Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
who the fuck cares what was used - it was all designed bullshit you're over there trying to justify or make "ok" while you take the "outcome" of such bullshit activity as something that trump has to suddenly prove he's innocent of.And that somehow proves the information Steele dug up on the Golden Boy is not true?
His son is caught trying to get the Russian Government's dirt on Hillary. But, but the DNC helped pay for Steele's research?
One big heaping helping of "Nope"
Sure, except that it's being reported throughout the media.
Yup.
Yep it is. Even on [gasp] Rachel Maddow's show. So what? Did they not also report on all the other phony scandals throughout President Obama's terms? Does it make the Great Grabber any more competent? Will it stop the diarrhea of the mouth he is afflicted with? Does it prove that there was no collusion between Russia and the campaign? What information from it was used by Clinton?
fucked up man.
Putin bitch trump still has not imposed the sanctions on Russia required by Congressional law he signed.Which is not illegal and nobody gives a rat fuck about that.
Jesus. What the fuck? Opposition research is now a crime?
ESPECIALLY because this thread is about Clinton/DNC PAYING for a political opposition hit piece that they tried to pass off as US National Intel product. They BOUGHT stories from Russian spies !!!!! How is that NOT collusion?
Well, the problem with your whole thing is that buying information from Russians is far different from Russians putting information into the press.
Not really. Whatever they injected was in the "noise level" of the campaign. NONE of it reached a life of it's own.
But you need to answer a question for me?
It's been suggested that Trump should be impeached for THINKING about doing business in Russia. So which is worse? --- pondering building a Hotel there? Or PAYING FUCKING RUSSIAN SPIES to make up shit about your opponent?
Need an answer to see if you realize the irony of your position..
No, no one is saying he should be impeached for doing business in Russia (unless they're a nutjob), what they're trying to show is that Trump had connections with Russia which might show that he was getting help from the Russians.
It's gone FAR beyond that. The media has suggested that ANY business dealings in Russia would be evidence of conflict of interest. TONS of media spew and USMB posts suggesting that. At least 15 threads on discussions Trump had with ANY Russian investors.
Did you answer my question? Don't think that you did. Why are you avoiding it? Which is worse?
And when WE are weak and dividedIt'll be called DNC/GOP day. Paid leave and bonuses for throwing the parties..
Kompromat - Wikipedia
Putin and Russian Intel are STILL stinging and pissed about the USA role in the fall of Soviet Union. WE took advantage of their weakness and interfered in stripping confidence of their public in their leadership. They've been looking for payback for a couple decades now. And when WE are weak and divided -- they just relish the opportunities.
so - you are saying it's a huge foul for someone to call you up and say "hey, i got dirt on hillary" with a reply of "wow, let me see!"And that somehow proves the information Steele dug up on the Golden Boy is not true?
His son is caught trying to get the Russian Government's dirt on Hillary. But, but the DNC helped pay for Steele's research?
One big heaping helping of "Nope"
we're saying "this is bad, m'kay...bad".
however, hiring russians to make up stories about trump isn't a problem for you it would seem. they would then use what they know to be fabricated as a way of getting FISA warrants. still no issue?
if you still think trump is the bigger crime i'm done.
who the fuck cares what was used - it was all designed bullshit you're over there trying to justify or make "ok" while you take the "outcome" of such bullshit activity as something that trump has to suddenly prove he's innocent of.And that somehow proves the information Steele dug up on the Golden Boy is not true?
His son is caught trying to get the Russian Government's dirt on Hillary. But, but the DNC helped pay for Steele's research?
One big heaping helping of "Nope"
Sure, except that it's being reported throughout the media.
Yup.
Yep it is. Even on [gasp] Rachel Maddow's show. So what? Did they not also report on all the other phony scandals throughout President Obama's terms? Does it make the Great Grabber any more competent? Will it stop the diarrhea of the mouth he is afflicted with? Does it prove that there was no collusion between Russia and the campaign? What information from it was used by Clinton?
fucked up man.
I'll tell you what is fucked up. Clinton was accused of running a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor. How many folks who are fauxraged over the funding for this dossier parroted that story? I say investigate it. Let's find out what is and what is not true.
who the fuck cares what was used - it was all designed bullshit you're over there trying to justify or make "ok" while you take the "outcome" of such bullshit activity as something that trump has to suddenly prove he's innocent of.And that somehow proves the information Steele dug up on the Golden Boy is not true?
His son is caught trying to get the Russian Government's dirt on Hillary. But, but the DNC helped pay for Steele's research?
One big heaping helping of "Nope"
Sure, except that it's being reported throughout the media.
Yup.
Yep it is. Even on [gasp] Rachel Maddow's show. So what? Did they not also report on all the other phony scandals throughout President Obama's terms? Does it make the Great Grabber any more competent? Will it stop the diarrhea of the mouth he is afflicted with? Does it prove that there was no collusion between Russia and the campaign? What information from it was used by Clinton?
fucked up man.
I'll tell you what is fucked up. Clinton was accused of running a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor. How many folks who are fauxraged over the funding for this dossier parroted that story? I say investigate it. Let's find out what is and what is not true.
so paying Russians for info good.An unknown republican paid "the researchers" to research the Oranguton first, and someone else previously paid them to "research" Mitt. It's nothing new to "research" people. Safe to say that Obama got a bit of a looking at, but they just couldn't nail down the fake birthcertificate.so - you are saying it's a huge foul for someone to call you up and say "hey, i got dirt on hillary" with a reply of "wow, let me see!"And that somehow proves the information Steele dug up on the Golden Boy is not true?
His son is caught trying to get the Russian Government's dirt on Hillary. But, but the DNC helped pay for Steele's research?
One big heaping helping of "Nope"
we're saying "this is bad, m'kay...bad".
however, hiring russians to make up stories about trump isn't a problem for you it would seem. they would then use what they know to be fabricated as a way of getting FISA warrants. still no issue?
if you still think trump is the bigger crime i'm done.
It is new to accept Russia's help for promising policy .... it that is shown to have occurred.
I actually do not know 1 single person who believed that story. I can honestly say the people I know are intelligent enough to know the difference between over-the-top fecal matter flinging and real news...and if it is even close they do their research (unlike CNNI'll tell you what is fucked up. Clinton was accused of running a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor. How many folks who are fauxraged over the funding for this dossier parroted that story? I say investigate it. Let's find out what is and what is not true.
).
not playing fetch here.who the fuck cares what was used - it was all designed bullshit you're over there trying to justify or make "ok" while you take the "outcome" of such bullshit activity as something that trump has to suddenly prove he's innocent of.And that somehow proves the information Steele dug up on the Golden Boy is not true?
His son is caught trying to get the Russian Government's dirt on Hillary. But, but the DNC helped pay for Steele's research?
One big heaping helping of "Nope"
Sure, except that it's being reported throughout the media.
Yup.
Yep it is. Even on [gasp] Rachel Maddow's show. So what? Did they not also report on all the other phony scandals throughout President Obama's terms? Does it make the Great Grabber any more competent? Will it stop the diarrhea of the mouth he is afflicted with? Does it prove that there was no collusion between Russia and the campaign? What information from it was used by Clinton?
fucked up man.
I'll tell you what is fucked up. Clinton was accused of running a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor. How many folks who are fauxraged over the funding for this dossier parroted that story? I say investigate it. Let's find out what is and what is not true.
And when WE are weak and dividedIt'll be called DNC/GOP day. Paid leave and bonuses for throwing the parties..
Kompromat - Wikipedia
Putin and Russian Intel are STILL stinging and pissed about the USA role in the fall of Soviet Union. WE took advantage of their weakness and interfered in stripping confidence of their public in their leadership. They've been looking for payback for a couple decades now. And when WE are weak and divided -- they just relish the opportunities.
Thankx to Putin's bitch trump
I read.so - you are saying it's a huge foul for someone to call you up and say "hey, i got dirt on hillary" with a reply of "wow, let me see!"And that somehow proves the information Steele dug up on the Golden Boy is not true?
His son is caught trying to get the Russian Government's dirt on Hillary. But, but the DNC helped pay for Steele's research?
One big heaping helping of "Nope"
we're saying "this is bad, m'kay...bad".
however, hiring russians to make up stories about trump isn't a problem for you it would seem. they would then use what they know to be fabricated as a way of getting FISA warrants. still no issue?
if you still think trump is the bigger crime i'm done.
Depends on who that person is and what he wants in exchange for that dirt don't you think?
How on earth would you know what was presented to the judges to get any FISA warrant?
who the fuck cares what was used - it was all designed bullshit you're over there trying to justify or make "ok" while you take the "outcome" of such bullshit activity as something that trump has to suddenly prove he's innocent of.And that somehow proves the information Steele dug up on the Golden Boy is not true?
His son is caught trying to get the Russian Government's dirt on Hillary. But, but the DNC helped pay for Steele's research?
One big heaping helping of "Nope"
Sure, except that it's being reported throughout the media.
Yup.
Yep it is. Even on [gasp] Rachel Maddow's show. So what? Did they not also report on all the other phony scandals throughout President Obama's terms? Does it make the Great Grabber any more competent? Will it stop the diarrhea of the mouth he is afflicted with? Does it prove that there was no collusion between Russia and the campaign? What information from it was used by Clinton?
fucked up man.
I'll tell you what is fucked up. Clinton was accused of running a child sex ring out of a pizza parlor. How many folks who are fauxraged over the funding for this dossier parroted that story? I say investigate it. Let's find out what is and what is not true.
Only the honest and moral seek the truth; sadly the Republican Party and its adherents are immoral and mendacious.
Never believe what a Republican says, watch what they do.
Bwuhahahaha......
Putin didn't CAUSE the chronic childish tribal partisan wars in this country. Been OUR doing for decades. OUR system is mortally damaged. Just like the Soviet Union was when WE took advantage of them.
What do you imagine is in the dossier that makes it credible?...verified as Russia-generated PROPAGANDA ... which snowflakes could not gobble up fast enough.Which was also one of the verified items in the dossier.
You're only showing that you're ignorant as to what's in the dossier.
Anyone could guess that without resorting to a forieng intelligence agent.The link is unverified and uncorroborated...Read the link, retard.You don't have a damn clue what "raw intelligence" is, how it is classified, and how it is verified. What you have is a pile of fabrications that can not be verified. ie; LIES No cooberating physical evidence.Well in actual court documents Steel admits that the dossier was unverified. Go argue with him.
Yes, it was raw intel.
Bullshit, dope.
One example. One report in the dossier was that Russia was planning cyber attacks targeting Clinton to obtain information it could use to leak in an effort to influence the election.
This report was compiled late in 15 and early 16. Long before any of this was publicly known.
The very fact that it happened is verification that the Intel was correct.
Keep on truckin, dope.
That's kinda the same thing. The Soviets in Afghanistan was part of the fall.Putin didn't CAUSE the chronic childish tribal partisan wars in this country. Been OUR doing for decades. OUR system is mortally damaged. Just like the Soviet Union was when WE took advantage of them.
How do you know this isn't payback for Afghanistan, where we backed BinLaden and the Taliban in their fight against the Soviet Union?
Putin has a long memory, and this could be his way of getting back, turning american against american.
Putin didn't CAUSE the chronic childish tribal partisan wars in this country. Been OUR doing for decades. OUR system is mortally damaged. Just like the Soviet Union was when WE took advantage of them.
How do you know this isn't payback for Afghanistan, where we backed BinLaden and the Taliban in their fight against the Soviet Union?
Putin has a long memory, and this could be his way of getting back, turning american against american.
Good for them.....saved the tax-payers money.every day there's a Clinton bombshell!
Clinton campaign, DNC paid for research that led to Russia dossier
'working with Russians is ok...'
EVERYONE, except defensive snowflakes it seems, knows information obtained from foreign agents about a candidate can not LEGALLY be used in a US political election..
