Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She was a St. Ronnie appointee. Therefore, she must also be saintly.Neither are the Reagan appointees!
Sandra Day O'Connor: Supreme Court Probably Screwed Up On Bush V. Gore
You stepped right in that one, fake Libertarian!
Who gives a fuck about that hag's regrets?
Is this another example of a conservative getting thrown under the bus for straying from the Party line?
Neither was Reagan, but that doesn't stop you wingnuts from pretending he was.She was a St. Ronnie appointee. Therefore, she must also be saintly.Who gives a fuck about that hag's regrets?
Is this another example of a conservative getting thrown under the bus for straying from the Party line?
O'connor was never a conservative, and is currently senile. what she says today has absolutely no value except to partisan hacks like you.
Neither was Reagan, but that doesn't stop you wingnuts from pretending he was.She was a St. Ronnie appointee. Therefore, she must also be saintly.
Is this another example of a conservative getting thrown under the bus for straying from the Party line?
O'connor was never a conservative, and is currently senile. what she says today has absolutely no value except to partisan hacks like you.
Justice O'Connor is not senile. Not even close.
Who gives a fuck about that hag's regrets?
Oh, Jesus H tapdancing Christ....The moonbats still aren't over Florida 2000.
No we're not, that's why we decided the Repugnants needed a real whipping, in 2008 and again in 2012. And, they're showing their butt-hurt every day.
But your idiotic party didn't do shit to stop the bleeding. Our country has fallen through the ranks as it hasn't done in the history of this nation. Think about it.
What do you mean it didn't do shit to stop the bleeding. Obama tried to pass a bigger Stimulus, but recalcitrant idiotic Republicans whined so much he had to cut it way back - and now they whine because it didn't help as much as it could have.
If McCain and his bimbo had won in 2008, we might now be a 3rd world country - we sure wouldn't be where we are.
Dow Jones up sharply during Obama's term: Sunday's Numbers | cleveland.com
That's another Republican/conservative bullshit lie. Go back and review the records, Dems might have had full control like for at least 72 days - that's just a little over 2 months.What do you mean it didn't do shit to stop the bleeding. Obama tried to pass a bigger Stimulus, but recalcitrant idiotic Republicans whined so much he had to cut it way back - and now they whine because it didn't help as much as it could have.
If McCain and his bimbo had won in 2008, we might now be a 3rd world country - we sure wouldn't be where we are.
Dow Jones up sharply during Obama's term: Sunday's Numbers | cleveland.com
You realize that the Obamunist party had absolute control from 2009 through 2011? The Porkulus was EXACTLY what the Obamunist party deemed it to be. The Republicans had zero influence or say over it.
It's still an indicator, a good indicator. I suppose the meltdown under Bush wasn't as bad as we imagined it to be?Since the DOW has a natural level of about 12,000 - the drop below 7,000 held the assets of nation well below actual value. It was inevitable to rise back to around 12,000.
The rise above that is another bubble - which is not the great thing that you imagine it to be.
Regardless of how you consider Dow Jones, Obama is doing a whole lot better than Reps want to give him credit for. I call that sour grapes.{. The American economy exhibits strong fiscal intervention alongside ginormous and endless rounds of monetary expansion. Therefore, this new and ephemeral sugar high is just another illusion created from our good old Federal Reserve-borne inflation. When the Fed debases the currency and inflates the dollar, the Dow index (based on dollar prices) will naturally go up. The price of everything will go up! Or in other words, the value of the dollar will go down.
Dow Jones 14,000 is Economic Illusion Created By the Federal Reserve}
Oh? How staggering were the costs in Massachusetts where ObamaCare was implemented and better known as RomneyCare?Many did - in 2008 and 2012. More to come...
Gee, what happened in the Mid Term election between 2008 and 2012? The Democrats got their collective asses handed to them by the voters. Right now the States in the country that are recovering the quickest are predominantly run by Republicans while the ones that are circling the proverbial toilet bowl are run by Democrats. We're about to have the REAL ObamaCare sprung on us with cost over-runs that are going to be staggering. More to come? Oh, you've got that right, little buddy...but I don't think it's going to pan out the way you "think" it is.
What the fuck did the lolberal Democratics accomplish with a super-majority in the Senate and control of the House for those 72 days?
No we're not, that's why we decided the Repugnants needed a real whipping, in 2008 and again in 2012. And, they're showing their butt-hurt every day.
But your idiotic party didn't do shit to stop the bleeding. Our country has fallen through the ranks as it hasn't done in the history of this nation. Think about it.
What do you mean it didn't do shit to stop the bleeding. Obama tried to pass a bigger Stimulus, but recalcitrant idiotic Republicans whined so much he had to cut it way back - and now they whine because it didn't help as much as it could have.
If McCain and his bimbo had won in 2008, we might now be a 3rd world country - we sure wouldn't be where we are.
Dow Jones up sharply during Obama's term: Sunday's Numbers | cleveland.com
What the fuck did the lolberal Democratics accomplish with a super-majority in the Senate and control of the House for those 72 days?
They didn't start a useless war.
That's your first lie in this post. Hmmmm, wonder how many more?But your idiotic party didn't do shit to stop the bleeding. Our country has fallen through the ranks as it hasn't done in the history of this nation. Think about it.
What do you mean it didn't do shit to stop the bleeding. Obama tried to pass a bigger Stimulus, but recalcitrant idiotic Republicans whined so much he had to cut it way back - and now they whine because it didn't help as much as it could have.
If McCain and his bimbo had won in 2008, we might now be a 3rd world country - we sure wouldn't be where we are.
Dow Jones up sharply during Obama's term: Sunday's Numbers | cleveland.com
That's an amusing "take" on what happened, Mert...Obama ALWAYS wants more money to spend...that's what he DOES! He's a progressive. His answer to all problems is to raise taxes and spend money. The reason he couldn't get another stimulus was that the first one failed to create jobs.
How do we know that? It's laughably simple actually...you don't invent a new statistic "jobs created or saved" if your program WORKED...you do that if it DIDN'T and you need to hide that fact! It's Democrats who ran for the hills when progressives called for "Stimulus II"! They were scared to death of losing their jobs. One look at what happened in 2010 shows that they had very good reason to be scared.
That's your first lie in this post. Hmmmm, wonder how many more?What do you mean it didn't do shit to stop the bleeding. Obama tried to pass a bigger Stimulus, but recalcitrant idiotic Republicans whined so much he had to cut it way back - and now they whine because it didn't help as much as it could have.
If McCain and his bimbo had won in 2008, we might now be a 3rd world country - we sure wouldn't be where we are.
Dow Jones up sharply during Obama's term: Sunday's Numbers | cleveland.com
That's an amusing "take" on what happened, Mert...Obama ALWAYS wants more money to spend...that's what he DOES! He's a progressive. His answer to all problems is to raise taxes and spend money. The reason he couldn't get another stimulus was that the first one failed to create jobs.
Even lying Ryan was able to see it. As for Obama wanting more money to spend, at least he didn't do like Bush, just leave it off the budget and that way no ones knows just how much he is putting the screws to the country, right?
Paul Ryan Stimulus Money Letters - Business Insider
How do we know that? It's laughably simple actually...you don't invent a new statistic "jobs created or saved" if your program WORKED...you do that if it DIDN'T and you need to hide that fact! It's Democrats who ran for the hills when progressives called for "Stimulus II"! They were scared to death of losing their jobs. One look at what happened in 2010 shows that they had very good reason to be scared.
Reps have all ways to try and say that the stimulus didn't work, but they can't come up with stats to back them up. And no matter how much they try to deny it, the facts don't seem to back them up.
And the only reason Reps gained in 2010 is because Dems don't get all excited about mid-term elections, but once they saw how archaic the policies of the Tea Party were, they woke up, and you saw the result in 2012.
The reputation of the stimulus is meticulously restored from shabby to skillful in Michael Grunwalds important new book, The New New Deal. His findings will come as a jolt to those who think the law failed, the typical Republican assessment, or was too small and sloppy to have any effect.
On the most basic level, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is responsible for saving and creating 2.5 million jobs. The majority of economists agree that it helped the economy grow by as much as 3.8 percent, and kept the unemployment rate from reaching 12 percent.
The stimulus is the reason, in fact, that most Americans are better off than they were four years ago, when the economy was in serious danger of shutting down.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/opinion/sunday/dont-tell-anyone-but-the-stimulus-worked.html
That's your first lie in this post. Hmmmm, wonder how many more?That's an amusing "take" on what happened, Mert...Obama ALWAYS wants more money to spend...that's what he DOES! He's a progressive. His answer to all problems is to raise taxes and spend money. The reason he couldn't get another stimulus was that the first one failed to create jobs.
Even lying Ryan was able to see it. As for Obama wanting more money to spend, at least he didn't do like Bush, just leave it off the budget and that way no ones knows just how much he is putting the screws to the country, right?
Paul Ryan Stimulus Money Letters - Business Insider
Reps have all ways to try and say that the stimulus didn't work, but they can't come up with stats to back them up. And no matter how much they try to deny it, the facts don't seem to back them up.How do we know that? It's laughably simple actually...you don't invent a new statistic "jobs created or saved" if your program WORKED...you do that if it DIDN'T and you need to hide that fact! It's Democrats who ran for the hills when progressives called for "Stimulus II"! They were scared to death of losing their jobs. One look at what happened in 2010 shows that they had very good reason to be scared.
And the only reason Reps gained in 2010 is because Dems don't get all excited about mid-term elections, but once they saw how archaic the policies of the Tea Party were, they woke up, and you saw the result in 2012.
The reputation of the stimulus is meticulously restored from shabby to skillful in Michael Grunwalds important new book, The New New Deal. His findings will come as a jolt to those who think the law failed, the typical Republican assessment, or was too small and sloppy to have any effect.
On the most basic level, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is responsible for saving and creating 2.5 million jobs. The majority of economists agree that it helped the economy grow by as much as 3.8 percent, and kept the unemployment rate from reaching 12 percent.
The stimulus is the reason, in fact, that most Americans are better off than they were four years ago, when the economy was in serious danger of shutting down.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/opinion/sunday/dont-tell-anyone-but-the-stimulus-worked.html
Sorry, Mert but TARP was what brought us back from the edge of a "shut down"...all the Obama Stimulus did was reward Barry's supporters while the rest of us were left twisting in the wind. A New York Times article saying the stimulus "worked" is laughable. If it really HAD worked then there wouldn't have been any need to come up with the whole "jobs saved" scam...they would have simply reported on how many jobs were created as was normally done. The stimulus was supposed to keep us from going over 6% unemployment...and now you're saying it was a success because the unemployment rate didn't hit 12%? That's amusing...
What the fuck did the lolberal Democratics accomplish with a super-majority in the Senate and control of the House for those 72 days?
They didn't start a useless war.
at all you lolberals.
That's another Republican/conservative bullshit lie. Go back and review the records, Dems might have had full control like for at least 72 days - that's just a little over 2 months.
It's still an indicator, a good indicator. I suppose the meltdown under Bush wasn't as bad as we imagined it to be?
Regardless of how you consider Dow Jones, Obama is doing a whole lot better than Reps want to give him credit for. I call that sour grapes.
They didn't start a useless war.
