Voter fraud in Connecticut

[bigrebnc1775]

Thanks for your opinion.

Not my opinion it's the opinion of a judge

 

[forkup]

No Trump wanted the vote looked at because things didn't add up.

Funny, that's not how I remember it, the courts remember it, or for that matter Trump remembers it.

The problem with your revisionism is that it flies in the face of what Trump's saying even today.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

And a justice system reliant on the system, and thus incapable of countering the system.

and yet this thread is about what happens when there is actual, real evidence ....the one thing missing from the 2020 fantasy

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Funny, that's not how I remember it, the courts remember it, or for that matter Trump remembers it.

The problem with your revisionism is that it flies in the face of what Trump's saying even today.

That's what happened you got caught up in the leftist twist of words.

 

[Hellbilly]

Not my opinion it's the opinion of a judge

1 judge, maybe. Not the other 60+ judges.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

and yet this thread is about what happens when there is actual, real evidence ....the one thing missing from the 2020 fantasy

Nope it's what happened when you have a judge that has some balls.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

1 judge, maybe. Not the other 60+ judges.

1 judge with balls other judges no balls.

 

[martybegan]

and yet this thread is about what happens when there is actual, real evidence ....the one thing missing from the 2020 fantasy

In a small area that Dems can point at and say "See? we prosecute it!" and then can ignore anywhere it happens where it really matters.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Nope it's what happened when you have a judge that has some balls.

no matter how many times you repeat this, it will never be true.

 

[Hellbilly]

1 judge with balls other judges no balls.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

In a small area that Dems can point at and say "See? we prosecute it!" and then can ignore anywhere it happens where it really matters.

If only you had some actual evidence, then it could not be ignored.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

In a small area that Dems can point at and say "See? we prosecute it!" and then can ignore anywhere it happens where it really matters.

Now we have legal precedence that it happens. Lawyers can use it.

 

[martybegan]

If only you had some actual evidence, then it could not be ignored.

It would be ignored by the likes of you.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

no matter how many times you repeat this, it will never be true.

It's true any time I say it.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It would be ignored by the likes of you.

Yes this is true.

 

[candycorn]

Mail in voting is secure and will continue to be used in elections going forward.

Trump votes by mail.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Trump votes by mail.

Really? proof is needed

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It would be ignored by the likes of you.

We will never know since there is none to ignore.

 

[Rumpole]

Democrats just can't help themselves without trying to cheat. Judge throws out election results and orders a new primary election. Ballot harvesting and mail in ballots.
Bridgeport primary election overturned; new vote ordered

Apparently you haven't been listening to Abrams much. Are you aware of his criticism of Republicans efforts to purge urban voters from the voter registration rolls?

He did, today, on his XM radio show, with evidence.

 

[martybegan]

We will never know since there is none to ignore.

You dismiss the one case here to ignore any others.

It's amazing the logical twister games progs like you play to ignore reality.