Was your vote affected by Russian interference?

[Stratford57]

The only thing the Russians influenced was in providing the Democrats a convenient framework for the ongoing plot against the duly-elected president.

Wrong. That was done by all anti-Russians: McCain, Steele, FBI and other Deep State puppets.
View attachment 236598

View attachment 236599


View attachment 236601

So what? It was above board, the proper documents were recorded for Orh passing what info he got onward....

and btw, Steele was not fired from the FBI... he didn't work for the FBI.... the FBI stopped publicly working with him because they believed Steele had talked with the press when they had asked him not to do that.... not because his dossier type field notes, were not helpful....

turns out it was not Steele but McCain's guy, who gave the dossier to Buzzfeed..... is what I heard this past week....

I didn't say Steele was from FBI: he was ex-British MI5 agent. He participated in another anti-Russian Litwinenko's case in Britain, which was as fake as "Russian dossier". Deep State puppets called that dirty dossier "Russian" with only one reason: to hurt Trump's intentions to normalize relationship with Russia.

Here is Putin's reaction on that "dossier" 2 years ago:
Putin: concerning the allegation that Trump arrived in Moscow and the first thing he did was meet with Moscow prostitutes. First, he is an adult and, second, he has for many years sponsored beauty contests and had the chance to meet the world’s most beautiful women. Why would he run to a hotel to meet up with our girls of limited social responsibility? Although they are, of course, the best in the world. But I doubt that Trump fell for it.

People who order these kinds of fabrications, which are now being used to smear the US President-elect, and use it to advance their political agenda are worse than prostitutes. They have no moral constraints at all. By the way, Russia is constantly dealing with such people, our opponents. The fact that such methods are being used against the President-elect of the United States is certainly unparalleled and has never happened before. This indicates the significant level of degradation among political elites in the West, including the United States.
Joint news conference with President of Moldova Igor Dodon

 

[Oddball]

 

[JWBooth]

The intel services are all wrong?

No, corrupt deception artists running the long con? Sure thing.

 

[AntonToo]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Dummy, you think people can actually deduce which specific propaganda piece pushed them into not voting or voting for someone else?

Thats not how it works.

 

[candycorn]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

No, because it was no 'Russian Interference'

The intel services are all wrong?

What exactly do you think the intel services said? I heard them say no votes were changed. Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's illegal server. They should have bought better cyber-security software instead of a barge of fireworks. Putin didn't release Hillary's 33,000 emails, he probably wanted to blackmail her if she won.

Russia meddled in US elections since 1946. WTF did we pay Obama's CIA, FBI, and NSA to do? Wasn't it their job to protect the US from foreign meddling?
'Stand Down': How The Obama Team Blew The Response To Russian Meddling | HuffPost

Hacking is a crime.
The Russians did it.
And it apparently only benefitted one of the two campaigns for President.
At the same time there were high level meetings between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
Stay tuned.

 

[georgephillip]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Because we don't yet know how many votes were influenced by Russian meddling; we should realize how vulnerable and corrupt US elections are.

Trump’s ties to the Russian mafia go back 3 decades

"There’s an old saying that sometimes the worst part of the scandal is what’s legal, and the Russians, to their credit, studied our system and campaign finance laws and they exploited it masterfully.

"They’ve used pharmaceutical companies and energy companies and financial institutions to pour money into our politics, and we really have no idea the extent of their influence.

"One thing Vladimir Putin got right was his insistence that American democracy is also corrupt, and I think he’s showing us exactly how corrupt it is.

"Trump is just the most glaring example, but surely there are others, most of which we know nothing about."

Does anyone believe Trump isn't available to the highest bidder?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Mine? No.

But if you’re truly undecided and you read these hacked e-mails (shockingly only the Democratic National Committee and HRC campaign Manager Podesta’s e-mails were released) that were published, perhaps your vote was swayed by the negativity.

The real question is, of course, why the Russians decided to hack only the Democrats and who directed such hacking and/or singularity of the hacking.

They TRIED to get the Republicans too BUT unlike the dumb ass Democrats the republicans did not hire spies and crooks nor have passwords like 1234 for their information.

 

[kyzr]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

No, because it was no 'Russian Interference'

The intel services are all wrong?

What exactly do you think the intel services said? I heard them say no votes were changed. Russia hacked the DNC and Hillary's illegal server. They should have bought better cyber-security software instead of a barge of fireworks. Putin didn't release Hillary's 33,000 emails, he probably wanted to blackmail her if she won.

Russia meddled in US elections since 1946. WTF did we pay Obama's CIA, FBI, and NSA to do? Wasn't it their job to protect the US from foreign meddling?
'Stand Down': How The Obama Team Blew The Response To Russian Meddling | HuffPost

Hacking is a crime.
The Russians did it.
And it apparently only benefited one of the two campaigns for President.
At the same time there were high level meetings between the Trump campaign and the Russians.
Stay tuned.

The Hillary campaign paid the Russians $12m for the Steele Dossier used to justify spying on the Trump campaign. IMHO Hillary colluded way more than Trump. Imagine that the names were reversed. Mueller would be nailing Trump for direct payments to Russia for "dirt". If Mueller had anything on Trump it would have leaked. It should be an interesting two years coming up.

 

[g5000]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

During the summer and fall of 2016, the pseudocons were celebrating the effect the meddling was having on the election.





See here:

New poll: 34 percent 'less likely' to vote for Clinton after new email revelations

Suck on it libs. Hillary is done for. She just can't win if one third of her voters are considering voting for someone else.

The Clintonites of the forum live in denial.

And how many are much more likely to vote for Trump as result? Many, many...

That means 1/3 of them were going to vote for HIllary. You can't win an election when 1/3 of your supports jump ship.

Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her.

"And how many are much more likely to vote for Trump as result? Many, many..."

"Hillary is done. Stick a fork in her."

"You can't win an election when 1/3 of your supports jump ship."



Now that the tards know Russia was behind those leaks which affected the outcome, they are trying to pretend it had NO impact.

Sorry, but I"m not as stupid or as forgetful as the tards are.

 

[candycorn]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Mine? No.

But if you’re truly undecided and you read these hacked e-mails (shockingly only the Democratic National Committee and HRC campaign Manager Podesta’s e-mails were released) that were published, perhaps your vote was swayed by the negativity.

The real question is, of course, why the Russians decided to hack only the Democrats and who directed such hacking and/or singularity of the hacking.

They TRIED to get the Republicans too BUT unlike the dumb ass Democrats the republicans did not hire spies and crooks nor have passwords like 1234 for their information.

You honestly believe that the GOP was hack-proof but Marriott, Sony, the DNC, Experian etc... are all rubes? Yeah..you full of shit.

 

[Clipper]

It wasn't the Russians. It was the fact that Hillary was on the ballot. Given the choice between her and a quart of potato salad left out in the hot Texas sun for 6 hours, the potato salad would have won hands down.

That potato salad has more brains then Trump.

 

[Thinker101]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Mine? No.

But if you’re truly undecided and you read these hacked e-mails (shockingly only the Democratic National Committee and HRC campaign Manager Podesta’s e-mails were released) that were published, perhaps your vote was swayed by the negativity.

The real question is, of course, why the Russians decided to hack only the Democrats and who directed such hacking and/or singularity of the hacking.

They TRIED to get the Republicans too BUT unlike the dumb ass Democrats the republicans did not hire spies and crooks nor have passwords like 1234 for their information.

You honestly believe that the GOP was hack-proof but Marriott, Sony, the DNC, Experian etc... are all rubes? Yeah..you full of shit.

Not too sure about hack-proof, but sure haven't heard of a GOP aide giving out their password.

 

[candycorn]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Mine? No.

But if you’re truly undecided and you read these hacked e-mails (shockingly only the Democratic National Committee and HRC campaign Manager Podesta’s e-mails were released) that were published, perhaps your vote was swayed by the negativity.

The real question is, of course, why the Russians decided to hack only the Democrats and who directed such hacking and/or singularity of the hacking.

They TRIED to get the Republicans too BUT unlike the dumb ass Democrats the republicans did not hire spies and crooks nor have passwords like 1234 for their information.

You honestly believe that the GOP was hack-proof but Marriott, Sony, the DNC, Experian etc... are all rubes? Yeah..you full of shit.

Not too sure about hack-proof, but sure haven't heard of a GOP aide giving out their password.

Also haven't heard of high level HRC operatives having meetings with Russians...only Trump's.

 

[Thinker101]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Mine? No.

But if you’re truly undecided and you read these hacked e-mails (shockingly only the Democratic National Committee and HRC campaign Manager Podesta’s e-mails were released) that were published, perhaps your vote was swayed by the negativity.

The real question is, of course, why the Russians decided to hack only the Democrats and who directed such hacking and/or singularity of the hacking.

They TRIED to get the Republicans too BUT unlike the dumb ass Democrats the republicans did not hire spies and crooks nor have passwords like 1234 for their information.

You honestly believe that the GOP was hack-proof but Marriott, Sony, the DNC, Experian etc... are all rubes? Yeah..you full of shit.

Not too sure about hack-proof, but sure haven't heard of a GOP aide giving out their password.

Also haven't heard of high level HRC operatives having meetings with Russians...only Trump's.

Sorry to hear FakeBook and/or CNN doesn't cover these things.
John Podesta and the Russians

John Podesta, in bed with the Russians all along

 

[JustAnotherNut]

Actually I have a serious question here...……

If a Presidential election is determined by the Electoral vote, and those electorates are nominated by their states political parties months before the election and are usually state elected officials, party leaders or have strong affiliation to the candidates...…..how would they be so easily influenced by a media frenzy of shit slinging AKA the Russians did it???????

 

[candycorn]

Mine? No.

But if you’re truly undecided and you read these hacked e-mails (shockingly only the Democratic National Committee and HRC campaign Manager Podesta’s e-mails were released) that were published, perhaps your vote was swayed by the negativity.

The real question is, of course, why the Russians decided to hack only the Democrats and who directed such hacking and/or singularity of the hacking.

They TRIED to get the Republicans too BUT unlike the dumb ass Democrats the republicans did not hire spies and crooks nor have passwords like 1234 for their information.

You honestly believe that the GOP was hack-proof but Marriott, Sony, the DNC, Experian etc... are all rubes? Yeah..you full of shit.

Not too sure about hack-proof, but sure haven't heard of a GOP aide giving out their password.

Also haven't heard of high level HRC operatives having meetings with Russians...only Trump's.

Sorry to hear FakeBook and/or CNN doesn't cover these things.
John Podesta and the Russians

John Podesta, in bed with the Russians all along

I'm sure they would have covered it if their meetings in 1990 were news. It's not.
Meanwhile back in reality and relevance....

Trump's son is having meetings with the Russians while the Russians are hacking the DNC computers.

 

[Thinker101]

They TRIED to get the Republicans too BUT unlike the dumb ass Democrats the republicans did not hire spies and crooks nor have passwords like 1234 for their information.

You honestly believe that the GOP was hack-proof but Marriott, Sony, the DNC, Experian etc... are all rubes? Yeah..you full of shit.

Not too sure about hack-proof, but sure haven't heard of a GOP aide giving out their password.

Also haven't heard of high level HRC operatives having meetings with Russians...only Trump's.

Sorry to hear FakeBook and/or CNN doesn't cover these things.
John Podesta and the Russians

John Podesta, in bed with the Russians all along

I'm sure they would have covered it if their meetings in 1990 were news. It's not.
Meanwhile back in reality and relevance....

Trump's son is having meetings with the Russians while the Russians are hacking the DNC computers.

You do know who John Podesta is, right?

 

[candycorn]

Actually I have a serious question here...……

If a Presidential election is determined by the Electoral vote, and those electorates are nominated by their states political parties months before the election and are usually state elected officials, party leaders or have strong affiliation to the candidates...…..how would they be so easily influenced by a media frenzy of shit slinging AKA the Russians did it???????

Each party has it's own slate of electors. Those who cast their electoral votes for Trump from Texas, for example were a different roster than the ones who would have cast their electoral votes for HRC. Which slate gets to vote is dependent upon who wins the popular vote in that state.

Here is a quote from a site that probably explains it better:

Who selects the Electors?

Choosing each state's Electors is a two-part process. First, the political parties in each state choose slates of potential Electors sometime before the general election. Second, on Election Day, the voters in each state select their state's Electors by casting their ballots for President.

The first part of the process is controlled by the political parties in each state and varies from state to state. Generally, the parties either nominate slates of potential Electors at their state party conventions or they chose them by a vote of the party's central committee. This happens in each state for each party by whatever rules the state party and (sometimes) the national party have for the process. This first part of the process results in each Presidential candidate having their own unique slate of potential Electors.

Political parties often choose Electors for the slate to recognize their service and dedication to that political party. They may be state elected officials, state party leaders, or people in the state who have a personal or political affiliation with their party's Presidential candidate. (For specific information about how slates of potential Electors are chosen, contact the political parties in each state.)

The second part of the process happens on Election Day. When the voters in each state cast votes for the Presidential candidate of their choice they are voting to select their state's Electors. The potential Electors' names may or may not appear on the ballot below the name of the Presidential candidates, depending on election procedures and ballot formats in each state.

The winning Presidential candidate's slate of potential Electors are appointed as the state's Electors—except in Nebraska and Maine, which have proportional distribution of the Electors. In Nebraska and Maine, the state winner receives two Electors and the winner of each congressional district (who may be the same as the overall winner or a different candidate) receives one Elector. This system permits the Electors from Nebraska and Maine to be awarded to more than one candidate.

The net result is that the electors need not be swayed; they vote the will of the popular vote unless they are a "faithless" elector which seldom means they would vote for the loser of the contest.

 

[candycorn]

You honestly believe that the GOP was hack-proof but Marriott, Sony, the DNC, Experian etc... are all rubes? Yeah..you full of shit.

Not too sure about hack-proof, but sure haven't heard of a GOP aide giving out their password.

Also haven't heard of high level HRC operatives having meetings with Russians...only Trump's.

Sorry to hear FakeBook and/or CNN doesn't cover these things.
John Podesta and the Russians

John Podesta, in bed with the Russians all along

I'm sure they would have covered it if their meetings in 1990 were news. It's not.
Meanwhile back in reality and relevance....

Trump's son is having meetings with the Russians while the Russians are hacking the DNC computers.

You do know who John Podesta is, right?

The guy that got hacked at the urging of the Trump campaign.

 

[AntonToo]

Actually I have a serious question here...……

If a Presidential election is determined by the Electoral vote, and those electorates are nominated by their states political parties months before the election and are usually state elected officials, party leaders or have strong affiliation to the candidates...…..how would they be so easily influenced by a media frenzy of shit slinging AKA the Russians did it???????

U. S. Electoral College, Official - What is the Electoral College?

The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President.

Each candidate running for President in your state has his or her own group of electors.


You are voting for WHICH electors will actually get to cast the electoral vote.