Was your vote affected by Russian interference?

[Seawytch]

Nothing yet disproved...

Re-examining the dossier after a year of indictments & guilty pleas

 

[Stratford57]

Not to Mention felon Manafort and his crew.

Manafort hasn't had any dealings with the Russians since many years before the campaign.

100% correct.

Dimitri Simes to a Russian Channel One:

For years Manafort worked as a political operator in Ukraine, providing pro-American tilt in Ukrainian foreign policy and according to American Media was a law-abiding person. But Manafort was discouraging Yanukovich from entering the EU, on the contrary, he suggested to be very very careful about that (making current Ukrainian rulers pretty mad).

We are seeing more and more Ukrainian fingerprints in 2016 elections. As you know Manaforts’ problems started when Ukrainian prosecutors found a document (without Manafort’s signature) with his “confession” about receiving millions of dollars for serving Yanukovich. It’s interesting that Ukrainian prosecutors launched that process during elections so that Manafort had to leave Trump’s team. And shortly after that the case has died down and Ukrainian prosecutors have NEVER charged Manafort. Many Republicans think Kiev just wanted to create problems for Manafort during elections time.

Mueller has been “investigating” Russian collusion. Manafort never has been involved with any Russians, but they subscribe him working for pro-Russian president Yanukovich. How come Yanukovich is called pro-Russian if all his advisers were Americans?

Dimitri K. Simes – Center for the National Interest

The problem is that all Media is silent about that: it's too busy with stuffing people's brains with alleged "Russian interference".

 

[bripat9643]

He was "working with someone?" He interviewed the man once. FOX news interviewed him multiple times. Was that against the law?

And your use of the phrase "trafficked in illegal gained information" is hilarious. Here's a clue for you moron, the New York Times does that all the time. The New York Times published information from illegal leaks. So did the Washington Post and every other fake news outlet. You're whining about something that all your trusted fake news outlets do without hesitation. Did you whine about that? Of course not. You gloated about it.

You're a giant dirigible full of sanctimony and hot gas. You're an idiot and a douchebag.

Well, Stone knew weeks before anyone else did. How unfortunate that you confirmed he was working/in contact with someone who was trafficking in illegally gained material.
Looks more and more like a conspiracy.

Stone didn't know anything that everyone else didn't already know.

Yes he did.

Really? What was that?

August 21, 2016:

View attachment 236699


October 7, 2016:

View attachment 236700

Somehow Trump adviser Roger Stone knew about the felonious use of a computer network.
Which means the Trump campaign knew about it.

Conspiracy to commit a felony...is a felony which well-satisfies the "high crimes and misdemeanors" hurdle for impeachment.

Not that I think it ever will (or should) come to that. The Senate would likely never vote to remove so it's pointless. And I'd much rather have this as a relevant topic in 2020 myself.

But its vivid that Stone/Trump Campaign knew about the felonies that would benefit them. The question is whether they were sponsoring it or not or if it was just a happy coincidence.

Now...that has been established.

Stone also had another buddy. Guccifer2.0. Guccifer is a front for Russian Intel agencies (Mil-int I think).

Hacker Releases More Democratic Party Documents

Stone is in close contact with Guccifer2.0 even calling Guccifer2.0's banning from Twitter outrageous:

View attachment 236701

Why Trump employed someone who is coordinating with hackers is something that should be investigated; especially since Guccifer2.0 hacked the DNC.

So it's pretty clear that the felony--unauthorized use of a computer network--was done by people who had ties to the Trump campaign. Whether you wish to acknowledge it or scream "nun-unh" is not important.

You haven't proved that Roger Stone knew anything. That tweet proves nothing. It's a prediction based on publicly known facts, and nothing else. Stone was never in Trump's employ. You have your most basic facts wrong. You're a conspiracy theorist.

 

[bripat9643]

Nothing yet disproved...

Re-examining the dossier after a year of indictments & guilty pleas

"Nothing disproved?" You just demonstrated your inability to commit logic.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Mine? No.

But if you’re truly undecided and you read these hacked e-mails (shockingly only the Democratic National Committee and HRC campaign Manager Podesta’s e-mails were released) that were published, perhaps your vote was swayed by the negativity.

The real question is, of course, why the Russians decided to hack only the Democrats and who directed such hacking and/or singularity of the hacking.

Why do you insist on trying to tell us you didn't vote Trump

 

[Google_Yourself]

Was your vote affected by Russian interference?

No, and neither was anyone else's.

 

[candycorn]

Well, Stone knew weeks before anyone else did. How unfortunate that you confirmed he was working/in contact with someone who was trafficking in illegally gained material.
Looks more and more like a conspiracy.

Stone didn't know anything that everyone else didn't already know.

Yes he did.

Really? What was that?

August 21, 2016:

View attachment 236699


October 7, 2016:

View attachment 236700

Somehow Trump adviser Roger Stone knew about the felonious use of a computer network.
Which means the Trump campaign knew about it.

Conspiracy to commit a felony...is a felony which well-satisfies the "high crimes and misdemeanors" hurdle for impeachment.

Not that I think it ever will (or should) come to that. The Senate would likely never vote to remove so it's pointless. And I'd much rather have this as a relevant topic in 2020 myself.

But its vivid that Stone/Trump Campaign knew about the felonies that would benefit them. The question is whether they were sponsoring it or not or if it was just a happy coincidence.

Now...that has been established.

Stone also had another buddy. Guccifer2.0. Guccifer is a front for Russian Intel agencies (Mil-int I think).

Hacker Releases More Democratic Party Documents

Stone is in close contact with Guccifer2.0 even calling Guccifer2.0's banning from Twitter outrageous:

View attachment 236701

Why Trump employed someone who is coordinating with hackers is something that should be investigated; especially since Guccifer2.0 hacked the DNC.

So it's pretty clear that the felony--unauthorized use of a computer network--was done by people who had ties to the Trump campaign. Whether you wish to acknowledge it or scream "nun-unh" is not important.

You haven't proved that Roger Stone knew anything. That tweet proves nothing. It's a prediction based on publicly known facts, and nothing else. Stone was never in Trump's employ. You have your most basic facts wrong. You're a conspiracy theorist.

Stone was a member of the campaign. The tweet proves his foreknowledge of the felony. The connection is being investigated. Cohen flipped. Manafort flipped. Is Stone next?

 

[bripat9643]

Stone didn't know anything that everyone else didn't already know.

Yes he did.

Really? What was that?

August 21, 2016:

View attachment 236699


October 7, 2016:

View attachment 236700

Somehow Trump adviser Roger Stone knew about the felonious use of a computer network.
Which means the Trump campaign knew about it.

Conspiracy to commit a felony...is a felony which well-satisfies the "high crimes and misdemeanors" hurdle for impeachment.

Not that I think it ever will (or should) come to that. The Senate would likely never vote to remove so it's pointless. And I'd much rather have this as a relevant topic in 2020 myself.

But its vivid that Stone/Trump Campaign knew about the felonies that would benefit them. The question is whether they were sponsoring it or not or if it was just a happy coincidence.

Now...that has been established.

Stone also had another buddy. Guccifer2.0. Guccifer is a front for Russian Intel agencies (Mil-int I think).

Hacker Releases More Democratic Party Documents

Stone is in close contact with Guccifer2.0 even calling Guccifer2.0's banning from Twitter outrageous:

View attachment 236701

Why Trump employed someone who is coordinating with hackers is something that should be investigated; especially since Guccifer2.0 hacked the DNC.

So it's pretty clear that the felony--unauthorized use of a computer network--was done by people who had ties to the Trump campaign. Whether you wish to acknowledge it or scream "nun-unh" is not important.

You haven't proved that Roger Stone knew anything. That tweet proves nothing. It's a prediction based on publicly known facts, and nothing else. Stone was never in Trump's employ. You have your most basic facts wrong. You're a conspiracy theorist.

Stone was a member of the campaign. The tweet proves his foreknowledge of the felony. The connection is being investigated. Cohen flipped. Manafort flipped. Is Stone next?

He was not a member of the campaign, and his tweet doesn't prove a damn thing. Why would Stone "flip?" He hasn't committed any crimes.

 

[Seawytch]

Nothing yet disproved...

Re-examining the dossier after a year of indictments & guilty pleas

"Nothing disproved?" You just demonstrated your inability to commit logic.

So what in the Dossier has been proven false?

 

[candycorn]

Yes he did.

Really? What was that?

August 21, 2016:

View attachment 236699


October 7, 2016:

View attachment 236700

Somehow Trump adviser Roger Stone knew about the felonious use of a computer network.
Which means the Trump campaign knew about it.

Conspiracy to commit a felony...is a felony which well-satisfies the "high crimes and misdemeanors" hurdle for impeachment.

Not that I think it ever will (or should) come to that. The Senate would likely never vote to remove so it's pointless. And I'd much rather have this as a relevant topic in 2020 myself.

But its vivid that Stone/Trump Campaign knew about the felonies that would benefit them. The question is whether they were sponsoring it or not or if it was just a happy coincidence.

Now...that has been established.

Stone also had another buddy. Guccifer2.0. Guccifer is a front for Russian Intel agencies (Mil-int I think).

Hacker Releases More Democratic Party Documents

Stone is in close contact with Guccifer2.0 even calling Guccifer2.0's banning from Twitter outrageous:

View attachment 236701

Why Trump employed someone who is coordinating with hackers is something that should be investigated; especially since Guccifer2.0 hacked the DNC.

So it's pretty clear that the felony--unauthorized use of a computer network--was done by people who had ties to the Trump campaign. Whether you wish to acknowledge it or scream "nun-unh" is not important.

You haven't proved that Roger Stone knew anything. That tweet proves nothing. It's a prediction based on publicly known facts, and nothing else. Stone was never in Trump's employ. You have your most basic facts wrong. You're a conspiracy theorist.

Stone was a member of the campaign. The tweet proves his foreknowledge of the felony. The connection is being investigated. Cohen flipped. Manafort flipped. Is Stone next?

He was not a member of the campaign, and his tweet doesn't prove a damn thing. Why would Stone "flip?" He hasn't committed any crimes.

Do I really have to show you where he was a member of the campaign? Really? Feel free to look it up yourself and save some embarrassment.

I’m sure you said the same thing about Cohen and Manafort. “Why would he flip?” Both did…..We’ll see what happens to Stone if he’s indicted.

 

[Seawytch]

Was your vote affected by Russian interference?

No, and neither was anyone else's.

So if ad campaigns don't work, why do candidates spend so much money on them?

 

[imawhosure]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

When the Leftist clowns produce 1...…….let me spell that for ya...…..O-N-E voter who had their mind changed, then we might need to investigate that 1! Until that time, they are just making excuses, and spinning as fast as they can.

By the way...…….any Leftists who had their minds changed...……….HOW...….DUMB......ARE...…...THEY!!!!!!!!!!!

We have had more PROPAGANDA from the Leftists on this site, then ANY Russian could spew; but I guess that is ok.

Truth be told, the only difference between a Russian Marxist, and a U.S. Socialist/Leftist is------------> The U.S. Socialist spins that it is the Russian Marxist, that got him elected. The Russian Marxist wants to get rid of him, by any means possible. Meanwhile, back at the ranch; the EU Socialists along with the Canadian wannabees, are cheering them both on, while good ole Meheeeeecooooo, is hoping they all succeed.

If we do not figure out a way to hose these people, we have lost the country, plain and simple. Trump it appears, has decided on which hill he is willing for all of us to die on if need be. I concur! We either win this fight, or lose the country for American citizens!

 

[blackhawk]

No because I knew the type of politican Hillary was long before the 2016 election I didn't learn anything about her in 2016 that I didn't already know or suspect.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

Was your vote affected by Russian interference?

YES...

because....

"In Amerika...you hkhkhave rright to bear arms..."
(thick Russian accent)


"In Mother Russia...we hkhkhave rrright to WHOLE bear..."

“Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia. And the foundation has been functioning ever since and played an important part in events now,” Soros responded.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

"Russian interference" looks like another Deep State puppets attempt to hurt Trump with his intentions to establish good relationship with Russia ans to put sanctions on Deep State #1 enemy, Russia. Same thing has happened in 2016. It looks like normal Americans are getting tired of this non-stop BS.

View attachment 236588


BTW, Ukrainian officials have interfered in US elections a lot more than alleged Russians: they were trashing Trump when he was a candidate, donated money to Clinton, framed Manafort (who worked in Ukraine) to harm Trump.

The Clinton foundation is also linked directly to Ukrainian oligarchs:
Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine. It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.
clintonfoundationinvestigation.com

Why is Soros Media silent about all that^?

Is USA a banana republic to allow the foreigners to interfere their elections?

Hacked emails also reveal Soros’ machinations with the US Government and the officials of the European Union in a scheme where, if he succeeds, he could win billions in the plunder of Ukraine assets. All, of course, would be at the expense of Ukrainian citizens and of EU taxpayers.

 

[francoHFW]

If so, please explain.

If not, why all the hoopla?

Yes by media bamboozled voters thinking hacked emails meant anything at all really. Such as Hillary cheated Sanders or she was anti-hispanic or god-knows-what, all garbage innuendo propaganda.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

"Russian interference" looks like another Deep State puppets attempt to hurt Trump with his intentions to establish good relationship with Russia ans to put sanctions on Deep State #1 enemy, Russia. Same thing has happened in 2016. It looks like normal Americans are getting tired of this non-stop BS.

View attachment 236588


BTW, Ukrainian officials have interfered in US elections a lot more than alleged Russians: they were trashing Trump when he was a candidate, donated money to Clinton, framed Manafort (who worked in Ukraine) to harm Trump.

The Clinton foundation is also linked directly to Ukrainian oligarchs:
Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine. It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.
clintonfoundationinvestigation.com

Why is Soros Media silent about all that^?

Is USA a banana republic to allow the foreigners to interfere their elections?

Soros also calls for supplying lethal arms to Ukraine and secretly training Ukrainian army personnel in Romania to avoid direct NATO presence inUkraine. The Atlantic Council is a leading Washington pro-NATO think tank.

 

[Dan Stubbs]

"Russian interference" looks like another Deep State puppets attempt to hurt Trump with his intentions to establish good relationship with Russia ans to put sanctions on Deep State #1 enemy, Russia. Same thing has happened in 2016. It looks like normal Americans are getting tired of this non-stop BS.

View attachment 236588


BTW, Ukrainian officials have interfered in US elections a lot more than alleged Russians: they were trashing Trump when he was a candidate, donated money to Clinton, framed Manafort (who worked in Ukraine) to harm Trump.

The Clinton foundation is also linked directly to Ukrainian oligarchs:
Between 2009 and 2013, including when Mrs. Clinton was secretary of state, the Clinton Foundation received at least $8.6 million from the Victor Pinchuk Foundation, according to that foundation, which is based in Kiev, Ukraine. It was created by Mr. Pinchuk, whose fortune stems from a pipe-making company. He served two terms as an elected member of the Ukrainian Parliament and is a proponent of closer ties between Ukraine and the European Union.
clintonfoundationinvestigation.com

Why is Soros Media silent about all that^?

Is USA a banana republic to allow the foreigners to interfere their elections?

Soros also calls for supplying lethal arms to Ukraine and secretly training Ukrainian army personnel in Romania to avoid direct NATO presence inUkraine. The Atlantic Council is a leading Washington pro-NATO think tank.

Soros further writes that Ukrainian President Poroshenko’s “first priority must be to regain control of financial markets,” which he assures Poroshenko that Soros would be ready to assist in: “I am ready to call Jack Lew of the US Treasury to sound him out about the swap agreement.”

He also calls on the EU to give Ukraine an annual aid sum of €11 billion via a special EU borrowing facility. Soros proposes in effect using the EU’s “AAA” top credit rating to provide a risk insurance for investment into Ukraine.

Whose risk would the EU insure?

 

[bripat9643]

Nothing yet disproved...

Re-examining the dossier after a year of indictments & guilty pleas

"Nothing disproved?" You just demonstrated your inability to commit logic.

So what in the Dossier has been proven false?

It has been proven false that Cohen went to Prague. Nothing else has been proven true. It's all a fairy tale. In order to use it to get a FISA warrant the FBI is required to verify the information in it. They obviously did nothing of the sort. The claim that nothing has been proven false is the mating call of an imbecile.

 

[bripat9643]

Really? What was that?

August 21, 2016:

View attachment 236699


October 7, 2016:

View attachment 236700

Somehow Trump adviser Roger Stone knew about the felonious use of a computer network.
Which means the Trump campaign knew about it.

Conspiracy to commit a felony...is a felony which well-satisfies the "high crimes and misdemeanors" hurdle for impeachment.

Not that I think it ever will (or should) come to that. The Senate would likely never vote to remove so it's pointless. And I'd much rather have this as a relevant topic in 2020 myself.

But its vivid that Stone/Trump Campaign knew about the felonies that would benefit them. The question is whether they were sponsoring it or not or if it was just a happy coincidence.

Now...that has been established.

Stone also had another buddy. Guccifer2.0. Guccifer is a front for Russian Intel agencies (Mil-int I think).

Hacker Releases More Democratic Party Documents

Stone is in close contact with Guccifer2.0 even calling Guccifer2.0's banning from Twitter outrageous:

View attachment 236701

Why Trump employed someone who is coordinating with hackers is something that should be investigated; especially since Guccifer2.0 hacked the DNC.

So it's pretty clear that the felony--unauthorized use of a computer network--was done by people who had ties to the Trump campaign. Whether you wish to acknowledge it or scream "nun-unh" is not important.

You haven't proved that Roger Stone knew anything. That tweet proves nothing. It's a prediction based on publicly known facts, and nothing else. Stone was never in Trump's employ. You have your most basic facts wrong. You're a conspiracy theorist.

Stone was a member of the campaign. The tweet proves his foreknowledge of the felony. The connection is being investigated. Cohen flipped. Manafort flipped. Is Stone next?

He was not a member of the campaign, and his tweet doesn't prove a damn thing. Why would Stone "flip?" He hasn't committed any crimes.

Do I really have to show you where he was a member of the campaign? Really? Feel free to look it up yourself and save some embarrassment.

I’m sure you said the same thing about Cohen and Manafort. “Why would he flip?” Both did…..We’ll see what happens to Stone if he’s indicted.

It turns out he was an advisor to the campaign, but that makes little difference. He hasn't broken any laws. Mueller has got nothing on him.