Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
sure, thats why businesses and rich people are moving to texas from the blue states every day. No state income tax, few unions, hard working honest people, and a balanced state budget------what a terrible place
You can call me a liar all you want if that's what you need to do to detract from your own lies, but I can prove it's you who is the liar. For example, you claim the labor force participation rate (LFPR) rose steadily during Bush first 7 years; when in fact, it fell from 67.2% to 66.2%. You also [falsely] claim that overall, after 8 years of Bush in office, the LFPR was actually higher than "the starting point in 2001." Well, no, that too is a lie. In fact, the LFPR went from 67.2% in January, 2001 to 65.7% in January, 2009.No, you flaming idiot (i.e., Conservative), I'm claiming the participation rate also dropped on Bush's watch.
Oh, so you're just lying. Got it. How progressive of you.
The same way you claim such a drop has lowered the unemployment rate under Obama also applies to Bush since it dropped during his 8 years in office. And even with that drop lowering the unemployment rate by the end of his presidency, the unemployment rate still nearly doubled on Bush's watch.
Capiche??
Quite the opposite.
For the first seven years of Bush's tenure the participation rate rose steadily. It dropped some in 2008, but remained above the starting point in 2001.
Factor in the drop in the labor force under Bush and the unemployment rate more than doubles by thd time Bush slithers out of the White House.
Bush still sucked worse.
Again, only your Messiah® managed to create a double digit unemployment rate. On the economy, Obama is the worst since Carter - and may actually turn out worse than his mentor.
Obama is an abysmal failure.
Sandra Day O'Connor Doubts Decision To Take Bush V. Gore
Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor expressed doubt Friday about the decision to take the 2000 Bush v. Gore case that resulted in the election of President George W. Bush.
Oh, and by the way ... Bush still sucked worse; and a retard like you has absolutely no chance to alter that pesky fact.
You can call me a liar all you want if that's what you need to do to detract from your own lies, but I can prove it's you who is the liar. For example, you claim the labor force participation rate (LFPR) rose steadily during Bush first 7 years; when in fact, it fell from 67.2% to 66.2%. You also [falsely] claim that overall, after 8 years of Bush in office, the LFPR was actually higher than "the starting point in 2001." Well, no, that too is a lie. In fact, the LFPR went from 67.2% in January, 2001 to 65.7% in January, 2009.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Now, I challenge you to prove I lied about anything, as you falsely claimed -- just as I just thoroughly proved your claims are complete and utter bullshit.
Oh, and by the way ... Bush still sucked worse; and a retard like you has absolutely no chance to alter that pesky fact.
You can call me a liar all you want if that's what you need to do to detract from your own lies, but I can prove it's you who is the liar. For example, you claim the labor force participation rate (LFPR) rose steadily during Bush first 7 years; when in fact, it fell from 67.2% to 66.2%. You also [falsely] claim that overall, after 8 years of Bush in office, the LFPR was actually higher than "the starting point in 2001." Well, no, that too is a lie. In fact, the LFPR went from 67.2% in January, 2001 to 65.7% in January, 2009.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Now, I challenge you to prove I lied about anything, as you falsely claimed -- just as I just thoroughly proved your claims are complete and utter bullshit.
Oh, and by the way ... Bush still sucked worse; and a retard like you has absolutely no chance to alter that pesky fact.
Your link doesn't support your claim..
Holy shit!You can call me a liar all you want if that's what you need to do to detract from your own lies, but I can prove it's you who is the liar. For example, you claim the labor force participation rate (LFPR) rose steadily during Bush first 7 years; when in fact, it fell from 67.2% to 66.2%. You also [falsely] claim that overall, after 8 years of Bush in office, the LFPR was actually higher than "the starting point in 2001." Well, no, that too is a lie. In fact, the LFPR went from 67.2% in January, 2001 to 65.7% in January, 2009.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Now, I challenge you to prove I lied about anything, as you falsely claimed -- just as I just thoroughly proved your claims are complete and utter bullshit.
Oh, and by the way ... Bush still sucked worse; and a retard like you has absolutely no chance to alter that pesky fact.
Your link doesn't support your claim..
Holy shit!
Do you really think the forum needs more evidence that you're a piece of shit lying Conservative??
My link absolutely supports my claim, but then, I'm staring from 2001, when Bush actually started.
Holy shit!You can call me a liar all you want if that's what you need to do to detract from your own lies, but I can prove it's you who is the liar. For example, you claim the labor force participation rate (LFPR) rose steadily during Bush first 7 years; when in fact, it fell from 67.2% to 66.2%. You also [falsely] claim that overall, after 8 years of Bush in office, the LFPR was actually higher than "the starting point in 2001." Well, no, that too is a lie. In fact, the LFPR went from 67.2% in January, 2001 to 65.7% in January, 2009.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Now, I challenge you to prove I lied about anything, as you falsely claimed -- just as I just thoroughly proved your claims are complete and utter bullshit.
Oh, and by the way ... Bush still sucked worse; and a retard like you has absolutely no chance to alter that pesky fact.
Your link doesn't support your claim..
Do you really think the forum needs more evidence that you're a piece of shit lying Conservative??
My link absolutely supports my claim, but then, I'm staring from 2001, when Bush actually started.
I'm good with the link at it shows LFPR and if you go back to 2001, my numbers are exactly as BLS indicates.Holy shit!
Do you really think the forum needs more evidence that you're a piece of shit lying Conservative??
My link absolutely supports my claim, but then, I'm staring from 2001, when Bush actually started.
ROFL
It was YOUR link sparky.
Maybe you should look at the link before posting it?
Holy shit!Your link doesn't support your claim..
Do you really think the forum needs more evidence that you're a piece of shit lying Conservative??
My link absolutely supports my claim, but then, I'm staring from 2001, when Bush actually started.
I hate to break it to you, but you are the one who posted that
I'm good with the link at it shows LFPR and if you go back to 2001, my numbers are exactly as BLS indicates.
Well let's take a look at that and see which one of us is accurate and which one of us is blowing Conservative numbers out of his ass, shall we?I'm good with the link at it shows LFPR and if you go back to 2001, my numbers are exactly as BLS indicates.
Sure sparky, whatever you say.....
Obama was right during the 2012 campaign, Republicans are bad with numbers, stats, math!Once again, you are caught bullshitting.
Funny howe you have to lie to fluff Bush, idn't it?
Impossible...Hence the endless deflections to BOOOOOOOOOSH!BLS shows Obama's LFPR worst of all and still headed straight down!
Can anyone defend him?? How would it be possible??
Impossible...Hence the endless deflections to BOOOOOOOOOSH!BLS shows Obama's LFPR worst of all and still headed straight down!
Can anyone defend him?? How would it be possible??
Good to see you, Robodoon!Not of late... now we have a PC pres who can do what bush did with PC cover....
