been ready to roll and it would have captured that animal assaulting the child.no video showed the hat being "ripped off" of the kids head.
This may have been a set up, given that the cell phone video's owner is not in evidence.
In addition - look closely at the child in yellow. There is nothing but pure shock on his face. This wasn't a "set up" you partisan hack. They had no idea this was coming. None. And it's obvious to anyone who isn't a left-wing idiot attempting to excuse and defend this behavior.
Man who attacked Texas teen for wearing āMAGAā hat speaks out, explains why he stole the hatJimenez characterized his actions on Wednesday as a ālapse of judgementā and āout of character,ā according to KSAT. But he admittedly became enraged when he saw the teenagerās āMAGAā hat, likening the headwear to hooded caps work by the Ku Klux Klan.
Heās not āenragedā by the hat and he doesnāt even believe that it equates to hoods worn by the Ku Klux Klan. Like everyone on the left, heās a fascist who canāt accept the fact that the left lost. He canāt accept the fact that the American people reject his idiotic left-wing ideology.Jimenez characterized his actions on Wednesday as a ālapse of judgementā and āout of character,ā according to KSAT. But he admittedly became enraged when he saw the teenagerās āMAGAā hat, likening the headwear to hooded caps work by the Ku Klux Klan.
Because the idiot came over and ripped the hat off of the child. At that point, his friend took out his cell phone and started recording. This isnāt rocket science. Watch the video.They obviously had SOME idea something was coming, otherwise, why was someone taping the conversation?
There is a witness at the table (several in the BG), plus Kino's confession.Because the idiot came over and ripped the hat off of the child. At that point, his friend took out his cell phone and started recording. This isnāt rocket science. Watch the video.They obviously had SOME idea something was coming, otherwise, why was someone taping the conversation?
I have about 9 times, the video starts with the guy throwing the drink, and you must assume it was at the kid sitting to the left off camera; it shows nothing of the hat until he walks away with it much less what happened before. There was no hurried, awkward fumbling of the camera, it was always smoothly held and well-aimed. Like I said, the Jimenez guy was not only a jerk, but stupid not to see the camera and take it rather than the hat. Now he's going to pay for that mistake.
Now I admit, I'm probably more prejudiced against the guy than I probably would have been had he been a Trump supporter stealing a hat off of some smarmy Hillary supporter, even so, I have to admit that:
A). There is no video evidence the kid ever owned or was wearing the hat much less the guy took it off him. We only see Jiminez walk away with it.
B). We never actually see the drink thrown in the kid's face.
I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV. Even a news station admitted that it was highly irregular to charge the guy with "theft of person" under these circumstances.
I'M BETTING this guy gets off w/o any jail time and only a moderate slap of the wrist.
And NO, I am NOT advocating for the guy. Just sayin'.
One more case of a lot of ado (national and worldwide?) made over a really minor affair. If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
YepThere is a witness at the table (several in the BG), plus Kino's confession.Because the idiot came over and ripped the hat off of the child. At that point, his friend took out his cell phone and started recording. This isnāt rocket science. Watch the video.They obviously had SOME idea something was coming, otherwise, why was someone taping the conversation?
I have about 9 times, the video starts with the guy throwing the drink, and you must assume it was at the kid sitting to the left off camera; it shows nothing of the hat until he walks away with it much less what happened before. There was no hurried, awkward fumbling of the camera, it was always smoothly held and well-aimed. Like I said, the Jimenez guy was not only a jerk, but stupid not to see the camera and take it rather than the hat. Now he's going to pay for that mistake.
Now I admit, I'm probably more prejudiced against the guy than I probably would have been had he been a Trump supporter stealing a hat off of some smarmy Hillary supporter, even so, I have to admit that:
A). There is no video evidence the kid ever owned or was wearing the hat much less the guy took it off him. We only see Jiminez walk away with it.
B). We never actually see the drink thrown in the kid's face.
I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV. Even a news station admitted that it was highly irregular to charge the guy with "theft of person" under these circumstances.
I'M BETTING this guy gets off w/o any jail time and only a moderate slap of the wrist.
And NO, I am NOT advocating for the guy. Just sayin'.
One more case of a lot of ado (national and worldwide?) made over a really minor affair. If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
There is a witness at the table (several in the BG), plus Kino's confession.Because the idiot came over and ripped the hat off of the child. At that point, his friend took out his cell phone and started recording. This isnāt rocket science. Watch the video.They obviously had SOME idea something was coming, otherwise, why was someone taping the conversation?
I have about 9 times, the video starts with the guy throwing the drink, and you must assume it was at the kid sitting to the left off camera; it shows nothing of the hat until he walks away with it much less what happened before. There was no hurried, awkward fumbling of the camera, it was always smoothly held and well-aimed. Like I said, the Jimenez guy was not only a jerk, but stupid not to see the camera and take it rather than the hat. Now he's going to pay for that mistake.
Now I admit, I'm probably more prejudiced against the guy than I probably would have been had he been a Trump supporter stealing a hat off of some smarmy Hillary supporter, even so, I have to admit that:
A). There is no video evidence the kid ever owned or was wearing the hat much less the guy took it off him. We only see Jiminez walk away with it.
B). We never actually see the drink thrown in the kid's face.
I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV. Even a news station admitted that it was highly irregular to charge the guy with "theft of person" under these circumstances.
I'M BETTING this guy gets off w/o any jail time and only a moderate slap of the wrist.
And NO, I am NOT advocating for the guy. Just sayin'.
One more case of a lot of ado (national and worldwide?) made over a really minor affair. If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
....here is the left-wing thug himself openly admittingThe only thing obvious in your post(s) is you're a damn liar. You have no idea and no evidence to prove what happened before the first frame of the video. So why not be honest for once? Your mendacity is obvious to everyone.You just answered your own question. If this was a "set up" - the video would have been ready to roll and it would have captured that animal assaulting the child.no video showed the hat being "ripped off" of the kids head.
This may have been a set up, given that the cell phone video's owner is not in evidence.
In addition - look closely at the child in yellow. There is nothing but pure shock on his face. This wasn't a "set up" you partisan hack. They had no idea this was coming. None. And it's obvious to anyone who isn't a left-wing idiot attempting to excuse and defend this behavior.
You know Petriot, your proclivity to label everyone wh
There is a witness at the table (several in the BG), plus Kino's confession.Because the idiot came over and ripped the hat off of the child. At that point, his friend took out his cell phone and started recording. This isnāt rocket science. Watch the video.They obviously had SOME idea something was coming, otherwise, why was someone taping the conversation?
I have about 9 times, the video starts with the guy throwing the drink, and you must assume it was at the kid sitting to the left off camera; it shows nothing of the hat until he walks away with it much less what happened before. There was no hurried, awkward fumbling of the camera, it was always smoothly held and well-aimed. Like I said, the Jimenez guy was not only a jerk, but stupid not to see the camera and take it rather than the hat. Now he's going to pay for that mistake.
Now I admit, I'm probably more prejudiced against the guy than I probably would have been had he been a Trump supporter stealing a hat off of some smarmy Hillary supporter, even so, I have to admit that:
A). There is no video evidence the kid ever owned or was wearing the hat much less the guy took it off him. We only see Jiminez walk away with it.
B). We never actually see the drink thrown in the kid's face.
I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV. Even a news station admitted that it was highly irregular to charge the guy with "theft of person" under these circumstances.
I'M BETTING this guy gets off w/o any jail time and only a moderate slap of the wrist.
And NO, I am NOT advocating for the guy. Just sayin'.
One more case of a lot of ado (national and worldwide?) made over a really minor affair. If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
Well if the guy CONFESSED, not much to do about that. Like I said, the guy ain't wrapped too tight. As to the witness, like someone said, eye witnesses are the least reliable. He's a friend, what's he going to say, Jiminez took the hat and splashed the drink? Hearsay. A good lawyer could have beat the rap. I would have made the case the whole thing was a staged set-up, Jiminez was paid to act it out and the kids framed him in a sick joke, produced a receipt that I owned the hat and gotten off scott free then sued both the kid for false accusation and my employer for discrimination.
And then the police beat the confession out of him.There is a witness at the table (several in the BG), plus Kino's confession.Because the idiot came over and ripped the hat off of the child. At that point, his friend took out his cell phone and started recording. This isnāt rocket science. Watch the video.They obviously had SOME idea something was coming, otherwise, why was someone taping the conversation?
I have about 9 times, the video starts with the guy throwing the drink, and you must assume it was at the kid sitting to the left off camera; it shows nothing of the hat until he walks away with it much less what happened before. There was no hurried, awkward fumbling of the camera, it was always smoothly held and well-aimed. Like I said, the Jimenez guy was not only a jerk, but stupid not to see the camera and take it rather than the hat. Now he's going to pay for that mistake.
Now I admit, I'm probably more prejudiced against the guy than I probably would have been had he been a Trump supporter stealing a hat off of some smarmy Hillary supporter, even so, I have to admit that:
A). There is no video evidence the kid ever owned or was wearing the hat much less the guy took it off him. We only see Jiminez walk away with it.
B). We never actually see the drink thrown in the kid's face.
I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV. Even a news station admitted that it was highly irregular to charge the guy with "theft of person" under these circumstances.
I'M BETTING this guy gets off w/o any jail time and only a moderate slap of the wrist.
And NO, I am NOT advocating for the guy. Just sayin'.
One more case of a lot of ado (national and worldwide?) made over a really minor affair. If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
Well if the guy CONFESSED, not much to do about that. Like I said, the guy ain't wrapped too tight. As to the witness, like someone said, eye witnesses are the least reliable. He's a friend, what's he going to say, Jiminez took the hat and splashed the drink? Hearsay. A good lawyer could have beat the rap. I would have made the case the whole thing was a staged set-up, Jiminez was paid to act it out and the kids framed him in a sick joke, produced a receipt that I owned the hat and gotten off scott free then sued both the kid for false accusation and my employer for discrimination.
And then the police beat the confession out of him.There is a witness at the table (several in the BG), plus Kino's confession.Because the idiot came over and ripped the hat off of the child. At that point, his friend took out his cell phone and started recording. This isnāt rocket science. Watch the video.They obviously had SOME idea something was coming, otherwise, why was someone taping the conversation?
I have about 9 times, the video starts with the guy throwing the drink, and you must assume it was at the kid sitting to the left off camera; it shows nothing of the hat until he walks away with it much less what happened before. There was no hurried, awkward fumbling of the camera, it was always smoothly held and well-aimed. Like I said, the Jimenez guy was not only a jerk, but stupid not to see the camera and take it rather than the hat. Now he's going to pay for that mistake.
Now I admit, I'm probably more prejudiced against the guy than I probably would have been had he been a Trump supporter stealing a hat off of some smarmy Hillary supporter, even so, I have to admit that:
A). There is no video evidence the kid ever owned or was wearing the hat much less the guy took it off him. We only see Jiminez walk away with it.
B). We never actually see the drink thrown in the kid's face.
I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV. Even a news station admitted that it was highly irregular to charge the guy with "theft of person" under these circumstances.
I'M BETTING this guy gets off w/o any jail time and only a moderate slap of the wrist.
And NO, I am NOT advocating for the guy. Just sayin'.
One more case of a lot of ado (national and worldwide?) made over a really minor affair. If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
Well if the guy CONFESSED, not much to do about that. Like I said, the guy ain't wrapped too tight. As to the witness, like someone said, eye witnesses are the least reliable. He's a friend, what's he going to say, Jiminez took the hat and splashed the drink? Hearsay. A good lawyer could have beat the rap. I would have made the case the whole thing was a staged set-up, Jiminez was paid to act it out and the kids framed him in a sick joke, produced a receipt that I owned the hat and gotten off scott free then sued both the kid for false accusation and my employer for discrimination.
And all the others who are seen on cam were crisis actors.
Funny (not) how the same people who attack the minor children who survived the Parkland Shooting and are seeking gun controls, are having their character assassinated; while these same people are having a fit that one kid got his hat taken and ice tossed on him.
Explain this, D.D.
First of all, why were the Parkland kids attacked ? Was it a political attack ? Was it based on hate ? Or, was it someone who was simply an out of control mentally ill person whom had no specific reason to kill and attack ?.
On the other hand, we have this case where this assault was purely about hate, and the fallout.wasn't about taking a citizens rights away.
the same people who attack the minor children who survived the Parkland Shooting and are seeking gun controls, are having their character assassinated; while these same people are having a fit that one kid got his hat taken and ice tossed on him.
Does the bold and underlined emphasis explain my comment?
He can't afford one. He's 30 years old and plays Dungeons & Dragons while living with daddy.And then the police beat the confession out of him.There is a witness at the table (several in the BG), plus Kino's confession.Because the idiot came over and ripped the hat off of the child. At that point, his friend took out his cell phone and started recording. This isnāt rocket science. Watch the video.
I have about 9 times, the video starts with the guy throwing the drink, and you must assume it was at the kid sitting to the left off camera; it shows nothing of the hat until he walks away with it much less what happened before. There was no hurried, awkward fumbling of the camera, it was always smoothly held and well-aimed. Like I said, the Jimenez guy was not only a jerk, but stupid not to see the camera and take it rather than the hat. Now he's going to pay for that mistake.
Now I admit, I'm probably more prejudiced against the guy than I probably would have been had he been a Trump supporter stealing a hat off of some smarmy Hillary supporter, even so, I have to admit that:
A). There is no video evidence the kid ever owned or was wearing the hat much less the guy took it off him. We only see Jiminez walk away with it.
B). We never actually see the drink thrown in the kid's face.
I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV. Even a news station admitted that it was highly irregular to charge the guy with "theft of person" under these circumstances.
I'M BETTING this guy gets off w/o any jail time and only a moderate slap of the wrist.
And NO, I am NOT advocating for the guy. Just sayin'.
One more case of a lot of ado (national and worldwide?) made over a really minor affair. If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
Well if the guy CONFESSED, not much to do about that. Like I said, the guy ain't wrapped too tight. As to the witness, like someone said, eye witnesses are the least reliable. He's a friend, what's he going to say, Jiminez took the hat and splashed the drink? Hearsay. A good lawyer could have beat the rap. I would have made the case the whole thing was a staged set-up, Jiminez was paid to act it out and the kids framed him in a sick joke, produced a receipt that I owned the hat and gotten off scott free then sued both the kid for false accusation and my employer for discrimination.
And all the others who are seen on cam were crisis actors.
Yeah, I know.
Like I said, a good attorney can be like gold.
In other words, youāre a typical left-wing lunatic who would egregiously lie about everything and then sue the people who told the truth? No surprise there. Thatās how the left rolls.I would have made the case the whole thing was a staged set-up, Jiminez was paid to act it out and the kids framed him in a sick joke, produced a receipt that I owned the hat and gotten off scott free then sued both the kid for false accusation and my employer for discrimination.
Which would then send the message to everyone that the behavior is acceptable will be tolerated.If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
And from a prosecutors view - I have a gold mine. I have multiple witnesses and I have at least half of the assault on video.I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV.
In other words, youāre a typical left-wing lunatic who would egregiously lie about everything and then sue the people who told the truth? No surprise there. Thatās how the left rolls.I would have made the case the whole thing was a staged set-up, Jiminez was paid to act it out and the kids framed him in a sick joke, produced a receipt that I owned the hat and gotten off scott free then sued both the kid for false accusation and my employer for discrimination.
Which would then send the message to everyone that the behavior is acceptable will be tolerated.If I were the judge, I'd order the guy to attend anger management, do community service, pay a stiff fine, and sincerely apologize to the kid.
If he wasn't an idiot he wouldn't have committed the crime. It's a whole Ouroboros thing.In other words, youāre a typical left-wing lunatic who would egregiously lie about everything and then sue the people who told the truth? No surprise there. Thatās how the left rolls.I would have made the case the whole thing was a staged set-up, Jiminez was paid to act it out and the kids framed him in a sick joke, produced a receipt that I owned the hat and gotten off scott free then sued both the kid for false accusation and my employer for discrimination.
Apparently your brain is a dog turd rolled in nuts who can't get past 1st grade nor read. I'm not a typical anything. I'm certainly not left-wing by any stretch. And I'm just playing the devil's advocate here. I know that's a big word for you, let me sound it out: Ad-vo-cate. And yes, in a court of law, evidence is IRRELEVANT. It's all about who can make the best presentation. Jiminez is no doubt guilty as sin but he could have beat this 100% if only he wasn't an idiot.
And from a prosecutors view - I have a gold mine. I have multiple witnesses and I have at least half of the assault on video.I realize these may seem incredulous arguments, but I'm just trying to look at it from a defense attorney's POV.
You could bring the Dream Team from the O.J. Simpson trial back together and you wouldnāt have a prayer of getting the defendant off.
Folks...you just canāt make this shit up. This guy is a typical left-wing lunatic. He wants no prisons and he claims evidence is āirrelevantā in a court of law.And yes, in a court of law, evidence is IRRELEVANT.
